Jews Overrepresentation in Communism

 

More About Justin Trudeau and Israel- Think He Is Any Different Than Harper?

For past posts on this topic, see here, here, here,  Also, see here for the Canadian government cracking down on criticism of Israel. See here for how supposedly "multicultural" Canada and Justin Trudeau supports an Israel that bans interracial marriage books. Also, see here for how Trudeau continues Harper’s policies on Israel.

Canadians Don’t Share Justin Trudeau’s
Pro-Israel Stance — Poll

A new survey has revealed a major disconnect between Canadians’ views of Israel and the policies of their government.

Large numbers of Canadians see Israel’s government negatively, and Canadians reject almost unanimously the view that criticizing Israel is anti-Semitic.

The poll conducted by EKOS Research Associates from 25 January to 2 February was commissioned by Independent Jewish Voices, Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East and journalists Dimitri Lascarisand Murray Dobbin.

According to the report accompanying the results, “no published survey has previously examined whether Canadians consider criticism of the Israeli government to be anti-Semitic.”

Overall, far more Canadians (46 percent) had a negative opinion of the Israeli government than a positive one (28 percent). Similar to trends noted in the US in recent years, there are sharp political and generational differences.

Among supporters of the governing Liberal Party, the opposition New Democratic Party (NDP), Bloc Québécois and Greens – all of which are considered left of center in Canada – negative views of Israel’s government ranged from 55 to 78 percent.

As in the United States, where support for Israel is much more concentrated among Republicans, 58 percent of Canadians who identify with the right-wing opposition Conservative Party view Israel’s government positively.

More than half of Canadians under age 35 view the Israeli government negatively, compared with just 37 percent of those aged over 65 who tended to hold a negative view of the Israeli government.

Just 17 percent of Canadians aged under 35 view Israeli government policy positively.

The EKOS survey also found that in “all ethnic categories including ethnically identified Jews, more respondents held negative than positive opinions of the Israeli government.”

Overall, in the province of Quebec, whose own nationalist movement has traditionally expressed strong solidarity for Palestinians, 57 percent of residents held a negative view of the Israeli government – the highest proportion of any region.

Criticizing Israel not anti-Semitic

Canadians see their government as more biased toward Israel: 61 percent said the government is pro-Israel, while just 16 percent see it as pro-Palestinian.

Among those supporting the left of center parties, including the governing Liberals, the number who see a pro-Israel bias ranges from 70 to 77 percent.

And in sharp contrast to their government, Canadians overwhelmingly reject efforts to paint criticism of Israel as anti-Semitic.

The survey found that that 91 percent “accept the view that criticism of Israeli government policy [is] like criticism of any other country and is not necessarily anti-Semitic.”

This figure rose to 100 percent among supporters of the NDP and the Bloc Québécois, and 97 percent among supporters of the Liberals, the party led by Justin Trudeau, Canada’s prime minister.

This is a stark contrast with efforts by the political class to stigmatize criticism of Israel and activism for Palestinian rights.

Last February, Trudeau’s government backed an opposition motion in the federal parliament condemning the Palestinian-led boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement.

In December 2016, the legislature in Ontario. Canada’s most populous province, passed a non-binding resolution tarring the BDS movement as racist.

The previous May, however, the Ontario legislature soundly rejected a bill that would have created a government blacklist of supporters of Palestinian rights.

“Historically, Canadian government policy has been staunchly pro-Israel, despite Israel’s decades-long construction of settlements in occupied Palestinian territory, which virtually the entire international community, including Canada, considers illegal,” the report states.

Canadian government policy formally “recognizes the Palestinian right to self-determination and supports the creation of a sovereign, independent, viable, democratic and territorially contiguous Palestinian state, as part of a comprehensive, just and lasting peace settlement.”

But the report notes that “successive Liberal and Conservative governments have emphasized their commitment to Israel and to protecting its security, while saying little if anything about the security of Palestinians. Under their watch, Canada created unprecedented trade and security pacts with Israel.”

This has not changed since the Liberals returned to power in November 2015. “In Trudeau’s brief time in office, Canada has voted against 16 motions critical of Israel in the [United Nations] General Assembly – the only major country, alongside the US, to do so,” the report states.

Scope for change

A major conclusion of the study is that the left of center and left parties – Liberals, NDP, Greens and Bloc Québécois – can afford to be much more bold on the question of Palestine without losing support.

“In Canada, political elites cling to the view that a vigorous defense of Palestinians rights would erode support for their parties,” the report states. “The results of this survey strongly suggest that the opposite is true, that demanding Israel’s respect for Palestinian rights will attract support from centrist and left-leaning voters.”

The survey also sends a message to members of these parties that they can “more confidently” push for policy changes.

Lascaris, a lawyer, journalist and former justice spokesperson for the Green Party, told The Electronic Intifada that the survey holds profound messages for Canadian leaders, including that they would likely find broad public support if they were to impose sanctions on Israel, for example over settlements.

“There is clearly a very negative view of the Israeli government in Canada, including a substantial majority of Liberal supporters,” Lascaris said. “If the political class in Canada pay attention to this poll, they should profoundly rethink their approach to sanctions.”

Lascaris noted that Canadians are highly skeptical of Israeli government policy despite the fact that Canadian media – like their counterparts in the United States – scarcely report on Israel’s human rights abuses.

“The Israeli government’s behavior has become so brazen and so inconsistent with a just and lasting peace, that even the mainstream media can’t prevent a significant section of the Canadian public from holding a negative view about the Israeli government,” he added. “If the media were being balanced and telling Canadians what is happening to Palestinians – and they are not – support for Palestinians would be stratospheric.”

Must See: Rape Culture of Israel

Watch the video below --- also see here and here. To see more about the Talmud, go to the Talmud category on my blog located here. (Be sure to scroll through all the articles there.) Also, be sure to watch this short excellent video from an honest Israeli talking about Judaism and Israel. For more about being labeled "Amalek" the enemy of the Jews, see here. 

Jewish Supremacist Quotes - Must Hear To Believe....

Yes, this is how crazy some of these people really are. It's amazing that no one says anything. In fact, it is ridiculous. 

Hypocrisy Of Jews And Israel- Racism Once Again... And Yet, These People Lecture Us About Racism?

Listen to one of the men being interviewed in the video below admit that a "Jewish state" and a democracy may be contradictory. How interesting! 

When you learn the truth about Judaism you should be asking this same question about countries like Canada and the United States. Is Judaism compatible with democracy and an open society? People who are quick to say "of course it is..." are often the very ones who are most ignorant of Judaism. The other word someone mentions in the video below is "rape," see here and here for more about this. 

Go here to learn more about the belief system of Judaism. To see more about the Talmud, go to the Talmud category on my blog located here. (Be sure to scroll through all the articles there.) Also, be sure to watch this short excellent video from an honest Israeli talking about Judaism and Israel. 

And of course, don't forget to watch this video with anti-racist Hitler showing you the utter hypocrisy of many of the so-called Jews.

Creating The Borg: Molecular Biology & Nanotechnology

To learn more about nanotechnology, go here. See here for more about weaponizing nanotechnology. Go here to see what the FBI is saying about this technology. See here for a documentary called "Playing God." Also see this here about "Extreme Genetic Engineering: an Introduction to Synthetic Biology."

The CIA and Media Manipulation

See this last post about media control, also see this post about media control in Canada. Now, see below about Operation Mockingbird which involved CIA manipulation of the media. This is what I am trying to describe to people here, here, here and here.  IT NEVER WENT AWAY! They are still full of crap. The reality is, this is much larger than people think--- it extends into the alternative media. They want to control it all, that is not an overstatement.

Remember, the CIA has always had ties to organized crime and drugs, especially Jewish organized crime. Essentially, your countries are being run by organized crime and the alternative media is a part of the new Phoenix program to find people that could cause potential problems for them. (See here for this former CIA agent talk about the old CIA Phoenix Program that originated in Viet Nam.) This is a part of Homeland Security. See here for an example diagram of how a targeted individual is rolled into this Stasi take down and torture program.

Operation Mockingbird: 

The CIA and the Media

Church Committee: CIA & the
Media (Operation Mockingbird)

Five Videos - Nixon On The Jews

RCMP and CSIS Torturing People For Fun---- This Is How Pathetic These Losers Are

See the video below and realize that the pieces of trash that run the RCMP and CSIS know of classified technology and they use horrible Stasi stalking and discrediting methods on targeted individuals. They don't need to torture people to obtain information, but they still do. This is no different than what I am saying here about Guantanamo Bay. Why are they doing all of this? It's pretty simple... because they are control freaks who like having power over people. This sort of counterintelligence work attracts people who are liars and psychopaths because only psychopaths would go along with the lies of these organizations.

Read Article: Jewish Individual Admits The Hypocrisy Of Liberal Jews and Zionism

See here for more about the so-called Jews and their belief system. Very few people know about nor understand this because Jews keep the population in ignorance about it. See this comedy bit about the absolute hypocrisy of the state of Israel. Truth be told, if you really are a Liberal, you should hate what the state of Israel is. It is an ethno-state based on biblically "chosen people" treating others unfairly in the occupied territories. 

By Luke Ford

A Jew can be a leftist, but leftism does not mesh easily with Judaism. Leftism does not take race and religion as valid ways of organizing and separating people. The essence of Judaism is separation — separation between Jews and non-Jews, between men and women, adults and children, the Sabbath and the other days of the week, etc.

The Hebrew word for holiness — “Kadosh” — literally means “separate.” Judaism conceives of Jews as a people who dwell apart.

If you are a normal Orthodox Jew, you put your Jewish identity first before all other identities. You see what is going on in the world in terms of whether or not it is good for the Jews. One of the major advantages in being an Orthodox Jew is that you know who you are. Your choices in life are simplified.

The stronger your in-group identity, be it as Jewish or Muslim, the less likely you are to be liberal (to live and let live and to be ok with diversity) and the more likely you are to have negative views of outsiders.

Shmuel Rosner writes:

The more liberal they are, the less their tendency to be actively “Jewish.” The level of liberalism is high among those who raise non-Jewish children “or who are married to non-Jews.” Liberal Jews feel less responsible for other Jews. They have a somewhat lesser sense of belonging to the Jewish people. Only a third of the “very liberal” (34%) feel that “being Jewish is very important” – compared to 54% of “right of center” non-Orthodox Jews. The “very liberal” don’t belong to synagogues (18%), have less Jewish friends, and tend less than others to fast on Yom Kippur or light Shabbat candles. Their attachment to Israel is markedly lower than the attachment of less liberal Jews.
That is to say: all across the board – feelings, activities, traditions, and affiliations – the liberals show a lesser level of engagement. The correlation between liberalism and disengagement is “modest” when it comes to “feelings” (Feel responsible for Jews in need, Feel a sense of belonging to the Jewish people, Feel being Jewish is very important). It is “strong” when it comes to “religious engagement” (Being religious very important, Kosher home, Shabbat candles usually+, Attends services monthly). It is also “strong” when it comes to “Israel attachment” (Israel essential to being Jewish, Feel very attached to Israel). In other words: liberal Jews feel moderately passionate about being Jewish; but they do not appreciate religion and do not appreciate Israel, and they especially do not appreciate hawkish views on Israel…

Why is it so difficult to seriously discusses these numbers and this reality? That’s simple: because often times liberal Jews tend to value their “liberalism” more than they value their “Jewishness” (this is me speaking, not Cohen. I am not sure he’d agree). If the numbers tell a story from which one learns that liberalism and Judaism cannot go hand in hand, the liberals will choose liberalism. So the obvious policy of Jewish leaders and institutions is to avoid this seeming contradiction – to hide it for as long as possible and thus not force the choice on a growing group of Jewish liberals…

These numbers have meaning. They have implications, and these implications could be of three possible types:
– Judaism and liberalism cannot go hand in hand, and we ought to understand that some Jewish Americans are lost to us, Jews.
– There is a need to make Jews slightly less liberal – at least when it comes to the kind of liberalism that seems to make it difficult for them to be actively Jewish.
– There is a need to make Jewish Americanism more adaptable to the priorities of liberal Americanism. In all likelihood, to succeed in an enterprise whose aim is to strengthen the active Jewishness of American Jewish liberals, it will have to be a combination of both points two and three (that is, if you do not accept point one). But the exact prescription will not be easy, as the numbers – while telling us a story – do not reveal its source. As Cohen framed it: “What about being liberal makes them ‘less Jewish?’”
In other words: as hard as it is to spell it out with such bluntness, as a general rule, liberal American Jews seem to be less Jewish.

Evil Incarnate: Leading Jewish Academic Wants Jews to Rape Palestinians

See a past article on this topic here, to see more about the Talmud, go to the Talmud category on my blog located here. (Be sure to scroll through all the articles there.) Also, be sure to watch this short excellent video from an honest Israeli talking about Judaism and Israel. 

============================================================================

The true evil of the Jewish Supremacist mindset has been dramatically revealed with the demand by Israeli professor Mordechai Kedar that Israeli forces carry out sex attacks on the relatives of Palestinians in order to halt Palestinian demands to return to their country.

Professor Kedar, from Bar- Ilan University’s Department of Arabic advocated rape of innocent women on an Israeli nationally broadcast radio show, according to a report in the Jewish Daily Forward. It has been totally covered up in the Jewish owned Western media read by Gentiles.

“The only thing that can deter terrorists, like those who kidnapped the children and killed them, is the knowledge that their sister or their mother will be raped,” Kedar said.

“It sounds very bad, but that’s the Middle East,” he added.

The program “Hakol Diburim” (“It’s All Talk”) was broadcast on July 1, immediately after the discovery of the bodies of the three young Jews abducted and murdered in the Occupied West Bank, which has been used as the excuse by the Israleis to attack all of Gaza once again.

“You have to understand the culture in which we live,” said Kedar. “The only thing that deters [Hamas leaders] is a threat to the connection between their heads and their shoulders.”

When presenter Yossi Hadar asked if that “could filter down” the organization’s ranks, Kedar replied: “No, because lower down the considerations are entirely different. Terrorists like those who kidnapped the children and killed them — the only thing that deters them is if they know that their sister or their mother will be raped in the event that they are caught. What can you do, that’s the culture in which we live.”

When Hadar said, “We can’t take such steps, of course,” Kedar continued: “I’m not talking about what we should or shouldn’t do. I’m talking about the facts. The only thing that deters a suicide bomber is the knowledge that if he pulls the trigger or blows himself up, his sister will be raped. That’s all. That’s the only thing that will bring him back home, in order to preserve his sister’s honor.”

Kedar is also a research fellow at the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies at Bar-Ilan, and in the past also served as chairman of the Israel Academia Monitor organization, which is involved in “exposing extremist Israeli academics who exploit academic freedom in order to take steps to deny Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state.”

Imagine for a second if any body in the world called for the mass rape of Jews, or any population group, for that matter.

There would be an international outcry, and demands for prosecution.

But because it is a Jewish Supremacists who made the comment, don’t even think that you will read about this in their Jewish-dominated mass media. There will be no outcry, no headlines, no uproar, no demands for resignation—because there is one standard for Jewish Supremacist, and another for the hated Goyim.

Hacking Goes Way Beyond Simple Identity Theft

Yes, they can even hack into your brain. See here for the mind has no firewall and here for more about classified technology. See here for more about weaponizing nanotechnology.

Transhumanism's Roots In Eugenics

 

Transhumanism (see here and here,) is arguably a covert form of slavery and certainly has connections with eugenics. It is also heavily oriented with Jews. For more about the connections to Judaism, see here and here. See here also for the connections between Judaism and eugenics. (Make sure you click on all the links there.) 

Article by Rebecca Taylor

Logo of the Second International Congress of Eugenics that states, "Eugenics is the self-direction of human evolution."

I have been talking about Transhumanism a lot lately because I believe it is the greatest threat to humanity that no one knows about.  Transhumanism is being sold as a philosophy that wants to use technology to surpass treating or preventing disease and use it to enhance otherwise healthy humans beyond natural capabilities.  

They envision a world where you can leave your pathetic, ignorant, weak existence behind and enhance your way to being super-smart, super-strong, super-happy, basically super-human.  



Transhumanists say they want to take man's evolution into their own hands creating a race of "post-humans."

There are many flaws in Transhumanist utopian ideas, most notably their refusal to acknowledge that Transhumanism will result in a world where the enhanced super-humans will naturally rule over the stupid, weak and miserable unenhanced.  Those that can afford or have access to enhancements will be the elite and those who do not or cannot be enhanced will be slaves.

In studying the roots of Transhumanism, one finds the beginnings of the movement are attributed to Julian Huxley. Huxley wrote the following in his 1957 piece, "Transhumanism:"

We are already justified in the con­viction that human life as we know it in history is a wretched makeshift, rooted in ignorance; and that it could be transcended by a state of existence based on the illumination of knowledge and comprehension, just as our modern control of physical nature based on science transcends the tentative fumblings of our ancestors, that were rooted in superstition and professional secrecy.

The human species can, if it wishes, transcend itself —not just sporadically, an individual here in one way, an individual there in another way, but in its entirety, as humanity. We need a name for this new belief. Perhaps Transhumanism will serve: man remaining man, but trans­cending himself, by realizing new possibilities of and for his human nature.

“I believe in Transhumanism”: once there are enough people who can truly say that, the human species will be on the threshold of a new kind of existence, as different from ours as ours is from that of Pekin man. It will at last be consciously fulfilling its real destiny.

So who was Julian Huxley?  Besides being the brother of the famous novelist Aldous Huxley who wrote Brave New World, he was an evolutionary biologist and also a famous eugenicist.  Eugenics was a movement of the early 20th century that tried to create a better human race by preventing the birth of those deemed "unfit."  Eugenics literally means "good birth" and it seeks to "improve" the human gene pool.  Eugenicists like Huxley assumed that the individual is nothing more than what is encoded in their genes.  Huxley wrote the following about his fellow man:

"No-one doubts the wisdom of managing the germ-plasm of agricultural stocks, so why not apply the same concept to human stocks?"

"The lowest strata are reproducing too fast. Therefore... they must not have too easy access to relief or hospital treatment lest the removal of the last check on natural selection should make it too easy for children to be produced or to survive; long unemployment should be a ground for sterilisation."

"...unless [civilised societies] invent and enforce adequate measures for regulating human reproduction, for controlling the quantity of population, and at least preventing the deterioration of quality of racial stock, they are doomed to decay..."   

The American Eugenics movement resulted in the forced sterilization of over 60,000 Americans in 33 states.  And eugenics did not stop there.  Adolf Hitler was a huge fan of eugenics and brought it to its natural conclusion in World War II where millions of the "genetically unfit" were experimented on and/or snuffed out in an effort to create a master race.  Those considered unfit were everything from political dissidents, free-thinkers, homosexuals, criminals, weak, feeble-minded, insane, and disabled. Anyone who came against them was in danger. Doesn't that sound like this?

Huxley wasn't just any eugenicist either.  He was president of the British Eugenics Society from 1959-1962, more than a decade AFTER the horrors of the Second World War was revealed.  He coined the term Transhumanism right before his tenure as president of the British Eugenics Society.

I don't believe modern Transhumanists have any idea where their ideology originated, but it is still instructive toward what will lie ahead if they get their way.  We have tried Transhumanism already, only it was called eugenics then.  Eugenics, in its attempt to control the direction of human evolution, did, in fact, create a world where the lesser humans were second-class citizens whose rights and lives were forfeit to the "greater good" determined by the elite.

I will quote the modern fiction writer, Dean Koontz, who truly understands Transhumanism and its ramifications:

"We live in hubristic age, when politicians imagine themselves to be messiahs and when many in the sciences frankly discuss their dreams of creating a “post-human” civilization of genetically engineered supermen, ignorant of the fact that like minds have often come before them and have left no legacy but death, destruction, and despair."

Transhumanism– the world's most dangerous idea

By Francis Fukuyama

See here for a previous article on Transhumanism.  (When you click through on that link, be sure to scroll down and go through all of the articles under the Transhumanist section of blog.)

For the last several decades, a strange liberation movement has grown within the developed world. Its crusaders aim much higher than civil rights campaigners, feminists, or gay-rights advocates. They want nothing less than to liberate the human race from its biological constraints. As "transhumanists" see it, humans must wrest their biological destiny from evolution’s blind process of random variation and adaptation and move to the next stage as a species.

It is tempting to dismiss transhumanists as some sort of odd cult, nothing more than science fiction taken too seriously: Witness their over-the-top Web sites and recent press releases ("Cyborg Thinkers to Address Humanity’s Future," proclaims one). The plans of some transhumanists to freeze themselves cryogenically in hopes of being revived in a future age seem only to confirm the movement’s place on the intellectual fringe.

But is the fundamental tenet of transhumanism — that we will someday use biotechnology to make ourselves stronger, smarter, less prone to violence, and longer-lived — really so outlandish? Transhumanism of a sort is implicit in much of the research agenda of contemporary biomedicine. The new procedures and technologies emerging from research laboratories and hospitals — whether mood-altering drugs, substances to boost muscle mass or selectively erase memory, prenatal genetic screening, or gene therapy — can as easily be used to "enhance" the species as to ease or ameliorate illness.

Although the rapid advances in biotechnology often leave us vaguely uncomfortable, the intellectual or moral threat they represent is not always easy to identify. The human race, after all, is a pretty sorry mess, with our stubborn diseases, physical limitations, and short lives. Throw in humanity’s jealousies, violence, and constant anxieties, and the transhumanist project begins to look downright reasonable. If it were technologically possible, why wouldn’t we want to transcend our current species? The seeming reasonableness of the project, particularly when considered in small increments, is part of its danger. Society is unlikely to fall suddenly under the spell of the transhumanist worldview. But it is very possible that we will nibble at biotechnology’s tempting offerings without realizing that they come at a frightful moral cost.

The first victim of transhumanism might be equality. The U.S. Declaration of Independence says that "all men are created equal," and the most serious political fights in the history of the United States have been over who qualifies as fully human. Women and blacks did not make the cut in 1776 when Thomas Jefferson penned the declaration. Slowly and painfully, advanced societies have realized that simply being human entitles a person to political and legal equality. In effect, we have drawn a red line around the human being and said that it is sacrosanct.

Underlying this idea of the equality of rights is the belief that we all possess a human essence that dwarfs manifest differences in skin color, beauty, and even intelligence. This essence, and the view that individuals therefore have inherent value, is at the heart of political liberalism. But modifying that essence is the core of the transhumanist project. If we start transforming ourselves into something superior, what rights will these enhanced creatures claim, and what rights will they possess when compared to those left behind? If some move ahead, can anyone afford not to follow? These questions are troubling enough within rich, developed societies. Add in the implications for citizens of the world’s poorest countries — for whom biotechnology’s marvels likely will be out of reach — and the threat to the idea of equality becomes even more menacing.

Transhumanism’s advocates think they understand what constitutes a good human being, and they are happy to leave behind the limited, mortal, natural beings they see around them in favor of something better. But do they really comprehend ultimate human goods? For all our obvious faults, we humans are miraculously complex products of a long evolutionary process — products whose whole is much more than the sum of our parts. Our good characteristics are intimately connected to our bad ones: If we weren’t violent and aggressive, we wouldn’t be able to defend ourselves; if we didn’t have feelings of exclusivity, we wouldn’t be loyal to those close to us; if we never felt jealousy, we would also never feel love. 

Even our mortality plays a critical function in allowing our species as a whole to survive and adapt (and transhumanists are just about the last group I’d like to see live forever). Modifying any one of our key characteristics inevitably entails modifying a complex, interlinked package of traits, and we will never be able to anticipate the ultimate outcome.

Nobody knows what technological possibilities will emerge for human self-modification. But we can already see the stirrings of Promethean desires in how we prescribe drugs to alter the behavior and personalities of our children. The environmental movement has taught us humility and respect for the integrity of nonhuman nature. We need a similar humility concerning our human nature. If we do not develop it soon, we may unwittingly invite the transhumanists to deface humanity with their genetic bulldozers and psychotropic shopping malls.

Judaism and Transhumanism Part 2

To learn more about Transhumanism, go to the Transhumanism category on my blog located here. (Be sure to scroll down and go through all the articles.) To see videos that provide an excellent introduction to Transhumanism, go here. Read this article and this article about Transhumanism and political control. Go here to see a list of classified technology. 

We Are the Borg: Resistance is Anti-Semitic

From Transhumanism and Judaism....

Click to Enlarge

Human beings, for the most part, have always had some sense of the Divine. From ancient Greece to Egypt, to the ancient pagan Celts, from all the continents of the world. Many Jews have no sense of the divine, spirit, soul, etc. Their tradition’s “materialist apocalyptic”, which they seek to escape through some AI machine (“an entity greater than any god ever imagined”), is competing against the divine/nature. They are corrupting and distorting natural laws, natural existence, perception, and expression. Our world is of spirit, consciousness and high order, while theirs is chaotic, simply materialistic, based on a resource for them to possess, without spirit or meaning, ruled by artificial intelligence.

Arthur Schopenhauer recognized these differences in perception also, stating:

The world is not a piece of machinery and animals are not articles manufactured for our use. Such views should be left to synagogues and philosophical lecture-rooms, which in essence are not so very different.

That being said....one does not have to be a religious individual to derive their sense of ethics in this world. Generally speaking though --- if people lack religion and they lack philosophy... they become legal positivists, (they adopt a sense of legal pragmatism,) or they gain their sense of right and wrong from their current epoch or culture. This is group thought or social metaphysics which makes society ripe for collectivism. 

Social Metaphysics is when people begin to holds the consciousnesses of other people, not objective reality, as their ultimate psycho-epistemological frame-of-reference. One of the major problems with Transhumanism besides it being a form of technological totalitarianism is that it resembles past forms of Utopian thought. See here for more about this. Another book to look at would be Eric Voegelin's Science, Politics, and Gnosticism which is about Gnosticism that is "lost in the world" and why it leads to utopianism. Eric Voegelin believes that utopian thought comes from a form of Gnosticism that is trying to find "salvation" in this world, and in doing so... creates Hell on earth. In other words... they ignore the Golden ratio or the warning of moderation from ancient Delphi.  

“Judaism without God?”

Atheism is entrenched in American Judaism. In researching their book American Grace, authors Robert Putnam and David Campbell found that half of all American Jews doubt God’s existence. In other groups, that number is between 10 and 15 percent.  source

One wonders why they still call themselves something that is related to the Bible at all. Honestly, the question is... why do they even bother? Why do we get in so much trouble for calling this group of people out for what they are....frauds, just like it says in the book of Revelation, (see here and here.) 

(See here for more about the so-called Jews.) They know this just as well as I do... and they are afraid of the truth. 

If you an atheist....be an atheist. Why are you a "JEWISH ATHEIST?" And why in the name of GOD do you have any right to some "Holy Land" in the middle east and why are you persecuting people for your insane beliefs? 

The reality is... even some of these "Jewish atheists" (not all,) adopt some of the crazy beliefs from the Jewish Talmud. When you learn some of what is in Talmud, you will see where this supremacist mentality is coming from. 

Through Marxism, Communism and Capitalist indoctrination most people now share this Judaic attitude and behavior,  opposing, subverting, and mindlessly destroying (without spirit/consciousness) nature, animals, spirit, and integrity.