Monday, October 31, 2016

Collection of Tweets About Glenn Greenwald & Edward Snowden Being Zionist Phonies

1. Glenn Greenwald is connected to the "Revelations" of Edward Snowden: Greenwald is a liar by omission for intelligence: http://glenngreenwald.net/

2. Below is his Twitter account picture: many of these "journalists" and writers work for intelligence, they are at war with the population because they are not telling you how bad the situation really is. Remember, the appearance of truth is more dangerous than lies.


3. THEY ARE NOT TELLING YOU THE TRUTH of how bad the world is or how much you are under surveillance.

4. Edward Snowden is a phony, Glenn Greenwald is Jewish and a Zionist. If Edward Snowden was real he would tell you how bad it really is. Here is Edward Snowden's Twitter account picture:



5. Why doesn't he tell you the real truth? He has a Twitter account. Follow him here. Edward Snowden could tweet out the info that the newspapers fail to publish, just like I am doing.

6. Here is a joking post I did a while back about why Edward Snowden is a phony:  https://exposeintelligence.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/edward-snowden-i-tell-you-this-go-here.html

7. Here is a non-joking real post about why he's a phony: Is Edward Snowden a Fake? Also, see this other post about classified technology.

8. Hey, Glenn- you know about space-based weaponry and everything I am talking about- right? So why shut up about it?

Collection of Tweets About When Insanity Becomes Mainstream

1. Look at this absurd sentence written in Richard Dawkins book- this tells you the crazy world you live in:

2. this is from The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution

3. "The evidence for evolution is at least as strong as the evidence for the Holocaust" (See here for a whole collection of interesting posts about the Holocaust, be sure to scroll down and see them all.)

4. Why would you make a comparison like this to back up your claim for evolution? I am not doubting evolution, but this is stupid.

5. The problem with the evolution/creation debate is that it's a false dichotomy where each will not acknowledge any truth from the other position. Why do they insist on doing this?

6. Creationism does not even have to be about the bible. Look what we can do now in our day with science. On the other hand, anyone who denies any form of evolution is being foolish.

7. In the story of Prometheus, he goes from the Titans to the Olympians, then he defies the Olympians and takes his fire to man- it is a dialectic

8. Similar to the bible. Jesus does the same thing. In the end, in the book of Revelation, Jesus has problems with some of the doctrines of the Christians and Paul, but also the Jews.

9.  As far as the quote in Dawkin's book, it would not surprise me if his publisher made him put it in.

10. Just look this: https://exposeintelligence.blogspot.ca/2016/01/numerous-accounts-of-six-million-jews.html and this statement from Oliver Stone about how Jewish control of the media is preventing free debate about the Holocaust: https://exposeintelligence.blogspot.ca/2016/04/oliver-stone-jewish-control-of-media-is.html

11. For whatever reason, the push to make Israel and the Jews so important has become a religion. The new religion is the Holocaust. It is the new secular God that you cannot question. This is extremely sad. This means they have to hold the same narrative together or potentially the Jews will cease to exist as a united people.


13. See here for an example of the problems of defending someone who questions the new secular God --- just amazing, the defendant's lawyer gets thrown in jail!

Collection of Tweets About Truth Seekers and Supposed "Conspiracy" Theorists Being Labeled As Potential Terrorists

Yes, it really is this crazy after September 11th and the advent of the new Homeland Security Laws in the United States and Bill C-51 or the "Anti-Terrorism Act" in Canada

1. 72 Types Of Americans That Are Considered “Potential Terrorists” In Official Government Documents

2. FBI Memo Labels Patriots, Truth-Seekers as Potential 'Terrorists

3. Look at what Cass Sunstein is saying about Conspiracies: or let us put this another way, freedom of thought

4. 
Look who Cass Sunstein's wife is: Samantha Power see her Twitter accounts here and here --- I promise you, these people know who I am. She is no Human Rights Defender. 
I am, not her.

5. Is this a joke to Americans and Canadians? Is everything just one big joke? How pathetic are our countries to allow this?

6. You have no rights anymore under the new laws in Canada and the United States- when they declare you a "terrorist," they can do this to anyone they want.


7. People should do research on Homeland Security and Bill C-51

8. Read here for Dennis Kucinich Attempted Ban of Space-Based Weapons. This new class of weapons is being used on unaware, not informed humans, who of course did not consent to such experimentation. The Nuremberg Code of Conduct for experimentation with human subjects, is part of the Customary Law and the UDHR. The Code lists ten points, which universally have been adopted after the Nuremberg trials of war criminals by the Nuremberg Military Tribunals. The secret technologies in question are covered by military/agency secrecy orders. The victims are not openly confronted as that would remove any feigned excuses and leave the perpetrators open to all manner of accusation. Instead, the methods used are covert; employing high-tech methods to remotely torture, torment and deceive victims without leaving evidence. 

9. Incidentally, Samantha Power is one of the names mentioned in this article about fighting "global anti-Semitism"

10. Go here to learn more about Homeland Security

11. You can see the articles I put up about James Altucher here and here. Isn't it interesting that Cass Sunstein was on his podcast show?





Sunday, October 30, 2016

Connecting Brains and Reading Minds - Brain Synchronization

For more information on this topic, go here.

How Many Americans Knew That This Was a Policy Of The United States Government? How Sad Can The United States Get?

SEE BELOW!
VERY IMPORTANT...

Yes, this is how pathetic the United States government has become. 


Essentially it is enforcing Israel's campaign against global free speech, see here to read about it. Also see here for how Israel would like world internet censorship. See here for the origins of Homeland Security. See here for a collection of tweets about Homeland Security and its connections to Zionism. See here for the strong connections between Israel, Canada, and the United States. See here for the Canada-Israel “Public Security” Agreement for Counter-Terrorism & Homeland security. See here for how the Canadian government is cracking down on criticism of Israel.

See here for the corruption of the RCMP and how they work with organized crime, see here for a video of the head of Homeland Security at the ADL "Leadership" Conference, see here and here for how Jewish groups get most of the Homeland Security grants, see here for how the ADL works with the RCMP and the FBI and its ties to organized crime.

=============================================================================

Monitoring and Combating Anti-Semitism


Date: 07/01/2013 Description: Ira Forman, Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism  - State Dept ImageThe Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism, Ira Forman, advances U.S. Foreign Policy on anti-Semitism. Anti-Semitism is discrimination against or hatred toward Jews. The Special Envoy develops and implements policies and projects to support efforts to combat anti-Semitism.
The Special Envoy was established by the Global Anti-Semitism Review Act of 2004. The Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor (DRL) produces the State Department's annual reports on Human Rights Practices and International Religious Freedom, and the Special Envoy provides input on anti-Semitism for these reports.
The Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism welcomes information on anti-Semitic incidents, including personal and property attacks; government policies, including judicial/prosecutorial decisions and educational programs on the issue; and press and mass media reports. The office can be contacted at: SEASinfo@state.gov.

Combating Global Anti-Semitism in 2016

Remarks

Ira N. Forman
Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism 
Berlin, Germany
March 16, 2016


On January 27, 2016, President Barack Obama made a powerful statement on fighting anti-Semitism at the Embassy of Israel. “Anti-Semitism is a distillation,” he said, “[it is] an expression of an evil that runs through so much of human history, and if we do not answer that, we do not answer any other form of evil.”
So how do governments effectively “answer” and strongly combat rising anti-Semitism?

The office of the Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism at the U.S. Department of State has been tracking the rise of anti-Semitism around the world and witnessing its alarming presence and growth in Europe and beyond. We know Jewish communities in Europe have faced an upsurge of anti-Semitic incidents, including violence in Western Europe over the past few years. Jewish communities are anxious about their safety and future. 

Sadly, if present trends continue, the viability of some of the smaller European Jewish communities will come into question due to anticipated emigration and/or assimilation. To best protect Jewish communities and combat anti-Semitism, the U.S. Department of State has encouraged European states to appoint Special Envoys or other senior officials to focus on anti-Semitism.

In Berlin, in November 2014, at the 10th Anniversary of the OSCE's Conference on Anti-Semitism, Ambassador Samantha Power stated, “One way to ensure sustained attention to anti-Semitism is to appoint a high-level envoy… Governments who appoint high-level officials to coordinate whole-of-nation efforts to combat anti-Semitism, and give them the political backing and resources they need, will see the difference it makes.”

We all welcomed the appointment of an EU Coordinator on Combating Antisemitism, Katharina von Schnurbein, and we look forward to future collaboration. This position is an important first step. Ideally, individual European governments will establish a point person to combat anti-Semitism.

Anti-Semitism is evolving into new, contemporary forms of hatred, racism, and political, social, and cultural discrimination against Jews. One virulent aspect is the relation of conflating Jewish communities with Israel, using criticism of Israel as a pretext for anti-Semitism. As government leaders we cannot ignore this phenomenon.

Being in Berlin, I am reminded of German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s recent statement urging the need to specifically address anti-Semitism among youth from countries where hatred of Israel and Jews is widespread.

We have witnessed instances where anti-Israel demonstrations have taken on anti-Semitic tones such as in Malmö, Sweden, when protestors shouted, “Slaughter the Jews!” And we have seen in Toulouse and Marseilles how Jews have been targeted by terrorists who reportedly said they were protesting the situation in Palestine.

In our work, we engage with Jewish community leaders in Europe. We have heard from the Dutch Jewish community that “any criticism toward Israel is considered ‘anti-Zionism’ [in the Netherlands], but people know this and they shout ‘Zionist!’ when they mean ‘Jew’ so they won't get in trouble.”

Jewish leaders from Sweden also noted how anti-Semitism can be covered by anti-Zionism. Recent graffiti with swastikas was not classified as 'anti-Semitism' by police in Stockholm, but as actions against Israel. And I quote, “If you are hurt wearing a kippa [in Sweden], it is classified as anti-Zionism, which is legal.”

And then there is an ongoing case in Germany, which many of us know of, when in the early morning hours of July 29, 2014, anti-Israel protestors in Wuppertal threw Molotov cocktails at the main synagogue. Last year, the judge determined these actions “anti-Israel” and not “anti-Semitic.” Although this decision has recently been challenged, we have to be aware of the correlation.

This is why it is especially important to define anti-Semitism clearly to more effectively combat it. My predecessor Special Envoy Hannah Rosenthal said it best, “Opposition to a policy by the State of Israel [can morph] into anti-Semitism …This form of anti-Semitism is more difficult for many to identify – but if all Jews are held responsible for the decisions of the sovereign State of Israel [or if] governments call upon and intimidate their Jewish communities to condemn Israeli actions…this is not objecting to a policy–this is anti-Semitism. Our State Department uses Natan Sharansky’s framework for identifying when someone or a government [can] cross the line – when Israel is demonized, when Israel is held to different standards than the rest of the countries, and when Israel is delegitimized.”

While we understand the complexities of this issue and the importance of context, we are concerned about those instances where the line is crossed between legitimate opposition of Israeli government policies into rhetoric that questions Israel’s right to exist and targets Jewish communities outside of Israel.
Thus we encourage European governments to adopt a working definition of anti-Semitism, ideally, one which would include a section on how anti-Semitism relates to Israel, to improve the safety and well-being of Jewish communities in Europe.

We should also note that we are very careful to use this definition appropriately and object to its misuse as part of efforts to silence the legitimate criticism of Israeli policies. It is important to be as accurate as possible and not overstate or understate the problem. Unfounded accusations of anti-Semitism motivated by ideological or political aims distract from and are counterproductive to good-faith efforts to combat anti-Semitism.

For example, when one of the strongest opponents of anti-Semitism today—Pope Francis— is accused of taking an anti-Semitic stance, those unsubstantiated accusations make it more difficult to identify and address actual incidents of anti-Semitism. The Catholic Church has made impressive strides in speaking out against anti-Semitism and condemning intolerance.

The United States government deeply appreciates the Church’s critical voice. In October 2015, our office had the opportunity to meet Pope Francis and Vatican officials and thank them for the Church’s continuing efforts to combat anti-Semitism, and encourage them to continue. Indeed, in 2015 Pope Francis told the media “anyone who does not recognize the Jewish people and the State of Israel — and their right to exist — is guilty of anti-Semitism.”

All of us are here because we believe that democratic governments should proactively combat anti-Semitism. But governments cannot combat anti-Semitism alone. If we are to beat back the tide of anti-Semitism, we need to strengthen and enable civil society, in Europe and wherever anti-Semitism arises, to raise its voice and speak out.

Everyone needs to understand that anti-Semitism is not just a “Jewish problem.” Anti-Semitism and religious intolerance are fundamental threats to democratic societies; religious intolerance leads to the loss of rights for other minority groups, threatening social cohesion and fundamental freedoms. Civil society, governments, and religious leaders all have a responsibility to act against all forms of intolerance, including against religious or ethnic minorities.

As many of you know, at the end of 2015, the U.S. State Department led an international effort that helped prevent a statue from being erected in Hungary to honor a notorious World War II-era anti-Semite, Balint Homan. We worked with members of Congress, U.S. and international NGOs, Hungarian groups, Jewish community leaders, and European government leaders—including several of you here –to send the message that anti-Semitic acts will be strenuously opposed.

We believe there is a significant role for legislators and parliamentarians to play in speaking out against anti-Semitism. The U.S. Congress, for instance, played an important role in our efforts in Hungary, and we are appreciative of their leadership in combating anti-Semitism.

We also believe governments should make it easier for civil society and religious leaders—who are often closer to the dynamics and issues on the ground and within their communities—to access their governmental leaders, meet with them, share information, and continue to receive funding for projects and programs that combat anti-Semitism and intolerance of any kind.

In Hungary, because Hungarian civil society—Jews and others—felt empowered after the success in December, plans to unveil another statue honoring another anti-Semite last month were foiled. Because we expect these issues to persist, civil society and governments must remain vigilant and continue to coordinate efforts to confront these anti-Semitic actions.

As parliamentarians we need to encourage civil society to speak out, to build coalitions and bridges with diverse communities, and to educate in terms of citizenship and democratic values.

With a robust civil society in Europe that is both encouraged and aided by governments, hopefully, together, we can turn down the faucet of anti-Semitism. I often use this metaphor of a faucet. We may not be able to turn it totally off, but we can certainly turn it down.

Thank you.

Police State Canada: Communications Security Establishment Runs Massive Stasi-Like Domestic Spying Program


For previous articles about the CSE, please see here, here and here.

The CSE is a part of the 5-Eyes with the NSAThe big secret that they are not talking about with the CSE is the advanced technology of Echelon and Signals Intelligence along with the true nature of what the PRISM data mining program really is. The eventual plan is to have everyone hooked up to a computer to monitor their thoughts and be able to "data-mine" them. It is a form of thought policing that extends far beyond telecommunications and the internet. To learn more about this, see herehere and here.

If you are a targeted person, they are recording your whole life Eventually, the plan is to record everyone's life. That is why they are building giant data centers like the one in Utah, they are using big data with sophisticated artificial intelligence and data mining software so they can predict the future just like in the movie Minority Report. The massive data centers in Utah are for data mining purposes so they can look for statistically significant patterns in the data. They want to have everyone "hooked up" so they can monitor all human thought patterns and hunt for what they deem as "irregular" thoughts or what they believe falls out of their categories of normality. In other words, they have set up a bell curve, and anyone who falls outside of this will be seen as suspicious. Right now, they are able to set alerts on your thoughts the same way they can on phone calls, emails, search terms etc.  See here for more about the inevitable problems of technology. See here for more about the DARPA A.I Control Grid.

As far as Echelon and Signals Intelligence, it's important to realize that Signals Intelligence covers everything from intercepting signals to surveillance and electronic warfare. Please see earth-penetrating tomographyInterferometry, also Earth's Field NMRNuclear Magnetic Resonance, and Electron Paramagnetic Resonance. One part of the secret of Echelon is leaking electrical emanations which is a part of the TEMPEST program and is categorized under RADIATION intelligence. It is classified. All natural things give out radio waves, that includes you.

See this video and this video for an example using a computer. (See here, where the physicist Dr. John Morgan says 2 minutes and 10 seconds into the video, that all natural things emit radio waves. Watch this video with Michael Persinger where he talks about how light and photons can be measured. Also, take notice in this video when the physicist mentions that the brain "radiates" radio.)


What You Are:


The imagers they use are multi-purpose, the imaging transmitters target locations, areas and living animals with directed energy. There are passive and active modes, the active mode requires the transmission of signals into the target where passive mode allows imaging with illumination occurring by other means like spying through leaking electrical emanations, including unintentional radio or electrical signals, sounds, and vibrations. 

Essentially, this technology can be used with nanotechnology for holography and nanoparticle imaging. (See here and here for examples of holography,  here for more about nanoparticle imaging and here for more about molecular imaging.) 

But that's not all, it can also be used for synthetic telepathy. Light can be measured, (photons,) minds can be read, thoughts can be sent. If you can think a thought, you can send it. Just like writing an email with your mind. Zuckerberg is saying it here,  he's just not telling you the whole story.  See here for another article with Mark Zuckerberg referring to synthetic telepathy. See here for a Cisco ad that talks about this technology. Also, see this TedTalk video for another example. This technology can be used between humans that are hooked up to computers, (human to human) or by a computer to a human.

When used in conjunction with nanotechnology they have access to your vital signs, the ability to read your EEG and your brain states, look out of your eyes and hear out of your ears. (See this old clip of a scientist looking out of a cat's eyes. What they have now is even more advanced.) They can hack into your brain the same way they do with your computer. They can also alter and affect your behavior. (See here and here.) They can track you anywhere on the planet and hurt or maim you in a plausibly deniable way from a remote location. They can shoot you and your family with space-based weapons. See here for more about electronic warfare. See here for more about microwave weaponry.

Remember, YOU PAY FOR ALL OF THIS! That is so important to remember, these losers work for you! Don't ever forget that, they are using your money to enslave you. Demand transparency, do not settle for anything less. Demand that your government starts being honest with you. Honesty and the democratizing of this technology scares the absolute crap out of these people. Do you know why? Because they know they will be lynched. The foundation of Canada will be called into question and they know this. Why are you so scared of them? They are your employees. 

============================================================================

By Keith Jones

On the basis of secret government directives, Canada’s national security apparatus is conducting mass surveillance of Canadians parallel to, if not directly patterned after, the domestic spying operations of the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA).
Communications Security Establishment (CSE), the NSA’s Canadian counterpart and longstanding partner, has been scrutinizing the metadata of Canadians’ electronic communications since at least 2005.
Moreover, the NSA routinely provides Canada’s security agencies with intelligence on Canadians and CSE reciprocates by providing U.S. intelligence officials with information about people living in the U.S. This arrangement allows both agencies to circumvent legal bans on warrantless surveillance of their own citizenry’s communications.
It was “common” for NSA “to pass on information about Canadians,” Wayne Easter, Canada’s Solicitor-General in 2002-3, told the Toronto Star this week. As Solicitor-General, Easter was responsible for overseeing the operations of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP).
The extent and scope of CSE’s spying and who is being targeted and why are all zealously guarded state secrets. The CSE functions under secret directives issued by the Minister of Defence—directives whose very existence is unknown to parliamentarians, let alone the public at large.
The Canadian government has responded to any slight or partial lifting of the veil on CSE activities with a campaign of disinformation, dissembling and lies. This campaign has even been facilitated by the supposed opposition parties, like the left-wing New Democratic Party, and of course, the corporate media; they have made no more than tepid calls for greater transparency about the CSC’s spying.
The Globe and Mail reported that in November 2011, former Defence Minister Peter MacKay signed a secret directive authorizing the CSE to continue its “mining” of the metadata of Canadians’ telephone and internet communications. (As I point out above, it is much worse than phone calls and internet communications.) The Globe said the program had been first authorized by Bill Graham, Defence Minister in Paul Martin’s Liberal government, in 2005, that is six years earlier.
MacKay, like U.S. President Barack Obama, responded to this revelation of massive state spying by flatly denying that CSE is “targeting” Canadians or violating constitutional prohibitions on warrantless surveillance of their communications. This lie is predicated on the drawing of a spurious distinction between the metadata created by any electronic communication and the rest of the communication and on the transparently false claim that such information is innocuous.
According to the Globe, a briefing prepared for MacKay in 2011, presumably by CSE or lawyers within his department, declared, “Metadata is information associated with a telecommunication … And not a communication.”
In fact metadata—which includes such information as the source, destination, and duration of a telephone call—is intrinsic to any electronic communication. By systematically gathering and analyzing such metadata, the U.S. and Canadian national-security apparatuses can rapidly build up detailed profiles of targeted individuals and groups, including identifying everything from their associates, to where they work, bank, and shop, and what websites they visit.
In the course of his efforts to cover-up the scope and purpose of CSE’s metadata mining, MacKay did make one revealing admission. In response to a question about the mass surveillance of Canadians’ communications, MacKay told Parliament, “I have a heads-up for the member … This is something that has been happening for years.”
Government sources, many of them unnamed, sought, meanwhile, to refute the Globe ’s claim that there had been serious questions within the state apparatus about the constitutionality of the CSE’s “metadata” mining of Canadians’ communications. In its report, the Globe said that in 2008 the then CSE Commissioner—that is the head of the government-appointed “watchdog” charged with ensuring the agency does not go beyond its legal mandate—had cautioned that the program could be violating Canadians constitutional rights and, because of his concerns, the metadata mining program was suspended for more than a year.
Sources from within the government and CSE dispute this. They say that the questions raised by Charles Gonthier—a former, now deceased former Supreme Court Justice—concerned only a small part of a much larger program, that only this part of the metadata mining program was ever suspended, and then only very briefly.
The current CSE Commissioner has publicly defended the mass surveillance and claimed that his predecessor likewise believed that the CSE has every right to spy on Canadian’s electronic communications. In an e-mailed statement to the Toronto Star, Ryan Foreman, a spokesman for CSE Commissioner Robert Decary, said, “The commissioner never questioned the legality of CSE’s metadata activities.”
MacKay and the government have also sought to shield CSE’s actions from public scrutiny by insisting that it is solely devoted to gathering foreign intelligence and, as MacKay told Parliament, “is specifically prohibited from looking at the information of Canadians.” This is an obvious falsehood and not just because warrantless metadata mining is a form of spying.
CSE’s government mandate stipulates—as MacKay well knows since he has been the minister responsible for overseeing its work for the past seven years—that it “provide technical and operational assistance” to CSIS, the RCMP and other domestic security-intelligence and law enforcement agencies “in the performance of their lawful duties.” Furthermore, CSE can seek authorization from the Defence Minister to capture and read the communications of Canadians who are in some way connected to its foreign intelligence targets. As the Toronto Star ’s Thomas Walkom has observed, “In 2011-12, the last year for which figures are available, eight such ministerial authorizations—all of unknown size and scope—were in play.”
While vigorously defending CSE’s metadata spying, the government has been anxious to put on a record that CSE does not have access to the NSA’s PRISM Program and has not been using it as a means of monitoring Canadians’ communications. Under PRISM, NSA agents are able to directly access the servers of the most important U.S. based internet companies, including Microsoft, Apple, Google, and Facebook.
The government’s claims concerning the CSE and PRISM are not credible. The CSE has been a close partner of the NSA, sharing intelligence information with it on a daily basis, for more than six decades.
Britain, which like Canada, is part of the “Five Eyes”—a consortium formed in the late 1940s by the NSA, CSE, and the signals communications agencies of Great Britain, Australia, and New Zealand to jointly monitor global communications—has already said that it obtained intelligence about Britons through PRISM.
The NSA and CSE, as the spurious distinction they have made between electronic communications’ metadata and rest of the communications illustrates, can and do create pretexts and mechanisms to illegally circumvent constitutional prohibitions.
Last but not least, whatever the validity of MacKay’s denial about spying on Canadians through PRISM, it only concerned CSE. As Easter’s comments cited above demonstrate, Canada’s security agencies have long been the recipients of intelligence on Canadians from the NSA as part of longstanding Canada-U.S. intelligence-sharing agreements and partnerships.
The CSE is part of a growing state within the state whose operations are hidden from the public. Most Canadians had never heard of the CSE and even now they know very little about its activities. When former Defence Minister MacKay renewed by secret ministerial order CSE’s authorization to spy on Canadians’ electronic communications in November 2011 he issued six other secret ministerial directives to CSE—none of whose subject let alone contents has been publicly revealed.
As in the United States, Canada’s elite has used the so-called war on terror to justify Canada’s participation in a series of imperialist wars, massively expand the national-security apparatus, and adopt laws that attack core democratic rights.


Tuesday, October 25, 2016

Counter Intelligence 101 - The Sabotage Of Legitimate Dissent

Besides the videos below, please see herehere, here, here and here. Also, see this post and this post about Judas goats and phony alternative media websites.

A Letter Sent To The Maple Ridge News About Something That is Happening in the Town I Live In

Important must read letter below
my introduction - the letter is from
a local newspaper in my town that
was sent in f
rom a resident in
 Maple Ridge, British Columbia, Canada

Introduction: Below my introduction is a letter that was sent to the local paper in my town. It describes the exact behavior I have seen from some people in Maple Ridge, British Columbia.

An interesting bit of information for you to know is the paper that this letter was written to knows that this is happening to me. My situation is different than the one described in the letter below, but similar and much more important because as I have said here, Edward Snowden is a phony and I am releasing information that everyone needs to know. (I contacted the newspaper on many occasions and received no reply even though the information I'm exposing is crucial. Absolutely no one will talk about it.) They won't say anything because of who they collect their paychecks from and who runs the papers and the media in Canada. The truth is, my situation is not "bullying" like is described in the letter below, it is 100% torture by any standards.

The individuals that are doing this to me are extremely aware of what they are doing and the importance of discrediting me. They have to do this because the information they are covering up is so horrible it would astound people. Honestly, it would literally affect the foundation of our country. All I can say is these people are demonic human beings that are hell bent on enforcing their ideology. The tactics they are using is similar to the Stasi in East Germany and comes from the Bolsheviks in Russia

Essentially, they are involved in political assassinations and counter-intelligence just like Noam Chomsky is talking abut here. (Also, see here and here for more about COINTELPRO.) This is what counter- intelligence really is and what intelligence agencies and the counter-intelligence departments inside the FBI and the RCMP really do and have been doing since at least the 60's. See here for the technology and here for the techniques they use to destroy a target's life. Be sure to check out the links on the techniques that refer to Zersetzung. See here for more about slander and here on how they discredit a targeted person with hi-technology.

Many of the people that are doing this to me are Jews, others are Christians and all of them care about Israel, (there is a reason why intelligence agencies have religious signs on them.) Besides Jews and Christians, the other people that are involved with this are community watch, vigilante groups connected to Zionism, intelligence agents or informants involved with drugs. Legal and non-legal. Intelligence agencies have always worked with individuals that are involved with drugs, some of these individuals that are involved with drugs get contracts from intelligence agencies, (for example, the intelligence agencies find people that are involved in drugs that they can use for spying, then they hook them up with deals that are involved with medical marijuana markets in the United States.) This way they can hit two birds with one stone, they can make money with drugs and be some sort of pseudo-spy for intelligence agencies.

This gives them maximum security clearance and makes them above the law.  All of this technology is financed by and used against the hapless taxpayers. They are literally subsidizing or socializing their costs and privatizing their profits. They allow YOU the taxpayer to pay for the research and development of the technology. The reality is if they want to make money with drugs and they are doing it in a legal way, that is one thing, but, for them to be using the United States or the Canadian government and taxpayer money to help themselves to accomplish this, that is another thing altogether. Especially when the technology that they have access to is extremely dangerous and massively invasive. 

As I said previously, many of the methodologies and tactics that these intelligence agencies are implementing on the population of their respective countries are right out of the playbooks of the former Stasi in East Germany, see here for more about the Stasi and how they were connected to the Cheka in Russia and how they were started by the Bolsheviks. The Stasi used to called themselves proud "Chekists." It is also important for people to know that many of the Bolsheviks were Jews, and this information comes from extremely reliable sources. This is relevant because of the connections between these tactics and the origins of the Homeland Security laws. (Public Safety Canada are the Homeland Security of Canada.) 

See here for what Zbigniew Brzezinski said about a future run an "elite" unrestrained by "traditional values" enforcing their ideology on our countries with dangerous and invasive hi-technology, see here for more about former U.S. Representative from Ohio Dennis Kucinich's attempted ban on
space- based weaponry.

The truth of the matter is, there might as well be no laws in Canada anymore. This country is pretty much gone. Your rights have been taken away and there is a very, very good chance that you will never get them back. Most Canadians don't know they can actually be waterboarded under the Bill
C-51 laws
. Though there's a slim chance they would do this because they don't need to waterboard you anymore. They will use the technology I'm exposing. They can read your mind and hurt you from a remote location outside of your house.  They can turn your house into a torture dungeon.

But, just as the RCMP officer said to me who came to my house to inform me that I had to take down information about someone working with intelligence  ---- "this is above our heads." 

Many police are afraid to even get involved with this because they will either lose their jobs or become targets themselves. If this keeps up, this is going to erupt into something very ugly in North America.

========================================================================

Original letter found can be found here.

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Letters: ‘Bullying continues online’


Maple Ridge, Pitt Meadows posted Oct 12, 2016 at 12:00 PM

Editor, The News:

Recently it has come to my attention that a fair number of Maple Ridge residents are engaging in cyber bullying – creating social media pages to intimidate, manipulate, put down, falsely discredit
or humiliate people with the intent to hurt or embarrass those who have a difference of opinion.

Their main targets are the homeless and people suffering mental health or substance use disorders.

Those who at their lowest point in life, with an already unstable mental state, do not need to be
ridiculed, picked on, followed around with cameras and harassed. But the bullying doesn’t stop
there. They’ll target anyone who dares to disagree with their way of thinking.

Posting photos of people and comments in online groups and public pages, then verbally attacking the person, mocking their intelligence. You would think this sort of behaviour would be on the decline given the histories of cyber bullying and it’s outcomes.

These people are grown adults, who consider themselves hard-working, tax-paying citizens of
Maple Ridge. What kind of example are they setting for the younger generation? That it’s OK to make fun of people who don’t share your opinion?

It’s one thing to have a cause that you believe in and promote and stand up for that cause. It’s
another to post things on social media solely for the purpose of ridiculing, telling people they are wrong, unintelligent, and are just a bleeding heart with their head in the sand because they have compassion. Maple Ridge is facing an epidemic, as are many other cities.

Hate and bullying are doing nothing to help the situation. They only makes things worse.

J. Curtis

Maple Ridge

Sunday, October 23, 2016

Human Moves Rat's Tail With Thoughts Alone

In addition to the video below, please see here, here, herehereherehere and here. For the patents that can be used to achieve this, see here. Also, see here for DARPA brain implants and human Guinea Pigs 

Brain Has Alternative Visual Pathways And Seeing With The Tongue

If you think the last post about seeing out a cats eyes was crazy, wait until you see this. In this link it shows how a device allows the blind to see out of their tongue. You can also watch the videos below where they talk about the same idea. What this shows is the brain has alternative visual pathways. Here is another article about blindness and remapping the brain and the restoration of vision.




Old Video Clip Shows Brain Researcher Seeing Out Cat's Eyes

Here is an old clip of what I have been talking about with this classified technology, the ability to see out a target individuals eyes and hear out their ears. Remember, this is an old clip, you don't think it's more accurate now? This is connected to the technology I am referring to here and here.

Control of the United States By Zionists

For more about the strength of the Israel lobby, please see here, here, here and here.

Thursday, October 20, 2016

Operation Flicker – Child Pornography Found At High Levels of Government

See past posts that cover topics of pedophilia, child trafficking and mind control herehere and here.

The following is a write-up by Voice of America on the government investigation known as “Operation Flicker.”

Federal investigators have identified members of the U.S. military and defense contractors who allegedly bought and downloaded child pornography, at times on government computers.  Some of the individuals have high-level security clearances.

The Pentagon released 94 pages of documents related to investigations that date back to 2002. Many names and details are blacked out, but the facts that remain are disturbing.

A contractor with top secret clearance, tasked with providing support to the National Security Agency, was charged with possessing child pornography.  Investigators say he tampered with his work computer after agents searched his home.  He fled the country and is believed to be in Libya.  The case is closed until he is arrested and extradited.

A National Reconnaissance Office contract employee acknowledged he regularly viewed sexually explicit images of children.

One sailor admitted to accessing child pornography while stationed on the Naval destroyer U.S.S. Mason.  He was sentenced to nearly four years in prison.

The findings come from a wider investigation conducted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. That probe, dubbed Operation Flicker, identified more than 5,000 individuals who subscribed to child pornography websites.   An assistant U.S. attorney general requested that the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, under the auspices of the Pentagon’s Inspector General, assist in identifying Pentagon-affiliated individuals.

The above article was written when only the DCIS investigation was released, which is found below. Since then, I have managed to get quite a few more pages declassified, which can also be downloaded here:

Declassified Documents


U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Documents, Released July 15, 2016 [932 Pages, 182.5MB]

Department of Defense / Office of Inspector General [2 Pages, 0.2MB] – As of July of 2015, the DOD/IG is denying all records associated with this request, and will not release them.