Showing posts with label Cultural Marxism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cultural Marxism. Show all posts

Monday, March 12, 2018

Narcissistic Jewish Bullies And The Bolshevik Mentality: This Is Now A Driving Force In Canada And The United States

Cultural Marxism is being implemented under Homeland Security in the United States and the Bill C-51 laws in Canada. They are also using neighborhood watch, social media like Facebook, (see here for an article about Facebook and intelligence agency connections,) vigilante groups, and Jewish Sayanim to accomplish this. (See this here about what is happening in the area where I grew up.)

This is happening all across Canada and in the United States too. The media is actively covering it up and is complicit. This is why it is important to know who the major shareholders and owners of the media are.

Unfortunately, much commentary on Cultural Marxism leaves out the Jewish influence, motivations, and ideology behind it. (See here for what Gilad Atzmon is saying.) It cannot be ignored if you want to face reality. It is the real driving force behind all of this.  It is literally on the flag of Israel. See here for more about Stalin's Jews - we must not forget that some of the greatest murderers of modern times were Jewish. See here for more about Homeland Security and its connections to Zionism. See here for the connections between Freemasonry, Jews, the state of Israel and the Stasi.

See here for the historical connections between the Bolsheviks, the Cheka, and the Stasi. See here for the historical connections between the Jews, Bolsheviks, and the Russian Revolution which led to the Cheka. See here for more about the Stasi and how Homeland Security is based on the exact same idea, see here for more about the tactics these sociopaths are implementing, and here for the classified technology they are using. Also, see here and here to learn more about the technique that intelligence agencies use called "Gaslighting."

End note: To see how Political Correctness and Cultural Marxism ties into intelligence agencies, Transhumanism, computers, and even drugs see here and here. The reality is, the intelligence agencies have always worked with Hollywood, drugs, organized crime, the military, universities, and banks. See here for the history of the intelligence agencies with drugs. (Scroll down and go through all the articles there on drugs and the CIA connections.) The Frankfurt School were the neo-Freudian architects of the 60's counterculture and also responsible for the modern ideas of  Cultural Marxism and Political Correctness. It is important to realize how much this was created to curb and monitor supposed "antisemitism" and the criticism of Jews and Zionism.

Friday, September 15, 2017

Something to Think About With Transhumanism - A Critique of Utopianism From Marx and Hayek

The following excerpt was taken from the book Hayek, Marx, and Utopia the question is... does this form of utopian thinking also apply to Transhumanism? After all... the idea behind Trans-humanism is to go "beyond" being a mere human. This is very vague and open-ended. In this sense, one could say it could also be a nice trap to sell people to embrace an anti-humanist stance with fancy terminology. If you watch this video here of Max More, he actually does kind of say that Transhumanism is against the ideology of humanism which has been progressing since the Renaissance. See here for the connection between Judaism and Transhumanism, see here for the Jewish utopia. Can people not see a connection between Transhumanism, slavery, usury and Judaism? See here for the history of Jewish slavery and here for more about banking, especially this post.
========================================================================

Both Marx and Hayek indict utopianism for its fundamentally nonradical method of theorizing. For both thinkers, the radical is that which seeks to get to the root of social problems, building the realm of the possible out of the conditions that exist.

By contrast, the utopian is, by definition, the impossible (the word, strictly translated, means ''no-place"). For both Marx and Hayek, utopians internalize an abstract, exaggerated sense of human possibility, aiming to create new social formations based upon a pretense of knowledge.

In their blueprints for the ideal society, utopians presuppose that people can master all the sophisticated complexities of social life. Even when their social and ethical ends are decidedly progressive, utopians often rely on reactionary means. They manifest an inherent bias toward the statist construction of alternative institutions in their attempts to practically implement their rationalist abstractions. Both the Marxian and Hayekian perspectives agree that utopianism:

1. fails to take into account the social and historical context of the society that exists;

2. fails to recognize the internal relationship between the theorist and his or her sociohistorical setting;

3. reifies human rationality as a capacity abstracted from social and historical specificity;

4. depends on constructivist rationalism to bridge the gap between conscious human purposes and unintended social consequences; and

5. fails to appreciate the complexity of social action that is constituted by both articulated and tacit elements.

And yet, despite their common anti-utopianism, Marx and Hayek differ with regard to some crucially important epistemic premises. For Hayek, Marx's vision of the ideal communist society rests on the mistaken assumption that in the future, people will be capable of mastering their own destiny. In Hayek's view, this grandiose Marxist illusion served as an ideological legitimation for modern attempts to achieve the millennium through the coercive power of the state.

Hayek explains that for important ontological and epistemological reasons, such a utopian goal must engender dystopian consequences. For Marxists, however, any such epistemic constraints are historically specific to capitalism. Such critics as Hilary Wainwright contend that Hayek embraces a "dogmatically individualist" view of knowledge that does not recognize the potential for efficacious collective action.

Despite their differences, both Marx and Hayek embrace a profoundly anti-utopian mode of inquiry. Marx identified this method as dialectics. His own use of dialectical conceptual tools represented the apotheosis of genuinely radical social theorizing. Indeed, Marx's insightful critique of his utopian contemporaries was a reflection of this dialectical approach.

Wednesday, March 15, 2017

Kevin MacDonald Prof. Cal State Jewish Influence On Western Culture

For books from Kevin MacDonald, see here. When talking about Judaism, one might want to ask the question ---- what exactly is meant by crypto-Judaism or "secretly practicing Judaism?"

Most people do not know enough about Judaism to be able to judge it properly. Were they expelled from nations in the past simply because they refrained from eating pork or because they observed the Sabbath?  Seriously, think of how stupid that sounds. 

At the 13 minute point of the video it becomes speculative when he is referring to how the Y chromosome can be traced back to Aaron and Moses. See here for more about Jews and DNA. Also see this video which supports the Christian interpretation of the Old Testament. The Christian interpretation is much more logical and reasonable. Hence, the Christian emphasis on LOGOS or reason and logic in the Gospel of John. 

Instruct certain men not to teach false doctrines or devote themselves to myths and endless genealogies, which promote speculation rather than the stewardship of God’s work, which is by faith. The goal of our instruction is the love that comes from a pure heart, a clear conscience, and a sincere faith - 1 Timothy 1:4