Exposing Intelligence Agency Human Rights Abuses, Government and Corporate Corruption Along with the Problems of Zionism. The Foundation of Freedom is Freedom of Thought and Freedom of Speech
Below are three interesting articles, read them all. Also, watch this documentary about experimenting on people with classified technology. Pure evil. The intelligence agencies and many police officers of the Western world are very aware of this technology. See here for more about Homeland Security. This is how truly sick our countries are. They rule over us and they work with criminals.
See here for more about Ewen Cameron. See here for a list of government agencies involved in covering up the human rights abuses and torture that continues now.
See here and here for more about classified and hi-technology. See here for more about MkUltra. (Be sure to scroll down and go through all of the articles when you click through on the MkUltra link.) See here for more about Transhumanism. (Be sure to scroll down and go through all of the articles and videos when you click on the Transhumanist link.)
The documentary below is an absolute must watch. Be sure to watch the whole presentation. You will learn how long this technology has been around and the massive human rights abuses that have been perpetrated. This is something that is rarely talked about, in fact, it is extremely difficult to find information on this topic. Be sure to watch this old news clip from CNN in the 80's. Also interesting are movies from the 80's like Videodrome and Brainstorm.
As early as 2014, futurologist Dr. Oskar Villani said it was possible to monitor people with barely visible computer chips. These tiny chips are called “Smart Dust.” Hundreds of them can be “transferred” to a person with a simple handshake. DARPA, a military research facility of the US Department of Defense, was significantly involved in its development. They also found a way to use Smart Dust to read our brain waves and signals, potentially exposing unexpressed thoughts and moods. The merging of humans with machines is being used to advance globalists’ interests, reshape humanity, and gain complete control over every aspect of our lives.
Futurologist Oskar Villani 2014 Interview
It appears that it is possible to transfer tiny chips, which are hardly visible to the naked eye, to other people with a handshake – it is no longer even necessary to implant microchips to monitor people. On July 1, 2014, the futurologist Oskar Villani was a guest on German television program “Heute Konkret”. The nearly 5-minute interview begins with Villani shaking hands with presenter Claudia Reiterer and then telling her that he has now transferred several hundred microchips to her, which can now be used to monitor her for up to 14 days and read a wide variety of data.
These tiny chips are called “Smart Dust,” hundreds of them can be “transferred” with a simple handshake. DARPA, a military research facility of the US Department of Defense, was significantly involved in the development. Villani also reported there is a way to use Smart Dust to monitor our brains.
Watch the following Interview with Dr. Oskar Villani that has been translated by RAIR Foundation USA here:
Intelligent Dust: Developed Through Military Research
Because the so-called ” smart dust” was already developed in the 1990s by Dr. Kris Pister, a professor of electrical engineering at the University of California, Berkeley, as a simple way to use smart wireless sensors, Pister envisioned a world where ubiquitous sensors could measure almost anything. Unsurprisingly, the U.S. military provided the impetus, funding, and development.
In 1997, DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) funded Pister’s research as part of their Smart Dust project. (DARPA was also involved in the development of mRNA technology). Then, in 2001, the American military conducted a surveillance test with the devices. After successfully calculating the speed and direction of 142 military vehicles, the test was declared a great success.
Brain Monitoring
In 2013, MIT reported, “How Smart Dust Could Spy On Your Brain.” This study revealed how Smart Dust is already developed, used, and soon will be a daily part of our lives.
Once again, Researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, were the first to propose what they called ‘neural dust’ – millimeter-sized sensors that could be implanted in the body and used to stimulate nerves and muscles and monitor the activity of different organs.
It consists of “many small wireless microelectromechanical systems (MEMS).” MEMS are tiny devices with cameras, sensors, and communication mechanisms to transmit the data to be stored and further processed. They are usually between 20 micrometers and one millimeter in size. They are wirelessly connected to a computer network and distributed over a specific area to perform tasks, generally using RFID technology(Radio Frequency Identification) can be recorded.
Elon Musk and Neuralink: Can We Read People’s Minds Soon
In 2016, DARPA program manager Doug Weber stated that “neural dust [note: smart dust] represents a radical departure from the traditional approach of using radio waves for wireless communication with implanted devices.” And further: “The soft parts of our body consist mostly of saltwater. Sound waves can pass through this tissue unhindered and be focused with great accuracy on nerve targets deep in our body, while radio waves cannot.” Using ultrasound to communicate with the nerve dust also allows the sensors to be made smaller. For example, they can be introduced into the body by injection with a needle.
This, therefore, is a technology that can be used in the spirit of transhumanists. Elon Musk has already founded Neuralink, a company whose goal is to connect the human brain to a computer. The company is developing an ultra-high bandwidth brain chip to connect humans, computers, and artificial intelligence, what Musk refers to as “a Fitbit in your skull with tiny wires.”
In 2020, Musk and Neuralink demonstrated their success with implanting just such a chip in pigs, with humans being their next target.
In his book “Shaping the Fourth Industrial Revolution,” Schwab advocates for a future in which authorities will be able to utilize the blending of technology with the human body to “intrude into the hitherto private space of our minds, reading our thoughts and influencing our behavior.”
Schwab writes that the ability “for law enforcement agencies and courts to use techniques to determine the likelihood of criminal activity, assess guilt or even possibly retrieve memories directly from people’s brains will increase,” adding, “Even crossing a national border might one day involve a detailed brain scan to assess an individual’s security risk.”
Klaus goes on to state that the “Fourth Industrial Revolution technologies will not stop at becoming part of the physical world around us; they will become part of us,” adding,
Indeed, some of us already feel that our smartphones have become an extension of ourselves. Today’s external devices—from wearable computers to virtual reality headsets—will almost certainly become implantable in our bodies and brains.
Exoskeletons and prosthetics will increase our physical power, while advances in neurotechnology enhance our cognitive abilities. We will become better able to manipulate our own genes, and those of our children
For years, people have been implanted with chips linked to digital currencies and smart devices through the 5G network to process payments directly and allow them to access their homes, offices, and gyms. The chips also allow big-tech databases and government surveillance measures to track and monitor their location, activities, and behaviors.
A global system of totalitarian technocracy has arrived; of course, I’m sure it will only help us! What an exciting “brave new world” we are entering. As Klaus notes:
[It] will change not only what we do but also who we are. It will affect our identity and all the issues associated with it: our sense of privacy, our notions of ownership, our consumption patterns, the time we devote to work and leisure, and how we develop our careers, cultivate our skills, meet people, and nurture relationships.”
The following excerpt was taken from the book Hayek, Marx, and Utopia the question is... does this form of utopian thinking also apply to Transhumanism? After all... the idea behind Trans-humanism is to go "beyond" being a mere human. This is very vague and open-ended. In this sense, one could say it could also be a nice trap to sell people to embrace an anti-humanist stance with fancy terminology. If you watch this video here of Max More, he actually does kind of say that Transhumanism is against the ideology of humanism which has been progressing since the Renaissance. See here for the connection between Judaism and Transhumanism, see here for the Jewish utopia. Can people not see a connection between Transhumanism, slavery, usury and Judaism? See here for the history of Jewish slavery and here for more about banking, especially this post.
========================================================================
Both Marx and Hayek indict utopianism for its fundamentally nonradical method of theorizing. For both thinkers, the radical is that which seeks to get to the root of social problems, building the realm of the possible out of the conditions that exist.
By contrast, the utopian is, by definition, the impossible (the word, strictly translated, means ''no-place"). For both Marx and Hayek, utopians internalize an abstract, exaggerated sense of human possibility, aiming to create new social formations based upon a pretense of knowledge.
In their blueprints for the ideal society, utopians presuppose that people can master all the sophisticated complexities of social life. Even when their social and ethical ends are decidedly progressive, utopians often rely on reactionary means. They manifest an inherent bias toward the statist construction of alternative institutions in their attempts to practically implement their rationalist abstractions. Both the Marxian and Hayekian perspectives agree that utopianism:
1. fails to take into account the social and historical context of the society that exists; 2. fails to recognize the internal relationship between the theorist and his or her sociohistorical setting;
3. reifies human rationality as a capacity abstracted from social and historical specificity;
4. depends on constructivist rationalism to bridge the gap between conscious human purposes and unintended social consequences; and 5. fails to appreciate the complexity of social action that is constituted by both articulated and tacit elements.
And yet, despite their common anti-utopianism, Marx and Hayek differ with regard to some crucially important epistemic premises. For Hayek, Marx's vision of the ideal communist society rests on the mistaken assumption that in the future, people will be capable of mastering their own destiny. In Hayek's view, this grandiose Marxist illusion served as an ideological legitimation for modern attempts to achieve the millennium through the coercive power of the state.
Hayek explains that for important ontological and epistemological reasons, such a utopian goal must engender dystopian consequences. For Marxists, however, any such epistemic constraints are historically specific to capitalism. Such critics as Hilary Wainwright contend that Hayek embraces a "dogmatically individualist" view of knowledge that does not recognize the potential for efficacious collective action.
Despite their differences, both Marx and Hayek embrace a profoundly anti-utopian mode of inquiry. Marx identified this method as dialectics. His own use of dialectical conceptual tools represented the apotheosis of genuinely radical social theorizing. Indeed, Marx's insightful critique of his utopian contemporaries was a reflection of this dialectical approach.
Transhumanism (see here and here,) is arguably a covert form of slavery and certainly has connections with eugenics. It is also heavily oriented with Jews. For more about the connections to Judaism, see here and here. See here also for the connections between Judaism and eugenics. (Make sure you click on all the links there.)
Article by Rebecca Taylor
Logo of the Second International Congress of Eugenics that states, "Eugenics is the self-direction of human evolution."
I have been talking about Transhumanism a lot lately because I believe it is the greatest threat to humanity that no one knows about. Transhumanism is being sold as a philosophy that wants to use technology to surpass treating or preventing disease and use it to enhance otherwise healthy humans beyond natural capabilities.
They envision a world where you can leave your pathetic, ignorant, weak existence behind and enhance your way to being super-smart, super-strong, super-happy, basically super-human.
Transhumanists say they want to take man's evolution into their own hands creating a race of "post-humans."
There are many flaws in Transhumanist utopian ideas, most notably their refusal to acknowledge that Transhumanism will result in a world where the enhanced super-humans will naturally rule over the stupid, weak and miserable unenhanced. Those that can afford or have access to enhancements will be the elite and those who do not or cannot be enhanced will be slaves.
In studying the roots of Transhumanism, one finds the beginnings of the movement are attributed to Julian Huxley. Huxley wrote the following in his 1957 piece, "Transhumanism:"
We are already justified in the conviction that human life as we know it in history is a wretched makeshift, rooted in ignorance; and that it could be transcended by a state of existence based on the illumination of knowledge and comprehension, just as our modern control of physical nature based on science transcends the tentative fumblings of our ancestors, that were rooted in superstition and professional secrecy.
The human species can, if it wishes, transcend itself —not just sporadically, an individual here in one way, an individual there in another way, but in its entirety, as humanity. We need a name for this new belief. Perhaps Transhumanism will serve: man remaining man, but transcending himself, by realizing new possibilities of and for his human nature.
“I believe in Transhumanism”: once there are enough people who can truly say that, the human species will be on the threshold of a new kind of existence, as different from ours as ours is from that of Pekin man. It will at last be consciously fulfilling its real destiny.
So who was Julian Huxley? Besides being the brother of the famous novelist Aldous Huxley who wrote Brave New World, he was an evolutionary biologist and also a famous eugenicist. Eugenics was a movement of the early 20th century that tried to create a better human race by preventing the birth of those deemed "unfit." Eugenics literally means "good birth" and it seeks to "improve" the human gene pool. Eugenicists like Huxley assumed that the individual is nothing more than what is encoded in their genes. Huxley wrote the followingabout his fellow man:
"No-one doubts the wisdom of managing the germ-plasm of agricultural stocks, so why not apply the same concept to human stocks?"
"The lowest strata are reproducing too fast. Therefore... they must not have too easy access to relief or hospital treatment lest the removal of the last check on natural selection should make it too easy for children to be produced or to survive; long unemployment should be a ground for sterilisation."
"...unless [civilised societies] invent and enforce adequate measures for regulating human reproduction, for controlling the quantity of population, and at least preventing the deterioration of quality of racial stock, they are doomed to decay..."
The American Eugenics movement resulted in the forced sterilization of over 60,000 Americans in 33 states. And eugenics did not stop there. Adolf Hitler was a huge fan of eugenics and brought it to its natural conclusion in World War II where millions of the "genetically unfit" were experimented on and/or snuffed out in an effort to create a master race. Those considered unfit were everything from political dissidents, free-thinkers, homosexuals, criminals, weak, feeble-minded, insane, and disabled. Anyone who came against them was in danger. Doesn't that sound like this?
Huxley wasn't just any eugenicist either. He was president of the British Eugenics Society from 1959-1962, more than a decade AFTER the horrors of the Second World War was revealed. He coined the term Transhumanism right before his tenure as president of the British Eugenics Society.
I don't believe modern Transhumanists have any idea where their ideology originated, but it is still instructive toward what will lie ahead if they get their way. We have tried Transhumanism already, only it was called eugenics then. Eugenics, in its attempt to control the direction of human evolution, did, in fact, create a world where the lesser humans were second-class citizens whose rights and lives were forfeit to the "greater good" determined by the elite.
I will quote the modern fiction writer, Dean Koontz, who truly understands Transhumanism and its ramifications:
"We live in hubristic age, when politicians imagine themselves to be messiahs and when many in the sciences frankly discuss their dreams of creating a “post-human” civilization of genetically engineered supermen, ignorant of the fact that like minds have often come before them and have left no legacy but death, destruction, and despair."
See here for a previous article on Transhumanism. (When you click through on that link, be sure to scroll down and go through all of the articles under the Transhumanist section of blog.)
For the last several decades, a strange liberation movement has grown within the developed world. Its crusaders aim much higher than civil rights campaigners, feminists, or gay-rights advocates. They want nothing less than to liberate the human race from its biological constraints. As "transhumanists" see it, humans must wrest their biological destiny from evolution’s blind process of random variation and adaptation and move to the next stage as a species.
It is tempting to dismiss transhumanists as some sort of odd cult, nothing more than science fiction taken too seriously: Witness their over-the-top Web sites and recent press releases ("Cyborg Thinkers to Address Humanity’s Future," proclaims one). The plans of some transhumanists to freeze themselves cryogenically in hopes of being revived in a future age seem only to confirm the movement’s place on the intellectual fringe.
But is the fundamental tenet of transhumanism — that we will someday use biotechnology to make ourselves stronger, smarter, less prone to violence, and longer-lived — really so outlandish? Transhumanism of a sort is implicit in much of the research agenda of contemporary biomedicine. The new procedures and technologies emerging from research laboratories and hospitals — whether mood-altering drugs, substances to boost muscle mass or selectively erase memory, prenatal genetic screening, or gene therapy — can as easily be used to "enhance" the species as to ease or ameliorate illness.
Although the rapid advances in biotechnology often leave us vaguely uncomfortable, the intellectual or moral threat they represent is not always easy to identify. The human race, after all, is a pretty sorry mess, with our stubborn diseases, physical limitations, and short lives. Throw in humanity’s jealousies, violence, and constant anxieties, and the transhumanist project begins to look downright reasonable. If it were technologically possible, why wouldn’t we want to transcend our current species? The seeming reasonableness of the project, particularly when considered in small increments, is part of its danger. Society is unlikely to fall suddenly under the spell of the transhumanist worldview. But it is very possible that we will nibble at biotechnology’s tempting offerings without realizing that they come at a frightful moral cost.
The first victim of transhumanism might be equality. The U.S. Declaration of Independence says that "all men are created equal," and the most serious political fights in the history of the United States have been over who qualifies as fully human. Women and blacks did not make the cut in 1776 when Thomas Jefferson penned the declaration. Slowly and painfully, advanced societies have realized that simply being human entitles a person to political and legal equality. In effect, we have drawn a red line around the human being and said that it is sacrosanct.
Underlying this idea of the equality of rights is the belief that we all possess a human essence that dwarfs manifest differences in skin color, beauty, and even intelligence. This essence, and the view that individuals therefore have inherent value, is at the heart of political liberalism. But modifying that essence is the core of the transhumanist project. If we start transforming ourselves into something superior, what rights will these enhanced creatures claim, and what rights will they possess when compared to those left behind? If some move ahead, can anyone afford not to follow? These questions are troubling enough within rich, developed societies. Add in the implications for citizens of the world’s poorest countries — for whom biotechnology’s marvels likely will be out of reach — and the threat to the idea of equality becomes even more menacing.
Transhumanism’s advocates think they understand what constitutes a good human being, and they are happy to leave behind the limited, mortal, natural beings they see around them in favor of something better. But do they really comprehend ultimate human goods? For all our obvious faults, we humans are miraculously complex products of a long evolutionary process — products whose whole is much more than the sum of our parts. Our good characteristics are intimately connected to our bad ones: If we weren’t violent and aggressive, we wouldn’t be able to defend ourselves; if we didn’t have feelings of exclusivity, we wouldn’t be loyal to those close to us; if we never felt jealousy, we would also never feel love.
Even our mortality plays a critical function in allowing our species as a whole to survive and adapt (and transhumanists are just about the last group I’d like to see live forever). Modifying any one of our key characteristics inevitably entails modifying a complex, interlinked package of traits, and we will never be able to anticipate the ultimate outcome.
Nobody knows what technological possibilities will emerge for human self-modification. But we can already see the stirrings of Promethean desires in how we prescribe drugs to alter the behavior and personalities of our children. The environmental movement has taught us humility and respect for the integrity of nonhuman nature. We need a similar humility concerning our human nature. If we do not develop it soon, we may unwittingly invite the transhumanists to deface humanity with their genetic bulldozers and psychotropic shopping malls.
To learn more about Transhumanism, go to the Transhumanism category on my blog located here. (Be sure to scroll down and go through all the articles.) To see videos that provide an excellent introduction to Transhumanism, go here. Read this article and this article about Transhumanism and political control. Go here to see a list of classified technology.
Human beings, for the most part, have always had some sense of the Divine. From ancient Greece to Egypt, to the ancient pagan Celts, from all the continents of the world. Many Jews have no sense of the divine, spirit, soul, etc. Their tradition’s “materialist apocalyptic”, which they seek to escape through some AI machine (“an entity greater than any god ever imagined”), is competing against the divine/nature. They are corrupting and distorting natural laws, natural existence, perception, and expression. Our world is of spirit, consciousness and high order, while theirs is chaotic, simply materialistic, based on a resource for them to possess, without spirit or meaning, ruled by artificial intelligence.
Arthur Schopenhauer recognized these differences in perception also, stating:
The world is not a piece of machinery and animals are not articles manufactured for our use. Such views should be left to synagogues and philosophical lecture-rooms, which in essence are not so very different.
That being said....one does not have to be a religious individual to derive their sense of ethics in this world. Generally speaking though --- if people lack religion and they lack philosophy... they become legal positivists, (they adopt a sense of legal pragmatism,) or they gain their sense of right and wrong from their current epoch or culture. This is group thought or social metaphysics which makes society ripe for collectivism.
Social Metaphysics is when people begin to holds the consciousnesses of other people, not objective reality, as their ultimate psycho-epistemological frame-of-reference. One of the major problems with Transhumanism besides it being a form of technological totalitarianism is that it resembles past forms of Utopian thought. See here for more about this. Another book to look at would be Eric Voegelin's Science, Politics, and Gnosticism which is about Gnosticism that is "lost in the world" and why it leads to utopianism. Eric Voegelin believes that utopian thought comes from a form of Gnosticism that is trying to find "salvation" in this world, and in doing so... creates Hell on earth. In other words... they ignore the Golden ratio or the warning of moderation from ancient Delphi.
“Judaism without God?”
Atheism is entrenched in American Judaism. In researching their book American Grace, authors Robert Putnam and David Campbell found that half of all American Jews doubt God’s existence. In other groups, that number is between 10 and 15 percent. source
One wonders why they still call themselves something that is related to the Bible at all. Honestly, the question is... why do they even bother? Why do we get in so much trouble for calling this group of people out for what they are....frauds, just like it says in the book of Revelation, (see here and here.)
(See here for more about the so-called Jews.) They know this just as well as I do... and they are afraid of the truth.
If you an atheist....be an atheist. Why are you a "JEWISH ATHEIST?" And why in the name of GOD do you have any right to some "Holy Land" in the middle east and why are you persecuting people for your insane beliefs?
The reality is... even some of these "Jewish atheists" (not all,) adopt some of the crazy beliefs from the Jewish Talmud. When you learn some of what is in Talmud, you will see where this supremacist mentality is coming from.
Through Marxism, Communism and Capitalist indoctrination most people now share this Judaic attitude and behavior, opposing, subverting, and mindlessly destroying (without spirit/consciousness) nature, animals, spirit, and integrity.
If you are not familiar with Transhumanism, check out the Wikipedia write-up here, you can also watch these introductory documentaries. I have already posted articles on this topic. To find these articles, look under the Transhumanist category on my blog located here. This is relevant to what I am saying in the articles located here and here about ethical issues and mind control. In fact, look at the official goal chart of the Transhumanist movement below. They literally admit that their goal right now is MIND CONTROL with a brain-computer interface! This is exactly what I have been talking about. The reality is, this has been possible for a while. See this post that features a lecture of a neuroscientist from the Royal Society, you'll also see an old video clip there with Jose Delgado controlling a charging bull that has an implant in its brain. It must be pointed out that they can get this in the human body in a completely non-invasive methodology now. They are doing this to tons of people. They have chips and nanotechnology in the brains of many unknowing citizens right now. I am one of these people. (See here for more about nanotechnology and here for brain-computer interface with synthetic telepathy.) They have the ability to get this into people with a simple injection, (see this video starting around 4 minutes and 25 seconds,) but they don't even need that. They can do it with a virus or a bacteria. For instance, just as if you were catching a cold. (See here and here.) Once it is inside you, it spreads. Also, see here for how RFID chips fuse with human brain cells and how they can be controlled. See here for more about classified technology. See here and here for how this is being used by intelligence agencies and organized crime more. This is where Transhumanism, eugenics and political control connect.
See here for some excellent introductory videos to Transhumanism. See here for more about creating the Borg, combining man with machine in synthetic biology. To learn more about nanotechnology, go here. See here for more about weaponizing nanotechnology. Go here to see what the FBI is saying about this technology. See here for a documentary called "Playing God." See here andhere for examples of biological warfare with the state of Israel. See here and here for more about artificial intelligence. It is worth noting, that Siri which is in your Apple product, was developed at SRI which has always had close connections with the NSA and CIA.
The technology that is featured in the article below is in the possession of intelligence agencies and organized crime and currently being used against the public. Not in 2030 like it mentions in the article below. But, absolutely 100%RIGHT NOW! See here and here. Maybe he means that by 2030 all of humanity will be hooked up. As pointed out here, this is the direction the world is going. We will all be a part of a gigantic world brain with everyone under constant surveillance, every moment of our lives will be recorded. You will be under thought monitoring for potential thoughts that deviate from the mean. Unless you know how to get this technology out of your body and brain or block it. This is already happening because intelligence agencies and organized crime have this technology and are using it. They fail to mention some of the negative aspects of this technology in the article below. Like for instance, mind control, neuroplasticity of the brain and behavior and personality changes. They can also create pain in your body, injure you or kill you. They can literally give you concussions, cancer, brain damage, heart attacks or a stroke. Obviously, the youth, the elderly and the unhealthy are at the greatest risk. If this isn't enough, they can also shoot you with classified space-based weapons. (See here and here.) They have access to your brain, your EEG readout and your eyes and ears. In other words, they can see out your eyes and hear out your ears. See this old clip of a scientist looking out of a cat's eyes. What they have now is even more advanced. See here and here for more about the ethical considerations of brain-computer interfaces and nanotechnology. For other articles on this topic, please see here. See here for more about DARPA Smartdust. See here for more about the DARPA Artificial Intelligence Control Grid. Also see here, here and here for more about using this sort of technology as a form of biowarfare. You can also see here, here and here for more about Smartdust.
The human brain could be enhanced by tiny robotic implants that connect to cloud-based computer networks to give us 'God-like' abilities, according to a leading computer scientist.
Ray Kurzweil, an author and inventor who describes himself as a futurist who works on Google's machine learning project, said such technology could be the next step in human evolution.
He predicted that by the 2030s, humans will be using nanobots capable of tapping into our neocortex and connecting us directly to the world around us.
Tiny robots (illustrated above) that have the capacity to connect our
brains directly to the internet could help to give humans God-like abilities, expanding our capacity for emotions and creativity
This will allow people to send emails and photos directly to each other's brains while also backing up our thoughts and memories. (See here and here for how synthetic telepathy is possible now.)
Speaking at an event organized by the Singularity University at Moffett Field in California, which he helped found and TheWorldPost, Mr Kurzweil said they could also expand our capacity for emotions and creativity.
He said this ability to expand our brains with the information held in the cloud will combine with the power of artificial intelligence to make humans more 'God-like'. Mr Kurzweil said: 'There is beauty, love and creativity and intelligence in the world, and it all comes from the neocortex.
'We are going to be able to expand the neocortex and so we are going to become more God-like.
'We are going to add additional levels of abstraction and create more profound means of expression so we are going to be more musical, we are going to be funnier, we are going to be sexier and be better at expression more loving sentiments.'
He added that it may be possible in the future to use the extra brain power provided by the cloud to multiply human intelligence.
He said in the 2030s if he met Google co-founder Larry Page, for example, in the street, the technology could provide some assistance.
He said: 'So I'm walking along, and I see Larry Page coming, and I think, 'I better think of something clever to say.'
But my 300 million modules in my neocortex isn't going to cut it. I need a billion in two seconds.
'I'll be able to access that in the cloud -- just like I can multiply intelligence with my smartphone thousands fold today.'
Scientists developing nano-machines have created capsules of DNA that can change their shape in response to certain conditions in the body and a molecular 'car' that uses balls of carbon as wheels (illustrated)
CREATING LIVING ROBOTS
DNA already has the potential to transform the computing world by recreating living cells into data storage devices. Now scientists have gone one step further and used DNA ‘nanobots’ inside living cockroaches that open up to deliver drugs. The nanorobots, which can function like living computers, were created using DNA strands that fold and unfold like origami. Bioengineers hope DNA nanobots could carry out complex programs that could one day be used to diagnose or treat diseases. Daniel Levner, a bioengineer at the Wyss Institute at Harvard University and his colleagues at Bar Ilan University in Ramat-Gan, Israel, made the nanobots by exploiting the binding properties of DNA. When DNA comes across a certain kind of protein, it unravels into two different strands, according to a report by Sarah Spickernell at New Scientist.
The concept of nanomachines being inserted into the human body has been around in science fiction for decades. See here for a video clip from a movie. In the TV series Star Trek tiny molecular robots called nanites were used to help repair damaged cells in the body. Mr Kurzeweil said similar robots could be built out of DNA and injected into the brain. Last year researchers injected packages of DNA that would unfurl under certain conditions into the bodies of cockroaches.
The DNA origami was described as being the first step towards building basic robots that perform logical operations when it encounters a specific protein – much like a 1 or a 0 from a silicon microchip. The more DNA robots injected into an animal, the greater the complexity can be achieved, and the researchers from the Bar Ilan University are now working to scale up the 'computing power' so that it rivals old 8-bit computers from the 1980s like a Commodore 64 or an Atari 800.
Scientists at Rice University recently demonstrated a single-molecule 'car', which had buckyballs of carbon for wheels and could be controlled by changes in temperature.
However, some scientists have warned the effectiveness of such devices will be limited.
Most nano-machines are likely to find more use as ways of delivering drugs to specific cells in the body.
Professor James Friend, a mechanical engineer at the University of California San Diego told TheWorldPost that getting approval to inject these into humans may be difficult.
He said would be a great deal of concern about injecting 'swimming mysterious things in your head and leaving them there'.
Other leading scientists and technology experts have expressed fears at the growing use of Artificial Intelligence and called for tighter controls to be placed on its development.
But Mr Kurzeweil said nanobots could also help people create realistic avatars with the aid of artificial intelligence.
He said: In the 2030s, we will be able to send nanobots into living people's brains and extract memories of people who have passed away. Then you can really make them very realistic.'
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE 'AS DANGEROUS AS NUCLEAR WEAPONS'
Artificial intelligence has the potential to be as dangerous to mankind as nuclear weapons, a leading pioneer of the technology has claimed.
Professor Stuart Russell, a computer scientist who has lead research on artificial intelligence, fears humanity might be 'driving off a cliff' with the rapid development of AI.
He fears the technology could too easily be exploited for use by the military in weapons, putting them under the control of AI systems. His views echo those of people like Elon Musk who have warned recently about the dangers of artificial intelligence.
Professor Stephen Hawking also joined a group of leading experts to sign an open letter warning of the need for safeguards to ensure AI has a positive impact on mankind. Dr Stuart Armstrong, from Oxford University's Future of Humanity Institute, has also predicted that intelligent robots could soon take over the running of countries.
He believes it's a race against time to develop safeguards around artificial intelligence research before robots outwit us. Professor Hawking has said: 'The development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race.'
See here for more about who Ray Kurzweil is and his connections to Transhumanism and Google. See here for more about DARPA guinea pigs, here for more about nano-wires in the brain and here for RFID chips fuse with human brain cells that can be controlled.
2.The people on this site were involved in parroting and online stalking activity: www.partiallyexaminedlife.com it is full of academics from American universities. Many of these people know about Transhumanism and how intelligence agencies and the military are working closely with neuroscience and computer science departments in universities.
14.See here for an interview with Ray Kurzweil where he admits about nanobots in the brain and connecting the brain wirelessly. See here for DARPA Control Grid from official government documents.
Below is more information about the Stanford Research Institute and its connections:
SRI International is an American nonprofit research institute headquartered in Menlo Park, California. The trustees of Stanford University established SRI in 1946 as a center of innovation to support economic development in the region. Wikipedia
