Mind Control- Old Video Clip With Michael Persinger

Below is an old video clip with Michael Persinger, he is one of the leading neuroscientists that has worked with the CIA. For another informative video with Michael Persinger see here. To hear an audio interview with him download and listen here. Read a paper of  his here called "Accessing Every Human Brain By Electromagnetic Induction Of Fundamental Algorithms." You might also want to see this paper here, called "The Mind Has No Firewall." This connects to what I was saying here.

OBAMA’s B.R.A.I.N. Initiative

Obama's Brain Mapping Initiative | A Means to an End  

  

BRAIN = Brain Research through Advanced Innovative Neurotechnologies.

Our road down the path of destruction is always presented as good intentions.  As you will see in this report, this project is no different. The significance of this project as stated in the White House April 2nd 2013 announcement states: 

“The BRAIN Initiative has the potential to do for neuroscience what the Human Genome Project did for Genomics by supporting the development and application of innovative technologies that can create a dynamic understanding of brain function. It aims to help researchers uncover the mysteries of brain disorders, such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases, depression, and traumatic brain injury.”

Let's look at one of the accomplishments of the Human Genome project with respect towards 

advancements in technocracy and trans-humanism.  It has enabled scientists to unlock the coding and sequencing of DNA so they can create synthetic DNA to be used in artificial life forms in conjunction with artificial intelligence by developing 'genetic circuits' to mimic the actions and reactions of living organisms.

Their goal is to map the human mind to create synthetic replicas that will mimic the workings of the neurological processes of the brain in the form of genetic circuits through the use of synthetic DNA.

This represents a quantum leap towards machine driven AGI or [artificial general intelligence] which will inevitably result in the AI singularity event horizon.

With respect to the initiative's claim that it will help scientists to better understand the mysteries behind Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, depression and other debilitating human afflictions, I see however, this technology has a much more nefarious side and as we've seen in the past, it will be used to those ends and here's why.

1. If you understand the agenda of global governance and the push behind trans-humanism, you 

understand that it is not the goal of these megalomaniacs to extend human longevity or improve 

the overall human condition.  

2. In recent history can anyone site an instance where a technological breakthrough was not used malevolently against humanity...nuclear, space-based technology, genetically modified food, weather modification...just to name of few of these technological feats.  Yet we are 

expected to believe that this will be different.

3.  If you have not read my post of the  patents for military and intelligence organizations use in the field of Remote Brain Computer Interface technology and Remote Neural Monitoring you should take a look at how far and for how long they have been fine-tuning this technology.  Their goal, and it's not hard to see when you start connecting the dots, is to create a population of obedient, temporarily useful, biological robots.  Human Network Nodes. (See here, here, and here for more) Also, see here to learn more about the company that is strongly behind this agenda.  

4. This initiative, if successful, will enable the proponents of a global command and control system and trans-humanism to turn living cells into computers. In support of this initiative, Obama goes on to say, “These breakthroughs have paved the way for unprecedented collaboration and discovery across  scientific fields. For instance, by combining advanced genetic and optical techniques, scientists can now use pulses of light to determine how specific cell activities in the brain affect behavior. 

Similarly, through the integration of neuroscience and physics, researchers can now use high-resolution imaging technologies to observe how the brain is structurally and functionally 

connected in living humans. 

While these technological innovations have contributed substantially to our expanding knowledge of the brain,  significant breakthroughs in how we treat neurological and psychiatric disease will require a new generation of  tools to enable researchers to record signals from brain cells in much greater numbers and at even faster speeds. That's where the BRAIN Initiative comes in.” 

Now, I have to say, there's not a whole lot of detailed information out there regarding specifics 

concerning this Brain Mapping program, so with that said, let's look at some of the key players in 

Obama's BRAIN Initiative: 

NIH   [National Institute of Health] 

FDA    [Food & Drug Administration] 

IARPA [Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Agency] 

DARPA  [Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency] 

NSF    [National Science Foundation]....plus the usual suspects from academia, and the private and 

corporate sectors, like: 

Glaxo-Smith Kline 

US Photonics 

University of Berkeley 

The Carnegie Mellon institute 

The Simons Foundation – mapping neural activity patterns 

The Allen Institute – brain perception functionality 

You can go to the whitehouse.gov site and explore the interactive map posted there to review the 

different agencies and organizations that have been identified to work on this program and what their 

specific R&D focuses will be.  [Whitehouse/BRAIN] 

The White House 2013 announcement goes on to say,  “ In the last decade, scientists have made a 

number of landmark discoveries that now create the opportunity to unlock the mysteries of the brain.“ I would argue they are creating an opportunity not to 'unlock' the mysteries of the brain as they 

proclaim, but to unlock technology to achieve complete command and control of the inner workings of  your mind....what you think....how you think...what you feel...how you behave and ultimately, your perceived usefulness by an Archonic, technocratic elite bent on the enslavement of humanity.    

Links: 

White House – Brain Initiative – Interesting info and collaborators 9.30.2014 

White House    Brain Initiative  4.02.2013 

BBN    Synthetic Biology    9.05.2012 

How to Turn Living Cells Into Computers      2.13.2013 

The Human Connectome Project    03.20.2015 

Synberc – Synthetic Biology Remote Brain Computer Interface -  RNM    07.26.2015 

NIH The Brain Initiative  8.19.2015 

Neuroscience and National Security

See another lecture from Jonathan Moreno here.

Threat to the Future of Humanity Became Apparent in 1999 From Advances in Human Brain Sciences

See the previous posts I made regarding the bio-ethical issues of having a BCI (Brian-Computer Interface) and non-consensual human experimentation and brain research here, here, here, here, and here (in the last link, see category 2. under Bioethics on Mind Control, Mind Reading, and Space-Based Weaponry.)

========================================================================

The advances in some areas of the human brain sciences and the possible threats for the future became apparent to Ellen M. McGee and Gerald Q. Maguire already in 1999. They talked about ear- and eye implants but also about more advanced implants and sensors in the environment able to spy on the human being and to control behavior and the human mind. The same ethical questions arising then are still very important today.

Since 1999, the progress in the implant technology happened very fast. It is possible today to connect a human brain to a computer, creating today’s cyborgs.

Technical innovation, scientists claim, are neither good nor bad, but how it is used and the moral and ethical consequences arising from the use of the technology in unethical ways. Today, the technology and its applications are still completely or partially unregulated. There is really not much for laws that admit to the use of this technology, nor that recognize or regulate how and to what extent human brain functions can or cannot be used, leaving a very open and huge range of possibilities for anyone that has its hands on this technology to use it – even when tested on people with more common place implants, like cochlear implants or pacemakers.

Because the brain chips are such a huge research area right now and because so many different kinds have been developed, it is important that we formulate strategies and directions that might be able to at least diminish some of the consequences of this technology and eliminate abuses. Implanting this technology in the human body without knowledge or consent must be prohibited, and at the absolute least, it must become widespread common knowledge that this is happening to people and law enforcement should have the technological means to be able to deal with it in the proper way.

This technology will become widespread enough to be used in normal medicine in the form of nanotechnology or in vaccinations against viruses of any kind. The human being subjected to this must be informed and humanity must know what the technology is capable of doing.

Paradoxically enough, the brain implant technology is getting too little or no attention or ethical debate. At the same time, the potential of this technology to affect human beings and change them is huge. The threat of the implantation technology is in fact, greater than genetic changes or enhancements.

Genetic changes are very much limited to human biology. Creating human-machine hybrids doesn’t have the same limitations. A computer connected to a human brain can share information at a distance. The potential for computer chips implanted into the human brain to change humanity is far greater.

ELLEN M. McGEE and GERALD Q. MAGUIRE (2007). Becoming Borg to Become Immortal: Regulating Brain Implant Technologies. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 16 , pp 291-302 doi:10.1017/S0963180107070326

Original: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=1017164

Mind Wars: Brain Research and National Defense

Brain Research at Stanford: The Law

Are Brain Waves as Unique as Fingerprints?

See this previous article on a similar topic. Also, see this video about the "Neuro" Revolution and Brain Finger Printing.

=============================================================================

When children enter adolescence their brains begin to undergo a series of rapid changes – actually a sort of neural overhaul – shedding what was needed in childhood and adding functions and abilities that are critical in adulthood.

Despite these considerable and ongoing changes, when something in the brain remains so steadily unaltered, neuroscientists take notice.

In a study co-authored by Dr. Mary Carskadon, professor of psychiatry at the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and director of the Sleep Research Laboratory at E.P. Bradley Hospital, researchers have found that most of their teenage study subjects maintained a unique and consistent pattern of underlying brain oscillations.

This observation appears to support an idea, already observed in adults, that people produce a kind of unique brain wave “fingerprint.”