Sunday, February 28, 2016

How Covert Agents Infiltrate The Internet To Manipulate, Deceive, And Destroy Reputations

Introductory note: Below is an article by Glenn Greenwald that pretty much describes what the intelligence agencies are doing to discredit people. Though, because he's a phony cover for the controlled media, (see here and here,) he leaves out how they have technology to influence human behavior, (see here,) or what they call "influencing the human domain." So, the worst of our problems are not internet and phone data collection etc. They also have the capability to kill or maim you from a remote location. (See here for more on this.)

A couple other points to make, Edward Snowden is not a real person. It is interesting and noteworthy that Glenn Greenwald has played an instrumental role in releasing the supposed "classified" Snowden documents. Don't be fooled. No real spy is going to be invited on NBC, by TedTalk or by a comedian named John OliverUnfortunately, it is even worse than what Snowden says because they have access to your brain and body. This is why Snowden is a phony, he is a liar by omission as I say here. He is also, if you can believe it, a character from a book and a movie! It is almost like these lying Zionist intelligence psychopaths are throwing it in your face and laughing at you. They want to see if you are awake to their lies. 

Also, the supposed "Hacktivist" group Anonymous isn't real either. Real in the sense of being a true threat to the people in power. Why? Because only hackers that work for intelligence cannot be caught... especially ones that release videos then put them on the internet and are interviewed by supposed "journalists." You have to understand that it is very challenging to go onto the internet and not be found. Once they find you, they would have your brain and body under constant surveillance. The internet (at least the publicly available internet, including VPN's,) right from its very inception, has always been connected to DARPA, Intelligence, military intelligence etc.

In this sense, nothing has changed. Don't let them fool you. But that's not the worst of it... they also have the ability to mine brains with their surveillance technology. They can set up "thought" alerts from brains the same way they can do with internet comments, emails, or phone calls. Understand that one of the goals of the internet is to find people that criticize those with political and economic power. It is part of a bigger plan. One of creating a global surveillance brain. It's a eugenics and Transhumanist project. (See here, herehere, herehere and here for more about this.) I also recommend reading the article below in light of this extremely important post.

============================================================================

by Glenn Greenwald

One of the many pressing stories that remain to be told from the archive is how western intelligence agencies are attempting to manipulate and control online discourse with extreme tactics of deception and reputation-destruction. It’s time to tell a chunk of that story, complete with the relevant documents.

Over the last several weeks, I worked to publish a series of articles about “dirty trick” tactics used by GCHQ’s (GCHQ is the U.K. version of the NSA,) previously secret unit, JTRIG (Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group). These were based on four classified GCHQ documents presented to the NSA and the other three partners in the English-speaking “Five Eyes” alliance. Today, we at the Intercept are publishing another new JTRIG document, in full, entitled “The Art of Deception: Training for Online Covert Operations.”

By publishing these stories one by one, our NBC reporting highlighted some of the key, discrete revelations: the monitoring of YouTube and Blogger, the targeting of Anonymous with the very same DDoS attacks they accuse “hacktivists” of using, the use of “honey traps” (luring people into compromising situations using sex) and destructive viruses. But, here, I want to focus and elaborate on the overarching point revealed by all of these documents: namely, that these agencies are attempting to control, infiltrate, manipulate, and warp online discourse, and in doing so, are compromising the integrity of the internet itself.

Among the core self-identified purposes of JTRIG are two tactics: (1) to inject all sorts of false material onto the internet in order to destroy the reputation of its targets; and (2) to use social sciences and other techniques to manipulate online discourse and activism to generate outcomes it considers desirable. To see how extremist these programs are, just consider the tactics they boast of using to achieve those ends: “false flag operations” (posting material to the internet and falsely attributing it to someone else), fake victim blog posts (pretending to be a victim of the individual whose reputation they want to destroy), and posting “negative information” on various forums. Here is one illustrative list of tactics from the latest GCHQ document we’re publishing today:


Other tactics aimed at individuals are listed here, under the revealing title “discredit a target”:



Then there are the tactics used to destroy companies the agency targets:


GCHQ describes the purpose of JTRIG in starkly clear terms: “using online techniques to make something happen in the real or cyber world,” including “information ops (influence or disruption).”


Critically, the “targets” for this deceit and reputation-destruction extend far beyond the customary roster of normal spycraft: hostile nations and their leaders, military agencies, and intelligence services. In fact, the discussion of many of these techniques occurs in the context of using them in lieu of “traditional law enforcement” against people suspected (but not charged or convicted) of ordinary crimes or, more broadly still, “hacktivism”, meaning those who use online protest activity for political ends.

The title page of one of these documents reflects the agency’s own awareness that it is “pushing the boundaries” by using “cyber offensive” techniques against people who have nothing to do with terrorism or national security threats, and indeed, centrally involves law enforcement agents who investigate ordinary crimes:


No matter your views on Anonymous, “hacktivists” or garden-variety criminals, it is not difficult to see how dangerous it is to have secret government agencies being able to target any individuals they want – who have never been charged with, let alone convicted of, any crimes – with these sorts of online, deception-based tactics of reputation destruction and disruption. There is a strong argument to make, as Jay Leiderman demonstrated in the Guardian in the context of the Paypal 14 hacktivist persecution, that the “denial of service” tactics used by hacktivists result in (at most) trivial damage (far less than the cyber-warfare tactics favored by the US and UK) and are far more akin to the type of political protest protected by the First Amendment.

The broader point is that, far beyond hacktivists, these surveillance agencies have vested themselves with the power to deliberately ruin people’s reputations and disrupt their online political activity even though they’ve been charged with no crimes, and even though their actions have no conceivable connection to terrorism or even national security threats. As Anonymous expert Gabriella Coleman of McGill University told me, “targeting Anonymous and hacktivists amounts to targeting citizens for expressing their political beliefs, resulting in the stifling of legitimate dissent.” Pointing to this study she published, Professor Coleman vehemently contested the assertion that “there is anything terrorist/violent in their actions.”

Government plans to monitor and influence internet communications, and covertly infiltrate online communities in order to sow dissension and disseminate false information, have long been the source of speculation. Harvard Law Professor Cass Sunstein, a close Obama adviser and the White House’s former head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, wrote a controversial paper in 2008 proposing that the US government employ teams of covert agents and pseudo-”independent” advocates to “cognitively infiltrate” online groups and websites, as well as other activist groups.

Sunstein also proposed sending covert agents into “chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups” which spread what he views as false and damaging “conspiracy theories” about the government. Ironically, the very same Sunstein was recently named by Obama to serve as a member of the NSA review panel created by the White House, one that – while disputing key NSA claims – proceeded to propose many cosmetic reforms to the agency’s powers (most of which were ignored by the President who appointed them).

But these GCHQ documents are the first to prove that a major western government is using some of the most controversial techniques to disseminate deception online and harm the reputations of targets. Under the tactics they use, the state is deliberately spreading lies on the internet about whichever individuals it targets, including the use of what GCHQ itself calls “false flag operations” and emails to people’s families and friends. Who would possibly trust a government to exercise these powers at all, let alone do so in secret, with virtually no oversight, and outside of any cognizable legal framework?

Then there is the use of psychology and other social sciences to not only understand, but shape and control, how online activism and discourse unfolds. Today’s newly published document touts the work of GCHQ’s “Human Science Operations Cell,” devoted to “online human intelligence” and “strategic influence and disruption”:




Under the title “Online Covert Action”, the document details a variety of means to engage in “influence and info ops” as well as “disruption and computer net attack,” while dissecting how human beings can be manipulated using “leaders,” “trust,” “obedience” and “compliance”:










The documents lay out theories of how humans interact with one another, particularly online, and then attempt to identify ways to influence the outcomes – or “game” it:




We submitted numerous questions to GCHQ, including: (1) Does GCHQ in fact engage in “false flag operations” where material is posted to the Internet and falsely attributed to someone else?; (2) Does GCHQ engage in efforts to influence or manipulate political discourse online?; and (3) Does GCHQ’s mandate include targeting common criminals (such as boiler room operators), or only foreign threats?

As usual, they ignored those questions and opted instead to send their vague and nonresponsive boilerplate: “It is a longstanding policy that we do not comment on intelligence matters. Furthermore, all of GCHQ’s work is carried out in accordance with a strict legal and policy framework which ensures that our activities are authorized, necessary and proportionate, and that there is rigorous oversight, including from the Secretary of State, the Interception and Intelligence Services Commissioners and the Parliamentary Intelligence and Security Committee. All our operational processes rigorously support this position.”

These agencies’ refusal to “comment on intelligence matters” – meaning: talk at all about anything and everything they do – is precisely why whistleblowing is so urgent, the journalism that supports it so clearly in the public interest, and the increasingly unhinged attacks by these agencies so easy to understand. Claims that government agencies are infiltrating online communities and engaging in “false flag operations” to discredit targets are often dismissed as conspiracy theories, but these documents leave no doubt they are doing precisely that.

Whatever else is true, no government should be able to engage in these tactics: what justification is there for having government agencies target people – who have been charged with no crime – for reputation-destruction, infiltrate online political communities, and develop techniques for manipulating online discourse? But to allow those actions with no public knowledge or accountability is particularly unjustifiable.

Documents referenced in this article:





DARPA's Artificial Intelligence Control Grid

Must See Video at the Bottom of This Page!

In addition to the video below, see here for more about classified technology and patents. These videos can give you a good introduction to artificial intelligence

It is worth mentioning that everything in the video below is from official government documents. Also, see this here. A quote from the document: "we will see an increase between the "haves" and the "have-nots," and that that the "haves" are going to start seeing the "have-nots" as a potential problem.")


It is important to realize that one of the goals of Homeland Security is protecting the one percent. See herehereherehere and here for more about who the one percent are.


How are they doing this? In a number of ways, one is having a bunch of  "alternative" media websites that are fronts working with intelligence. All of the popular and semi-popular alternative media are a part of the New Phoenix program. What is the Phoenix Program? (See here for a quick video.) It is basically like Mao's Hundred Flowers Campaign. In other words, it is a form of COINTELPRO. (See here for more about Counter-intelligence.) It is a way to bring the "snakes" out of their den. What better way to find potential political dissidents of the policies of NATO and Israel?


In May 25, 2007, the U.S. Director of National Intelligence Michael McConnell authorized the National Applications Office (NAO) of the Department of Homeland Security to allow local, state, and domestic Federal agencies to access imagery from military intelligence Reconnaissance satellites and Reconnaissance aircraft sensors which can now be used to observe the activities of U.S. citizens. The satellites and aircraft sensors will be able to detect chemical traces, and identify objects in buildings and "underground bunkers", and will provide real-time video at much higher resolutions than the still images produced by programs such as Google Earth. See here and here for more. 


They also have access to technology that can find oil and mineral deposits underground with up to 99% accuracy. That includes diamonds! See this ad from Shell and this video here as examples. They can rape the planet and hoard all its resources. (Who do you really think is behind the conglomerates that have consolidated the mainstream and alternative media? The same people that are behind the banks. The financiers and the corporations that sell the resources that are being pulled out of the ground. Incidentally, the FBI works with these corporations too! Many of the large mining companies have access to technology that most people do not know about, like this and this.) This is why Africa is being held down. This is what AFRICOM is truly about.

But that is far from all they can do.  In a nutshell, they can put you under horrible crippling surveillance and they can shoot you and your family with space-based weapons. See here for more about electronic warfare. See here for more about microwave weaponry.

Ever wonder what they do at the NSA and CSE in Canada with Signals Intelligence?  Or better yet, who has access to it? It is pretty much class warfare. It is being used by wealthy criminals against the general public for surveillance, entertainment (reality TV-like torture and voyeurism,) weaponization that can injure or kill someone in a plausibly deniable way, intellectual property theft, drug running, human trafficking and insider trading. 

Echelon is involved in Signals Intelligence. Please also see here for radiation intelligence and TEMPEST. See this video and this video for an example using a computer. It is important to realize that Signals Intelligence covers everything from intercepting signals to surveillance and electronic warfare

Please see Earth-Penetrating TomographyInterferometryEarth's Field NMRNuclear Magnetic Resonance and Electron Paramagnetic Resonance. The imagers are multi-purpose, the imaging transmitters serve to target locations, areas, and living animals with directed energy. There are passive and active modes, the active mode requires the transmission of signals into the target where passive mode allows imaging with illumination occurring by other means like spying through leaking electrical emanations, including unintentional radio or electrical signals, sounds, and vibrations. 

Do you know what else has unintentional leaking electrical signals and vibrations? You! (See here, where the physicist Dr. John Morgan says 2 minutes and 10 seconds into the video, that all natural things emit radio waves. Watch this video with Michael Persinger where he talks about how light and photons can be measured. Also, take notice in this video when the physicist mentions that the brain "radiates" radio.)

What You Are:
4. The human body has resonance frequencies

You also have magnetite in your brain. Magnetite is the most magnetic of all the naturally-occurring minerals on Earth and is also used in the creation of the hard drive in your computer. Now, realize that the earth's magnetic field allows for information storage too, see this video about the Earth's magnetic field and information storage. Learn about magnetism and information storage: same as your computer hard drive. Taking this information into consideration, it can be used with nanotechnology for holography and synthetic telepathy(See here and here for examples of holography, here for more about nanoparticle imaging and here for more about molecular imaging.)  

You are exactly like this says, your mind has no firewall: https://www.docdroid.net/mmsy/mind-no-firewall.pdf.html you are surrounded by wireless communication and that immerses you in the background or the "shadow" of communications systems. So, besides all of us being embedded in the earth's magnetic field, (something that is EXTREMELY important because of the Schumann Resonance and its relation to the brain and the mind and specifically, the Hippocampus which is the gateway to consciousness, memory and information storage. If you access the Hippocampus you can garner all of the information that is being consolidated in an individuals experience.) We are all embedded in a homogeneous secondary field called the communications system, and, much of it is pulsed in the range of the brain. We are quite literally, living in the shadow of a massive electromagnetic field that is generated by our communications systems. 

Beyond this, foot soldier intelligence operatives and criminals have technology that is similarly displayed in these videos that can influence people at a distance. Light can be measured, (photons,) minds can be read, thoughts can be sent. If you can think it, you can send it. Just like writing an email with your mind. Zuckerberg is saying it here, he is just not telling you the whole story. Also see here for another article with Mark Zuckerberg referring to synthetic telepathy. See here for a Cisco ad that talks about this technology.

So, essentially they have access to your vital signs, the EEG readouts of your brainwaves and your brain states to know what you are thinking, the ability to see out of your eyes and hear out your ears. (
See this old clip of a scientist looking out of a cat's eyes. What they have now is even more advanced.)

They can also put thoughts in your head and hook you up to another individual's brain. When engaging in the latter, if an individual changes the EEG of his or her brain,  that individual can change the EEG of another brain that they are hooked up to. In other words, two brains can effectively become one. Also, see this TedTalk video for another example

This is called Total Information Awareness, meaning the goal is to have access to every piece of information on this planet. (See herehere and here for more.) Very soon, every object on earth will be collecting data. So, it would be wise to learn more about big data and artificial intelligence.  


Transhumanist Documentaries That Are a Must Watch

Please also see my past posts on this topic located here, here, here, here, here and here.








Friday, February 26, 2016

Racist Jew to Anthony Weiner: "You are Married to an Arab" @ 03:54 (ish)

Whatever you think of Anthony Weiner, he is in the right here. As you can see here and here, this is a part of the mentality of some Jews. Please watch the video below, and realize  ---- this is all that I am trying to do with all of my posts against Talmudic Jewish identity. You cannot let them call you a racist or an anti-Semite for speaking out against them, they are the racists and the anti-Semites. The reality is, the Palestinians are Semitic. (See here and here about the Talmud.)

What you see him say in the video about Anthony Weiner's wife is a perfect example. What most Jews will not tell you is this mentality is endemic to the state of Israel and Talmudic Jewish identity. See here, here and here for some of my past posts on this matter. The reality is, the same could be said against Mark Zuckerberg's wife who is Asian and isn't Jewish. I would be very surprised if he agreed with a country that would not allow him to marry his wife. (This would be the case in Israel. He would not have been allowed to marry his wife, see this video for more on this topic.)

So why doesn't he say anything about it? Is he bound? Maybe that should tell you something about the truth in the bible and the time we are living in.


Thursday, February 25, 2016

The Future Jewish Utopia

Did you know that there is a future Jewish Utopia in the works? Read this book about the future Jewish utopia.

Many people don't know about this, but, many of the Jews do. The question is, what does this "Jewish Utopia" mean to a non-Jew? What will it be like? 

Well, that really depends on who you talk to. Some Orthodox Jews essentially think that gentiles (non-Jews,) are here to be slaves for the Jews. 

If you would like to learn more about this, I suggest learning more about Transhumanism, (see hereherehere and here.) In addition, watch this video about becoming a human node in a world surveillance network. Also, see this about the problems of Facebook and Google.

The reality is, this is already happening!



PATENT# 6470214 – USAF – Device for Implementing RF Hearing Effect 10.22.2002

I published this in an earlier post located hereBut I think it would be good to republish it once again. Please also see this post hereIn addition, this is also a good video to watch about becoming a human node in a world surveillance network. The reality is, this is already happening.

~Synopsis ~ 


ABSTRACT: 

A modulation process with a fully suppressed carrier and input preprocessor filtering to produce an
encoded output; for amplitude modulation (AM) and audio speech preprocessor filtering, intelligible
subjective sound is produced when the encoded signal is demodulated using the RF Hearing Effect.
Suitable forms of carrier suppressed modulation include single sideband (SSB) and carrier suppressed amplitude modulation (CSAM), with both sidebands present.

(Note: In other words, using remodulated signals for speech from your 'brain map' they can put 'voices (speech) into your head' by sending these signals to the inner ear which then sends them to the acoustic brain via the auditory nerve.)


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION​

1. A method of encoding an input audio signal a(t) to produce a double sideband output signal
having a .omega..sub.c carrier frequency, which when transmitted to the head of a receiving
subject, will by the radio frequency hearing effect induce a thermal-acoustic signal in the
bone/tissue material of the head that replicates the input audio signal and is conducted by the
bone/tissue structure of the head to the inner ear where it is demodulated by the normal
processes of the cochlea and converted to nerve signals which are sent to the brain, thereby
enabling intelligible speech to be perceived by the brain as any other nerve signal from the
cochlea, the method comprising: applying an input audio signal a(t) to an audio pre-distortion
filter with an As(f) filter function to produce a first output signal a(t)As(f); adding a very low
frequency bias A to the first output signal to produce a second output signal a(t)As(f)+A;
applying the second output signal to a square root processor to produce a third output signal
(a(t)As(f)+A).sup.1/2 ; applying the third output signal to a balanced modulator to produce a
double sideband​1 output signal (a(t)As(f)+A).sup.1/2 sin(.omega..sub.c t), where .omega..sub.c
is the carrier frequency; and transmitting the double sideband output signal to the head of the
receiving subject.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the As(f) filter function step further comprises the step of
de-emphasizing the high frequency content.​
 ​
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the further step of suppressing one of the sidebands of the double
sideband output signal is done resulting in a single sideband modulation transmission.

DETAINED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT​

 With reference to the drawings, FIG. 1 illustrates the RF to acoustic demodulation process of the
invention. Ordinarily and acoustic signal A reaches the outer ear E of the head H and traverses first to the inner ear I and then to the acoustic receptors of the brain B. A modulated RF signal, however,
enters a demodulator D, which is illustratively provided by the mass M of the brain, and is approximated, as shown in FIG. 2, (not available) by a sphere S of radius r in the head H. The radius r of the sphere S is about 7 cm to make the sphere S equivalent to about the volume of the brain B. It will be appreciated that where the demodulator D, which can be an external component, is not employed with the acoustic receptors of the brain B, it can have other forms.

(Note: this external component can be wearable technology or a remote receiver/transmitter device such as nanotechnology or brainchips.)

The sphere S, or its equivalent ellipsoid or similar solid, absorbs RF power which causes an increase in temperature that in turn causes an expansion and contraction which results in an acoustic wave. As a first approximation, it is assumed that the RF power is absorbed uniformly in the brain. Where the demodulator D is external to the brain B, the medium and/or RF carrier frequency can be selected to assure sufficiently uniform absorption.

(Note: This 'sphere S' as defined above would be the skull's bone/tissue matter “of the head” )

For the modulated RF signal of FIG. 1, the power absorbed in the sphere S is proportional to the power waveform of the modulated RF signal. The absorption rate is characterized quantitatively in terms of the SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) in the units of absorbed watts per kilogram per incident watt per square centimeter.​

The temperature of the sphere S is taken as following the integrated heat input from the power
waveform, i.e. the process is approximated as being adiabatic, at least for short term intervals on the
order of a few minutes.

(Note: An adiabatic process is one that occurs without transfer of heat or matter between a system and its surroundings.[1][2] The adiabatic process provides a rigorous conceptual basis for the theory used to expound the first law of thermodynamics, and as such it is a key concept in thermodynamics.  Some chemical and physical processes occur so rapidly that they may be conveniently described by the "adiabatic approximation," meaning that there is not enough time for the transfer of energy as heat to take place to or from the system.[3] Coincidentally, 'adiabatic' in terms of data processing and computing refers to quantum computing.)

The radial expansion of the sphere (or the bone/tissue matter of the head) follows temperature and is
converted to sound pressure, p(t), determined by the radial velocity (U.sub.r) multiplied by the real part of the specific acoustic impedance (Z.sub.s) of the sphere, as indicated in equation (1), below. (Note: not show in this report – go to link provided for entire patent information.)​

The specific acoustic impedance for a sphere of 7 cm radius, on the order of the size of the brain, has a lower cut-off break frequency of about 3,547 Hertz (Hz) for the parameters given for equation (1). The essential frequency range of speech is about 300 to 3000 Hz, i.e., below the cut-off frequency.

(Note: They are talking about firing wireless signals which can penetrate the bone/tissue matter of the head in order to create these desired effects.​)

 In the speech spectrum, which is below the brain cut-off frequency, the sphere S is an acoustic filter
which "rolls off", i.e. decreases in amplitude at -40 dB per decade with decreasing frequency. In
addition to any other demodulation processes to be analyzed below, the filter characteristics of the
sphere will modify the acoustic signal with a 40 dB per decade slope in favor of the high frequencies.​

 Results for an AM Modulated Single Tone​

 The SPL (Sound Pressure Level), in acoustic dB, is approximated as 20 log[p(t)/2E-5]. The standard
acoustic reference level of 2E-5 Newtons per square meter is based on a signal in air; however, the
head has a water-like consistency. Therefore, the subjective level in acoustic dB is only approximate, but sufficient for first order accuracy.​

 Below the cutoff frequency the real part of the impedance varies as the square of the frequency or
gives a boost of 40 dB per decade. Therefore, if the input modulation signal is 1 kHz, the second
harmonic will have a boost of about 4 time in amplitude, or 12 dB, due to the variation of the real part of the specific acoustic impedance with frequency. So the second harmonic pressure term in equation (8) is actually four times the power or 6 dB higher than the fundamental term. If the second harmonic falls above the cutoff frequency then the boost begins to fall back to 0 dB. However, for most of the speech spectrum there is a sever distortion and strong boost of the high frequency distortion components.

(Note: An AI system running sophisticated dynamic algorithms can compensate for any 'server distortions' experienced in a signal to signal transference/modulation. A system such as this that sits on a GIG (neural net) that is mapping the Human Nodes on a network can also transmit the signal information instantaneously by satellite to a computer anywhere on the planet.​)

Results for Two Tone AM Modulation Analysis​

 Because of the distortion attending single tone modulation, predistortion of the modulation could be
attempted such that the resulting demodulated pressure wave will not contain harmonic distortion. This will not work, however, because of the non-linear cross-products of two-tone modulation are quite different from single tone modulation as shown below.

(Note: It would appear that there is tech now relating to 'coherent demodulators' ( DSBSC-AM) using a Costas Loop.​2​3​)

Nevertheless, two-tone modulation distortion provides an insight for the design of a corrective process for a complex modulation signal such as speech. The nature of the distortion is defined in terms of relative amplitudes and frequencies.

(Note: The 'corrective process' technology referred to is here.​)

However, the serious distortion problem can be overcome by means of the invention which exploits the characteristics of a different type of RF modulation process in addition to special signal processing.​

AM Modulation with Fully Suppressed Carrier for the Intelligible Encoding of Speech by the
Invention for Compatibility with the RF Hearing Phenomena​

The output of the balanced modulator is applied to a spherical demodulator, which recovers the input
signal a(t) that is applied to the inner ear and then to the acoustic receptors in the brain.

(Note: This is hacking the acoustic center of the brain.​)

The invention provides a new and useful encoding for speech on an RF carrier such that the speech will be intelligible to a human subject by means of the RF hearing demodulation phenomena. Features of the invention include the use of AM fully suppressed carrier modulation, the preprocessing of an input speech signal be a compensation filter to de-emphasize the high frequency content by 40 dB per decade and the further processing of the audio signal by adding a bias terms to permit the taking of the square root of the signal before the AM suppressed carrier modulation process.​

The invention may also be implemented using the same audio signal processing and Single Sideband (SSB) modulation in place of AM suppressed carrier modulation. The same signal processing may also be used on Conventional AM modulation containing both sideband and the carrier; however, there is a serious disadvantage. The carrier is always present with AM modulation, even when there is no signal.

The carrier power does not contain any information but contributes substantially to the heating of the
thermal-acoustic demodulator, i.e. the brain, which is undesirable. The degree of this extraneous heating is more than twice the heating caused by the signal or information power in the RF signal. Therefore conventional AM modulation is an inefficient and poor choice compared to the double side-band suppressed carrier and the SSB types of transmissions.

(Note: So it would appear that this technology can also, at high enough frequencies/power, fry a target's brain. It is also worth restating at this point, that technology exists today to overcome the 'disadvantages' cited above.​)




* * * * * 


The only 1 of 8 images available on US Patent site

Research Links:

President's Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues letter to respondent 07.27.2011
Patent # 003951134 Distant Brain Reading & Brain Wave Manipulation 4.10.1976
Patent # 6011991 Communication system and method including brain wave analysis and/or use of
brain activity 01.04.2000
Patent # 6470214 USAF RF Hearing Effect for skull/tissue penetrating sound
Patent # 6587729 Similar to Patent # 6470214
Double Sideband Suppressed Carrier Amplitude Modulation and Coherent Detection
Journal of Lightwave Technology  August 1, 2008
Demodulation of AM Signals – Restoring/recovering message signal from the received modulated
waveform that is generally corrupted by noise.

1 The standard AM modulated signal contains a sinusoidal component at the carrier frequency which does not convey any of the baseband message information. This component is included to create a positive envelope which allows demodulation by a simple, inexpensive envelope detector. From an information theory point of view, the power in the sinusoidal carrier component is wasted. In this experiment, you will see that it is not necessary to transmit the carrier component and that the baseband message can be recovered by a coherent demodulator. In fact, it can be shown that
a coherent demodulator performs better than an envelope detector when the received signal is corrupted by additive noise.

The type of modulation that will be studied in this chapter is called double-sideband suppressed-carrier amplitude modulation (DSBSC-AM). A close approximation to an ideal coherent demodulator called a Costas loop will be implemented.

Source:  Springer Link
2 Journal of Lightwave Technology  August 1, 2008
3 Demodulation of AM Signals – Restoring/recovering message signal from the received modulated waveform that is generally corrupted by noise.

"Sadistic & Grotesque": Noam Chomsky on How Israel Limits Food & Medicine in Occupied Gaza


Wednesday, February 24, 2016

Was September 11, 2001 The New USS Liberty?

Note: Before reading the article below, one might want to take a look at this article and realize that this involves more than the state of Israel.  The more the terrorist attacks that happened on September 11 are studied with a close eye, the more one comes to the conclusion that this involved collusion with high officials within the Intelligence of the military (NSA) and the CIA. The reality is, when you take into consideration all of the classified technology on this blog that I am exposing, how could it be otherwise? It would also be useful for you to see this article about which group of people are most likely to be terrorists, and this and this on the history of Zionist terrorism. 


Mossad agents, who are equivalent to Israel’s CIA, were actually caught with surveillance equipment filming the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks and subsequently celebrating after the towers came down. When the five men, known as the dancing Israelis, were later arrested they kept repeating, “we are on the same side now, our common enemy are Palestinian terrorists.” They were later released to Israel, and served no jail time. After a thorough investigation, FBI officials concluded that Israel had to have known of the attacks prior to Sept. 11, 2001. The evidence is clear that either Israel knew this attack was going to happen and allowed it to take place in order to increase American support for Israel, or they had a hand in planning it. After the attacks, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, “We are benefitting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq.” He also said, “these events have swung American public opinion in our favor.”
While this may seem unthinkable and shocking to most, those who understand the history of Israel can only view this as a pattern. Israeli false flag attacks date back to 1954 when Israel was caught red-handed hiring terrorists to bomb American and British targets in Egypt with the express goal of drawing the two Western nations into the region to support the Israeli state (see the Lavon Affair). In 1967, Israel purposefully attacked an American navy ship, the USS Liberty, with the intention of murdering every sailor on board and then blaming the attack on Egypt so America would enter the Israeli-Arab War. Israel thought that this “hostile action by Egypt” would get America to change its neutral status on the Israeli-Arab war and form an alliance with Israel to defeat its neighbors. Unfortunately for Israel, a few survivors managed to radio the US command that Israel had attacked them.
The facts of the September 11, 2001 attack are as follows:
Larry Silverstein, a real-estate developer and close friend of Israeli PM’s Ariel Sharon and Netanyahu, was awarded a lease on July 24, 2001 for the World Trade Center buildings for a fire sale price. The man responsible for awarding the lease, Lewis Eisenberg, was a former Vice President of the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Silverstein was originally outbid by Vornado Realty, but they mysteriously pulled their bid.
Shortly after purchasing the World Trade Center buildings, Silverstein realized that not only did he have a one billion dollar requirement to remove asbestos from the buildings, but he was also having trouble finding tenants. After winning the bid, Silverstein inexplicably doubled the insurance on the buildings specifically to cover a terrorist attack.
Right after the attacks he sued the insurance company because he claimed each attack was a separate terrorist attack and therefore he was entitled to double the payout. He received more than $4.68 billion off his original $15 million investment. 
Silverstein admitted in a television interview with Charlie Rose that he had breakfast in “Windows on the World” restaurant in the World Trade Center every single morning in the months preceding the attack, except on September 11th, 2001. Silverstein claimed that his wife had made an early doctors appointment for him that morning. Neither his son nor daughter, who worked in building 7, showed up on September 11, 2001.
More than 1600 Architects and Engineers have staked their reputations and licenses on the line to say building 7 of the WTC was not brought down by planes. The scientific evidence that led these architects and engineers to this conclusion is overwhelming.(see the videos below.)

The Iranian President Ahmidinijad said most world leaders believe America (aka Israel) orchestrated the September 11 attacks, and his statement was later substantiated by the chief of Japan’s Democratic Party who said that 9/11 was a hoax. According to the Anti-Defamation League, more than half of the world now believes that Israel was responsible for the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.

Kroll Inc was responsible for the WTC security, and the owner, Jules Kroll, is a dual US/Israeli citizen. ICTS, an Israeli company, was responsible for airport security at Boston’s Logan airport, which was one of the airports that allowed the 9-11 terrorists on the planes.

An Israeli newspaper, Haaretz, reported that Odigo, an instant messaging service, confirmed that two Jewish workers were messaged 2 hrs before the attacks to get out of the buildings. Odigo has offices in Herzilaya, Israel, where the Mossad main office is located.

Some hijackers originally blamed by the FBI later turned up alive and actually gave press conferences to prove they were alive. Directly after the attacks, Osama Bin Laden said that America had perpetrated the attack themselves. In fact, the FBI never made a connection between Bin Laden and 9/11. See the videos here, here, herehere and here. The last two videos display information about the historical connection between the CIA and the Mujahideen, which morphed into Al-Qaeda. 

The mainstream media has attempted to discredit the movement for a thorough investigation of the attacks from the start. Calling the people who seek this investigation the derogatory term, “truthers.” The Huffington Post, which was recently bought up by big media, even censored Jesse Ventura’s article “What really happened on 9-11.” The Huff asked Ventura to write an article on anything he wanted, and originally posted it on the front page, but immediately removed it after publication.

Now, please watch all the videos below. Also, check out these three articles:

1.  5 Israelis Detained for Puzzling Behavior' After WTC Tragedy

2.  Were Israelis Detained on Sept. 11 Spies?


3.  Five Men Detained As Suspected Conspirators


9/11: Blueprint for Truth - WTC Building 7 - 10 minute
Segment from AE911Truth.org Companion Edition



9/11: Blueprint for Truth-The Architecture of Destruction- 114 min



9/11: Explosive Evidence - The Experts Speak Out




9/11 NYPD Found Suspicious Device Believe A Van
 Full Of Explosives Caused The Collapse



9/11 Fire Fighters Reveal Bombs Destroyed World Trade Centre Lobby




9/11 FDNY Chief of Safety, Albert Turi Describes Bombs
And Secondary Explosions Killing Responders




9/11 George Washington Bridge Incident Full All News Agencies




9/11 AND ISRAEL ALAN SABROSKY'S SHOCKING PRESS TV INTERVIEW 


9-11 Cop Who Arrested Dancing Israelis Speaks




Fox News Report: Israel Spying on the US Before 9/11 - Part 1 of 4


Fox News Report: Israel Spying on the US Before 9/11 - Part 2 of 4


Fox News Report: Israel Spying on the US Before 9/11 - Part 3 of 4


Fox News Report: Israel Spying on the US Before 9/11 - Part 4 of 4



Cheering Israelis, Were They Tracking Hijackers Pre 9/11? 1/2


Cheering Israelis, Were They Tracking Hijackers Pre 9/11? 2/2


Christopher Ketcham Interview




9/11: September 11 Terrorist Attacks - Missing Links

Human Infected With Computer Virus Via RFID Implant


In addition to the videos below, please see here about nanotechnology and catching a potential virus.



Tuesday, February 23, 2016

Can Someone Influence Your Behavior and Affect Your Judgment So it Makes it Harder For You To Tell The Difference Between Right and Wrong?

Click through on the links below to:

1. Morality Study Narrows Gap between Mind and Brain

2. Morality is modified in the lab

3. Scientists Show that They Can Change People's Moral Judgments

4. Watch this video starting at 35:20.

5. Professor Creates Remote Control People (Based on the work of Jose Delgado, see here for bull example. These examples are very crude compared to what they have today. Imagine how the same could be done with nanotechnology: see here and here for more information.

6. Watch this video about using synthetic telepathy. This is classified technology that allows two brains to connect. What this demonstrates is how one brain can influence another at a distance. Or, how you could influence the EEG of another person's brain. What can you do when you change the EEG of another person? You can change who that person is. Effectively, two brains become one. There have been scientific studies conducted that show how a BCI (Brain-Computer Interface,) can change the neuroplasticity of a human brain. This is one of the reasons why ethical considerations plague anything that alters the human mind.

7. See these three patents: here, here and here.

8. Watch this video about DARPA brain implant and guinea pigs.

9. Watch this video that has been put together using government documents and talks about the use of nanotechnology, augmented cognition and synthetic telepathy.

10. Watch this video of an amateur techie driving a remote control car with his thoughts.

11. Connecting Brains: Merging Two Brains to Become One --- Or The Ethical Implications of When "I" Becomes "We"

12. BCI- The Brain Computer Interface

13. Homemade Mind Controlled TV Remote & Controlling Your Computer With Your Mind

14. Human Moves Rat's Tail With Thoughts Alone

15. Gamer - Nanotechnology - Classified Technology - and Covertly Influencing People

16. Watch this old CNN clip from 80's discuss what they could do way back then. One of the people they interview is Jose Delgado and the other is a pioneer in Bioelectricity and Bioelectromagnetism named Robert Becker.

17. See this Cisco commercial admitting that synthetic telepathy, (telepathy with technology,) is possible

18. See here for where Mark Zuckerberg talks about synthetic telepathy.

19. See here and here for more information about mind control.

Do you understand the implications of this and the other documents I've posted?

I think it's important to realize that we live under what some people have coined a  pseudo "Panopticon." For, in a true panopticon you would KNOW the level of surveillance that you are under. But, if you don't know about the existence of any of this technology, how do you know what the truth is in this world?

Think about it for a second. How much of your tax money is going into creating a technological surveillance-dictatorship?