Saturday, June 22, 2013

The Hidden Dangers of Political Correctness

I have to quote what Marc Faber wrote because it's very well said:

 The Hidden Dangers of Political Correctness

"First, I shall discuss Political Correctness. In 1948, Norman M. Thomas, Leader of the US Socialist Party opined that “The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism, but under the name of 'liberalism', they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day America will be a socialist nation without knowing it happened.”

Political Correctness (PC) is the outcome of a distinctive 'turn' in Leftist politics, which became obvious in the mid-1960s. PC is a subjective list put together by the few to rule the many - a list of things one must think, say, or do. It affronts the right of the individual to establish his or her own beliefs. In the 20th century, the contemporary use of the phrase “Politically Correctness” dates from the dogmatic application of Stalinist doctrine, debated between formal Communists and Socialists, during the middle of the 20th century. Peter Drucker noted that, until recently, only Nazis and Stalinists spoke of “political correctness.” It is indeed a purely totalitarian concept. It asserts the fight of those in power to suppress all but the party line's official lies."

Trying to control what another human-being is saying or thinking is the world of this book.


That Is a World That I Refuse to Live In

That book is the one we read in high school, and are taught... (for good reason,) is the epitome of evil. It tells of a world that we should despise... and if being implemented, one we should fight against.

I Completely Agree With That

Any person who seeks to regulate what another human-being is thinking or saying, or how that human-being is acting...  especially if the human-being is on their property, in their house, and they are not physically harming anyone else --- is a person that is described quite well in this book.

They are seeking to deprive a human-being of an environment that is conducive to the pursuit of happiness and flourishing. To suppress it. To hamper it. To destroy it.

If this is your idea of freedom --- and you are trying to impose it on other human-beings, I don't want to be a part of it.


Wednesday, June 19, 2013

Torture and Trauma Bonding

A couple of interesting videos to watch about Trauma Bonding.... after you watch the videos, be sure to read what I've written below them.







Of course, after I watched the videos ... an article went up on this site. (If they take it down, I copied it.)

I'm sure it's just a coincidence... even though I know the people at that site have access to the technology I've been talking about on this blog. It's not the first time they have done that. It's been going on for two and half years ---- and that's just when I noticed it.

In the posts on their site --- they mention my thoughts, a topic that I've been talking about with someone else, or something my family and I are talking about or doing.

Monday, June 17, 2013

"Thinking" About What Some Call Principles

For some strange reason when I woke up this morning I was "thinking" deep thoughts about principles. Maybe it was after what I wrote last night.

Then I got on my computer and proceeded to go over to this website. (I really don't know why... though I do like this article that was recently posted.)

Then I began to realize, there are those who talk about principles --- and there are those who actually stand up for their principles that they "talk" about having.

I also remembered that even those who don't have any principles at least have one principle; they will say and do anything to make people believe them.

Personally, I don't think Americans need anymore people like that running for congress ... there is already enough of them.

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Top Secret America --- Massive Outsourced US Intelligence


Spies For Hire

More on the problems of outsourced intelligence.......







The Choose Yourself Era - Is Outsourcing Intelligence a Big Problem?

I think so.

Is this an example of anarcho-capitalism at work? That's a question I cannot answer. What I would say is this looks eerily similar to the dissolution of the state after the end of the Soviet Union.

The video and the articles below help to make this less CONFIDENTIAL. In other words... it allows you to see it with a pair of "choose yourself" glasses.

So this will have to do.

Imagine if people in the private sector have access to all or some of the stuff I've been talking about on this blog. How are they held accountable?

Can they use what is described here on whoever they want?

Below you'll find two videos about a company called Stratfor. (Also see here.) I'm sure a few people know about them in the financial industry.




And here is another:

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Drowning Ideologies - Israel - The NSA and 911

There are some people who think the state of Israel cannot do anything wrong.

You will notice such people by their absolute silence when it comes to talking about many of the issues I have mentioned on this blog.

If someone brings up such issues, they will either attack a person's character --- or --- completely ignore what has been said.

How to Spot Such a Person:

1. If such a person was a squash player trying to join a squash club, he might act like an arrogant and belligerent ass to the club and then complain that the reason the club didn't let him in was because they were Anti-Semitic.

2. Such a person, if in a position of power and privilege --- might abuse this by using high-tech surveillance (see here,) with his "friends" to look into another human being's brain, and then constantly and covertly berate and admonish that person about their thoughts on his blog.

If the latter mentioned in number two happened to anyone... (it happened to me --- not just by one person, blog, website or media source... but numerous,) that by itself, should be enough to make anyone re-evaluate the truth and state of the world.

As I have mentioned in another post, the state of Israel is extremely important to Christians and Jews. So much so, that they are willing to do almost anything to protect its reputation no matter what it does. This alone makes it the most important country in the world next to the United States.

It is rather funny that Christians support the state of Israel --- a place that denies their supposed Messiah and that's based on racial laws similar to the Nuremberg Laws. We would not tolerate this anywhere in the western world. So why do we allow Israel to do this? At the absolute least, why do we allow our countries to support it?

Why else would the Christian prime minister of Canada say this: "Canada will always stand by Israel" and "As long as I'm Prime Minister, this government will remain very supportive’ of Israel."
(Update: nothing has changed for Canada, Trudeau is just as pathetic, see here and here.)

Now, don't misunderstand me.

I don't think that it is wrong to stand up for a country. But, should one stand by a country no matter what it is doing or what it has done? Or... without questioning what it even stands for?

Off of the topic of Israel and onto the United States and 9/11.

There has been much talk about the 9/11 attacks and conspiracies. Unfortunately, I believe much of what has been talked about is a red herring. For example, one of the popular topics to focus on is the collapse of the buildings.

While there may be very interesting reasons to question if the damage caused from the planes was the ONLY reason that the towers collapsed, I think it's also important to remember that the planes that crashed into the towers and the Pentagon were enough to bring about an atmosphere of fear and paranoia to fuel a country to go to war.

So it must be asked... was there a reason to collapse the towers? They would and could have gone to war from the terrorist attack itself --- even without the collapse of the towers. The collapse of the towers certainly did create more chaos and damage, but I don't think it really mattered. This is why endlessly studying the collapse of the towers isn't as important to me.

What I Think is More Important is This...

Once you understand the level of technological sophistication the NSA and CIA have, you cannot help but realize that they know a LOT more than what they have said they know.

In fact, I'm sure they know everything that happened on that day. Not just a little --- but absolutely everything. Sadly, this is being completely under-emphasized.

All we have to do is look at the way the media releases information about the NSA and the CIA.

They purposely under-emphasize the level of technological sophistication these Intelligence Agencies possess. In fact, I've yet to see any information that talks about the the level of technology that I'm talking about in the mainstream media. The alternative media isn't much better --- they still won't tell the whole story.

Why? 

Because then you would see through the REAL big lie of the military industrial complex... and... they don't want you to know that you literally live in Orwell's 1984.

This has lead me to believe that at the absolute least... the terrorist attack on 9/11 was allowed to happen. As horrible as that sounds.

There is just no way that they didn't see it coming.

Yet, it's always written off as incompetence in the media. I find it impossible to believe that they were not following the hijackers the whole time on that day.

I also think the location of Osama Bin Laden was known long before the capture of 2012. Once again, with the level of technological sophistication the Intelligence Agencies possess, I do not see how it could be otherwise.

Why there aren't more people concerned about this when so many died on that day, and so many have died after .... is absolutely inconceivable to me.

When we see the cost of the increased build-up in security and surveillance, with the loss of rights from the Patriot Act and the results of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan .... what else could it be?