Racism and Ethnocentrism in Israel

See here for a collection of posts about Jews and the state of Israel, I highly recommend you read what I wrote and begin to watch some of the videos that I provide in the links. Also, see this collection of posts about the Jewish Talmud. This is information that is covered up from most people in North America and many other parts of the world. 

“Racism is most certainly present to some degree everywhere, but in Israel it exists deep within the spirit of the laws. It is taught in schools and colleges, spread in the media, and above all and most dreadful, in Israel the racists do not know what they are doing and, because of this, feel in no way obliged to apologize." 

-Shlomo Sand: Author and Historian 

Thomas Sowell & Sam Harris- Among a Group of Liars Who Work to Further the Zionist Agenda...

Very important, see this post about Zionism being a cult.

By Jonas E. Alexis

The Incorrigible Sam Harris and Zionist Group-Think

“The intellectual levels of politicians are just one of the
many things that intellectuals have grossly misjudged
 for years on end…

“…the ignorance of Ph.D.s is still ignorance and high-IQ groupthink is still groupthink, which is the antithesis of real thinking.”
- Thomas Sowell

Zionist propagandists, Jewish intellectuals and even neoconservative shills continue to amaze us all with their “logic.”

What makes it so disappointing and sometimes frustrating is that some of those neoconservative shills do not lack the intellectual sophistication and academic background to follow a logical deduction all the way through.

First, let us look at Thomas Sowell. Last July, he began one of his articles by saying,

“Many years ago, on my first trip around the world, I was struck by how the children in the Middle East — Arab and Israeli alike — were among the nicest looking little children I had seen anywhere. It was painful to think that they were going to grow up killing each other. But that is exactly what happened.”

Sowell could never explain how or why those children were going to grow up slaughtering each other. Leaving that aside, he then proceeded to say,

“At one time, launching a military attack on another nation risked not only retaliation but annihilation. When Carthage attacked Rome, that was the end of Carthage.

“But when Hamas or some other terrorist group launches an attack on Israel, they know in advance that whatever Israel does in response will be limited by calls for a cease-fire, backed by political and economic pressures from the United States.

“It is not at all clear what Israel’s critics can rationally expect the Israelis to do when they are attacked. Suffer in silence? Surrender? Flee the Middle East?”[1]

Can this man be really serious? Does he actually have a phone at the Hoover Institution, where he has been the Rose and Milton Friedman Senior Fellow in Public Policy for more than three decades? If so, why can’t Sowell call Israeli and Zionist historian Benny Morris before he made a fool of himself?

If Sowell wants to bring the issue of Carthage and Rome to the debate and justifies Israel’s perpetual carnage in the Middle East, let us grant him that silly argument and follow it to its own logical trail.

Let us go back to 1948. Who launched a military attack on the Palestinians? Sowell’s ancestors? Perhaps his grandpa? His mother-in-law? Let us quote Morris again:

“A Jewish state would not have come into being without the uprooting of 700,000 Palestinians. Therefore it was necessary to uproot them. There was no choice but to expel that population.

“It was necessary to cleanse the hinterland and cleanse the border areas and cleanse the main roads. It was necessary to cleanse the villages from which our convoys and our settlements were fired on.”

In the same vein, the eminent Israeli historian Shlomo Sand declares that Israel’s occupation “is leading us on the road to hell.”[2] Previously, Sand writes,

“Racism is most certainly present to some degree everywhere, but in Israel it exists deep within the spirit of the laws. It is taught in schools and colleges, spread in the media, and above all and most dreadful, in Israel the racists do not know what they are doing and, because of this, feel in no way obliged to apologize.”[3]

To be quite blunt, Sowell would almost certainly not make it as a serious academic at a major institution in Israel precisely because Sowell has a “bad” skin color or that he was born in the “wrong” family.

Furthermore, Sowell could have been a Palestinian. He could have been one of those Ethiopians who have been treated like animals in Israel. The Ku Klux Klan has evolved over the years[4] and has recently extended its hands to Jews, blacks, gays, and Hispanics.[5] Members or leaders of the NAACP have already expressed interest in joining the Klan.[6]

The point here is that Israel is worse than the Ku Klux Klan in that it continues to display blatant racism everywhere. Sand again writes,

“I am often even ashamed of Israel, particularly when I witness evidence of its cruel military colonization, with its weak and defenseless victims who are not part of the ‘chosen people.’

“Earlier in my life I had a fleeting utopian dream that a Palestinian Israel should feel as much at home in Tel Aviv as a Jewish American does in New York. I struggled and I sought for the civil life of a Muslim Israeli in Jerusalem to be similar to that of the Jewish French person whose home is in Paris.

“I wanted Israeli children of Christian African immigrants to be treated as the British children of immigrants from the Indian subcontinent are in London. I hope with all my heart that all Israeli children would be educated together in the same schools.

“Today I know that my dream is outrageously demanding, that my demands are exaggerated and impertinent, that the very fact of formulating them is viewed by Zionists and their supporters as an attack on the Jewish character of the State of Israel, and thus as anti-Semitism.”[7]

It certainly would be interesting to see how Sowell would debate Morris and Sand on this very issue. Wouldn’t it be laughable to watch Goyim like Sowell arguing with Israeli historians and saying that the Jewish state did not indeed uproot the Palestinians?

It would be so funny to see Morris pulling documents from the archives and indicating that the Jewish state indeed committed genocide and then to see Sowell taking the opposite position with no historical backup.

It would also be hilarious if Sowell summons Israeli Zionist professors like Steven Plaut as his authority. (Plaut even believes that Rachael Corrie was aiding terrorists!) And wouldn’t it show the moral perversity and the intellectually promiscuous cleverness of neocon shills such as Sowell?

More importantly, if we follow Sowell’s political architecture here, the world should be bombing Israel for literally massacring at least 700,000 Palestinians from their homes! Is that the road that Sowell wants to take?

Sowell, as usual, continues his litany against Iran and then says,

“Even if the Israelis were all saints—and sainthood is not common in any branch of the human race—the cold fact is that they are far more advanced than their neighbors, and groups that cannot tolerate even subordinate Christian minorities can hardly be expected to tolerate an independent, and more advanced, Jewish state that is a daily rebuke to their egos.”[8]

Sowell has written some decent books in the past. His books, Education: Assumption vs. History and Inside American Education[9] are very informative. His views on affirmative action are quite correct.[10]

But the neoconservative/neo-Bolshevik ideology has morally and intellectually crippled him. A serious metaphysician, eager to discover moral insight and intellectual rigor with respect to the Middle East, will never take Sowell seriously because his positions are inadequate and out of touch with the historical accounts. Sowell cannot reach his full potential as a serious scholar and thinker because he seems to be (intentionally) blind.[11]

Like other neoconservative noisemakers such as Ann Coulter, Sowell tries desperately to remain a neoconservative shill and a rational human being at the same time, most particularly with respect to the Middle East.

This is an impossible task for Sowell precisely because neoconservatism—or shall we say Neo-Bolshevism—breaths lies and deceptions and hoaxes and reproduces them in the media.

---

Sowell has said some manifestly ludicrous things about Iran and the Middle. But his internal contradiction is so monumental that one needn’t be a scholar to detect them. For example, he declared that

“assumptions are so much taken for granted by so many people, including so-called ‘thinking people,’ that neither those assumptions nor their corollaries are generally confronted with demands for empirical evidence.

“Indeed, empirical evidence itself may be viewed as suspect, insofar as it is inconsistent with [the prevailing vision].”[12]

Sowell has been piling assumptions about Iran without bothering to verify those assumptions from time immemorial, despite the fact that the evidence stacks against him.[13] Why doesn’t he bother to verify the facts?

Simple: you cannot follow the neoconservative/Neo-Bolshevik/Zionist ideology with respect to perpetual wars in the Middle East and still live a rational life. The neoconservative architecture is neither logical nor existentially livable and always ends up getting America into trouble.

---

 Thomas Sowell, of course, reminds us that some Goyim are willing to sell whatever rational clarity they possess for a mess of Jewish pottage.

Some of those Goyim are satisfied with the political price because their masters—the Dreadful Few—are able to put one foot in the rational world and the other foot in the irrational world. Sam Harris is a classic example.

The pervasive inconsistencies and internal contradictions that exist in the writing of this man are so monumental that one can write an entire book discussing them. I have discussed some of them in previous articles, most specifically in “God and the Intellectuals.” But let us discuss just a few here.

When he was confronted with the fact that “Israel is the only power in [the Middle East] to have nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons without being a signatory to the nonproliferation treaty,” Harris said,

“Correct. But this just speaks to the difference in intention that I consider paramount. Do you lose any sleep over the fact that Israel has nuclear weapons?”

Harris missed the point. He could not address Israel’s inconsistency with regard to the nuclear programs issue and swiftly moved to a comfortable territory: if you do not lose any sleep over Israel’s nuclear weapons, then it should be all right.

Is that a logical argument? Wasn’t Harris also trained in philosophy and therefore sound logic? Is it possible that this man superficially appeals to logic when it suits him (The End of Faith) and disregards it when it does not line up with his Zionist agenda?

Perhaps it is time for Harris to pick up the phone and call Israeli military historian Martin van Cleveld and ask him what he meant when he said,

“We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force.

“Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: ‘Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother.’

“I consider it all hopeless at this point. We shall have to try to prevent things from coming to that, if at all possible. Our armed forces, however, are not the thirtieth strongest in the world, but rather the second or third.

“We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.”[14]

---

 Harris, like Jewish psychologist Steven Pinker of Harvard, declares in page after page in The End of Faith that Christianity was primarily the main cause of social and political upheavals in the world, most specifically during the Middle Ages. In Letters to a Christian Nation, he explicitly declares that

“Christians have abused, oppressed, enslaved, insulted, tormented, tortured, and killed people in the name of God for centuries…”[15]

Yet when it comes to Gaza, Harris again has to play the Jewish card. He admitted that Gaza “is a prison camp,” but he prefaced this remark by saying that

“The only reason that suicide bombing is no longer a weekly occurrence on the streets of Jerusalem and Tel Aviv is that there is now a concrete wall separating Israel from the people who want to carry out such bombings.”

When Harris again was confronted with the fact that Israel literally controlls virtually everything that comes in and out of Gaza and that “they occupy and control that entire region, and maintain checkpoints that burden and enrage many of the inhabitants,” he responded,

“The problem with invoking history in this discussion is that you have to decide when to start the clock. You could go back further than 1948—and many Jews would have you go back 2,000 years, pointing to the fact that this is their ancestral homeland, as evidenced by the history of the diaspora.

“The Jews were kicked out of Palestine and hunted and hounded and ghettoized and murdered for millennia—which would seem to justify the decision to return them to their homeland, provided it could be done in a way that wouldn’t ruin the lives of other people.”

I thought Harris was an atheist! I thought he said Judaism “was total bullshit”! Why is he subtly and politically defending the Judaic/Talmudic narrative? This is a central contradiction which Harris himself could not avoid.

It must be noted in passing that this central contradiction can also be found among anti-Zionists who irrationally and irresponsibly declare that Jewish behavior is genetic.

I simply have been amazed to see how people simply cannot see the internal contradiction that exists in their own worldviews. I have spent hours reading what some of those people are saying, trying to follow what they are trying to say, but inconsistency and illogical leap on serious matters simply drive me crazy.

For example, many anti-Zionists who oppose the Khazarian theory relentlessly quote Jewish writers, rabbis, ideologues, newspapers, and even some Jewish scientists in order to perpetuate the risible idea that Jewish behavior is genetic.

What about other scientists who say that the theory is just plain nonsense and is not on really based on science but ideology? No matter: for those people, intent is prior to content. Examining competing theories rationally is simply not an option for them because they are not really interested in the truth.

Without serious thought, those anti-Zionist writers indirectly argue that since rabbis and Jewish writers believe that the genetic theory is true, therefore it must be true.

Yet the simple fact is that the same Jewish writers and rabbis claim that they got the idea from the Old Testament, which those anti-Zionists say is a myth and a collection of fabrication! So which one is it? Those anti-Zionists do not believe the stories in the Old Testament, but what rabbis perversely say about the Old Testament is actually true. Nonsense!

I simply do not know how those people can maintain both positions simultaneously while their heads do not split into different particles. Those people certainly need to get real. They are like those Jewish intellectuals who proclaim that they do not believe in God but they do believe that God gave them Palestine.

Those anti-Zionists are free to live in contradiction and in an irrational and imaginary world, but they are not free to impose their perverse logic upon us.

Until they can rationally explain to us how their ideas work in a cogent fashion, we should not pay attention to them. Nor should we take them seriously in the fight against Zionism.

I particularly have been waiting for a serious writer who can rigorously and rationally explain the contradictions that are inherent in the idea that Jewish behavior is genetic. I’m only thirty-five years old, and hopefully I’ll find one in my lifetime.

---

After Harris declared that the history of the Jews goes back to 2,000 years, which is an implicit appeal to the Old Testament, Andrew Sullivan, the interviewer, was stunned. He immediately realized that Harris was ideally shooting himself in the toes:

“But you are supporting Israel based on just such a religious claim, which, given your other arguments, doesn’t make any sense. Because if Israel-Palestine were not an explicitly Jewish state, as you’d prefer, there would be a majority Arab population—that would presumably, in your view, result in the immediate extermination of every Jew in the country.”

Harris proved that Illan Pappe was right when he said that “Most Zionists don’t believe that God exists but they do believe that he promised them Palestine.”

Harris, as a Jewish intellectual ideologue, appealed to David Wyman’s book The Abandonment of the Jews to support the untenable and historically risible thesis that

“During World War II, with full knowledge that the Jews of Europe were being exterminated, there were anti-Semitic speeches on the floor of Congress. We even turned back boats of Jews who had escaped the inferno of Europe, knowing that they were thereby doomed.”

Sullivan, who seems to have no background in what was happening in Europe during that time, nodded and said, “It’s a shameful episode in American history.”

In a similar vein, David Turner of the Jerusalem Post accuses the Roosevelt Administration of anti-Semitism because it refused to allow immigrant Jews from Europe entrance.[16] (I have interacted with Turner in the past, and the interaction can be found here.)

Not once did Turner mention the complex social issues of the 1920s, such as the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, which was largely viewed as a Jewish revolutionary activity.[17]

During the Bolshevik Revolution, millions upon millions of people were killed, including innocent peasants.[18]

In addition, the Bolshevik ideology, with its Marxist leanings, began to spread like wildfire in Asian countries like China,[19] and wherever it went countries began killing their own people by the millions (We have seen over and over that Mao alone liquidated more than 40 million people[20]).

Not once did Turner mention that the U.S. State Department published a three-volume report in 1931 stating that Jewish-owned German banks conspired to send large sums of money to Lenin, Trotsky, and other Bolshevik luminaries to overthrow the Tsar.[21]

Jewish financiers such as Jacob Schiff in the United States and Max and Paul Warburg in Germany poured millions of dollars into the Bolshevik movement. Schiff is said to have given $20 million dollars to the regime—a sum equivalent to billions of dollars today.[22] Even The Jewish Encyclopedia calls communism and socialism Jewish phenomena.[23]

Not once did Turner mention that the Jewish immigrants who came to the United States in the 1920s and 30s began to establish communist and socialist cells in major universities in the United States.[24]

In addition, when Hollywood film industries were overtaken by Jewish revolutionaries, they began to implement communist and sexual ideologies in their films.[25]

Also, we have seen in previous articles that between World War I and World War II, the pornography industry in America was largely controlled by Jews, as was “white slavery,” or prostitution, from 1880 until 1939.[26] Both were used as a weapon to destroy the political and moral order, and were a huge problem in Germany before and during the rise of Adolf Hitler.

Turner agrees that Roosevelt had several Jews on his staff, including Henry Morgenthau as Treasury Secretary, and even nominated Felix Frankfurter to be justice of the Supreme Court.

Yet somehow Roosevelt, according to Turner’s reasoning, harbored anti-Semitism in private by refusing to allow Jews to come to America from Europe and the Soviet Union.[27]

The sad part is that Turner and others would find themselves in a heated debate with two Jewish scholars and historians who have recently argued that Roosevelt was a flaming Zionist.[28]

Jewish scholars Richard Breitman and Allan J. Lichtman abide by the Zionist narrative as perpetuated by the Holocaust establishment. Yet in their book FDR and the Jews, they produced documents saying that Roosevelt

“acted decisively to rescue Jews, often withstanding contrary pressures from the American public, Congress, and his own State Department."

“Oddly enough, he did more for the Jews than any other world figure, even if his efforts seem deficient in retrospect. He was a far better president for Jews than any of his political adversaries would have done.”[29]

Roosevelt “used his executive powers to loosen immigration restrictions and to promote his own ambitious plans to resettle the Jews of Europe in other lands. He publicly backed a Jewish homeland in Palestine and pressured the British to keep Palestine open to Jewish immigrants.”[30]

In 1943, Roosevelt again "established a War Refugee Board to help rescue the surviving Jews of Europe and pursued plans for the postwar resettlement of refugees. Shortly before his death, a gravely ill president met personally with the influential king of Saudi Arabia in an effort to secure a Jewish homeland in Palestine."

“Roosevelt also denounced organized anti-Semitism as an integral part of Hitler’s brutal attempt to rule Europe and the Western world. Any American who condoned or participated in anti-Semitism was ‘playing Hitler’s game,’ he said in February in 1944. ‘There is no place in the lives or thoughts of true Americans for anti-Semitism.’”[31]

Roosevelt’s mother ended up receiving the “Einstein Medal for lifetime humanitarian service to the Jewish people.”[32]

Roosevelt’s family saw the Protestant elites as “heroes of Enlightenment Europe who challenged the reactionary Catholic Church and oppressive monarchs.”[33]

As governor of New York, Roosevelt “denounced discrimination against Jews in 1930 and backed Palestine as a Jewish homeland. In 1932, he became the first presidential candidate in history to criticize anti-Semitism.”[34]

But the authors declare that “The Bolshevik Revolution of October 1917 in Russia and America’s Red Scare of 1919-1920 led many Americans to associate Jewish socialism with communism abroad and subversion at home.”[35]

Now here is the point: Roosevelt was obviously a Zionist pawn and opportunist who also played by the Jewish card. As we have already demonstrated in previous articles, Roosevelt allied with blood-thirsty monsters like Joseph Stalin and war-mongering Winston Churchill in order to defeat Hitler.

Yet despite what he has done for the Dreadful Few, people like David Turner are now saying that he was an anti-Semite! That is really stupid. And this simply shows how mad some Zionists are. Brother Nathanael Kapner was right after all: the Zionists will not be satisfied until they have total control of much of the world.

If Assad abides by international law but does not support the Zionist state of Israel, Assad has to go and the rule of law has to be abandoned. In fact, Israel prefers Al-Qaeda rather than Iran or Assad. Besides the video below, to learn more about ISIS, see here, here, here, here, here, and here.   

[1] Thomas Sowell, “Cease the Cease-Fires,” Jewish World Review, July 29, 2014.

[2] Shlomo Sand, How I Stopped Being a Jew (New York: Verso, 2014), 100.

[3] Ibid., 98.

[4] For a recent story, see for example Gareth Platt, “From KKK Grand Dragon to Anti-Racism Crusader: The Remarkable Reinvention of Scott Shepherd,” International Business Times, September 24, 2014.

[5] Fiona Keating, “Ku Klux Klan Opens its Doors to Hispanics, Blacks, Jews and Gays,” International Business Times, November 9, 2014.

[6] “NAACP and Ku Klux Klan Sit Down for Unprecedented Meeting,” NY Daily News, September 4, 2013.

[7] Sand, How I Stopped Being a Jew, 99.

[8] Sand, How I Stopped Being a Jew, 98.

[9] Thomas Sowell, Education: Assumptions vs. History (Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, 1985); Inside American Education (New York: Free Press, 1992).

[10] Thomas Sowell, Affirmative Action Around the World: An Empirical Study (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004).

[11] I have written to him in the past asking for evidence for some of his assertions. No response was made available.

[12] Thomas Sowell, The Vision of the Anointed: Self-Congratulation as a Basis for Social Policy (New York: Basic Books, 1995), 2.

[13] See for example Trita Parsi, Treacherous Alliance: The Secret Dealings of Israel, Iran, and the United States (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008); A Single Roll of Dice: Obama’s Diplomacy with Iran (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2011).

[14] Quoted in “The War Game,” Guardian, September 21, 2003.

[15] Sam Harris, Letter to a Christian Nation (New York: Vintage Books, 2008), 23.

[16] David Turner, “The Acquiescence of the United States in the Murder of the Jews,” Jerusalem Post, April 12, 2012.

[17] See Slezkine, The Jewish Century; Carr Hallett Edward, The Bolshevik Revolution (New York; Macmillan, 1950); Stephen Cohen, Bukharin and the Bolshevik Revolution (New York: Oxford University Press, 1980); Adam B Ulam, Bolsheviks (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980); Jerry Z. Muller, Capitalism and the Jews (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010). Many scholars do not declare that Jews were at the forefront of the revolution because this would imply that anti-Jewish reactions would have to be reassessed.

[18] See Robert Conquest, Harvest of Sorrow: Soviet Collectivism and the Terror-Famine (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008) and The Great Terror (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990); Miron Dolot, Execution by Hunger: The Hidden Holocaust (New York: W. W. Norton, 1987).

[19] See Steven Rosefielde, Red Holocaust (New York: Routledge, 2010).

[20] See Frank Dikotter, Mao’s Great Famine (New York: Walker, 2010).

[21] http://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/forrel.asp.

[22] See Gary Allen, None Dare Call It Conspiracy (Cutchogue, NY: Buccaneer Books, 1976).

[23] Cyrus Adler and Isidore Singer, ed., The Jewish Encyclopedia (New York: Funk-Wagnalls, 1901-1906), 583-585.

[24] See Kramer, Murphy, et al, The Black Book of Communism.

[25] See Gabler, An Empire of their Own.

[26] See Gerztman, Bookleggers and Smuthounds; Bristow, Prostitution and Prejudice.

[27] David Turner, “FDR and the Holocaust, Part 1: The President and the Jews,” Jerusalem Post, March 29, 2012.

[28] Richard Breitman and Allan J. Lichtman, FDR and the Jews (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2013).

[29] Ibid., 2.

[30] Ibid., 3.

[31] Ibid., 4.

[32] Ibid., 8.

[33] Ibid., 9.

[34] Ibid., 5.

[35] Ibid., 21.

TWO MUST SEE VIDEOS: Brain Chips and Tracking Chips

TWO SHORT MUST SEE VIDEOS
 AT THE BOTTOM OF PAGE! 

The two videos below and this article certainly don't surprise me. After all the information I'm talking about. These people don't care about you at all. The reality is, this is not even that big deal in the larger context. This has been happening for years. They experiment on people, just like former President Clinton is admitting here.

But also just like the CIA has always done:
Quoting about the founding of the CIA

"In this anything-goes atmosphere, Donavan appointed this man, Stanley Lovell, a Boston industrialist, to break new ground in many scientific and technical fields, Donavan called Lovell his Dr. Moriaty, after the fiendish professor in Sherlock Holmes. Lovell liked the name and posed for this Saturday Evening Post photo. He later wrote of his OSS job, it was quote "to stimulate the Peck's Bad Boy beneath every American scientist, and to say to him, throw all of your normal law-abiding concepts out of the window, here is a chance to raise Merry hell. It was in this atmosphere that the search for mind control began. "

They are doing this to tons of people. They have chips and nanotechnology in the brains of many unknowing citizens right now. I am one of these people. (See here for more about nanotechnology and here for brain-computer interface with synthetic telepathy.) They have the ability to get this into people with a simple injection, (see this video starting around 4 minutes and 25 seconds,) but they don't even need that. They can do it with a virus, just as if you were catching a cold. (See here and here.) Once it is inside you, it spreads. See here for RFID chips fuse with human brain cells and can be controlled. Also, see here for an excellent video about world surveillance and the inevitable problems of technology. This is happening right now. Do you still want your freedom?

The funny thing is, under Bill C-51 in Canada and Homeland Security in the United States, they think they can do whatever they want... even torture people. Remember, they can actually waterboard you in both countries. Yes, even in Canada. But, they don't have to because there is absolutely no point. They can torture you with microwaves from a remote location and find out what you are thinking without resorting to waterboarding by using classified technology.

That is how many rights you have in these countries. If they don't like you, you go on a list and they will treat you like some sort of animal in a slaughter factory. You will be used, abused, experimented on and potentially killed. They will ruin your life so bad that you will want to kill yourself. They will allow a bunch of people access to you and your brain like it is a reality TV show. THIS IS THE REAL TRUTH. There are tons of awful pieces of scum walking around in your country that know this right now.

They are absolutely ruthless. They hook your brain up to a computer, watching out your eyes and hearing out your ears. (See here.) They can also shoot you with microwaves. (See here.) They contact people around you and slander you. They then get people to stalk, harass and follow you. See here for more information about how intelligence agencies are working with drug dealers, informants, and organized crime to accomplish this. Many of them have access to you too.

Some of these stalking and harassing losers are connected to you with synthetic telepathy.  See here for more about this. The CSIS (Canadian Intelligence,) recruiting videos actually show them following people around! It is absolutely awful beyond anything you could imagine. They think no one will ever catch them or point them out. Some of these psychos also have access to the brains and houses of other people.

Think about it... Google Earth is extremely old technology and you know what it can do.

As one example, in May 25, 2007, the U.S. Director of National Intelligence Michael McConnell authorized the National Applications Office (NAO) of the Department of Homeland Security to allow local, state, and domestic Federal agencies to access imagery from military intelligence Reconnaissance satellites and Reconnaissance aircraft sensors which can now be used to observe the activities of U.S. citizens. The satellites and aircraft sensors will be able to detect chemical traces, and identify objects in buildings and "underground bunkers", and will provide real-time video at much higher resolutions than the still images produced by programs such as Google Earth. See here and here for more.

Now, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that this sort of technology will be abused. You have complete control over the lives of other people without them knowing it. It is like amped up reality TV or a game to these demon psychopaths. If you have nanotechnology or brain-computer interface in you, they have access to your EEG, can put thoughts in your head, look out your eyes and hear out your ears.

They love to torture people and make them go crazy. They love to slander people and watch the public pick them apart. This is exactly what they did in Communist countries with political dissidents, they allowed a bunch of gangs and mobs to go after intellectuals and political dissidents because they were the vanguard of the population.

The CIA and Drugs, Inc.: a Covert History

For previous articles on this topic, see here, here and here. It is worth noting that the CIA is the only "independent agency" out of the whole intelligence community apparatus. This is similar to the Federal Reserve bank. They have zero oversight, just as Alan Greenspan says about the Federal Reserve bank in this video clip. One wonders why the founding of the CIA can be traced back to Wall Street. These low life pieces of trash use your tax dollars to do all of this. They are also involved with child trafficking, human trafficking, overthrowing governments that oppose their business interests, organized crime, spying on you and your family, and of course, intimidation and attempting to ruin the lives of political threats. This is done through Stasi-like activities, for example, stalking, harassment and slander campaigns. The reality is, the CIA is not against working with anyone. They recruit people similar to the Stasi. 

By Douglas Valentine

Gary Webb was a good investigator. He linked a drug dealer in Los Angeles, through Contra suppliers, to CIA officers and Republican politicians. His editor let the story rip, and the “Dark Alliance” series made a mighty impact on Black Americans, who saw it as evidence that the ruling class was as racist as ever.

Webb stuck a stake in the evil heart of the national security state and embarrassed the CIA’s contacts in the mainstream media. All of which was unforgivable. Pressure was applied, history re-written, and Webb, in despair, apparently committed suicide.

The irony, of course, is that Webb had exposed only a small part of the story. The fact of the matter is that the US government has always managed large portions of the illicit, international drug business, and was doing so long before the CIA came into existence.

Documented cases abound, like the Opium Scandal of 1927, in which a “former” US Attorney in Shanghai provided a Chinese warlord with 6500 Mausers in exchange for $500,000 worth of opium.

Two years later, US Customs inspectors found a huge quantity of opium, heroin, and morphine in the luggage of Mrs. Kao, the wife of a Nationalist Chinese official in San Francisco. At which point Secretary of State Henry L. Stimson hustled Chiang Kai-shek’s ring of drug dealing diplomats out of the country.

The State Department likewise protected a ring of drug smugglers in 1934, and thus allowed heroin to pour into New Orleans. Two historians said about the Honduran Drugs-For-Guns case: “the defense of the Western hemisphere against the Axis powers…reduced to insignificance clandestine attempts to link the managerial personnel of a major cargo airline to smuggling.”[i]

As it was in the beginning, it is now and ever shall be: the ruling class’s power resides in its control of the criminal underworld; and since 1947, it has been the CIA’s job to advance and protect the conspiracy.

Consider the Federal Narcotic Bureau’s drug conspiracy case on Bugsy Siegel, which included Lucky Luciano and Meyer Lansky, both of whom had provided services to the US government during the war. The conspiracy had its inception in 1939 when, at Lansky’s request, sexy Virginia Hill moved to Mexico and seduced a number of Mexico’s “top politicians, army officers, diplomats, and police officials.”[ii]

Hill came to own a nightclub in Nuevo Laredo and made frequent trips to Mexico City with Dr. Margaret Chung, an alleged prostitute and abortionist, honorary member of the Hip Sing T’ong, and the attending physician to the Flying Tigers – the private airline the US government formed to fly supplies to Chiang Kai-shek’s forces in Kunming, a city described as infused with spies and opium. As the FBN was well aware, Dr. Chung was “in the narcotic traffic in San Francisco.”[iii]

Chung took large cash payments from Siegel and delivered heroin to Hill in New Orleans, Las Vegas, New York, and Chicago. And yet, despite the fact that West Coast FBN agents kept her under surveillance for years, they could never make a case against her, because she was protected by the American military establishment. Indeed, Siegel’s murder in 1947 may have been a government hit designed to protect its sanctioned KMT-Mafia drug operation out of Mexico. As Peter Dale Scott observed, right after Bugsy was squashed, Mexico’s intelligence service, the DFS, formed relations with the top Mexican drug lord, at which point the CIA “became enmeshed in the drug intrigues and protection of the DFS.” By 1950, Mexican drug lords were receiving narcotics from the Lansky-Luciano connection, which stretched to the Far East.

The CIA’s involvement in the Far East drug trade began with its predecessor organization, the Office of Strategic Services, which supplied Iranian opium to Burmese guerrillas fighting the Japanese. This is no secret: General William Peers, commander of OSS Detachment 101 in Burma, confessed in his autobiography: “If opium could be useful in achieving victory, the pattern was clear. We would use opium.” [iv]

OSS chief William Donovan and Chiang’s intelligence chief, General Tai Li, tried hard to control drug trafficking in China during the war. To ensure security for KMT smuggling operations, the Americans sent a team to Chungking to train Chiang’s secret political police force. The head of the team, Charles Johnston, was described as previously having spent fifteen years “in the narcotics game.” [v]

Johnston’s team and Tai Li’s agents worked closely with Chiang’s designated drug smuggler Du Yue-sheng. Tai Li’s agents escorted Du’s opium caravans from Yunnan to Saigon, where the Kuomintang used Red Cross operations as a front for selling opium to the Japanese. In so far as national security always trumps drug law enforcement, this operation was afforded the same immunity as OSS Detachment 101.

After the war, the Americans did nothing to stop the French from importing tons of opium from Laos, and selling it on the black market to finance their colonial war against the Vietnamese. During a visit to Saigon in 1948, an FBN agent reported that opium was “the greatest single source of revenue” for the French.[vi]

CIA drug ops took a great leap forward in 1949, when Mao chased Chiang to Taiwan, where KMT gangsters slaughtered thousands of people and set up a worldwide drug ring. To facilitate this particular criminal conspiracy in the name of freedom and democracy, US officials exempted a subsidiary of William Donovan’s World Commerce Corporation from the Foreign Agents Registration Act, so it could supply the KMT with everything from gas masks to airplanes. This subsidiary was accused of smuggling “contraband” to America.

Some of the “contraband” no doubt emanated from the KMT’s 93rdDivision, which had fled from Yunnan into Burma in 1949. In exchange for launching covert raids into China, these enterprising KMT forces were allowed to grow and export opium onto the black-market in Bangkok and Hong Kong. In the same way the Israeli Lobby blackmails and bribes Congress to achieve its criminal ends, the US-China Lobby attacked KMT critics and launched a massive propaganda campaign citing the People’s Republic as the source of all the illicit dope that reached San Francisco.

To facilitate the drug trade emanating from its KMT army in Burma, the China Lobby raised five million dollars of private money, which the CIA used to create its drug smuggling airline Civil Air Transport (CAT). The aforementioned General William Peers, as CIA station chief in Taipai, arranged for CAT to support KMT incursions from Burma into Yunnan – and thus enabled the KMT to bring to market “a third of the world’s illicit opium supply.”[vii]

When Burma charged the KMT with opium smuggling in 1953, the CIA requested “a rapid evacuation in order to prevent the leakage of information about the KMT’s opium business.” The State Department announced that KMT troops were being airlifted by the CAT to Taiwan, but most remained in Burma or were relocated to northern Thailand with the consent of Thailand’s top policeman and drug lord. US Ambassador William J. Sebald wasn’t fooled by this chicanery, and rhetorically asked if the CIA had deliberately left the KMT troops behind in Burma to continue “the opium smuggling racket.”[viii]

Suborning the Police

The story of the CIA’s drug empire is the biggest cover-up in American history – even though the basic facts are available in books like Al McCoy’s The Politics of Heroin in Southeast Asia and Richard M. Gibson’s The Secret Army.

Organizing the cover-up initially depended on the CIA’s ability to suborn the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, which, as the conflict in Vietnam heated up, was forced to investigate the flow drugs from the Far East to America. Thus, in 1963, FBN headquarters sent Agent Sal Vizzini to Thailand to open an office in Bangkok. As Vizzini told me, “Customs was already in Vietnam, but only under the aegis of helping the soldiers. Apart from that, no one’s making cases in Vietnam, because the CIA is escorting dope to its warlords.”

Vizzini’s assertion was validated on 30 August 1964, when Major Stanley C. Hobbs was caught smuggling 57 pounds of opium from Bangkok to a clique of South Vietnamese officers in Saigon. Hobbs had flown into Saigon on the CIA’s new drug smuggling airline, Air America. Hobbs’s court martial was conducted in secret and the defense witnesses were all US army and South Vietnamese intelligence officers. The records of the trial were dutifully lost and Hobbs was fined a mere three thousand dollars and suspended from promotion for five years. As a protected CIA drug courier, he served no time.

The FBN Commissioner wrote a letter to Senator Thomas J. Dodd asking for help obtaining information about Hobbs. But Dodd was stonewalled too, proving that the CIA is able to subvert drug law enforcement at the highest legislative level in the nation.

Later in 1963, FBN Agent Bowman Taylor replaced Sal Vizzini in Bangkok. Taylor was famous for slipping into Laos and making a case on General Vang Pao, commander of the CIA’s private army of indigenous, opium-growing tribesmen. Taylor didn’t know the identity of the person he was buying from: he simply set up an undercover buy, got a flash roll together, and went to “the meet” covered by the Vientiane police. But when the seller stepped out of his car and opened the trunk, and the police saw who it was, they ran away, leaving Taylor to bust the felonious general alone.

“Yep, I made a case on Vang Pao and was thrown out of the country as a result,” Taylor acknowledged. “The prime minister gave him back his Mercedes Benz and morphine base, and the CIA sent him to Miami for six months to cool his heels. I wrote a report to the Commissioner, but when he confronted the CIA, they said the incident never happened.

“The station chiefs ran things in Southeast Asia,” Taylor stressed, adding that the first secretary at the Vietnamese Embassy in Bangkok had a private airline for smuggling drugs to Saigon, as the CIA was well aware. “I tried to catch him, but there was no assistance. In fact, the CIA actively supported the Thai Border Police, who were involved in trafficking.”

Taylor shrugged. “The CIA would do anything to achieve its goals.”

The 118A Strategic Intelligence Network

Not only was the CIA protecting Vietnamese warlords, their Corsican accomplices, and its private armies of opium growers in Laos, Burma and Thailand, it was managing the caravan that moved opium to the world’s biggest market in Houei Sai, Laos.

In 1991, in Chiang Mai, Thailand, I interviewed William Young, the CIA officer who set the operation up.

The son of an American missionary in Burma, Young had learned the local dialects before he mastered English. During World War II, his family was forced to move to Chiang Mai in northern Thailand, where Young’s father taught William Donovan the intricacies of the region’s opium business.

Following a tour of duty with the US Army in Germany, Young was recruited into the CIA and in 1958, posted to Bangkok then Chiang Mai. From Chiang Mai, Young led a succession of CIA officers to the strategically placed Laotian and Burmese villages that would eventually serve as Agency bases.

It was Young who introduced General Vang Pao to his first official CIA case officer.

From his headquarters at the CIA airbase at Long Tieng, on the south side of the opium-rich Plain Of Jars, Vang Pao conscripted 30,000 tribesmen, many as young as 13, into a secret army to fight the Pathet Lao and its Vietnamese allies. In exchange for selling his people as cannon fodder, he was allowed to make a fortune selling opium. Much of the brokering was done at the village of Houei Sai in western Laos. Pao’s front man was the chieftain of the local Yao tribe, but behind the scenes Young set up deals between Pao, the top Laotian generals and politicians, and the KMT generals inside Burma. The Burmese generals operated clandestine CIA radio listening posts inside Burma, and in return were allowed to move 90% of the opium that reached Houei Sai.

It was a happy arrangement until October 1964, when the Chinese detonated an atomic bomb at Lop Nor. That seminal event signaled a need for better intelligence inside China, and resulted in the CIA directing Young to set up a strategic intelligence network at Nam Yu (aka Base 118), a few miles north of Houei Sai. The purpose of the 118A Strategic Intelligence Network was to use a KMT opium caravan to insert agents inside China. The agents placed by Young in the caravan were his childhood friends, Lahu tribesmen Moody Taw and Isaac Lee. Young equipped them with cameras, and while in China they photographed Chinese engineers building a road toward the Thai border, as well as Chinese soldiers massing along it. Knowing the number and location of these Chinese troops helped the CIA plot a strategy for fighting the Vietnam War.

Once the 118A network was up and running, Young turned it over to CIA officer Lou Ojibwe, and after Ojibwe was killed in the summer of 1965, Anthony Poshepny took charge. A Marine veteran who served with the CIA in the Indonesia and Tibet, “Tony Poe” was the balding, robust model for Marlon Brando’s Colonel Kurtz in Apocalypse Now! Poe also served as a father figure to the junior CIA officers (including Terry Burke, a future acting chief of the DEA) he commanded in the jungles of Laos.

When I interviewed Poe in Udorn, Thailand in 1991, he said he “hated” Vang Pao because he was selling guns to the Communists. But Poe was a company man, and he made sure the CIA’s share of opium was delivered from Nam Yu to the airfield at Houei Sai. The opium was packed in oil drums, loaded on C-47s, and flown by KMT mercenaries to the Gulf of Siam. The oil drums were dropped into the sea and picked up by accomplices in sampans waiting at specified coordinates. The opium was ferried to Hong Kong, where it was cooked into heroin by KMT chemists and sold to the Mafia and Corsicans.

FBN Agent Albert Habib, in a Memorandum Report dated 27 January 1966, cited CIA officer Don Wittaker as confirming that opium drums were dropped from planes, originating in Laos, to boats in the Gulf of Siam. Wittaker identified the chemist in Houei Sai, and fingered the local Yao leaders as the opium suppliers.

By 1966, when FBN Agent Douglas Chandler arrived in Bangkok, the existence of the CIA’s 118A opium caravan was a known fact. As Chandler recalled, “An interpreter took me to meet a Burmese warlord in Chiang Mai. Speaking perfect English, the warlord said he was a Michigan State graduate and the grandson of the king of Burma. Then he invited me to travel with the caravan that brought opium back from Burma.” Chandler paused for effect.

“When I sent the information to the CIA, they looked away, and when I told the embassy, they flipped out. We had agents in the caravan who knew where the Kuomintang heroin labs were located, but the Kuomintang was a uniformed army equipped with modern weapons, so the Thai government left them alone.”

As described by Young and Poe, the 118A Strategic Intelligence Network was the CIA’s private drug channel to its Mafia partners in Hong Kong – people like Santo Trafficante, the Mafia boss the CIA hired to kill Fidel Castro, and protected ever thereafter. The same thing is happening today in Afghanistan, with the DEA providing cover for the CIA and military, just as the FBN did in the 1960s.

Which brings me back to Gary Webb. The CIA wasn’t happy that Poe and Young were talking. Poe was told to shut up after his chat with me, and he did. But Young sold his story to a major Hollywood studio for $100,000. And that was unforgivable.

On April Fool’s Day, 2011, Thai police found Bill Young’s corpse. It had been perfectly arranged with a pistol in his one hand and a crucifix in the other.

Maybe he was depressed too?

And it is seriously depressing, the fact our utterly corrupt government, aided by its criminal co-conspirators in the mainstream media, pretends as if the CIA doesn’t deal drugs.

Doug Valentine is the author of The Strength of the Wolf: The Secret History of America’s War on Drugs, and The Strength of the Pack: The Personalities, Politics, and Espionage Intrigues that Shaped the DEA.

Notes:

[i] Douglas Clark Kinder and William O. Walker III, “Stable Force In a Storm: Harry J. Anslinger and United States Narcotic Policy, 1930-1962,” The Journal of American History, Volume 72, No 4, March 1986, p. 919, note.

[ii] Ed Reid, The Mistress and the Mafia, p. 42.

[iii] Reid, Mistress, p. 90.

[iv] William Peers and Dean Brellis, Behind The Burma Road, Boston: Little Brown, 1963 p. 64.

[v] Milton Miles, A Different Kind of War, New York: Doubleday, 1967.

[vi] William O. Walker, Opium and Foreign Policy, University of North Carolina Press, 1991, p. 177.

[vii] Burton Hersh, The Old Boys: The American Elite And The Origins Of The CIA, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1992 p. 300