Proof FBI Snitching & Organized Stalking Program

This connects right into Homeland Security and the FBI InfraGard. (See here and here for more about InfraGard.). The RCMP is also doing the same. See here for some of the Stasi tactics they use. Also see here, here, here and here. For more about classified and hi-technology go here and here. 

Former FBI Agent Confirms That Organized Gang Stalking is Real: Global News, CTV, and CBC Where Are You? Who Do You Work For? These Losers Seriously Believe if They Ignore Information it Will Go Away!

See here for a collection of posts about mental illness diagnosis and how people in political power abuse it.  See here for CSIS scum following people around, call them up.... find out how sick and full of crap these losers are. 

     Click Here to Read

Also See Here

1. See this important post about intelligence and law enforcement abusing this technology (Women getting raped, videos with a medical doctor)
2. See another doctor confirming that Stasi organized stalking and smear tactics exist. 
3. See my blog with technology here

In the Movies: 

4. Gamer -controlling people
5. Videodrome - snuff and torture
6. Brainstorm - experiencing other people's emotions, seeing out their eyes
7. Surrogates - live through surrogates (people)
8. Anon - see out eyes of people, voyeurs, and police 
9. 8MM about Snuff and Porn

The Blockchain Biometric Transhumanist Slavery Agenda Exposed

 

Watch Video Below About Joe Rogan: They Are Covering Up Torturing People -These People Need to Be Arrested or Hung For Treason

Be Sure to See Below

See here for a list of Silicon Valley individuals. They all know what is going on. Why do none of them say anything?  How Many Were at Trump's Inauguration? They are scum, they know this is happening. They sit on mounds of money lying to ALL OF YOU EVERY DAY.

See here for a list of individuals in the alternative media covering up DARPA tracking nanotechnology and satellite-based torture. These people are all scum of the earth.
Not one word. 

The internet is connected to www or 666.

What is the only flag in the
world with 666 on it? Israel. 

Here is a list of government agencies 

Watch the Video Below!

Watch this documentary, it was made by someone who used to work for Alex Jones. Alex Jones and Joe Rogan know about the history of human rights abuses with classified technology. 

See here and here for a list of these lying pieces of crap. See here for James Altucher the complete lying psychopath.  See here for a list of Silicon Valley scum. They all work for government agencies or they are connected to them somehow.  

All of these people are Satanic human waste, that is what they all have in common.  That is what the video below shows, Joe Rogan is a Satanist. All of them serve the evil Satanic system while they cover up torturing innocent people with nanotechnology via space-based weaponry, satellites, and radar.  See here for other lowlifes in Hollywood (Hollywood means magic wand,) involved in this and covering it up. They are scum.  Here is more about how it connects to the internet and slandering people. 

Here are some CSIS (Canada Intelligence,) videos showing them following people around.  

Here is some information about InfraGard and how they are a part of the FBI, they work with all the major corporations in the USA. See here for government documents about tagging and tracking with nanotechnology. 

The stalking game they are involved in reminds me of Videodrome, the Circle, the Running Man, or the Hunger Games. Check out the links below the video too. 

Lying Weasel Scum James Altucher

1. See this important post about intelligence and law enforcement abusing this technology (Women getting raped, videos with a medical doctor)
2. See another doctor confirming that Stasi organized stalking and smear tactics exist. 
3. See my blog with technology here

In the Movies: 

4. Gamer -controlling people
5. Videodrome - snuff and torture
6. Brainstorm - experiencing other people's emotions, seeing out their eyes
7. Surrogates - live through surrogates (people)
8. Anon - see out eyes of people, voyeurs, and police 
9. 8MM about Snuff and Porn

Loser Joe Rogan with the son of the
 founder of the Church of Satan

The Church of Satan is connected to Jewish causes. The symbol is surrounded by
Hebrew Letters. Samael and Lilith are from the Talmud and the Kabballah.
The inverted goat pentagram contains the Hebrew letters at the five points
 of the pentagram spelling out Leviathan the Sea Monster (לויתן).
See Thomas Hobbes Leviathan, the book of Job 3:8, 40:15–41:26, 
Job 41:1–34, Isaiah 27:1, Psalms 74:14.

The Great Reset Agenda

Also see here, here, here and here. Connected to the fourth industrial revolution. The Great Reset came out a couple months after the COVID-19 issues began. Also, see this book, another one that came out soon after it began.  See here and here for more about weaponizing nanotechnology from neuroscientist Dr. James Giordano. See here for humans will be obsolete by 2025 says evil’s AI cyber life-form ‘Louise.’

See here for activist reveals hidden military ties between Canada and Israel- in regards to weaponizing nanotechnology. See here for targeted individual program is US Special Operations Command’s “Continuous Clandestine Tagging, Tracking, and Locating Hostile Forces." See here for a documentary that covers the history of human experimentation.

PFIZER ADMITS MRNA JABS CONTAIN 'NANOBOTS' THAT PERMANENTLY ALTERS DNA

Connected to the fourth industrial revolution. The Great Reset came out a couple months after the COVID-19 issues began. Also, see this book, another one that came out soon after it began.  

Even David Lee Roth Seems To Know Something..... Still Don't Know Anything?

Read this, this, and this about torture, slander and organized stalking and how it connects to Zionism and Satanism. What does he mean by RUN RITE? See here and here for what it means.  David Lee Roth was also on Joe Rogan's show many times.  See here for Joe Rogan and Satanism. (See here to see him on Joe Rogan's show.) Read his tweet below:

 

The following excerpt from Stasi: The Untold Story of the East German Secret Police: 

Excerpt:

Like a giant octopus, the Stasi's tentacles probed every aspect of life. Full-time officers were posted to all major industrial plants. Without exception, one tenant in every apartment building was designated as a watchdog reporting to an area representative of the Volkspolizei(Vopo), the People's Police. In turn, the police officer was the Stasi's man. If a relative or a friend came to stay overnight, it was reported. Schools, universities, and hospitals were infiltrated from top to bottom. German  academia was shocked to learn Heinrich Fink, professor of theology and vice chancellor at East Berlin's Humbolt University, had been a Stasi informer since 1968. After Fink's Stasi connections came to light, he was summarily fired. Doctors, lawyers, journalists, writers, actors and sports figures were co-opted by Stasi officers, as were waiters and hotel personnel. Tapping about 100, 000 telephone lines in West Germany and West Berlin around the clock was the job of 2000 officers.

Stasi officers knew no limits and had no shame when it came ot protecting the party and the state. Churchmen, including high officials of both the Catholic and Protestant denominations, were recruited en masse as secret informers. Their offices and confessionals were infested with eavesdropping devices. Even the director of Leipzig's famous Thomas Church choir, Hans-Joachim Rotch, was forced to resign when he was unmasked as a Spitzel, the people's pejorative for a Stasi informant.

Absolutely nothing was sacred to the secret police. Tiny holes were bored in apartment and hotel room walls through which Stasi agents filmed their "suspects" with special video cameras. Even the bathrooms were penetrated by the communist voyeurs. Like the Nazi Gestapo, the Stasi was the sinister side of Deutsche Grundlichkeit (German thoroughness.)

Another Video About Hacking Into People

 

The Digital ID Prison

 

More Videos To Watch: Reasons To Not Trust Facebook

Facebook is a complete joke. It is way worse than people think and the scumbag from Hell named Mark Zuckerberg knows it. For more information about Facebook see here, here and here. See here and here for the Jewish hand behind the internet and here for a list of Silicon Valley and computer entrepreneurs who know about classified technology but keep their mouths shut.

A Quote From Thomas Jefferson About the Jews (Hi Gad Saad and Travis Pangburn)

No one is perfect, certainly not Thomas Jefferson, but what did he see in some Jews that was questionable? Are we allowed to talk about this? Or, are your people eternally innocent and perfect all of the time? We always hear about all the problems of Christians and Muslims.  (By the way, Jordan Peterson, who blocked me, even sent a message out to the Muslims and the Christians. Where was the message for the Jews, Jordan?) 

Both of you (Gad and Travis,) are supposedly atheists, so what exactly are you two defending?  Travis, you are covering up spying technology, (along with others,) and individuals being attacked, tortured, and spied upon with classified technology for exercising their freedom of speech, what do you do besides promote debates? 


" [Some New England federalists] are marked, like the Jews, with such a perversity of character, as to constitute, from that circumstance, the natural division of our parties."  - Thomas Jefferson


See here for the political writings of Thomas Jefferson for the source. 

People Fear the Jews For Their Power

No one had the courage to speak favorably about him in public, for they were afraid of getting in trouble with the Jewish leaders - John 7:13

Israeli says to American stopped by Israeli police: “The Godly thing to do is to kill you.

Video From 1995 Talking About Mind Control and Vaccines

This Got Me Blocked From Jordan "Struggles With God" Peterson Twitter "X" Account - Screenshots For Everyone to See

 First off, a video of Jordan Peterson having dinner with Ben Shapiro and Benjamin Netanyahu. Also see this past post of someone in the Netanyahu government blocking my Twitter account before it was taken down. (I had no idea who she was.) Jordan Peterson works for the Daily Wire.  (See here for an article about the differences Candice Owens had with the Daily Wire regarding Israel. )

For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? Or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul? - Mark 8:36-37

This is when Jordan Peterson boldly (cowardly?) called for the massacre of Palestinians after Oct. 7.

Nimrod Vax -See Pictures Below

His company is an American company with engineering in Israel. See here, here, and here.

It definitely connects to the World Economic Forum.  Look up who Nimrod is. 

Why the United States Can Never Stop Israel

 Also see here. 

These Israeli Protesters Are Blocking Aid To STARVE Gaza

 

Learn More About Israel and Politics in the United States (Including the Failure of the Republican and Democratic Party)

 

Must See: Video of Jewish Doctor Talking About the Horror in Gaza

 Video of Jewish Doctor
Talking About the Horror in Gaza

Is Zionism / Jewish Nationalism a Political Cult?

By Juan Cole

Liberal politics in the broad sense, in the tradition of Locke, Voltaire, Madison, Jefferson and John Stuart Mill, is rooted in a conviction that vigorous debate clarifies issues and makes for better public policy over time. This principle is often misunderstood by political partisans, who confuse analytical disagreement with simply being contrarian and hurling insults.

The opposite of liberal debate and analytical argument is the cult. Sociologists of religion sometimes shy away from that word nowadays, feeling that it has been appropriated by the tabloids and become pejorative. But it has an important place in the history of the modern sociology of religion and I think it should be used, but defined carefully.

I define a cult as an organization characterized by very high demands for obedience by the leaders, complete intolerance of dissent, secretive whisper campaigns against dissidents, dishonest destruction of reputations, and shunning and excommunication as social control mechanisms. It will be objected that all churches have some of these characteristics. But cultness is on a spectrum. Some organizations are high on a cult scale, some are much lower.

There are also political cults. Stalinism and Baathism are both political cults in this sense.

And, it is clear to me that some devotees of Jewish nationalism or Zionism practice their politics in a cult-like manner. I am not a fan of nationalism. I think most of its premises are frankly stupid. There are no “peoples” in the sense that romantic nationalists used the term. No “peoples” are tied to a land or territory. There is no such thing as a national character. People switch out their languages (the ancestors of most Americans did not speak English; the Mongolians of central Afghanistan, the Hazaras, are now Persian-speaking Shiites). I don’t think making Judaism the basis for nationalist zealotry is a good idea, and most American Jews were appalled by the idea for most of the first half of the twentieth century. It isn’t worse than other nationalisms. It mostly isn’t much better. But when it is practiced as a political cult it is truly objectionable.

In Liberal politics (which includes modern conservatism of the William Buckley sort), if you make an argument, you can expect a counter-argument and a debate. In a political cult, if you make an argument you can expect to be smeared, undermined, and if possible destroyed professionally. Cults are extremely destructive, whether religious or political. They insist that the leader and the organization be exempt from criticism.

That so many Jewish nationalists insist that it is not legitimate ever to criticize anything Israel does is a clear sign of political cultism. It is the same mindset that American Communists had in the 1930s about Josef Stalin and the Soviet Union.

So a considered examination of the Israeli government’s Gaza War might conclude that disproportionate force was deployed, and that the army showed reckless disregard for civilian life.

By no means, all Jewish nationalists would be unwilling to debate these points rationally. But very large numbers are not willing, and they respond to this perfectly legitimate argument with abuse. The author of the argument is, they allege, a racialist bigot. He or she is purveying a Protocols of the Elders of Zion conspiracy theory. Others contradict without arguing. Or he or she is questioning the right of Israel to exist (they don’t specify the national borders). They mouth slogans such as that the Israeli army is the most humane in the world, or that Hamas is to blame for civilian deaths even when Israeli bombs do the killing. Some even hint at violence (a Jewish dissident wrote me recently, fearful of thuggish tactics of the Jewish Defense League– an organization classed by the FBI as having been the major source of domestic terrorism in the US 1965-1980). And perhaps worst of all, they secretly compile and send around a dossier to the employer of the author of the argument, seeking to have the person fired.

Of course, all nationalism is somewhat intolerant. The Dixie Chicks got into trouble for disavowing the Bush administration and its war of aggression in Iraq. But in a Liberal society, nationalism’s worst excesses are curbed by a rule of law. People are not punished for making arguments in public in a free society, assuming they are not libelous (and a truly free society needs to avoid having political libel on the books).

All this is prelude to my condemnation of of the University of Illinois for firing Steven Salaita, apparently for his Twitter feed! Professor Salaita said some provocative things during the war, but none of them are indefensible in rational debate. When asked about organized religion, Voltaire said “Crush the infamous thing!” Jefferson advocated an American revolution every 25 years, which would have gotten him in trouble with today’s FBI. Etc. Are there lines that shouldn’t be crossed? Sure, but they should bad arguments based on shoddy research that people in the field have a consensus as being bad.

Vijay Prashad, now at the American University of Beirut but previously at Trinity, wrote on Facebook:

“But I do know that twice, the Anti-Defamation League and the Jewish Community Relations Council of the Jewish Federation came to see my college president to have me removed from some administrative positions I held because they argued that I was an anti-Semite based on my role in the BDS movement (I am fortunate that the outgoing president at Trinity sent me all the emails before he left). I’ve been slowing reading through them — it is astounding how these organizations held private meetings with the president about my role on campus, and the administration at no point asked me to meet with them, or at no point did they wish to meet with me. It was an attempt to get me out behind closed doors.”

He later saw emails detailing the skullduggery.

I strongly suspect that Zionist organizations pressured the university to fire Professor Salaita. But note that they did not engage him in a public debate. They went into the halls of power behind the scenes. We saw this a few years ago with Norman Finkelstein. This behavior is undemocratic and cult-like, and it is unacceptable in a Liberal society. We also see Jewish nationalists on the bench, in public office, and in high administrative positions who misuse their public position to engage in a sectarian vendetta so as to protect Israel from criticism or to punish its critics. That behavior is unethical. US law and the US constitution should guide the decision-making of public servants, not narrow and idiosyncratic commitments. Would it be all right for a judge of Serbian ancestry to throw the book at a Croatian-American defendant?

Universities are places for argument and debate. If Salaita says challenging things, he should be debated on them. He has been saying such things for a long time, so they should have been known when he was hired. But academic hiring and firing in any case should be based on academic writing, not on Twitter! Will we next be promoting people to academic positions because they sent out flattering tweets about their president or dean?

Issues in decorum are legitimately taken account of in decisions about whether to promote someone to an administrative post at a university. But professors should argue, and sometimes they may argue provocatively, deploying rhetorical devices like hyperbole. We have a tenure system to make sure that academic debate is not punished, and I believe that it is important to the republic and its democratic values that this be so. Our journalists are often muzzled by the corporations for which they work. Likewise, businesses often maintain that they can fire employees for taking political stances that embarrass the business. Much of America cannot in fact exercise free speech, for fear of economic reprisals, despite constitutional guarantees. That is not right, but at least in academia it is difficult to just fire someone for making a public argument. But sometimes the dirty deed can be done, with regard to the untenured or to those with an outside offer who are moving between tenured positions. It is a shameful business.