Monday, August 15, 2016

Meet Hillary’s # 1 Campaign Donor, Israeli Billionaire Haim Saban - Saban, a long-time supporter and donor of many pro-Jewish and Israel causes, has stated his main goal in multiple interviews: “I’m a one-issue guy, and my issue is Israel.”

Introductory Note: I have already written extensively on Donald Trump and his connections to what I believe is the Israeli and Jewish right, (see here, here and here,) now we can look at Hillary Clinton and what is left of the left-wing in the United States. I say this sarcastically, because essentially the Democrats and the Republicans have become one giant party, give or take a few policy points. I have already posted once about Hillary here, now read the article below.

Hillary Clinton has gone all in to win US Presidency and is using foreign donors to do it making a special deal with one issue guy Israeli Haim Saban
Hillary Clinton, Israeli Haim Saban, Israeli Minister Tzipi Livni at the Saban Forum in Washington, D.C

Haim Saban is an Israeli media proprietor, investor, philanthropist, musician, record, film & television producer.
An accomplished businessman primarily involved with business interests pertaining to financial services, entertainment, and media, and an estimated net worth of $3 billion, he is ranked by Forbes as the 143rd richest person in America.
Saban is the founder of Saban Entertainment, producer and distributor of children’s television programs in the US such as Power Rangers. He headed up consortiums which purchased the broadcasters ProSiebenSat.1 Media and Univision Communications. He is a major donor to the US Democratic Party and active in pro-Israel political efforts in the US.


Early Life


Saban was born to a Jewish family in AlexandriaEgypt, in 1944. In 1956, the Saban family immigrated to Israel along with most of the Egyptian Jewish community.
Saban was sent to a Youth Aliyah boarding school. Expelled for being a troublemaker, he enrolled in a night school where the principal told him: “You’re not cut out for academic studies; you’re cut out for making money.”
Saban is married to Cheryl Lynn (Flor) Saban, with whom he has two children. He also has two stepchildren, Tifany andHeidi Lenhart. He resides in Beverly HillsCalifornia.
Saban started his career in 1966 as a bass player and manager with the rock band The Lions of Judah (Ha’arayot).
In 1969, Dave Watts from the British band The Tornados joined The Lions. That year, the band traveled to England, performed in night clubs in London and was signed up by Polydor Records.
In July 1969, the band appeared on the BBC TV programme Colour Me Pop. The Lions recorded a single, “Our Love’s A Growing Thing”, but it was not released in the UK due to financial difficulties. The band returned to Israel and Saban focused on being a music promoter.
In the early 1970s, Saban moved to France where he worked as a music producer. His clients included Noam KanielMike Brant and Shuki & Aviva. He also launched a record company with Shuki Levy.
In 1978 and 1982, Saban used the pseudonym Kussa for music/lyrics writing credits on four records for which he also served as producer using his real name. Since then, he has frequently used the name Kussa Mahchi for his composing credits on Saban Entertainment productions, including the Mighty Morphin Power Rangers: The Movie theme song.

Saban Entertainment


In the United States, he became a television producer, founding Saban Entertainment in 1988.[13] During that time, Haim Saban and partner Shuki Levy became known for soundtrack compositions for children’s television programs of the 1980s. Although Levy and Saban composed for their own properties (such as Kidd Video and Maple Town), they scored for other production companies as well (such as Inspector GadgetThe Mysterious Cities of GoldM.A.S.K.DinosaucersDragon QuestHe-Man and the Masters of the UniverseShe-Ra: Princess of Power, and Jayce and the Wheeled Warriors).
In 1998, The Hollywood Reporter reported that he did not actually compose all the music (totalling 3,700 works in 2008) he is credited for; ten composers threatened to sue and Saban settled out of court.
In the 1990s, Saban’s company became best known for the production of Power RangersMasked RiderVR Troopersand Big Bad Beetleborgs, which were Western adaptations of Japanese tokusatsu shows.

Hillary Clinton To Hold Fundraiser in Tel Aviv May 17


ABC Family


On July 23, 2001, Saban announced that he and News Corporation would sell Fox Family Worldwide Inc for $5.3 billion to The Walt Disney Company. and on October 24, 2001, the sale was completed and the network was renamed ABC Family. Saban profited about $1.6 billion from this sale.


ProSiebenSat.1


In August 2003, Saban led a consortium, which acquired a controlling stake in the straggling ProSiebenSat.1 Media group from the Kirch Media Group, the then-bankrupt German media conglomerate.
ProSiebenSat.1, is Germany’s largest commercial television broadcasting company, which owns five German TV channels, including ProSieben and SAT.1, two of the top three stations in Germany. Collectively, ProSiebenSat.1’s channels represented approximately 45% of the German TV advertising market at the time. Saban’s ProSiebenSat.1 acquisition was the first time a foreigner took control of a significant German Media company.
Saban oversaw a successful business turnaround of ProSiebenSat.1, recruiting former business rivals, ex-BSkyB chief executive Tony Ball and former BBC Director General Greg Dyke to the board of the company.
In March 2007, Saban Capital Group and the consortium sold its controlling interest in ProSiebenSat.1 to KKR andPermira, for 22.40 euros a share after originally paying 7.5 euros per share in 2003.
From left: Tzipi Livni, Hillary Clinton, Haim Saban and Isaac Herzog


Univision


On June 27, 2006, Saban Capital Group led a group of investors bidding for Univision Communications, the largest Spanish-language media company in the United States.
Other investors in the Saban-led group were Texas Pacific Group of Fort Worth, Texas and Thomas H. Lee Partners. The group was successful in acquiring Univision with a bid valued at $13.7 billion (USD).


Political views and fundraising



Saban says his greatest concern is to protect Israel. At a conference in Israel, Saban described his formula. His three ways to influence American politics were: make donations to political parties, establish think tanks, and control media outlets.
Saban became involved in politics in the mid-1990s when he felt that support for Israel was slipping in the United States. He says his views have shifted over the years: “I used to be a real leftist. I remember Ariel Sharon [the leader of Israel’s right-wing Likud Party] coming here, to my house, a few months before Camp David, when he was still leader of the opposition. He told me there would be no deal because [Yassir] Arafat would not sign. I told myself that there was nothing to be done – these right-wingers were simply insane. I had no doubt that there would be a deal and the problems would be resolved. History proved that Sharon was right and I was wrong. In matters relating to security, that moved me to the right. Very far to the right…When there is a terrorist attack, I am [Avigdor] Lieberman. Sometimes to the right of Lieberman. For two days I really love Lieberman. But afterward I come back to reality. Look, I don’t see a solution today.”
Saban has been a generous and consistent donor to the United States Democratic Party according to his mandatory Federal Election Commission filings. Mother Jones, in an analysis of the major donors to the campaigns of 1998 election cycle, ranked Saban 155th among individual donors. Amy Paris noted that Saban’s Clinton-era “generosity did not go unrewarded. During the Clinton administration, the entertainment executive served on the President’s Export Council, advising the White House on trade issues.” The New York Times reported that Haim and his wife “slept in the White House several times during President Clinton’s two terms.” Saban remains close friends with the former President. Clinton described Saban as a “very good friend and supporter.” Saban contributed between $5 million to $10 million to the William J. Clinton Foundation.
During the 2000 presidential election, Saban increased his rank to 5th among individual donors with a combined contribution of $1,250,500. Matthew Yglesias wrote that “Saban was the largest overall contributor to the Democratic National Committee during the 2001–2002 cycle.”  Saban’s donations during that 2001–2002 period exceeded $10 million, the largest donation the DNC has received from a single source up to that time.
In September 2004, Hillary Clinton described Saban as a very good friend, supporter and adviser: “I am grateful for his commitment to Israel, to a just and lasting peace in the Middle East and to my foundation’s work, particularly on reconciliation issues.”
In May 2007, Haim publicly declared his support for Clinton in 2008 presidential election.
In June 2007, Saban and Steven Spielberg co-hosted a Hillary Clinton fundraiser at the house of Peter Chernin, the President of News Corporation.[According to the Los Angeles Times, the fundraiser brought in over $850,000.
In March 2008, Saban was among a group of major Jewish donors to sign a letter to Democratic Party house leader Nancy Pelosi warning her to “keep out of the Democratic presidential primaries.”The donors, who “were strong supporters of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton presidential campaign”, “were incensed by a March 16 interview in which Pelosi said that party ‘superdelegates‘ should heed the will of the majority in selecting a candidate.”The letter to Pelosi stated the donors “have been strong supporters of the DCCC” and implied, according to The Jewish Telegraphic Agency, that Pelosi could lose their financial support in important upcoming congressional elections.
On May 19, 2008, it was reported that Haim Saban had “offered $1 million to the Young Democrats of America during a phone conversation in which he also pressed for the organization’s two uncommitted superdelegates to endorse Hillary Clinton as the Democratic nominee for president.”
Saban has also made donations to members of the Republican Party including a 2003 contribution to George W. Bush‘s 2004 re-election campaign.

Saban Center for Middle East Policy


In 2002 Saban provided an initial grant of 13 million USD and a pledge of additional funds to create the Saban Center for Middle East Policy, a foreign policy think tank based in Washington, D.C.. The Saban Center is part of the larger Brookings Institution think tank.[29] The Saban Center aims to provide policy makers in government with information and analysis regarding America’s foreign policy in the Middle East. Saban recruited Martin Indyk to direct the center.
Haim Saban discussed his views on the Middle East and Persian Gulf region in great detail in a 2006 interview with Haaretz. Particularly notable were his comments regarding Iran: “When I see Ahmadinejad, I see Hitler. They speak the same language. His motivation is also clear: the return of the Mahdi is a supreme goal. And for a religious person of deep self-persuasion, that supreme goal is worth the liquidation of five and a half million Jews. We cannot allow ourselves that. Nuclear weapons in the hands of a religious leadership that is convinced that the annihilation of Israel will bring about the emergence of a new Muslim caliphate? Israel cannot allow that. This is no game. It’s truly an existential danger.”

Saban National Political Leadership Training Seminar


Saban sponsors the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee’s Saban National Political Leadership Training Seminar, a series of semiannual seminars in Washington to provide college student activists for three days of intensive pro-Israel advocacy training.[31] The seminars provide up to 300 students from a hundred campuses with training in order to “prepare for challenges and opportunities on their campuses and [the students] left Washington prepared to mobilize for legislative and electoral impact during the next school year and into campaign ’08.”Among the prominent figures to have addressed the seminars are Senator Evan Bayh and Congressman Mark Kirk and academics David Makovsky, Robert Satloff andDennis Ross.

Jane Harman AIPAC controversy


Regarding Jane Harman AIPAC Controversy, in April 2009, New York Times, quoting anonymous sources, said a caller promised her that Saban would withhold campaign contributions to Representative Nancy Pelosi if she did not select Ms. Harman for the intelligence post.”

California redistricting


In 2005, Saban spent $100,000 to oppose California’s 2005 Proposition 77 redistricting reform. Saban contributed $100,000 to pass California’s 2008 redistricting reform, Proposition 11, which created a Citizens Redistricting Commission to redraw California’s state political boundaries, but not U.S. Congressional districts. Saban contributed $2,000,000 to supportProposition 27, California’s proposed 2010 repeal of Proposition 11, the 2008 redistricting reform – the same reform that Haim Saban previously supported with a $100,000 contribution. He joined list of other well-connected, big-money donors to the Democratic Party in supporting Proposition 27.


Philanthropy


In 2007, Saban donated $14 million to complete the children’s hospital at Soroka Medical Center.
Saban, a long-time supporter and donor of many pro-Jewish and Israel causes, has stated his main goal in multiple interviews: “I’m a one-issue guy, and my issue is Israel.”

Saturday, August 13, 2016

OBAMA’s B.R.A.I.N. Initiative

Obama's Brain Mapping Initiative | A Means to an End  

  
BRAIN = Brain Research through Advanced Innovative Neurotechnologies.

Our road down the path of destruction is always presented as good intentions.  As you will see in this report, this project is no different. The significance of this project as stated in the White House April 2nd 2013 announcement states: 

“The BRAIN Initiative has the potential to do for neuroscience what the Human Genome Project did for Genomics by supporting the development and application of innovative technologies that can create a dynamic understanding of brain function. It aims to help researchers uncover the mysteries of brain disorders, such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases, depression, and traumatic brain injury.”

Let's look at one of the accomplishments of the Human Genome project with respect towards 
advancements in technocracy and trans-humanism.  It has enabled scientists to unlock the coding and sequencing of DNA so they can create synthetic DNA to be used in artificial life forms in conjunction with artificial intelligence by developing 'genetic circuits' to mimic the actions and reactions of living organisms.

Their goal is to map the human mind to create synthetic replicas that will mimic the workings of the neurological processes of the brain in the form of genetic circuits through the use of synthetic DNA.

This represents a quantum leap towards machine driven AGI or [artificial general intelligence] which will inevitably result in the AI singularity event horizon.

With respect to the initiative's claim that it will help scientists to better understand the mysteries behind Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, depression and other debilitating human afflictions, I see however, this technology has a much more nefarious side and as we've seen in the past, it will be used to those ends and here's why.

1. If you understand the agenda of global governance and the push behind trans-humanism, you 
understand that it is not the goal of these megalomaniacs to extend human longevity or improve 
the overall human condition.  

2. In recent history can anyone site an instance where a technological breakthrough was not used malevolently against humanity...nuclear, space-based technology, genetically modified food, weather modification...just to name of few of these technological feats.  Yet we are 
expected to believe that this will be different.

3.  If you have not read my post of the  patents for military and intelligence organizations use in the field of Remote Brain Computer Interface technology and Remote Neural Monitoring you should take a look at how far and for how long they have been fine-tuning this technology.  Their goal, and it's not hard to see when you start connecting the dots, is to create a population of obedient, temporarily useful, biological robots.  Human Network Nodes. (See herehere, and here for more) Also, see here to learn more about the company that is strongly behind this agenda.  

4. This initiative, if successful, will enable the proponents of a global command and control system and trans-humanism to turn living cells into computers. In support of this initiative, Obama goes on to say, “These breakthroughs have paved the way for unprecedented collaboration and discovery across  scientific fields. For instance, by combining advanced genetic and optical techniques, scientists can now use pulses of light to determine how specific cell activities in the brain affect behavior. 

Similarly, through the integration of neuroscience and physics, researchers can now use high-resolution imaging technologies to observe how the brain is structurally and functionally 
connected in living humans. 

While these technological innovations have contributed substantially to our expanding knowledge of the brain,  significant breakthroughs in how we treat neurological and psychiatric disease will require a new generation of  tools to enable researchers to record signals from brain cells in much greater numbers and at even faster speeds. That's where the BRAIN Initiative comes in.” 

Now, I have to say, there's not a whole lot of detailed information out there regarding specifics 
concerning this Brain Mapping program, so with that said, let's look at some of the key players in 
Obama's BRAIN Initiative: 

NIH   [National Institute of Health] 
FDA    [Food & Drug Administration] 
IARPA [Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Agency] 
DARPA  [Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency] 
NSF    [National Science Foundation]....plus the usual suspects from academia, and the private and 
corporate sectors, like: 
Glaxo-Smith Kline 
US Photonics 
University of Berkeley 
The Carnegie Mellon institute 
The Simons Foundation – mapping neural activity patterns 
The Allen Institute – brain perception functionality 

You can go to the whitehouse.gov site and explore the interactive map posted there to review the 
different agencies and organizations that have been identified to work on this program and what their 
specific R&D focuses will be.  [Whitehouse/BRAIN] 

The White House 2013 announcement goes on to say,  “ In the last decade, scientists have made a 
number of landmark discoveries that now create the opportunity to unlock the mysteries of the brain.“ I would argue they are creating an opportunity not to 'unlock' the mysteries of the brain as they 
proclaim, but to unlock technology to achieve complete command and control of the inner workings of  your mind....what you think....how you think...what you feel...how you behave and ultimately, your perceived usefulness by an Archonic, technocratic elite bent on the enslavement of humanity.    

Links: 

White House – Brain Initiative – Interesting info and collaborators 9.30.2014 
White House    Brain Initiative  4.02.2013 
BBN    Synthetic Biology    9.05.2012 
The Human Connectome Project    03.20.2015 
Synberc – Synthetic Biology Remote Brain Computer Interface -  RNM    07.26.2015 
NIH The Brain Initiative  8.19.2015 

The Insane Jewish Gene Idea

See here for more examples of insanity and ignorance. Also, see here for more about the rabid ethnocentrism and some of the other craziness that exists in the Talmud.  Another good video to watch is this one, especially at the 1 hour and 12-minute mark where he lays out in simple terms why the Jewish idea of "chosenness" is absolutely absurd.

Newt Gingrich: A Judas Goat From the Beginning

"In early 1995, Congressman Newt Gingrich, Speaker of the House, fired his newly appointed congressional librarian, Christina Jeffrey. He fired her for having once suggested that history students, when studying the Holocaust, (see herehere and here,) should also study the German point of view on the subject. She was fired in spite of her high standing in her profession and notwithstanding her long and cozy relations with the powerful Jewish ADL (Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith). The very suggestion that there could be another side to any issue affecting Jews is decried as “anti-Semitic.” In both the entertainment and news media, the only permissible opinion is that Jews are always innocent victims persecuted by intolerant Christians and other “anti-Semites.”



A Judas Goat From the Beginning:
Newt Gingrich: Voice for Corrupted Conservatism—
The Republican Favorite of The Enemy Within

A front-page exclusive published in the January 28, 1985 issue of The Spotlight revealed—much to the dismay of many self-styled “conservatives”— that Georgia Congressman Newt Gingrich, then a little known “backbencher” in the House of Representatives, was the brains behind a clique of internationalist Republicans who were working to scrap the GOP’s historic nationalist stance in foreign policy making.

Unfortunately, this honest effort to expose Gingrich’s internationalist bent was greeted with a mixture of outrage and scorn by many conservatives who were hoodwinked by the mainstream media into following the Georgia congressman’s peculiar brand of “leadership.”

The Spotlight revealed that Gingrich, along with several other House Republicans (Reps. Vin Weber [Minn.], Connie Mack [Fla.], and Robert Walker [Pa.]) had attended a secret meeting with Donald
Graham, publisher of the Washington Post, and Meg Greenfield, the Post’s editorial page editor.

Gingrich and his fellow GOP lawmakers had dubbed themselves the Conservative Opportunity Society (COS), although their critics called them the Conservative “Opportunists” Society.

At that meeting, The Spotlight reported, Gingrich and his colleagues effectively agreed to work to revamp the so-called “conservative wing” of the Republican Party and use their influence to push the GOP into the internationalist camp. In return, the Post’s power-wielders agreed to give Gingrich and his colleagues widespread favorable publicity in the pages of their influential daily in the nation’s capital. Until that time Gingrich and company had been relegated to “backbench” status by the media, sometimes even painted as “extremists” and “troublemakers.”

Gingrich and his colleagues told the Post that they would come out swinging in favor of economic sanctions against the anti-communist, pro-American regime in South Africa.This, of course, was a 180-degree reversal of the traditional “conservative”stand in support of South Africa and in opposition to sanctions.

In short time they did, in fact, call for sanctions, causing syndicated columnist Pat Buchanan to comment that Gingrich and company were “turncoat[s]” who were guilty of “stabbing South Africa in the back.” 

By adopting the new position, Gingrich and his COS clique had effectively signed on with the liberal internationalists in Congress who had been waging war against South Africa for decades. Shortly, the Washington Post published a laudatory profile of Gingrich. This set the stage for many future such puff-pieces promoting Gingrich and placing him in line for his ultimate election as House Minority Whip (second-ranking position in the GOP hierarchy).

Then, to the outrage of nationalist-minded Republicans, Gingrich’s COS colleague,Vin Weber, authored a prominently placed op-ed column in the Post (never permitted as a forum for GOP conservatives) which called upon the GOP to become “America’s new internationalist party.”

Ultimately The Spotlight’s world exclusive on the secret meeting between Gingrich and the Post was confirmed by the Post itself—but only after Gingrich had reached a position of influence. In short, The Spotlight’s “conspiracy theory”—as some called it—proved not to be a “conspiracy theory,” but a fact.

As the Spotlight warned, Gingrich himself is an unabashed internationalist and has been recognized as such by the self-styled “new age” movement. One internationalist journal, New Options, even hailed Gingrich as a key “globally responsible” legislator.

In keeping with his orientation, Gingrich, in 1983, joined then-Rep. Albert Gore Jr. (D-Tenn.), later vice president, in introducing a bill to “advise the president on ‘critical trends and alternative futures’”—an effort heralded by a well-known “one world”advocacy journal known as Leading Edge.

All of this should have been no surprise to long-time Gingrich watchers, however. In 1968 when then-California Governor Ronald Reagan and Richard Nixon were vying for “conservative” support in their respective bids for the GOP presidential nomination, Gingrich opted to sign on as the Southeast regional coordinator for one of their opponents, New York Governor Nelson Rockefeller. Later, prior to his election to Congress, Gingrich taught at the Rockefeller-funded Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, an outpost of the Rockefeller empire.

The reality of what Gingrich truly represents is reflected in his critical role in railroading NAFTA through Congress. Gingrich was almost single-handedly responsible for ensuring passage of the sovereignty-robbing, job-exporting North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). He
rallied the GOP votes necessary to enable NAFTA’s enactment, delivering a victory to his fellow member of the Rockefeller-financed Council on Foreign Relations, President Bill Clinton.

On September 3, 1995, the Washington Post assured its readers that Gingrich was “okay” despite many public criticisms of Gingrich by some liberal critics.The Post rushed to the defense of the new House Speaker and pointed out in a headline that “For the ultra-right, Gingrich is just a tool of the world government plot.”The Post said that “anyone who glances at The Spotlight, the weekly newspaper knows that . . . Gingrich is hardly the leader of their movement; in their eyes, he is actively working to subvert it.” (However, the Post was careful not to mention that it was The Spotlight that first blew the whistle on the secret deal between Gingrich and the Post.)

According to the sarcastic and less than factual commentary by the Post,“Those with a paranoid bent are convinced that the Georgian is in cahoots with President Clinton, the Rockefellers, the Freemasons, the Council on Foreign Relations and the entire Eastern Establishment to
abrogate the Constitution and forge a New World Order under the thumb of Jewish central bankers and the United Nations.”

The Post concluded:“It is important for national opinion-makers to understand the chasm between most House Republicans and the loony right. Gingrich and his GOP revolution may be controversial and provocative, but they are not the source of violent extremism.” As far as Gingrich’s close friend and fellow House Republican Vin Weber is concerned,Weber was forced, ultimately, to abandon a promising career in the House after he was caught red-handed in the House check-kiting scandal.

Despite having devoted much time and energy to promoting the demands of the pro-Israel lobby, including working to disrupt an effort to force a congressional inquiry into Israel’s June 7, 1967 unprovoked naval and air attack on the U.S.S. Liberty, sailing peacefully in the Mediterranean, resulting in the deaths of 34 Americans and the wounding of 171 others,Weber’s financial misdeeds caught up with him. Needless to say,Weber received heavy campaign financing from pro-Israel elements in return for his efforts.

However, after Weber’s departure from Congress, his friends in the Zionist elite ensured his future financial security.Weber was named to the prestigious globalist group, the Council on Foreign Relations, and was later named by President George W. Bush as head of the National Endowment for Democracy, an institution promoting “global democracy,”part of the neoconservative agenda.

Gingrich himself abandoned his congressional seat in the midst of the furor over President Bill Clinton’s affair with White House intern Monica Lewinsky. Because it was subsequently revealed thatGingrich had been carrying on an extramarital affair behind the back of his second wife, Marianne,many speculated that Gingrich’s affair (and the possibility that it might become a political issue in the heated fight over the attempt to drive Clinton from office) was the reason that he left office, perhaps convinced by his fellow Republicans that it was best for the party. He later married his mistress, who was a singer in a church choir during her affair with the GOP leader.

As an added note, it should be pointed out that while Gingrich was busy on Capitol Hill carrying water for Israeli interests, his then-wife Marianne was on the payroll of a group known as the Israel Export Development Company (IEDCO) which was promoting the financial interests of Israel vis-à-vis lucrative trade agreements with the United States.

In fact, it seems that Mrs. Gingrich’s lucrative deal with IEDCO was cut in August of 1994 after she and her husband traveled to Israel at the expense of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a foreign lobby for Israel.

Although she was taking home a monthly salary of $2500, plus “commissions,”Mrs. Gingrichrefused to disclose the size of those “commissions.” And while Mrs. Gingrich responded to criticisms of her sweet deal that “If I were going to get a political payoff, it would not be for the amount of money I am making,” the fact is that the yearly figure of $30,000 is precisely the kind of figures often seen linked to political payoffs. And what is interesting is that IEDCO’s president, Larry Silverstein, admitted to the Wall Street Journal that Gingrich was one of a number of members of Congress who were lobbied to support his company’s proposal.

Although his wife’s Israeli connection was obviously an egregious conflict of interest for NewtGingrich, the congressman’s friends in high places saw no problem whatsoever—since “our ally Israel”was involved. Imagine the ruckus if Mrs.Gingrich had been working for Arab interests! These days Gingrich continues to make noise on behalf of Israel and is said to be positioning himself for a future presidential run,his past scandals notwithstanding.

He is even promoting himself—and the media is helping him do it—as an advocate of “reform,”his record of corruption notwithstanding. The bottom line, however, is that Gingrich is not just a spokesman for The Enemy Within.

He constitutes an Enemy Within in and of himself. He is a classic case study of the manner in which the major media has created and promoted a shameless and power-hungry politician whose
loyalties clearly do not lie with the interests of the American people— his rhetoric notwithstanding—but instead with the plutocratic forces within the Zionist and globalist elite.Americans would do well to reject Gingrich now and in the future.