Superman and Wolverine Against Jordan Peterson? Or Shall I Say Dr. Strange?

 Wolverine would almost certainly oppose any public figure who advocated for the mass death of civilians, as it fundamentally violates his deeply held personal code of protecting the innocent.

While Logan is a violent character who frequently uses lethal force, his morality is defined by specific principles that would put him at odds with the scenario described:

• Protection of Non-Combatants: Logan has lived through multiple world wars and witnessed immense bloodshed. He holds a strict boundary against harming innocents, children, and civilians, and he fiercely despises those who encourage or celebrate the slaughter of defenseless populations.
• Disdain for Armchair Ideologues: Wolverine has a notorious lack of respect for philosophers, politicians, and media figures who sit in safety while inciting violence or war. He values real-world honor and would view someone calling for mass death from behind a microphone or computer screen as a coward.
• Indifference to Wealth and Institutional Power: Corporate backing, massive contracts (like a $70 million media deal), and institutional influence mean absolutely nothing to Logan. He is entirely anti-authoritarian and judges people solely on their actions and character, not their wealth or status.

In the Marvel Universe, Wolverine frequently clashes with ideologues who use media, politics, or wealth to target specific groups of people, making it highly likely he would view such rhetoric with contempt.

Superman would stand firmly against anyone advocating for the mass death of civilians, as it directly violates his core belief in the sanctity of all human life.

As DC Comics' ultimate symbol of hope and peace, Superman’s response to the scenario described would be guided by absolute moral principles:

• The Sanctity of Life: Superman operates under a strict code against killing. He believes that every life—regardless of nationality, ethnicity, or religion—has inherent value. Calling for the destruction or mass death of any group, including Palestinians, goes against everything he stands for.
• Champion of the Oppressed: From his earliest comic book appearances, Superman was created to be a defender of the helpless and vulnerable. He actively steps in to protect civilians caught in the crossfire of war and geopolitics, viewing the incitement of violence against non-combatants as an act of cruelty.
• Immunity to Wealth and Media Influence: A $70 million media contract or corporate backing from an organization like the Daily Wire would not intimidate or impress Superman. As Clark Kent, he is a journalist dedicated to truth and exposing corruption; as Superman, he fights for justice without regard for an individual's institutional power or wealth.
• Words as Weapons: Superman understands the power of rhetoric. He has frequently opposed demagogues, dictators, and media figures who use fear, division, and hatred to turn populations against one another or justify atrocities.

Rather than using physical violence like Wolverine might, Superman would likely confront this rhetoric by publicly standing with the victims, exposing the falsehoods of the propaganda through his work as Clark Kent, and using his global platform to advocate for peace, human rights, and coexistence.