Exposing Intelligence Agency Human Rights Abuses, Government and Corporate Corruption Along with the Problems of Zionism. The Foundation of Freedom is Freedom of Thought and Freedom of Speech
Now, of course, I am not saying that "every Jew was involved in slavery" or something ridiculous like that. But, I do want to get at the root of what caused this. Why were Jews overrepresented in the slave trade? I honestly believe that it comes back to the Talmud and their interpretation of the Old Testament. To learn more about this see here and here. Most people do not understand what the New Testament is about, nor what it means in the Gospel of John when Jesus is "modifying the law." Even in the Quran, (not the Hadith,) they talk about "freeing the slaves" and the problems of usury. The historical fact is less than 4% of non-Jewish whites in the South of the United States owned slaves. Less than 2% of the whites in all of pre-civil war America, while 40% of Jewish households owned slaves. Notice how guilt is only ascribed to "white people" - while Jews were 2000% more likely to own slaves than Gentile whites. Why are black and white Americans not allowed to know who the primary slave traders were?
Here are Some Quotes from Jewish Historians:
American Jewish Historical Society - New World Jewry- 1493-1825: Requiem for the Forgotten- Seymour B. Liebman
"They came with ships carrying African blacks to be sold as slaves. The traffic in slaves was a royal monopoly, and the Jews were often appointed as agents for the Crown in their sale." "The Jews were the largest ship chandlers in the entire Caribbean region, where the shipping business was mainly a Jewish enterprise." "The ships were not only owned by Jews, but were manned by Jewish crews and sailed under the command of Jewish captains."
Jews and Judaism in the United States: A Documentary History - Marc Lee Raphael
"Jewish merchants played a major role in the slave trade. In fact, in all the American colonies, whether French (Martinique,) British, or Dutch, Jewish merchants frequently dominated."
"This was no less true on the North American mainland, where during the eighteenth century Jews participated in the "triangular trade" that brought slaves from Africa to the West Indies and exchanged them for molasses, which in turn was taken to New England and converted into rum for sale in Africa."
"Isaac Da Costa of Charleston in the 1750's, David Franks of Philadelphia in the 1760's and Aaron Lopez of Newport in the late 1760's and early 1770's dominated Jewish slave trading on the American continent."
Jews in Colonial Brazil: Arnold Wiznitzer- Pages 72 & 73:
"The buyers that appeared at the auctions were almost always Jews, and because of their lack of competitors they could buy slaves at low prices." "If it happened that the date of such an auction fell on a Jewish holiday the auction had to be postponed."
The Jewish Encyclopedia: Vol. 10, Page 48:
"The trade in slaves constituted the main source of livlihood for the Roman Jews"
A History of the Jews: From Babylonian Exile to the end of World War II - Solomon Grayzel:
"Jews were among the most important slave dealers in European society."
Jacob Marcus, the author of United States Jewry: 1776-1985 wrote in the Encyclopedia Britanica:
" In the dark ages the commerce of western Europe was largely in the Jews hand, in particular, the slave trade."
United States Jewry: 1776-1985 Jacob Marcus - pg 586
"All through the eighteenth century, into the early nineteenth, Jews in the North were to own black servants"
"In 1820, over 75% of all Jewish families in Charleston, Richmond, and Savannah owned slaves"
"Almost 40% of all Jewish householders in the United States owned on slave or more"
Note: Regarding the current United States Presidential election and the importance of Israel and Jewish interests --- I previously made a post about Donald Trump, now equally, I think it is time to post information about Hillary Clinton. To give the article below a bit more context, it is important to see this, this, this, this, and this.
From: Sidney Blumenthal To: Hillary Clinton Date: 2012-07-23
Quoting an Israeli security source Sidney Blumenthal wrote:
“[I]f the Assad regime topples, Iran would lose its only ally in the Middle East and would be isolated. At the same time, the fall of the House of Assad could well ignite a sectarian war between the Shiites and the majority Sunnis of the region drawing in Iran, which, in the view of Israeli commanders would not be a bad thing for Israel and its Western allies.”
In 1982, Oded Yinon an Israeli journalist, formerly attached to the Israeli Foreign Ministry, published a document titled ‘A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties.’ The strategic plan later named ‘The Yinon Plan’ suggested that for Israel to maintain its regional superiority, it must break its neighboring Arab states into smaller sectarian units engaged in endless tribal wars. The Yinon Plan implied that Arabs and Muslims killing each other was an insurance policy for Israel.
Most commentators on the Middle East and American foreign affairs now realise that the chaos in the Middle East has a lot to do with Israel and its supportive Jewish lobbies around the world. However, thanks to the newly leaked Clinton email archive we may have a document that provides confirmation that the Yinon Plan was, de facto, an Israeli strategy to create sectarian chaos in the Middle East.
According to the Wikileaks archive of former US Secretary of State Clinton, it appears that in 2012 the Israeli intelligence service considered a potential Sunni-Shiite war in Syria a favorable development for the Jewish State and the West.
In an email sent by Sidney Blumenthal to Hilary Clinton, an Israeli source is quoted suggesting that Iran would lose "its only ally" in the Middle East if the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad collapses. Such a development in the view of Israeli commanders “would not be a bad thing for Israel and its Western allies,” Blumenthal wrote.
It is crucial to point out that in his email to Clinton, Blumenthal also quotes an alternative view that is more reasonable and is far less enthusiastic about the escalation in Syria. “Israeli security officials believe that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is convinced that these developments (expanding Arab civil war) will leave them [Israelis] vulnerable, with only enemies on their borders.”
This email allows us to look at a vivid Israeli political debate that occurred back in 2012. The Jewish State had to decide whether to destroy the Syrian people just to weaken Iran or, alternatively, to destroy Iran for the sake of destroying Iran. History suggests that a decision was taken to destroy the Syrians first. And the outcome must be disappointing for Israel —Iran is now stronger than ever.
Shockingly, in late 2015, after three years of disastrous Syrian civil war with hundreds of thousands of fatalities and millions of displaced people, Clinton, so it seems. still clung to the formula that Israel’s concerns with Iran should be fought on the expense of the Syrian people. In an email that US presidential candidate Hillary Clinton sent to an unknown account on 11/30/2015 Clinton wrote:
“The best way to help Israel deal with Iran’s growing nuclear capability is to help the people of Syria overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad.”
Israel is not the only one to blame for the Syrian shoah; Hilary Clinton shares some of the responsibility. I suggest that Ms. Clinton consider inviting at least a few Syrian refugees to settle in Clinton’s suburban home. Such a move would prove that she can be empathic, merciful and hopefully regretful.
In addition to reading the following article, please see here and here.
The state of Israel was founded upon the science of Jewish racial eugenics and continues with that policy to the present day, as a series of articles published in Jewish newspapers shows.
According to a new report in the Jewish Daily Forward magazine, titled “Israel’s Uncomfortable History of Racist Engineering,” (Jewish Daily Forward, April 21, 2014), written by the opinion editor of the Jerusalem Post, Seth J. Frantzman, even the founder of Tel Aviv’s Department of Sociology and leading Zionist was an outspoken eugenicist.
According to the Daily Forward, the Zionist Arthur Ruppin—who, among other things, was the founder of the city of Tel Aviv, head the Jewish Agency from 1933 to 1935, and “father of Jewish Sociology” called for the “purification of the “Jewish Race” and expressly stated that it was “desirable that only the racially pure come to the land [of Israel].”
Ruppin was a major figure in the Zionist narrative, and he is honoured in Israel to the present day, with a building at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem named in his honor.
Many cities in Israel named streets after him, and the city of Haifa has a prize in his name awarded for “extraordinary works” in thinking, philosophy and politics.
According to the Daily Forward, however, Ruppin, was a believer in eugenics.
In 1919 he argued that the Jewish race should be “purified” and that it was “desirable that only the racially pure come to the land.”
As head of the Palestine Office of the Zionist Executive (later the Jewish Agency for Israel), he put his purity schemes into practice, arguing that Ethiopian Jews should not be permitted to immigrate, because “they have no blood connection,” and arguing that Yemenite Jews should be brought only for menial labor. (“Israel’s Uncomfortable History of Racist Engineering,” Jewish Daily Forward, April 21, 2014).
This Jewish eugenics program designed to “purify their race” continues to the present day.
When the sterilization policy was exposed, the Israeli government denied it, but continued media coverage on why the birth rates among the “Ethiopian community” in Israel had fallen dramatically, forced the Israeli Health Ministry’s director-general to admit that Depo-Provera has been used without telling the women involved.
The Zionist state was therefore founded on the policy of ensuring Jewish racial purity—and ever since then, this policy has been continued under different names (“the “Jewish state”; the Jews-only immigration policy; the outlawing of marriages between Jews and non-Jews; and many other measures).
All of this proves the important fact that no matter what the Jewish Supremacists might tell the outside world, they know that they are a race and have continually sought to prevent mixing with non-Jews.
Though this video is from 2010, it is still going on now. In addition to the video below, see here. (Be sure to check out all of the links on that article when you click through on it.)
When reading this, this and this post about Israel and its traditional relationship with the British Empire and the United Nations, I want to make it clear that this fits right into the mentality of the right wing nuts that are running the state of Israel. Don't think so? See this, this, this, here, this, this, this and this. But just as important, everyone should know the relationship that Israel had with apartheid South Africa. Read this article to find out more. (To learn the history of Jewish involvement in the Slave trade see here and here. )
The Liberal Party of Canada, which is led by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and came to power in October 2015, brands itself as a progressive alternative to the Conservatives.
When it comes to Israel and the Palestinian-led campaign for boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS), however, the Liberals have continued down the Conservatives’ troubling path, violating Canadians’ wishes and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms along the way.
On 22 February the House of Commons passed a motion by an overwhelming margin of 229-51 votes in condemnation of the BDS movement.
The Liberals have a majority in the House of Commons and the motion, introduced by two Conservative members of parliament, would not have passed without them. Only two of 184 Liberal MPs voted against the motion.
The motion emphasizes the “friendship,” economic and diplomatic relations between Canada and Israel and claims that the BDS movement “promotes the demonization and delegitimization of the State of Israel.”
Expanded political ties
Canada certainly does have a deep relationship with Israel, both politically and economically, which was significantly expanded when Stephen Harper was prime minister.
The Harper government isolated Canada from the the world when it came to Israel. His government voted against United Nations motions for Palestinian statehood, opposed UN motions demanding that Israeli nuclear facilities be opened for inspection, and cracked down on charities providing relief to Palestinians.
Lauding Israel as a “priority market” for Canada, Harper updated the free trade agreement between Israel and Canada in July 2015 to reduce tariffs and broaden investment links with Israeli businesses, including allowing goods from Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank to be exported to Canada duty free.
The two-way trade relationship between Canada and Israel now amounts to at least $1.6 billion.
Boycott as threat
The recent motion, then, is clearly a step toward crushing BDS, a movement that could threaten Israel’s status as a “priority market” for Canada. This goal has existed for years but has recently been intensified, and the Liberals aren’t willing to reverse the trend.
In 2014, the Canadian government added “national origin” into the list of identifiers covered by hate speech laws, in order to criminalize those advocating boycotts against the state of Israel.
Then, in January 2015, the Canadian government agreed to strengthen ties with Israel even further. At the announcement, then foreign affairs minister John Baird said the country would “fight any efforts internationally to delegitimize the State of Israel, including the disturbing BDS Movement.”
This message was reinforced shortly afterwards at a United Nations General Assembly meeting when then public safety minister Stephen Blaney said that Canada takes a “zero-tolerance approach to anti-Semitism,” listing the BDS movement as a form of discrimination, borrowing the tactic used by Israeli government and Israel advocacy groups to undermine BDS by portraying it as being motivated by anti-Semitism.
The effort to combat BDS became more explicit by May 2015, when a government spokesperson responded to a journalist’s questions on what the government’s zero-tolerance policy response would entail by stating that “hate crimes” would not be allowed to undermine the Canadian way of life, explicitly equating human rights-based Palestine solidarity activism to criminal acts.
No divergence
These events, which have led some to fear the government will eventually move to ban BDS, took place under Conservative rule. Still, the Liberal Party’s recent vote in support of condemning BDS shouldn’t come as a surprise.
An early indicator for the Trudeau-ruled Liberals’ uncritical support of Israel came in July 2014, during Israel’s 51-day attack on Gaza, when the party released a statement claiming that “Israel has the right to defend itself and its people. Hamas is a terrorist organization and must cease its rocket attacks immediately.”
The statement failed to criticize Israel’s mass slaughter of Palestinians.
BDS specifically came under fire shortly thereafter. In March 2015, Trudeau tweeted in response to an upcoming vote to support BDS at McGill University that “The BDS movement, like Israeli Apartheid Week, has no place on Canadian campuses. As a @McGillU alum, I’m disappointed. #EnoughIsEnough.”
Rejecting rights
Trudeau became prime minister on 19 October. Within a week, he calledBenjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, giving an assurance that Canada would continue to be a good ally. Israel’s ambassador to Canada, Rafael Barak, said the call “left his country assured that relations between Canada and the Jewish state will remain strong” since Trudeau had been consistent in supporting Israel throughout his campaign.
“I’m sure maybe the style will change,” the envoy added. “But I don’t feel there will be a change on the substance. I’m really reassured.”
This has been exactly the case as Trudeau has continued to offer Israel uncritical support. At the November 2015 UN General Assembly, a month after Trudeau had come to power, the Canadian government voted against all proposed resolutions supporting the rights of Palestinians.
The vote, which saw Canada reject 16 resolutions, was the exact same as the vote a year earlier when the Conservatives were ruling. The recent vote condemning BDS appears to be an extension of this willingness to support Israel.
Out of touch
The Liberals portrayed the vote as a necessary step in combating anti-Semitism and furthering the economic relationship with Israel, as well as a reflection of Canadian values. The reality is, however, that when it comes to BDS the Canadian government is out of touch with the people it represents.
BDS has been widely supported at Canadian universities. The undergraduate student society at McGill University, representing approximately 30,000 students, passed a motion to support BDS on 22 February, the same day the government condemned the movement (though the McGill vote ultimately failed to be ratified through an online process).
Several graduate student unions have also done the same. University students, as represented by their student societies, hold different views of Israel than the government, seeing the state as a force of oppression in the world as opposed to a friend for Canada.
The Canadian populace at large is also less supportive of Israel than the government would like to acknowledge. No polls specifically measuring support for BDS in Canada have been conducted, but there are several other indicators that Canadians are at least split on the issue at large.
A May 2014 Forum poll found that Canadians are evenly split on who is responsible for the hostilities between Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories. A 2011 BBC World Service poll, meanwhile, found that 46 percent of Canadians surveyed support the recognition of a Palestinian state, with only 25 percent opposed.
Free speech violation
Regardless of public opinion, however, the recent string of anti-BDS motions appears to violate the enshrined Charter of Rights and Freedoms in Canada. The National Council on Canada-Arab Relations issued a statementnoting that the suppression of BDS activism violates freedom of speech.
The leader of the New Democratic Party, the third major party in Canada, also expressed shock with the motion, and most of his party’s MPs voted against it (though the NDP has also cracked down on pro-Palestinian protesters in the past).
Tom Mulcair, the NDP’s leader, said “This goes against the freedom of expression we hold so dear in our society,” adding that BDS can be opposed. “But to call upon the government to condemn someone for having that opinion, that’s unheard of.”
Mulcair said the motion “makes it a thought crime to express an opinion.”
It’s a shame that the Canadian government, whether Liberal or Conservative ruled, is insistent on uncritically supporting Israel. The Liberals could have taken a strong stance against Israel’s human rights violations when they got into power, as they won by a wide enough margin to throw their weight around. Instead, they’ve prioritized perceived economic and political benefits over justice, thereby undermining their claim to be more progressive than the Conservatives.
Davide Mastracci is an associate editor at the Islamic Monthly. He has written for a range of publications including Al Jazeera America, Alternet’s Grayzone Project, The Globe and Mail, and the National Post. Website: davidemastracci.com.
“Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination,” reads UN General Assembly Resolution 3379. The measure was adopted 40 years ago, on Nov. 10, 1975, and the majority of the international community backed it. 72 countries voted for the resolution, with just 35 opposed (and 32 abstentions).
Although little-known in the US today (it is remarkable how effectively the US and its allies have rewritten history in their favor), UN GA Res. 3379, titled “Elimination of all forms of racial discrimination,” made an indelible imprint on history.
The geographic distribution of the vote was telling. The countries that voted against the resolution were primarily colonial powers and/or their allies. The countries that voted for it were overwhelmingly formerly colonized and anti-imperialist nations.
Map of the votes on UN GA Res. 3379 (CREDIT: Wikimedia Commons)
The resolution also cited two other little-known measures passed by international organizations in the same year:
the Assembly of the Heads of State and Government of the Organization of African Unity’s resolution 77, which ruled “that the racist regime in occupied Palestine and the racist regimes in Zimbabwe and South Africa have a common imperialist origin, forming a whole and having the same racist structure”; and
the Political Declaration and Strategy to Strengthen International Peace and Security and to Intensify Solidarity and Mutual Assistance among Non-Aligned Countries, which called Zionism a “racist and imperialist ideology.”
When the resolution was passed, Israeli Ambassador to the UN Chaim Herzog — who later became Israel’s sixth president, and the father of Isaac Herzog, the head of Israel’s opposition — famously tore up the text at the podium.
Herzog claimed the measure was “based on hatred, falsehood, and arrogance,” insisting it was “devoid of any moral or legal value.” Still today, supporters of Israel argue UN GA Res. 3379 was an anomalous product of anti-Semitism. In reality, however, the resolution was the result of international condemnation of the illegal military occupation to which Palestinians had been subjected since 1967 and the apartheid-like conditions the indigenous Arab population had lived under as second-class citizens of an ethnocraticstate since 1948.
In 1991, resolution 3379 was repealed for two primary reasons: One, the Soviet bloc, which helped pass the resolution, had collapsed; and two, Israel and the US demanded that it be revoked or they refused to participate in the Madrid Peace Conference.
At the UN on Nov. 11, US Ambassador to the UN Samantha Power and Secretary of State John Kerry eulogized the late Herzog and forcefully condemned the resolution on its 40th anniversary.
In his 2,500-word statement, Kerry mentioned Palestinians just once, and only then as an extension of Israelis. In her remarks, Power did not mention Palestinians at all.
The “right” kind of “national liberation movement”
In his speech, Kerry smeared resolution 3379 as “anti-Semitic” and “absurd.” Kerry called it “a bitter irony that this resolution against Zionism was originally a resolution against racism and colonialism” and lamented that “reasonableness was detoured by a willful ignorance of history and truth.”
Sec. Kerry insisted “we will do all in our power to prevent the hijacking of this great forum for malicious intent” — a fascinating claim, considering how incredibly often the US itself hijacks the UN against the will of the international community, in the interests of both itself and Israel.
Kerry warned about “the global reality of anti-Semitism today” (he made no mention whatsoever of the global reality of rampant, rapidly accelerating, and viciously violent anti-Muslim, anti-Arab, and anti-Black racism), and implied that the “terrorist bigots of Daesh [ISIS], Boko Haram, Al Shabaab, and so many others” are part of this larger anti-Semitic trend. One could argue Sec. Kerry downplayed the severity of the present political situation by characterizing these fascistic groups’ violent extremism as rooted in anti-Semitic bigotry, rather than in radicalization under conditions of intense oppression, bitter poverty, and brutal tyranny.
The US secretary of state extolled “Zionism as the expression of a national liberation movement.” The national liberation movements of Vietnam, Korea, China, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Colombia, Congo, South Africa, Burkina Faso, and so many more nations, however, did not get such approval from Washington; au contraire, they were mercilessly crushed under the iron fist of American empire. Traditionally, only right-wing and settler-colonial “national liberation movements” have garnered the US’s official approval.
“Why do we Americans care so much about the rights of others being respected?” Kerry asked unprovoked. “Because, in an interconnected world, injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” He should tell that to the victims of US-backed dictatorships in Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Bahrain, Qatar, Egypt, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Thailand, Brunei, Rwanda, Ethiopia, Uganda, and, once again, so many more nations.
“Times may change, but one thing we do know: America’s support for Israel’s dreaming and Israel’s security, that will never change,” Kerry proclaimed.
“Legitimacy” and imperial hubris
In her speech at the UN, Power, like Kerry, conflated the heinous Nazi attacks on Jewish civilians in the Kristallnacht with UN GA Res. 3379. Both speakers cited the abominable horrors of the Holocaust several times as reasons to support Zionism, glossing over the fact that Zionism was created in the late 19th century and that the Balfour Declaration dates back to 1917, decades before World War II.
Amb. Power — a serial warmonger and veteran blame-dodger — did what she did best: rewrote history in the favor of US imperialism. She called the resolution “1975 smearing of Jews’ aspirations to have a homeland” and insisted multiple times that resolutions like 3379 “threaten the legitimacy of the UN.”
Like Kerry, Power conveniently forgot to mention that, when it comes to the halls of the UN, there is no other rogue state as blunt as the US, which regularly spits in the face of the international community, defying UN resolutions, violating the UN Charter, and breaking international law when it sees fit.
Power’s speech exposed the fault lines in the contentious (to put it mildly) relationship between the US and the UN — that is to say, between the US and the international community. Such tensions are not the fault of the UN; the blame rests squarely on the shoulders of Washington, with its doctrinal “American exceptionalism” and the flagrant disregard for international law that so frequently accompanies such imperial hubris.
UN machinations
In their speeches, both Kerry and Power also thanked Israeli UN Ambassador Danny Danon, who was described by an Israeli Labor Party lawmaker as “a right-wing extremist with the diplomatic sensitivity of a pit bull” and who proposed legislation that would, in his own words, have the Israeli government “annex the West Bank and repeal the Oslo Accords.” Amb. Danon insists that God gave the land of historic Palestine to the Jewish people as an “everlasting possession” (while forsaking the US). He also told theTimes of Israel that the “international community can say whatever they want, and we can do whatever we want.”
Netanyahu addressed the session with a video message. He claimed that Israel, which has for years led the world in violating UN Security Council resolutions, “continues to face systemic discrimination here at the UN.” In a January 2013 statement submitted to the UN Human Rights Council, the Russell Tribunal calculated Israel had defied a bare minimum of 87 Security Council resolutions.
The Russel Tribunal also crucially noted “that Israel’s ongoing colonial settlement expansion, its racial separatist policies, as well as its violent militarism would not be possible without the US’s unequivocal support.” The tribunal pointed out that Israel “is the largest recipient of US foreign aid since 1976 and the largest cumulative recipient since World War II” and that, between 1972 and 2012, the US was the lone veto of UN resolutions critical of Israel 43 times.
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon joined Kerry, Power, and Netanyahu in the echo chamber, albeit with a bit more subtlety. “The reputation of the United Nations was badly damaged by the adoption of resolution 3379, in and beyond Israel and the wider Jewish community,” he said. Unlike the others, Ban condemned not just anti-Semitism, but also “wide-ranging anti-Muslim bigotry and attacks [and] discrimination against migrants and refugees.”
Although the Israeli government accuses the UN of bias, the evidence demonstrates the opposite. Secret cables released by whistleblowing journalism organization WikiLeaks revealed that the US and Israel worked hand-in-hand with the UN and Sec.-Gen. Ban in order to undermine investigation into and punitive action on Israel’s war crimes in Gaza.
“Something colonial”
The real victim of the 40th anniversary event was the truth — and, of course, as it was four decades ago, the Palestinians. Yet, while UN GA Res. 3379 was repealed, the truth cannot be revoked. Zionism was and remains an unequivocally racist movement — just like any other hyper-nationalist and ethnocratic movement.
None other than the founding father of Zionism, Theodor Herzl, recognized this elementary fact. In a 1902 letter to Cecil Rhodes — a diamond magnate and white supremacist British colonialist with oceans of African blood on his hands — Herzl, writing of “the idea of Zionism, which is a colonial idea,” requested help colonizing historic Palestine.
“It doesn’t involve Africa, but a piece of Asia Minor, not Englishmen but Jews… How, then, do I happen to turn to you since this is an out-of-the-way matter for you? How indeed? Because it is something colonial,” Herzl wrote. “I want you to… put the stamp of your authority on the Zionist plan.”
About Ben Norton
Ben Norton is a journalist and writer based in New York City. His work has been featured in a variety of publications. You can follow Ben on Twitter at @BenjaminNorton. His website is BenNorton.com.
See last posts here, here, here, here, here and here. This project is being spearheaded by NATO and Israel. It must be remembered that many of these strong Israel supporters have turned on the UN and they now believe that the United States should be a world empire. To learn more about Full Spectrum Dominance see here, here and here. To learn more about the Greater Israel Project see here. To see the former Ambassador to the United States admit that choosing the Sunni over the Shia is the less of two evils, go here and here. While that is not evidence of what I am saying here, it does make it more believable. Also, see this video where two United States Generals admit the funding of radical elements of Islam in the Middle East.
Caroll Quigley was a prominent professor at Georgetown University. He was a professor to Bill Clinton. See here for Bill Clinton talking about him. See here for John Taylor Gatto talking about him.
Please see my previous post to learn more about this Anglo-American empire and its connections to Zionism, see here for more about the Jewish Utopia. See here for words from Zbigniew Brzezinski about a future technocracy being ruled by an elite. To download Quigley'sTragedy and Hope free go here, to download theAnglo-American Establishment free go here. To learn more about who the one percent primarily are, seehere, here, here, here and here. To learn about this system they have set up in the United States and Canada, (and probably the rest of the NATO countries) that is modeled after the Stasi in East Germany go here. (See this document and this video to see what official government documents are saying, that we will see an increase between the "haves" and the "have-nots," and that that the "haves" are going to start seeing the "have-nots" as a potential problem.)
Now, watch the videos below to learn more about Carroll Quigley and these very important books!
Note:In addition to the following article, please see here, here, here, here and here.
Posted by Lloyd Burrell
There are so many unpleasant diseases in the world who can say that cancer is worse than motor neuron disease, or that Parkinson’s is worse than Alzheimer’s, or that a brain tumor is worse than a defective pancreas? One thing I do know, in my book anyway, is that child diseases are worse than so-called adult diseases. Seeing kids being cheated of a normal life is always heartbreaking. Autism is one of these child diseases.
Autism And Electromagnetic Radiation
Autism, a neural developmental disorder, may be apparent soon after birth but usually appears within the first three years. It is characterized by impaired communication and social skills.
What is alarming is the rate at which this disease is developing. There has been nearly 60 fold increase since the late 1970s, but the most significant increases in the past decade.
All sorts of explanations have been put forward. Genetics, mercury, vaccines, the psychological state of the mother and even an inability to break down a certain protein in milk are all said to be possible triggers. But another less talked about cause is electromagnetic fields.
Delbert Parkinson who has 54 years of experience in the electronics field and has worked for a number of years for the US Department of Defense, like me, firmly believes that EMFs have a lot to answer.
His particular bone to pick is with EMFs and autism. Below I would like to share with you a few short videos where Delbert gives rather a good explanation of the link between EMFs and autism.
Delbert Parkinson: “Good evening ladies and gentlemen my name is Delbert Parkinson. I live in Lacey Washington and my endeavor is to explain to you what causes autism. I have worked for 54 years in the electronics field. For most of my career, I have provided technical and logistic support to the US Department of Defense on terrestrial and tactical satellites systems around the world. I have also worked on atmospheric and seismographic detection systems for measuring above ground nuclear detonations levels and checking for intercontinental ballistic missile lift off locations.
ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION AND THE LINK TO AUTISM
I will try to explain to you what I believe is the cause of the current epidemic in autism, in autism spectrum disorders including Asperger syndrome. I’m sorry to say but I can’t cure autism or Asperger syndrome because I believe in my heart and mind that it is an electromagnetic radiation problem. In my estimation, most children spend most of their first 2 -3 years in and around their homes. For this very reason, we must take a closer look at the conditions of our homes to determine if there is something there that is hurting our children’s’ health.
More Electromagnetic Gadgets In The Home – More Autism
I don’t think that it is a coincidence that the number of children suffering from Autism spectrum disorders has increased as typical households acquire more and more gadgets that emit stronger and stronger electromagnetic radiations. You cannot see these electromagnetic radiations, EMR, but I will show you where you can find them in your homes by using my electromagnetic field meter. The FCC does not oversee the EMF or EMR exposures to common household appliances including microwave ovens, television sets computer monitors and cordless phones.”
Delbert Parkinson: “We’ve talked about the electromagnetic emissions that are in my house from different appliances and equipment, but now I want to go into a basic course on how the brain works. The brain consists of typical nerve cells which at one end have 4 to 5 synaptic gaps where the communication occurs. The brain also contains Glial cells, there’s only about 1 to 50 trillion of these cells in the brain. The brain has approximately 100 billion cells.
The important thing about this whole presentation is talking about the Limbic system of the brain. The Limbic system communicates through the hypothalamus and goes out to the frontal cortex of the brain. This is where the entire decision-making process takes place. The Limbic system starts in the middle of the brain. The brain, as you know, is the world’s greatest computer, it is just unbelievable when you study this. But I am going to show you what the Limbic system controls: happiness, smelling, sensory input, pleasure, and addiction and it’s required for decision making.
EMFs From Your TV Damage Your Limbic System
Now the reason that the Limbic system controls all those and that autism children cannot do few or any of those is because they’ve sat for 2 to 4 hours for half of their lives in front of a television that radiates electromagnetic radiation and gives their frontal lobe, the front of their brain, an electronic lobotomy and it is terrible. Let me explain the electronics of the action potentials in the nerve cell. We start at -70mV, when we get a stimulus what happens is the Sodium channel opens, Potassium channel closes and we trigger and we go up to a plus 30mV level.
All these are very very low voltage and that’s the whole endeavor of my research here is to show you that the 100 billion neuron cells in the brain are operating at -70mV to 30 mV, a thousand of a Volt. The action potential comes down the neuron and it is perpetuated through the center of the cell and out to the end, to the synapses. And at this time, the voltage fires a chemical reaction and it is the chemical reaction that goes across this opening to enable the next neuron.”
The US frequency Allocation Chart Of Electromagnetic Radiation
Delbert Parkinson: “This is a United States Frequency allocation chart that is put out by the government; Department of Commerce. There are 420 channels of electromagnetic radiation put out around and in America. This radio spectrum goes from basically 3 kilohertz to 300 gigahertz and they fit into the radio spectrum which is a frequency spectrum around the world. There’s infrared, visible light, ultraviolet, x-rays, gamma rays, cosmic rays, but these 420 channels fit into this radio spectrum. 150 years ago the radio spectrum was zero: there were no radiations put out. There were very few radio stations, no TVs, it was a blank slate.
My endeavor is to show you how many radiations are between me and the camera. This is a little 15 band, RadioShack radio and when I turn it on and as I go down the dial, each one of these radio stations you hear is electromagnetic radiations from all over. We can go on for an hour listening to them because there are approximately 350 different radiations coming into my house 150, according to my estimation and my 54 years of electronics, 150 of these are strong enough to overcome your corona field: they are very dangerous. But the levels of these radio signals are basically down, around -70 to -80 DBM.
The radiation coming off the TV is very high. The TV spectrum in channel 6 is 78 megahertz and according to my friend doctor Henry Lai, he stipulates that man, on average --- a 6-foot man, the absorption of the maximum power for man is 78 megahertz. That’s man’s resident frequency. If you are in the TV area on Channel 6 you will absorb a majority of that electromagnetic radiation.”
Can Electromagnetic Radiation Be The Real Cause Of Autism And What Can You Do About It
I do think that EMFs go some way to explaining the spike in autism rates we are currently experiencing. I think the degree to which EMFs are causal varies from case to case.
The point is EMFs impact our health and those of our children in ways in which we are only just beginning to discover. If you are concerned on this issue my advice is to limit your exposure to electromagnetic radiation.
