Using Sound Waves to Control Brain Cells Part 2

See part 1 here. For past articles on using Ultrasound with nanotechnology to control the brain, see here, here, here and here. See here for similar examples using light. See here, here and here for some excellent examples of using soundwaves to put voices and sounds into the brains of others.  

=============================================================================

September 15, 2015, Salk Institute

Salk scientists have developed a new way to selectively activate brain, heart, muscle and other cells using ultrasonic waves. The new technique, dubbed sonogenetics, has some similarities to the burgeoning use of light to activate cells in order to better understand the brain.

This new method—which uses the same type of waves used in medical sonograms—may have advantages over the light-based approach—known as optogenetics—particularly when it comes to adapting the technology to human therapeutics. It was described September 15, 2015 in the journal Nature Communications.

"Light-based techniques are great for some uses and I think we're going to continue to see developments on that front," says Sreekanth Chalasani, an assistant professor in Salk's Molecular Neurobiology Laboratory and senior author of the study. "But this is a new, additional tool to manipulate neurons and other cells in the body."

In optogenetics, researchers add light-sensitive channel proteins to neurons they wish to study. By shining a focused laser on the cells, they can selectively open these channels, either activating or silencing the target neurons. But using an optogenetics approach on cells deep in the brain is difficult: typically, researchers have to perform surgery to implant a fiber optic cable that can reach the cells. Plus, light is scattered by the brain and by other tissues in the body.

Chalasani and his group decided to see if they could develop an approach that instead relied on ultrasound waves for the activation. "In contrast to light, low-frequency ultrasound can travel through the body without any scattering," he says. "This could be a big advantage when you want to stimulate a region deep in the brain without affecting other regions," adds Stuart Ibsen, a postdoctoral fellow in the Chalasani lab and first author of the new work.

Chalasani and his colleagues first showed that, in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, microbubbles of gas outside of the worm were necessary to amplify the low-intensity ultrasound waves. "The microbubbles grow and shrink in tune with the ultrasound pressure waves," Ibsen says. "These oscillations can then propagate noninvasively into the worm."

Next, they found a membrane ion channel, TRP-4, which can respond to these waves. When mechanical deformations from the ultrasound hitting gas bubbles propagate into the worm, they cause TRP-4 channels to open up and activate the cell. Armed with that knowledge, the team tried adding the TRP-4 channel to neurons that don't normally have it. With this approach, they successfully activated neurons that don't usually react to ultrasound.

So far, sonogenetics has only been applied to C. elegans neurons. But TRP-4 could be added to any calcium-sensitive cell type in any organism including humans, Chalasani says. Then, microbubbles could be injected into the bloodstream, and distributed throughout the body—an approach already used in some human imaging techniques. Ultrasound could then noninvasively reach any tissue of interest, including the brain, be amplified by the microbubbles, and activate the cells of interest through TRP-4. And many cells in the human body, he points out, can respond to the influxes of calcium caused by TRP-4.

"The real prize will be to see whether this could work in a mammalian brain," Chalasani says. His group has already begun testing the approach in mice. "When we make the leap into therapies for humans, I think we have a better shot with noninvasive sonogenetics approaches than with optogenetics."

Both optogenetics and sonogenetics approaches, he adds, hold promise in basic research by letting scientists study the effect of cell activation. And they also may be useful in therapeutics through the activation of cells affected by disease. However, for either technique to be used in humans, researchers first need to develop safe ways to deliver the light or ultrasound-sensitive channels to target cells.

Targeting the Brain with Sound Waves Part 1

For past articles on using Ultrasound with nanotechnology to control the brain, see here, here, here and here. See here, here and here for some excellent examples of using soundwaves to put voices and sounds into the brains of others. 

Ultrasound provides a new, noninvasive way to control brain activity.


by Emily Singer  June 4, 2009

Ultrasound waves, currently used in medicine for prenatal scans and other diagnostic purposes, could one day be used as a noninvasive way to control brain activity. Over the past two years, scientists have begun experimenting with low-frequency, low-intensity ultrasound that can penetrate the skull and activate or silence brain cells. Researchers hope that the technology could provide an alternative to more-invasive techniques, such as deep-brain stimulation (DBS) and vagus nerve stimulation, which are used to treat a growing number of neurological disorders.

“Once people have found out what they can do with DBS and vagus nerve stimulation, we think we can unplug those devices and control activity from outside the body,” says William (Jamie) Tyler, a neuroscientist at Arizona State University, in Tempe. Tyler has started a company called SynSonix to commercialize the technology.

Devices designed to treat brain disorders have grown in popularity in recent years. DBS, which is used to treat Parkinson’s disease, dystonia, and obsessive-compulsive disorder, delivers an electrical jolt to the brain via an implanted electrode. Because of its invasive nature, however, DBS is only used for severe cases that are untreatable with medication. A less invasive technique is transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), in which an electric coil placed over the head generates a magnetic field that passes through the skull and excites neurons in the brain below. TMS is used to treat clinical depression, but it can only target the more superficial parts of the brain.

“With ultrasound, we have a much better spatial focus than [with] DBS,” says Tyler. “And unlike TMS, we can get anywhere in the brain.” Ultrasound–consisting of sound waves with a frequency above 20 kilohertz–has been used for decades in medicine to image muscle, organs, and fetuses. In the past five years, better tools for focusing ultrasound energy have enabled its use as an ablation tool: surgeons can now use high-intensity, high-frequency ultrasound (HIFU) to essentially burn away uterine fibroids. HIFU is also in clinical testing for treating brain tumors, breast tumors, and prostate cancer.

These same tools are now allowing scientists to apply ultrasound to control the brain, an idea that has actually been around for decades. Better ultrasound transducers, which generate the acoustic waves, enable more-precise focusing of ultrasound energy. And magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) used in conjunction with ultrasound allows surgeons to target specific areas of the body more precisely. “The ability to marry focused ultrasound with MR [magnetic resonance] guidance is exceedingly powerful,” says Neal Kassell, a neurosurgeon at the University of Virginia, in Charlottesville, and chairman of the Focused Ultrasound Surgery Foundation, a nonprofit based in Charlottesville that was founded to develop new applications for focused ultrasound.

One of the challenges in using ultrasound to target the brain is figuring out how to get the sound waves through the skull in a controlled manner. Typically, ultrasound operates in the megahertz to gigahertz range–frequencies that are fine for passing through soft tissue but would liquefy bone. (As bone absorbs the energy of the acoustic wave, it heats up.) Researchers at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, in Boston, have found that an ultrasound frequency of less than one megahertz can do the trick, but with a trade-off: the lower the frequency, the more difficult it is to focus the energy on a particular point in the brain.

In the past year, however, scientists have had some success in solving this trade-off. Detailed images of the skull generated via CT scan and MRI can help scientists calculate the best way to focus the sound waves, says Seung-Schik Yoo, a neuroscientist at Brigham and Women’s and Harvard Medical School. In as yet unpublished work, Yoo and his colleagues have demonstrated that low-frequency, low-intensity ultrasound can successfully suppress visual activity in rabbits’ brains, as well as selectively trigger activity in the motor cortex. “We are also looking at the ability to modulate hormones or neurotransmitters, which may have application for psychiatric disorders, obesity, and addiction,” says Yoo.

In a paper published last year in the journal PLoS ONE, Tyler demonstrated that low-frequency, low-intensity ultrasound can activate channels that sit in the membrane of nerve cells in a slice of brain tissue, triggering the cells to send an electrical message through the neural circuit. He has since been able to use ultrasound to stimulate the motor cortex and trigger movement in live mice. This work has not yet been published.

Researchers hope to co-opt instruments developed for HIFU for this new application. Several instrument companies have developed phased arrays of ultrasound transducers, which allow precise targeting of ultrasound energy, and which are currently being tested for removal of brain tumors. “Depending on individual anatomy of the skull, you can program the ultrasound equipment to fire individual elements to deliver a well-characterized beam, in terms of location and size, that can be tailor-made to each patient,” says Yoo.

Because focused ultrasound is already used extensively, researchers are optimistic that it will not face any major hurdles in moving toward clinical testing. “For neurologists and neurosurgeons, it’s a well-established technique,” says Tyler. “The safety margins are well known.” Adds Kassell, “I think it will actually be easier to get approval [than it was for HIFU] because the pressure of the focused ultrasound is less pressure than the brain gets from transcranial Doppler, a diagnostic device used to look at vessels in the head after stroke and hemorrhage.”

Kassell says that the foundation is most interested in using low-intensity, low-frequency ultrasound for surgical planning. In epilepsy patients, surgeons could use the technology to temporarily silence a piece of brain tissue thought to be responsible for triggering seizures, thus confirming the correct localization, and then use HIFU to ablate that piece of tissue.

Tyler is most interested in using focused ultrasound for treating Parkinson’s disease. “Since it’s not invasive, we might be able to treat patients much earlier in progression,” he says. “Right now, people who get DBS are the worst-case patients.”

While initial devices would likely resemble a smaller version of MRI machines, treating Parkinson’s patients would require a wearable or implantable device capable of delivering continual stimulation. Tyler’s team is working on flexible ultrasound transducers that could be implanted on top of the skull or formulated into a cap.

It’s not yet clear how ultrasound triggers electrical activity in neurons, but some believe that it is through thermal energy generated by sound waves. Tyler, however, says he has evidence that the neurons are activated through mechanical energy. Previous research has indeed shown that the neuron channels that control electrical activity in the brain can be activated with mechanical pressure. “What we think is happening is some kind of microcavitational effect, such as radiation or sheer strain, which affect the channels that control neural activity,” he says.

How Smart Dust Could Spy On Your Brain

This is technology that intelligence agencies and organized crime currently have and are using against the public. For other articles on this topic, please see here. See here for more about DARPA smart dust. See here for more about the DARPA Artificial Intelligence Control Grid. Also see here and here for biowarfare. 

=============================================================================

MIT Technology Review

Intelligent dust particles embedded in the brain

could form an entirely new form

of brain-machine interface, say engineers

The real-time monitoring of brain function has advanced in leaps and bounds in recent years.

That’s largely thanks to various new technologies that can monitor the collective behavior of groups of neurons, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging, magnetoencephalopathy and positron emission tomography.

This work is revolutionizing our understanding of the way the brain is structured and behaves. It has also lead to a new engineering discipline of brain-machine interfaces, which allows people to control machines by thought alone.

Impressive though these techniques are, they all suffer from inherent limitations such as limited spatial resolution, a lack of portability and extreme invasiveness.

Today, Dongjin Seo and pals at the University of California Berkeley reveal an entirely new way to study and interact with the brain. Their idea is to sprinkle electronic sensors the size of dust particles into the cortex and to interrogate them remotely using ultrasound. The ultrasound also powers this so-called neural dust.

Each particle of neural dust consists of standard CMOS circuits and sensors that measure the electrical activity in neurons nearby. This is coupled to a piezoelectric material that converts ultra-high-frequency sound waves into electrical signals and vice versa.

The neural dust is interrogated by another component placed beneath the scale but powered from outside the body. This generates the ultrasound that powers the neural dust and sensors that listen out for their response, rather like an RFID system.

The system is also tetherless - the data is collected and stored outside the body for later analysis. That gets around many of the limitations. The system is lower power, can have a high spatial resolution, and it is easily portable.

It is also rugged and can potentially provide a link over long periods of time.
“A major hurdle in brain-machine interfaces (BMI) is the lack of an implantable neural interface system that remains viable for a lifetime,” say Seo and co.
The difficulty is in designing and building such a system and today’s paper is a theoretical study of these challenges.

First is the problem of designing and building neural dust particles on a scale of roughly 100 micrometers that can send and receive signals in the harsh, warm and noisy environment within the body.

That’s why Seo and co have chosen ultrasound to send and receive data. They calculate that the power required to use electromagnetic waves on the scale would generate a damaging amount of heat because of the amount of energy the body absorbs and the troubling signal-to-noise ratios at this scale.

By contrast, ultrasound is a much more efficient and should allow the transmission of at least 10 million times more power than electromagnetic waves at the same scale.

Next is the problem of linking the electronics to the piezoelectric system that converts ultrasound to electronic signals and vice versa. Ensuring that the system works efficiently will be tricky given that it has to be packaged in an inert polymer or insulator film (which must also expose the recording electrodes to nearby neurons).

Finally, there is the challenge of designing and building the interrogation system that generates the ultrasound to power the entire array but at a low enough power to avoid heating skull and the brain.

On top of all this is the additional challenge of implanting the neural dust particles in the cortex. Seo and co say this can probably be done by fabricating the dust particles on the tips of a fine wire array, held in place by surface tension, for example. This array would be dipped into the cortex where the dust particles become embedded.

That’s an ambitious vision that is littered with challenges beyond the state-of-the-art. However, the team has a strong background in nanoelectromechanical systems and in the interface between electronic systems and cells.

Indeed, one of the authors, Michel Maharbiz, developed the world’s first remotely controlled beetle a few years ago, a development that was named one of the top 10 emerging technologies of 2009 by Technology Review.

These guys are clearly not afraid to take on big challenges. It’ll be interesting to see how they fare.

Is This Crazy Enough For You? Part 2

See part 1 here. Below a prominent Israelite rabbi Yisrael Ariel says that non-Jewish people who refuse the "Noahide Laws" must be killed and their women taken from them.

By the way, the 7 Noahide laws that he is speaking about in the video below are not in the Old Testament nor the New Testament. They are just making them up. Some of them are similar to the ten commandments. The one interesting Noahide law is worshiping their idea of God because it holds all other religions and belief systems as idol worship. It doesn't matter if you are an atheist or a believer. If you come against them, you will be seen as Amalek. 

I ask you again....do you really know what Judaism and Zionism are about? If not, you better educate yourself. It doesn't matter if you are believer or not, EVERYONE will be affected by it. See here for the so-called Jews. Coexist? See here for more about this.

Interesting Quote From Famous Jewish Director About Hitler

Is there information being covered up from the public? Are they telling you the whole story about Hitler, the Nazi's and Germany? 

This is a quote from the JEWISH director of renown movies like 2001, a Space Odyssey, the Shining, a Clockwork Orange, Eyes Wide Shut, Doctor Strangelove and Full Metal Jacket.

His name is Stanley Kubrick. Here is the quote... 

"Hitler Was Right About Almost Everything"-Stanley Kubrick

It would be good for everyone to check out this article that I put up. Could World War II have been stopped? Did they allow it to happen? Something to think about. The people in power today are absolute lying psychopaths, all they do is lie. 

Marlon Brando- "I'm Very Angry With Some Of The Jews- They Run Hollywood- They Should Be More Sensitive To People Who Are Suffering"

Right from the mouth of the Godfather... just as I say here and here. Don't forget about the influential Jews on Wall Street and intelligence. The reality is, if you look into the history of the CIA, you will see that it connects to Wall Street. Intelligence is connected to protecting the class interests and resources of the insiders of banking and corporate business. This includes the drug trade.

The Corruption of the RCMP and How They Work With Organized Crime

In addition to the following article, please see here and here about the ADL, how it works with the RCMP and the FBI, and its ties to organized crime. See here for the strong Jewish organized crime presence in Canada, see here for the Zionist takeover of Canada. See here and here for previous articles regarding the little known nor talked about topic of Jewish organized crime.

=============================================================================

Some of the RCMP  are using classified technology.  (See enumerated previous posts below this article regarding the RCMP, CSIS, and the CSE.) These corrupt RCMP officers work with organized crime, CSIS and the CSE. They know how drugs get in and out of the country at the top of these organizations. It's a complete joke. See this post about the CIA's connections with drugs. Do you think it is any different in Canada?

Organized Crime is running Canada. It's 100% true.

It is Zionism at the very top of the RCMP.  CSIS was formed in 1984 under the supervision of the influential Zionist Bob Kaplan when the intelligence was taken away from the RCMP. This was part of the strategy, this way they could feed the "intelligence" to the RCMP and provide their ideas of terrorism to them. This was around the same time as the Ernst Zundel trial and when Reagan was in power in the United States. Reagan came to power with the help of organized crime. (See here, here and here.) These same powers were and are in control of Canada, (also see here and here.) Did you know that Canada is currently trying to wrestle power away from Zionist bankers over at the Bank of Canada? See here for the secrets of banking and learning about the money changers. 

As far as Ernst Zundel, it doesn't matter if he was right or not, what matters is; 1.) That such a thing even had to go to trial to begin with 2.) How he was treated when going up to the courthouse. I have never seen any criminal in Canada get attacked like him while going into court. Think about that... with all the heinous crimes and criminals we have had in this country. NEVER! In fact, I have never seen anything like that in any country. It just goes to show you how powerful these people are and how controversial this topic is. It was like the Manson trial of Canada.

Now, see here for the origins of Homeland Security. See here for a collection of tweets about Homeland Security and its connections to Zionism. See here for the strong connections between Israel, Canada, and the United States. See here for the Canada-Israel “Public Security” Agreement for Counter-Terrorism & Homeland security. See here for how the Canadian government is cracking down on criticism of Israel. 

These powerful interests are running the country and feeding you a false perception of your country and the world through the media.  Ask yourself one question, why is the media not talking about any of the info on my blog?

NOT EVEN YOUR TAXPAYER SUPPORTED
 CBC  WILL SAY A THING. YOU PAY FOR IT!  

This is such important information it can change the way you look at your country and the world. Why won't they say anything?  It is because these are the real people that control your country and they have taken away your rights with Bill C-51, just like the Patriot Act and the NDAA have accomplished in the United States.

Imagine if you really knew the truth of your government and how much they are lying to you. We Canadians should be doing something about this NOW.

1. CSIS- The Recruiting Videos Make You Think You Will Be The Next James Bond

2. RCMP + CSEC + CSIS = Stasi (Oh, I Almost Forgot, They Already Took "Canada" Out Of The Name Of Our Most Important Spy Agency)

3. Canadian Police State - Fusion Centers - Data Mining - Loss of Sovereignty

4. The ADL That Works With the RCMP and the FBI - and its Ties to Organized Crime

5. RCMP Targets Muslim Extremists, But Gives Zionist Terrorists Free Pass

6. Canada --- Pathetic like the United States

7. Zersetzung - The Origins of Modern Day Homeland Security and the Police State

8. Homeland Security - Organized Stalking and Militant Zionism

9. Homeland Security and the Alternative Media

10. Activist Reveals Hidden Military Ties Between Canada and Israel

11. Brian Hutchinson: The RCMP and Pickton

12. CIA and Drugs: The Relation to Stasi Stalking and Organized Crime

13. The Canada-United States Partnership

CSIS- The Recruiting Videos Make You Think You Will Be The Next James Bond- Literally Shows Stalking

It's interesting that the video below features content that is similar to what is happening to me.

See here: http://exposeintelligence.blogspot.ca/2014/02/parroting.html
and here: http://exposeintelligence.blogspot.ca/2014/10/the-stasi-octopus.html for more.

These ridiculous James Bond-like videos make you think that you will actually be participating in a beneficial service to your country. The truth is the exact opposite.

CSIS is a disservice to the citizens of Canada and the very nature of the Canadian way of life. The activities that CSIS are involved in go against everything that Canadians believe in and that makes Canada a great country and worth fighting for. The Canadian Bill of Rights and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms are put in place to ENSHRINE the rights that you have as FREE PEOPLE before they were written up. The government does not grant you these guaranteed and fundamental rights and freedoms, it is there to uphold them.

There is ample evidence on this blog of classified technology that "YOU ARE PAYING FOR." I can absolutely guarantee that CSIS is aware of this technology. This technology is highly invasive and infringes on the human rights of Canadian citizens.  Why aren't you told of this? Remember, you pay for it! Why do we allow them to do this? Why did we allow them to pass BILL C-51?

Maybe this taxpayer-supported news service can help us out!

Remote Control of Brain Activity with Heated Nanoparticles

 Click Here to Read Article

Israel Attack On The USS Liberty (See All Screenshots Below and Watch the Video Clip)

Want to learn more about the USS Liberty?  See here and here for more about this. This is just another perfect example of Zionist terrorism. Also see the Zionist terrorism category of my blog. 

Click Here to Watch the Clip

United States Sends State of Israel $7000 a Minute

Is Zionism / Jewish Nationalism a Political Cult?

Also see here for more about the "so-called" Jews.

By Juan Cole

Liberal politics in the broad sense, in the tradition of Locke, Voltaire, Madison, Jefferson and John Stuart Mill, is rooted in a conviction that vigorous debate clarifies issues and makes for better public policy over time. This principle is often misunderstood by political partisans, who confuse analytical disagreement with simply being contrarian and hurling insults.

The opposite of liberal debate and analytical argument is the cult. Sociologists of religion sometimes shy away from that word nowadays, feeling that it has been appropriated by the tabloids and become pejorative. But it has an important place in the history of the modern sociology of religion and I think it should be used, but defined carefully.

I define a cult as an organization characterized by very high demands for obedience by the leaders, complete intolerance of dissent, secretive whisper campaigns against dissidents, dishonest destruction of reputations, and shunning and excommunication as social control mechanisms. It will be objected that all churches have some of these characteristics. But cultness is on a spectrum. Some organizations are high on a cult scale, some are much lower.

There are also political cults. Stalinism and Baathism are both political cults in this sense.

And, it is clear to me that some devotees of Jewish nationalism or Zionism practice their politics in a cult-like manner. I am not a fan of nationalism. I think most of its premises are frankly stupid. There are no “peoples” in the sense that romantic nationalists used the term. No “peoples” are tied to a land or territory. There is no such thing as a national character. People switch out their languages (the ancestors of most Americans did not speak English; the Mongolians of central Afghanistan, the Hazaras, are now Persian-speaking Shiites). I don’t think making Judaism the basis for nationalist zealotry is a good idea, and most American Jews were appalled by the idea for most of the first half of the twentieth century. It isn’t worse than other nationalisms. It mostly isn’t much better. But when it is practiced as a political cult it is truly objectionable.

In Liberal politics (which includes modern conservatism of the William Buckley sort), if you make an argument, you can expect a counter-argument and a debate. In a political cult, if you make an argument you can expect to be smeared, undermined, and if possible destroyed professionally. Cults are extremely destructive, whether religious or political. They insist that the leader and the organization be exempt from criticism.

That so many Jewish nationalists insist that it is not legitimate ever to criticize anything Israel does is a clear sign of political cultism. It is the same mindset that American Communists had in the 1930s about Josef Stalin and the Soviet Union.

So a considered examination of the Israeli government’s Gaza War might conclude that disproportionate force was deployed, and that the army showed reckless disregard for civilian life.

By no means, all Jewish nationalists would be unwilling to debate these points rationally. But very large numbers are not willing, and they respond to this perfectly legitimate argument with abuse. The author of the argument is, they allege, a racialist bigot. He or she is purveying a Protocols of the Elders of Zion conspiracy theory. Others contradict without arguing. Or he or she is questioning the right of Israel to exist (they don’t specify the national borders). They mouth slogans such as that the Israeli army is the most humane in the world, or that Hamas is to blame for civilian deaths even when Israeli bombs do the killing. Some even hint at violence (a Jewish dissident wrote me recently, fearful of thuggish tactics of the Jewish Defense League– an organization classed by the FBI as having been the major source of domestic terrorism in the US 1965-1980). And perhaps worst of all, they secretly compile and send around a dossier to the employer of the author of the argument, seeking to have the person fired.

Of course, all nationalism is somewhat intolerant. The Dixie Chicks got into trouble for disavowing the Bush administration and its war of aggression in Iraq. But in a Liberal society, nationalism’s worst excesses are curbed by a rule of law. People are not punished for making arguments in public in a free society, assuming they are not libelous (and a truly free society needs to avoid having political libel on the books).

All this is prelude to my condemnation of of the University of Illinois for firing Steven Salaita, apparently for his Twitter feed! Professor Salaita said some provocative things during the war, but none of them are indefensible in rational debate. When asked about organized religion, Voltaire said “Crush the infamous thing!” Jefferson advocated an American revolution every 25 years, which would have gotten him in trouble with today’s FBI. Etc. Are there lines that shouldn’t be crossed? Sure, but they should bad arguments based on shoddy research that people in the field have a consensus as being bad.

Vijay Prashad, now at the American University of Beirut but previously at Trinity, wrote on Facebook:

“But I do know that twice, the Anti-Defamation League and the Jewish Community Relations Council of the Jewish Federation came to see my college president to have me removed from some administrative positions I held because they argued that I was an anti-Semite based on my role in the BDS movement (I am fortunate that the outgoing president at Trinity sent me all the emails before he left). I’ve been slowing reading through them — it is astounding how these organizations held private meetings with the president about my role on campus, and the administration at no point asked me to meet with them, or at no point did they wish to meet with me. It was an attempt to get me out behind closed doors.”

He later saw emails detailing the skullduggery.

I strongly suspect that Zionist organizations pressured the university to fire Professor Salaita. But note that they did not engage him in a public debate. They went into the halls of power behind the scenes. We saw this a few years ago with Norman Finkelstein. This behavior is undemocratic and cult-like, and it is unacceptable in a Liberal society. We also see Jewish nationalists on the bench, in public office, and in high administrative positions who misuse their public position to engage in a sectarian vendetta so as to protect Israel from criticism or to punish its critics. That behavior is unethical. US law and the US constitution should guide the decision-making of public servants, not narrow and idiosyncratic commitments. Would it be all right for a judge of Serbian ancestry to throw the book at a Croatian-American defendant?

Universities are places for argument and debate. If Salaita says challenging things, he should be debated on them. He has been saying such things for a long time, so they should have been known when he was hired. But academic hiring and firing in any case should be based on academic writing, not on Twitter! Will we next be promoting people to academic positions because they sent out flattering tweets about their president or dean?

Issues in decorum are legitimately taken account of in decisions about whether to promote someone to an administrative post at a university. But professors should argue, and sometimes they may argue provocatively, deploying rhetorical devices like hyperbole. We have a tenure system to make sure that academic debate is not punished, and I believe that it is important to the republic and its democratic values that this be so. Our journalists are often muzzled by the corporations for which they work. Likewise, businesses often maintain that they can fire employees for taking political stances that embarrass the business. Much of America cannot in fact exercise free speech, for fear of economic reprisals, despite constitutional guarantees. That is not right, but at least in academia it is difficult to just fire someone for making a public argument. But sometimes the dirty deed can be done, with regard to the untenured or to those with an outside offer who are moving between tenured positions. It is a shameful business.

Something Very Few People Know About- The Attack on the USS Liberty By Israel That Was Covered Up

For a previous post on this topic, see here.  For more about Zionist terrorism see here. 
See here for Zionist terrorists who need to be dealt with. See here for how the RCMP targets Muslim extremists, but gives Zionist terrorists free pass. See here for how the Canadian government is killing freedom of speech on Israel and Zionism. See here and here for Zionism against the United Nations. 

Canadian Police State - Fusion Centers - Data Mining - Loss of Sovereignty

Beyond looking for keywords set off in sent emails or words used in conversations on phone calls, CSIS and CSE have access to technology very similar to the CIA and the NSA. The NSA and the CIA use extremely sophisticated software like this: https://www.recordedfuture.com/, https://www.palantir.com/, and  http://bericotechnologies.com/ to comb through mounds of data to find statistically significant patterns from all of the data they get from all over the internet. Some of the major contributors of data and information are companies like Facebook, Twitter, Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, LinkedIn and Apple.  They also have access to the databases of the U.S. government's files. The CIA and the NSA can also access every Canadian citizen's data. See more about PROMIS software here, here, here and here how this was possible a long time ago. There was problems with the United States and Israel at that time. Nothing has changed.

Essentially PROMIS was a precursor to the three software companies I list above and is the brainchild of the PRISM surveillance program.

To learn more about big data go here. Once a target has been recognized, the information is passed along to what is known as a fusion center. (See here for how the United States and Canada are working together in their fusion centers, intelligence agencies, and national police forces.)

This is where the informant society and organized stalking comes into play. This model is based highly on the East German Stasi government.

All of this spying is has reached a pinnacle with political eugenics and Transhumanism. You have to realize that the United States government's intelligence community, DARPA, and Raytheon BBN Technologies were involved in the creation of the internet. This means the internet was set up for spying, intelligence, and data gathering right from the beginning. They have the potential to gather data from numerous sources on the internet, especially counter intelligence websites like the ones shown here, here and here. Also, see here for more about Judas goats and political dissidents. It is important to remember, that the main targets of the East German STASI were those that they deemed to be political dissidents.

Except it is much, much worse...

In May 25, 2007, the U.S. Director of National Intelligence Michael McConnell authorized the National Applications Office (NAO) of the Department of Homeland Security to allow local, state, and domestic Federal agencies to access imagery from military intelligence Reconnaissance satellites and Reconnaissance aircraft sensors which can now be used to observe the activities of U.S. citizens. (This is in the United States, but, all of the links below will show you how close the relationship is between Canada and the USA.) The satellites and aircraft sensors will be able to detect chemical traces, and identify objects in buildings and "underground bunkers", and will provide real-time video at much higher resolutions than the still images produced by programs such as Google Earth. See here and here for more.

In other words, these people have access to technology that can find oil and mineral deposits underground with up to 99% accuracy, (this is called earth-penetrating tomography, Interferometry, see also Earth's Field NMR, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, and Electron Paramagnetic Resonance.) See here for an example using space-based radar, see here and here for more about satellite terrorism. 

Along with satellites and radar, the process of weaponizing nanotechnology and brain-computer interface technology has begun, just as this political activist says here. These technologies allow them to read your mind and thoughts, influence your behavior and track you around the globe. See here and here for more about this.

They have access to the EEG readouts of your brainwaves and brain states to know what you are thinking, and the ability to see out of your eyes and hear out your ears. This is called Total Information Awareness, meaning the goal is to have access to every piece of information on this planet. (See here for more about being hooked up to a supercomputer with artificial intelligence at the NSA and the CIA, and here for why Edward Snowden is a fake.) 

Like I said, they can also influence your behavior. They can put thoughts in your head and hook you up to another individual's brain. When engaging in the latter, if an individual changes the EEG of his or her brain,  that individual can change the EEG of another brain that they are hooked up to. Or in other words, two brains can effectively become one.

BUT IT GETS EVEN WORSE! They can also shoot you with space-based weapons. (See here, here and here for more.)

See Below for More About the Loss of Canada's Sovereignty to the
 Ideology of Zionism, the State of Israel and the United States: 

RCMP + CSEC + CSIS = Stasi

Homeland Security - Organized Stalking and Militant Zionism 

Canadian Government Cracking Down On Israeli Criticism

RCMP in BC has a Hate Crime Division: Cpl. Normandie Levas

The Canada-Israel “Public Security” Agreement

RCMP Targets Muslim Extremists, But Gives Zionist Terrorists Free Pass

The Canada-US Partnership

Canada's National Security in the Post-9/11 World

Smart Border Declaration

Beyond the Border: A Shared Vision for Perimeter Security and Economic Competitiveness

Towards a North American Homeland: U.S.-Canada “Cross-Border” Surveillance, Intelligence Sharing, Law Enforcement and Data Collection

The North American Homeland Security Perimeter: A Threat to Canada’s National Sovereignty

New US-Canada Border Regime: Deep Integration and the North-American Homeland

Political Prisoners in the North American Homeland

Towards the Canadian Homeland Security State: Sweeping Surveillance Bill introduced in the Canadian Parliament

The Integration of Canada into a U.S. Dominated North American Security Perimeter

VIDEO: State of Insecurity – Political Repression in Canada

RCMP Targets Muslim Extremists, But Gives Zionist Terrorists Free Pass

Introductory Note: I did not write the article below, all I want to say beforehand is how bad Canada really is when it comes to this topic.  It is worse than what this article is saying! I personally believe that extremist Zionist Jews and Zionist Christians are the driving force behind taking our rights away in Canada and the United States. They are the driving force behind  Bill C-51, the Patriot Act, the NDAA and Homeland Security.  You can see for yourself that the JDL is listed as a terrorist organization. See also here. BUT NOT IN CANADA. In fact, they were asked to be a part of Stephen Harper's entourage.

This is nothing new. just look at the Ernst Zundel trial. Now, remember, it doesn't matter if Ernst Zundel was right or not, what matters is; 1.) That such a thing even had to go to trial to begin with 2.) How he was treated when going up to the court house. I have never seen any criminal in Canada get attacked like him while going into court. Think about that... with all the heinous crimes and criminals we have had in this country. NEVER! In fact, I have never seen anything like that in any country. It just goes to show you how powerful these people are and how controversial this topic is. It was like the Manson trial of Canada.

===========================================================================

Non-Aligned Media
Sept. 3, 2014

CBC News has reported that the RCMP, Canada’s equivalent of the FBI, has in the works a new program designed “to stop Canadians from becoming radicalized by violent ideologies.”

“As of early 2014, about 130 people with Canadian connections were believed to be in countries such as Syria, Somalia and Afghanistan participating in terrorism-related activities,” reports CBC.

The RCMP is allegedly establishing a Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) program “to stop Canadians at risk of being radicalized.”

The CBC report further noted that “[an anti-terrorism] law passed in 2013 […] made it illegal to leave or attempt to leave the country to commit certain terrorism-related offences.”

Well then, will those Canadians who espouse the ideology of Zionism — an incredibly violent, narcissistic and racist ideology that seeks the ethnic replacement of Palestinian Arabs with Jews — and who endeavour to join Israel’s military to participate in brutal war crimes, including the indiscriminate slaughter of small children as they play soccer on the beach, be considered as prime subjects for this new RCMP program to counter radicalism among Canadians?

What could be more radical than to want to join a foreign army that has one of the worst human rights records of any modern state and daily commits terrorism against a virtually defenseless, captive population? What could be more extreme than wanting to travel half-way across the world to spray bullets at civilians in Gaza and drop bombs on hospitals, schools, apartment blocks, etc.?

In a recent article entitled “Supporting ‘terror tourism’ to Israel gets Canadian tax credits,” writer Yves Engler explains how hundreds of Canadian Jews fight in the Israeli military. Engler documents how Canadian charities established by Zionists are freely allowed to financially sponsor young Canadian Jews who wish to join the IDF and fight in Israel’s bloody conquests.

“The double standard is extreme. It is illegal for Somali Canadians to fight in that country but it is okay for Canadian Jews to kill Palestinians in Gaza. And the government will give you a charitable tax credit if you give them money to support it,” says Engler.

What could explain such lavish privilege afforded to Canadian Jews who commit terrorism abroad and then return to Canada to enrich our society with their self-righteous zealotry and demented hubris?

Has Canada become nothing more than a de facto slave colony of the Jewish State?

Written by Brandon Martinez