ASTRAZENECA JUST ADMITTED THE TRUTH ABOUT ITS COVID VACCINE

 Also see here and here.  Also see here and here for more about weaponizing nanotechnology from neuroscientist Dr. James Giordano. 

Evidence of What I Am Talking About- Slander and Electronic Warfare Are In Military Field Manuals

Click here to see the U.S. military manual for Guerrilla Warfare and Special Forces Operations.
In Chapter 9, at section 152 under the Psychological Operations in Support of Unconventional Warfare they refer to using slander as a tactic against an enemy population. This is why I refer to these tactics in this post here. Also see this post about how covert agents infiltrate the internet to manipulate, deceive and destroy reputations.

Now, click here to see the Army Special Operations Forces Unconventional Warfare Manual. Go to Appendix B-23, and you will see they admit using Electronic Warfare.

There you go, they admit using slander and electronic warfare, just like I said.

It is so important for people to realize that this is not just the military doing this, this is the Intelligence Agencies and the Police.

CSIS, CSE and the RCMP in Canada and the NSA, CIA and the FBI in the United States. This is COINTELPRO. (See here and here for more about COINTELPRO.) See here for more articles about the RCMP. See here for the RCMP targeting political dissidents. See here for the RCMP terrorism guide. See here for how the RCMP is transferring resources away from dealing with organized crime into watching supposed "terrorists." See here for Homeland Security, a collection of must see links.

See here for more about electronic warfare from Wikipedia. See here for more about electronic warfare and microwave weapons. See here for more about classified technology.  

The Great Reset Agenda

Also see here, here, here and here. Connected to the fourth industrial revolution. The Great Reset came out a couple months after the COVID-19 issues began. Also, see this book, another one that came out soon after it began.  See here and here for more about weaponizing nanotechnology from neuroscientist Dr. James Giordano. See here for humans will be obsolete by 2025 says evil’s AI cyber life-form ‘Louise.’

See here for activist reveals hidden military ties between Canada and Israel- in regards to weaponizing nanotechnology. See here for targeted individual program is US Special Operations Command’s “Continuous Clandestine Tagging, Tracking, and Locating Hostile Forces." See here for a documentary that covers the history of human experimentation.

Another Video About Hacking Into People

 

Brain Implants ‘Could Lead to Hackers Controlling Your Mind,’ Scientists Warn

Elon Musk isn’t content with conquering space with Space X, revolutionizing transport with Hyperloop and making tons of money with his Tesla electric car.

One of his companies aims to create a Matrix-style ‘brain implant’ to plug humans directly into machines. It’s a leap forward which could lead to humans merging with machines – but a group of neuroscientists has warned that brain scans, brain implants and related technologies could have terrifying side effects.

In a letter in the scientific journal Nature this week, 27 top neuroscientists highlighted some of the risks of the technology. The scientists pointed out that some people who have had brain implants report feeling an ‘altered sense of identity. The researchers write, ‘The technology could also exacerbate social inequalities and offer corporations, hackers, governments or anyone else new ways to exploit and manipulate people,.

‘It could profoundly alter some core human characteristics: private mental life, individual agency and an understanding of individuals as entities bound by their bodies.’ Algorithms that are used to target advertising, calculate insurance premiums or match potential partners will be considerably more powerful if they draw on neural information — for instance, activity patterns from neurons associated with certain states of attention.

‘And neural devices connected to the Internet open up the possibility of individuals or organizations (hackers, corporations or government agencies) tracking or even manipulating an individual’s mental experience.

The Digital ID Prison

 

An Israeli (Of All People Claiming to Care About Your Human Rights) at the Top the Canadian Civil Liberties Association

See here. Try contacting this disgusting organization or the Canadian Human Rights Commission. Both are run by sick evil demented people who don't give the slightest damn about us. See here for more information about how I contact these organizations and it resulted in absolutely nothing. 

More Videos To Watch: Reasons To Not Trust Facebook

Facebook is a complete joke. It is way worse than people think and the scumbag from Hell named Mark Zuckerberg knows it. For more information about Facebook see here, here and here. See here and here for the Jewish hand behind the internet and here for a list of Silicon Valley and computer entrepreneurs who know about classified technology but keep their mouths shut.

A Quote From Thomas Jefferson About the Jews (Hi Gad Saad and Travis Pangburn)

No one is perfect, certainly not Thomas Jefferson, but what did he see in some Jews that was questionable? Are we allowed to talk about this? or, are your people eternally innocent and perfect all of the time? We always hear about all the problems of Christians and Muslims.  (By the way, Jordan Peterson, who blocked me, even sent a message out to the Muslims and the Christians. Where was the message for the Jews Jordan?) 

Both of you (Gad and Travis,) are supposedly atheists, so what exactly are you two defending?  Travis, you are covering up spying technology, (along with others,) and individuals being attacked, tortured and spied upon with classified technology for exercising their freedom of speech, what do you do besides promote debates? 


" [Some New England federalists] are marked, like the Jews, with such a perversity of character, as to constitute, from that circumstance, the natural division of our parties."  - Thomas Jefferson


See here for the political writings of Thomas Jefferson for the source. 

People Fear the Jews For Their Power

No one had the courage to speak favorably about him in public, for they were afraid of getting in trouble with the Jewish leaders - John 7:13

Israeli says to American stopped by Israeli police: “The Godly thing to do is to kill you.

Video From 1995 Talking About Mind Control and Vaccines

This Got Me Blocked From Jordan "Struggles With God" Peterson Twitter "X" Account - Screenshots For Everyone to See

 First off, a video of Jordan Peterson having dinner with Ben Shapiro and Benjamin Netanyahu. Also see this past post of someone in the Netanyahu government blocking my Twitter account before it was taken down. (I had no idea who she was.) Jordan Peterson works for the Daily Wire.  (See here for an article about the differences Candice Owens had with the Daily Wire regarding Israel. )

For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? Or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul? - Mark 8:36-37

This is when Jordan Peterson boldly (cowardly?) called for the massacre of Palestinians after Oct. 7.

Nimrod Vax -See Pictures Below

His company is an American company with engineering in Israel. See here, here, and here.

It definitely connects to the World Economic Forum.  Look up who Nimrod is. 

Australian Doctors REVEAL Horrific Situation in Gaza

 See this past post from 2014. See here from other interview from Doctor in Gaza. 

Why the United States Can Never Stop Israel

 Also see here. 

Must Watch: Doctor Interviews About Gaza - News Flash: There Are Palestinians in Gaza That Are Not a Part of Hamas Elon Musk, Sam Harris, Bill Mahar, Gaad Saad, Ben Shapiro, Jordan Peterson and Ezra Levant

"Most Zionists Don't Believe That GOD Exists, But They Do Believe He Promised Them PALESTINE." - Ilan Pappe

See here, for most will never tell you the TRUTH. Are we losing free speech in America? See here. See here for how even Sam Harris, a Jew himself, says "Jews often bring it on themselves" because of  Judaism's strident sectarian beliefs.   

For past posts on the current massacre going on in Gaza, please see here, here, here, here, and here.

“What the Palestinians are asking is not the stars, the moon, and the sky. They are asking for their minimum basic, uncontroversial rights under International Law, which have been repeatedly certified in all the political, and legal, and human rights bodies in the world” - Norman Finkelstein

These Israeli Protesters Are Blocking Aid To STARVE Gaza

 

Learn More About Israel and Politics in the United States (Including the Failure of the Republican and Democratic Party)

 

Must See: Video of Jewish Doctor Talking About the Horror in Gaza

 Video of Jewish Doctor
Talking About the Horror in Gaza

Is Zionism / Jewish Nationalism a Political Cult?

By Juan Cole

Liberal politics in the broad sense, in the tradition of Locke, Voltaire, Madison, Jefferson and John Stuart Mill, is rooted in a conviction that vigorous debate clarifies issues and makes for better public policy over time. This principle is often misunderstood by political partisans, who confuse analytical disagreement with simply being contrarian and hurling insults.

The opposite of liberal debate and analytical argument is the cult. Sociologists of religion sometimes shy away from that word nowadays, feeling that it has been appropriated by the tabloids and become pejorative. But it has an important place in the history of the modern sociology of religion and I think it should be used, but defined carefully.

I define a cult as an organization characterized by very high demands for obedience by the leaders, complete intolerance of dissent, secretive whisper campaigns against dissidents, dishonest destruction of reputations, and shunning and excommunication as social control mechanisms. It will be objected that all churches have some of these characteristics. But cultness is on a spectrum. Some organizations are high on a cult scale, some are much lower.

There are also political cults. Stalinism and Baathism are both political cults in this sense.

And, it is clear to me that some devotees of Jewish nationalism or Zionism practice their politics in a cult-like manner. I am not a fan of nationalism. I think most of its premises are frankly stupid. There are no “peoples” in the sense that romantic nationalists used the term. No “peoples” are tied to a land or territory. There is no such thing as a national character. People switch out their languages (the ancestors of most Americans did not speak English; the Mongolians of central Afghanistan, the Hazaras, are now Persian-speaking Shiites). I don’t think making Judaism the basis for nationalist zealotry is a good idea, and most American Jews were appalled by the idea for most of the first half of the twentieth century. It isn’t worse than other nationalisms. It mostly isn’t much better. But when it is practiced as a political cult it is truly objectionable.

In Liberal politics (which includes modern conservatism of the William Buckley sort), if you make an argument, you can expect a counter-argument and a debate. In a political cult, if you make an argument you can expect to be smeared, undermined, and if possible destroyed professionally. Cults are extremely destructive, whether religious or political. They insist that the leader and the organization be exempt from criticism.

That so many Jewish nationalists insist that it is not legitimate ever to criticize anything Israel does is a clear sign of political cultism. It is the same mindset that American Communists had in the 1930s about Josef Stalin and the Soviet Union.

So a considered examination of the Israeli government’s Gaza War might conclude that disproportionate force was deployed, and that the army showed reckless disregard for civilian life.

By no means, all Jewish nationalists would be unwilling to debate these points rationally. But very large numbers are not willing, and they respond to this perfectly legitimate argument with abuse. The author of the argument is, they allege, a racialist bigot. He or she is purveying a Protocols of the Elders of Zion conspiracy theory. Others contradict without arguing. Or he or she is questioning the right of Israel to exist (they don’t specify the national borders). They mouth slogans such as that the Israeli army is the most humane in the world, or that Hamas is to blame for civilian deaths even when Israeli bombs do the killing. Some even hint at violence (a Jewish dissident wrote me recently, fearful of thuggish tactics of the Jewish Defense League– an organization classed by the FBI as having been the major source of domestic terrorism in the US 1965-1980). And perhaps worst of all, they secretly compile and send around a dossier to the employer of the author of the argument, seeking to have the person fired.

Of course, all nationalism is somewhat intolerant. The Dixie Chicks got into trouble for disavowing the Bush administration and its war of aggression in Iraq. But in a Liberal society, nationalism’s worst excesses are curbed by a rule of law. People are not punished for making arguments in public in a free society, assuming they are not libelous (and a truly free society needs to avoid having political libel on the books).

All this is prelude to my condemnation of of the University of Illinois for firing Steven Salaita, apparently for his Twitter feed! Professor Salaita said some provocative things during the war, but none of them are indefensible in rational debate. When asked about organized religion, Voltaire said “Crush the infamous thing!” Jefferson advocated an American revolution every 25 years, which would have gotten him in trouble with today’s FBI. Etc. Are there lines that shouldn’t be crossed? Sure, but they should bad arguments based on shoddy research that people in the field have a consensus as being bad.

Vijay Prashad, now at the American University of Beirut but previously at Trinity, wrote on Facebook:

“But I do know that twice, the Anti-Defamation League and the Jewish Community Relations Council of the Jewish Federation came to see my college president to have me removed from some administrative positions I held because they argued that I was an anti-Semite based on my role in the BDS movement (I am fortunate that the outgoing president at Trinity sent me all the emails before he left). I’ve been slowing reading through them — it is astounding how these organizations held private meetings with the president about my role on campus, and the administration at no point asked me to meet with them, or at no point did they wish to meet with me. It was an attempt to get me out behind closed doors.”

He later saw emails detailing the skullduggery.

I strongly suspect that Zionist organizations pressured the university to fire Professor Salaita. But note that they did not engage him in a public debate. They went into the halls of power behind the scenes. We saw this a few years ago with Norman Finkelstein. This behavior is undemocratic and cult-like, and it is unacceptable in a Liberal society. We also see Jewish nationalists on the bench, in public office, and in high administrative positions who misuse their public position to engage in a sectarian vendetta so as to protect Israel from criticism or to punish its critics. That behavior is unethical. US law and the US constitution should guide the decision-making of public servants, not narrow and idiosyncratic commitments. Would it be all right for a judge of Serbian ancestry to throw the book at a Croatian-American defendant?

Universities are places for argument and debate. If Salaita says challenging things, he should be debated on them. He has been saying such things for a long time, so they should have been known when he was hired. But academic hiring and firing in any case should be based on academic writing, not on Twitter! Will we next be promoting people to academic positions because they sent out flattering tweets about their president or dean?

Issues in decorum are legitimately taken account of in decisions about whether to promote someone to an administrative post at a university. But professors should argue, and sometimes they may argue provocatively, deploying rhetorical devices like hyperbole. We have a tenure system to make sure that academic debate is not punished, and I believe that it is important to the republic and its democratic values that this be so. Our journalists are often muzzled by the corporations for which they work. Likewise, businesses often maintain that they can fire employees for taking political stances that embarrass the business. Much of America cannot in fact exercise free speech, for fear of economic reprisals, despite constitutional guarantees. That is not right, but at least in academia it is difficult to just fire someone for making a public argument. But sometimes the dirty deed can be done, with regard to the untenured or to those with an outside offer who are moving between tenured positions. It is a shameful business.