Want to learn more about the USS Liberty? See here and here for more about this. This is just another perfect example of Zionist terrorism. Also see the Zionist terrorism category of my blog.
Thursday, July 19, 2018
Tuesday, July 17, 2018
Saturday, July 14, 2018
Is Zionism / Jewish Nationalism a Political Cult?
Also see here for more about the "so-called" Jews.
By Juan Cole
Liberal politics in the broad sense, in the tradition of Locke, Voltaire, Madison, Jefferson and John Stuart Mill, is rooted in a conviction that vigorous debate clarifies issues and makes for better public policy over time. This principle is often misunderstood by political partisans, who confuse analytical disagreement with simply being contrarian and hurling insults.
The opposite of liberal debate and analytical argument is the cult. Sociologists of religion sometimes shy away from that word nowadays, feeling that it has been appropriated by the tabloids and become pejorative. But it has an important place in the history of the modern sociology of religion and I think it should be used, but defined carefully.
I define a cult as an organization characterized by very high demands for obedience by the leaders, complete intolerance of dissent, secretive whisper campaigns against dissidents, dishonest destruction of reputations, and shunning and excommunication as social control mechanisms. It will be objected that all churches have some of these characteristics. But cultness is on a spectrum. Some organizations are high on a cult scale, some are much lower.
There are also political cults. Stalinism and Baathism are both political cults in this sense.
And, it is clear to me that some devotees of Jewish nationalism or Zionism practice their politics in a cult-like manner. I am not a fan of nationalism. I think most of its premises are frankly stupid. There are no “peoples” in the sense that romantic nationalists used the term. No “peoples” are tied to a land or territory. There is no such thing as a national character. People switch out their languages (the ancestors of most Americans did not speak English; the Mongolians of central Afghanistan, the Hazaras, are now Persian-speaking Shiites). I don’t think making Judaism the basis for nationalist zealotry is a good idea, and most American Jews were appalled by the idea for most of the first half of the twentieth century. It isn’t worse than other nationalisms. It mostly isn’t much better. But when it is practiced as a political cult it is truly objectionable.
In Liberal politics (which includes modern conservatism of the William Buckley sort), if you make an argument, you can expect a counter-argument and a debate. In a political cult, if you make an argument you can expect to be smeared, undermined, and if possible destroyed professionally. Cults are extremely destructive, whether religious or political. They insist that the leader and the organization be exempt from criticism.
That so many Jewish nationalists insist that it is not legitimate ever to criticize anything Israel does is a clear sign of political cultism. It is the same mindset that American Communists had in the 1930s about Josef Stalin and the Soviet Union.
So a considered examination of the Israeli government’s Gaza War might conclude that disproportionate force was deployed, and that the army showed reckless disregard for civilian life.
By no means, all Jewish nationalists would be unwilling to debate these points rationally. But very large numbers are not willing, and they respond to this perfectly legitimate argument with abuse. The author of the argument is, they allege, a racialist bigot. He or she is purveying a Protocols of the Elders of Zion conspiracy theory. Others contradict without arguing. Or he or she is questioning the right of Israel to exist (they don’t specify the national borders). They mouth slogans such as that the Israeli army is the most humane in the world, or that Hamas is to blame for civilian deaths even when Israeli bombs do the killing. Some even hint at violence (a Jewish dissident wrote me recently, fearful of thuggish tactics of the Jewish Defense League– an organization classed by the FBI as having been the major source of domestic terrorism in the US 1965-1980). And perhaps worst of all, they secretly compile and send around a dossier to the employer of the author of the argument, seeking to have the person fired.
Of course, all nationalism is somewhat intolerant. The Dixie Chicks got into trouble for disavowing the Bush administration and its war of aggression in Iraq. But in a Liberal society, nationalism’s worst excesses are curbed by a rule of law. People are not punished for making arguments in public in a free society, assuming they are not libelous (and a truly free society needs to avoid having political libel on the books).
All this is prelude to my condemnation of of the University of Illinois for firing Steven Salaita, apparently for his Twitter feed! Professor Salaita said some provocative things during the war, but none of them are indefensible in rational debate. When asked about organized religion, Voltaire said “Crush the infamous thing!” Jefferson advocated an American revolution every 25 years, which would have gotten him in trouble with today’s FBI. Etc. Are there lines that shouldn’t be crossed? Sure, but they should bad arguments based on shoddy research that people in the field have a consensus as being bad.
Vijay Prashad, now at the American University of Beirut but previously at Trinity, wrote on Facebook:
“But I do know that twice, the Anti-Defamation League and the Jewish Community Relations Council of the Jewish Federation came to see my college president to have me removed from some administrative positions I held because they argued that I was an anti-Semite based on my role in the BDS movement (I am fortunate that the outgoing president at Trinity sent me all the emails before he left). I’ve been slowing reading through them — it is astounding how these organizations held private meetings with the president about my role on campus, and the administration at no point asked me to meet with them, or at no point did they wish to meet with me. It was an attempt to get me out behind closed doors.”
He later saw emails detailing the skullduggery.
I strongly suspect that Zionist organizations pressured the university to fire Professor Salaita. But note that they did not engage him in a public debate. They went into the halls of power behind the scenes. We saw this a few years ago with Norman Finkelstein. This behavior is undemocratic and cult-like, and it is unacceptable in a Liberal society. We also see Jewish nationalists on the bench, in public office, and in high administrative positions who misuse their public position to engage in a sectarian vendetta so as to protect Israel from criticism or to punish its critics. That behavior is unethical. US law and the US constitution should guide the decision-making of public servants, not narrow and idiosyncratic commitments. Would it be all right for a judge of Serbian ancestry to throw the book at a Croatian-American defendant?
Universities are places for argument and debate. If Salaita says challenging things, he should be debated on them. He has been saying such things for a long time, so they should have been known when he was hired. But academic hiring and firing in any case should be based on academic writing, not on Twitter! Will we next be promoting people to academic positions because they sent out flattering tweets about their president or dean?
Issues in decorum are legitimately taken account of in decisions about whether to promote someone to an administrative post at a university. But professors should argue, and sometimes they may argue provocatively, deploying rhetorical devices like hyperbole. We have a tenure system to make sure that academic debate is not punished, and I believe that it is important to the republic and its democratic values that this be so. Our journalists are often muzzled by the corporations for which they work. Likewise, businesses often maintain that they can fire employees for taking political stances that embarrass the business. Much of America cannot in fact exercise free speech, for fear of economic reprisals, despite constitutional guarantees. That is not right, but at least in academia it is difficult to just fire someone for making a public argument. But sometimes the dirty deed can be done, with regard to the untenured or to those with an outside offer who are moving between tenured positions. It is a shameful business.
By Juan Cole
Liberal politics in the broad sense, in the tradition of Locke, Voltaire, Madison, Jefferson and John Stuart Mill, is rooted in a conviction that vigorous debate clarifies issues and makes for better public policy over time. This principle is often misunderstood by political partisans, who confuse analytical disagreement with simply being contrarian and hurling insults.
The opposite of liberal debate and analytical argument is the cult. Sociologists of religion sometimes shy away from that word nowadays, feeling that it has been appropriated by the tabloids and become pejorative. But it has an important place in the history of the modern sociology of religion and I think it should be used, but defined carefully.
I define a cult as an organization characterized by very high demands for obedience by the leaders, complete intolerance of dissent, secretive whisper campaigns against dissidents, dishonest destruction of reputations, and shunning and excommunication as social control mechanisms. It will be objected that all churches have some of these characteristics. But cultness is on a spectrum. Some organizations are high on a cult scale, some are much lower.
There are also political cults. Stalinism and Baathism are both political cults in this sense.
And, it is clear to me that some devotees of Jewish nationalism or Zionism practice their politics in a cult-like manner. I am not a fan of nationalism. I think most of its premises are frankly stupid. There are no “peoples” in the sense that romantic nationalists used the term. No “peoples” are tied to a land or territory. There is no such thing as a national character. People switch out their languages (the ancestors of most Americans did not speak English; the Mongolians of central Afghanistan, the Hazaras, are now Persian-speaking Shiites). I don’t think making Judaism the basis for nationalist zealotry is a good idea, and most American Jews were appalled by the idea for most of the first half of the twentieth century. It isn’t worse than other nationalisms. It mostly isn’t much better. But when it is practiced as a political cult it is truly objectionable.
In Liberal politics (which includes modern conservatism of the William Buckley sort), if you make an argument, you can expect a counter-argument and a debate. In a political cult, if you make an argument you can expect to be smeared, undermined, and if possible destroyed professionally. Cults are extremely destructive, whether religious or political. They insist that the leader and the organization be exempt from criticism.
That so many Jewish nationalists insist that it is not legitimate ever to criticize anything Israel does is a clear sign of political cultism. It is the same mindset that American Communists had in the 1930s about Josef Stalin and the Soviet Union.
So a considered examination of the Israeli government’s Gaza War might conclude that disproportionate force was deployed, and that the army showed reckless disregard for civilian life.
By no means, all Jewish nationalists would be unwilling to debate these points rationally. But very large numbers are not willing, and they respond to this perfectly legitimate argument with abuse. The author of the argument is, they allege, a racialist bigot. He or she is purveying a Protocols of the Elders of Zion conspiracy theory. Others contradict without arguing. Or he or she is questioning the right of Israel to exist (they don’t specify the national borders). They mouth slogans such as that the Israeli army is the most humane in the world, or that Hamas is to blame for civilian deaths even when Israeli bombs do the killing. Some even hint at violence (a Jewish dissident wrote me recently, fearful of thuggish tactics of the Jewish Defense League– an organization classed by the FBI as having been the major source of domestic terrorism in the US 1965-1980). And perhaps worst of all, they secretly compile and send around a dossier to the employer of the author of the argument, seeking to have the person fired.
Of course, all nationalism is somewhat intolerant. The Dixie Chicks got into trouble for disavowing the Bush administration and its war of aggression in Iraq. But in a Liberal society, nationalism’s worst excesses are curbed by a rule of law. People are not punished for making arguments in public in a free society, assuming they are not libelous (and a truly free society needs to avoid having political libel on the books).
All this is prelude to my condemnation of of the University of Illinois for firing Steven Salaita, apparently for his Twitter feed! Professor Salaita said some provocative things during the war, but none of them are indefensible in rational debate. When asked about organized religion, Voltaire said “Crush the infamous thing!” Jefferson advocated an American revolution every 25 years, which would have gotten him in trouble with today’s FBI. Etc. Are there lines that shouldn’t be crossed? Sure, but they should bad arguments based on shoddy research that people in the field have a consensus as being bad.
Vijay Prashad, now at the American University of Beirut but previously at Trinity, wrote on Facebook:
“But I do know that twice, the Anti-Defamation League and the Jewish Community Relations Council of the Jewish Federation came to see my college president to have me removed from some administrative positions I held because they argued that I was an anti-Semite based on my role in the BDS movement (I am fortunate that the outgoing president at Trinity sent me all the emails before he left). I’ve been slowing reading through them — it is astounding how these organizations held private meetings with the president about my role on campus, and the administration at no point asked me to meet with them, or at no point did they wish to meet with me. It was an attempt to get me out behind closed doors.”
He later saw emails detailing the skullduggery.
I strongly suspect that Zionist organizations pressured the university to fire Professor Salaita. But note that they did not engage him in a public debate. They went into the halls of power behind the scenes. We saw this a few years ago with Norman Finkelstein. This behavior is undemocratic and cult-like, and it is unacceptable in a Liberal society. We also see Jewish nationalists on the bench, in public office, and in high administrative positions who misuse their public position to engage in a sectarian vendetta so as to protect Israel from criticism or to punish its critics. That behavior is unethical. US law and the US constitution should guide the decision-making of public servants, not narrow and idiosyncratic commitments. Would it be all right for a judge of Serbian ancestry to throw the book at a Croatian-American defendant?
Universities are places for argument and debate. If Salaita says challenging things, he should be debated on them. He has been saying such things for a long time, so they should have been known when he was hired. But academic hiring and firing in any case should be based on academic writing, not on Twitter! Will we next be promoting people to academic positions because they sent out flattering tweets about their president or dean?
Issues in decorum are legitimately taken account of in decisions about whether to promote someone to an administrative post at a university. But professors should argue, and sometimes they may argue provocatively, deploying rhetorical devices like hyperbole. We have a tenure system to make sure that academic debate is not punished, and I believe that it is important to the republic and its democratic values that this be so. Our journalists are often muzzled by the corporations for which they work. Likewise, businesses often maintain that they can fire employees for taking political stances that embarrass the business. Much of America cannot in fact exercise free speech, for fear of economic reprisals, despite constitutional guarantees. That is not right, but at least in academia it is difficult to just fire someone for making a public argument. But sometimes the dirty deed can be done, with regard to the untenured or to those with an outside offer who are moving between tenured positions. It is a shameful business.
Tuesday, July 10, 2018
Something Very Few People Know About- The Attack on the USS Liberty By Israel That Was Covered Up
For a previous post on this topic, see here. For more about Zionist terrorism see here.
See here for Zionist terrorists who need to be dealt with. See here for how the RCMP targets Muslim extremists, but gives Zionist terrorists free pass. See here for how the Canadian government is killing freedom of speech on Israel and Zionism. See here and here for Zionism against the United Nations.
See here for Zionist terrorists who need to be dealt with. See here for how the RCMP targets Muslim extremists, but gives Zionist terrorists free pass. See here for how the Canadian government is killing freedom of speech on Israel and Zionism. See here and here for Zionism against the United Nations.
Sunday, July 1, 2018
Canadian Police State - Fusion Centers - Data Mining - Loss of Sovereignty
Beyond looking for keywords set off in sent emails or words used in conversations on phone calls, CSIS and CSE have access to technology very similar to the CIA and the NSA. The NSA and the CIA use extremely sophisticated software like this: https://www.recordedfuture.com/, https://www.palantir.com/, and http://bericotechnologies.com/ to comb through mounds of data to find statistically significant patterns from all of the data they get from all over the internet. Some of the major contributors of data and information are companies like Facebook, Twitter, Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, LinkedIn and Apple. They also have access to the databases of the U.S. government's files. The CIA and the NSA can also access every Canadian citizen's data. See more about PROMIS software here, here, here and here how this was possible a long time ago. There was problems with the United States and Israel at that time. Nothing has changed.
Essentially PROMIS was a precursor to the three software companies I list above and is the brainchild of the PRISM surveillance program.
To learn more about big data go here. Once a target has been recognized, the information is passed along to what is known as a fusion center. (See here for how the United States and Canada are working together in their fusion centers, intelligence agencies, and national police forces.)
This is where the informant society and organized stalking comes into play. This model is based highly on the East German Stasi government.
All of this spying is has reached a pinnacle with political eugenics and Transhumanism. You have to realize that the United States government's intelligence community, DARPA, and Raytheon BBN Technologies were involved in the creation of the internet. This means the internet was set up for spying, intelligence, and data gathering right from the beginning. They have the potential to gather data from numerous sources on the internet, especially counter intelligence websites like the ones shown here, here and here. Also, see here for more about Judas goats and political dissidents. It is important to remember, that the main targets of the East German STASI were those that they deemed to be political dissidents.
Except it is much, much worse...
In May 25, 2007, the U.S. Director of National Intelligence Michael McConnell authorized the National Applications Office (NAO) of the Department of Homeland Security to allow local, state, and domestic Federal agencies to access imagery from military intelligence Reconnaissance satellites and Reconnaissance aircraft sensors which can now be used to observe the activities of U.S. citizens. (This is in the United States, but, all of the links below will show you how close the relationship is between Canada and the USA.) The satellites and aircraft sensors will be able to detect chemical traces, and identify objects in buildings and "underground bunkers", and will provide real-time video at much higher resolutions than the still images produced by programs such as Google Earth. See here and here for more.
In other words, these people have access to technology that can find oil and mineral deposits underground with up to 99% accuracy, (this is called earth-penetrating tomography, Interferometry, see also Earth's Field NMR, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, and Electron Paramagnetic Resonance.) See here for an example using space-based radar, see here and here for more about satellite terrorism.
Along with satellites and radar, the process of weaponizing nanotechnology and brain-computer interface technology has begun, just as this political activist says here. These technologies allow them to read your mind and thoughts, influence your behavior and track you around the globe. See here and here for more about this.
They have access to the EEG readouts of your brainwaves and brain states to know what you are thinking, and the ability to see out of your eyes and hear out your ears. This is called Total Information Awareness, meaning the goal is to have access to every piece of information on this planet. (See here for more about being hooked up to a supercomputer with artificial intelligence at the NSA and the CIA, and here for why Edward Snowden is a fake.)
Like I said, they can also influence your behavior. They can put thoughts in your head and hook you up to another individual's brain. When engaging in the latter, if an individual changes the EEG of his or her brain, that individual can change the EEG of another brain that they are hooked up to. Or in other words, two brains can effectively become one.
Along with satellites and radar, the process of weaponizing nanotechnology and brain-computer interface technology has begun, just as this political activist says here. These technologies allow them to read your mind and thoughts, influence your behavior and track you around the globe. See here and here for more about this.
They have access to the EEG readouts of your brainwaves and brain states to know what you are thinking, and the ability to see out of your eyes and hear out your ears. This is called Total Information Awareness, meaning the goal is to have access to every piece of information on this planet. (See here for more about being hooked up to a supercomputer with artificial intelligence at the NSA and the CIA, and here for why Edward Snowden is a fake.)
Like I said, they can also influence your behavior. They can put thoughts in your head and hook you up to another individual's brain. When engaging in the latter, if an individual changes the EEG of his or her brain, that individual can change the EEG of another brain that they are hooked up to. Or in other words, two brains can effectively become one.
BUT IT GETS EVEN WORSE! They can also shoot you with space-based weapons. (See here, here and here for more.)
See Below for More About the Loss of Canada's Sovereignty to the
Ideology of Zionism, the State of Israel and the United States:
Ideology of Zionism, the State of Israel and the United States:
RCMP Targets Muslim Extremists, But Gives Zionist Terrorists Free Pass
Introductory Note: I did not write the article below, all I want to say beforehand is how bad Canada really is when it comes to this topic. It is worse than what this article is saying! I personally believe that extremist Zionist Jews and Zionist Christians are the driving force behind taking our rights away in Canada and the United States. They are the driving force behind Bill C-51, the Patriot Act, the NDAA and Homeland Security. You can see for yourself that the JDL is listed as a terrorist organization. See also here. BUT NOT IN CANADA. In fact, they were asked to be a part of Stephen Harper's entourage.
This is nothing new. just look at the Ernst Zundel trial. Now, remember, it doesn't matter if Ernst Zundel was right or not, what matters is; 1.) That such a thing even had to go to trial to begin with 2.) How he was treated when going up to the court house. I have never seen any criminal in Canada get attacked like him while going into court. Think about that... with all the heinous crimes and criminals we have had in this country. NEVER! In fact, I have never seen anything like that in any country. It just goes to show you how powerful these people are and how controversial this topic is. It was like the Manson trial of Canada.
===========================================================================
===========================================================================
Non-Aligned Media
Sept. 3, 2014
CBC News has reported that the RCMP, Canada’s equivalent of the FBI, has in the works a new program designed “to stop Canadians from becoming radicalized by violent ideologies.”
“As of early 2014, about 130 people with Canadian connections were believed to be in countries such as Syria, Somalia and Afghanistan participating in terrorism-related activities,” reports CBC.
The RCMP is allegedly establishing a Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) program “to stop Canadians at risk of being radicalized.”
The CBC report further noted that “[an anti-terrorism] law passed in 2013 […] made it illegal to leave or attempt to leave the country to commit certain terrorism-related offences.”
Well then, will those Canadians who espouse the ideology of Zionism — an incredibly violent, narcissistic and racist ideology that seeks the ethnic replacement of Palestinian Arabs with Jews — and who endeavour to join Israel’s military to participate in brutal war crimes, including the indiscriminate slaughter of small children as they play soccer on the beach, be considered as prime subjects for this new RCMP program to counter radicalism among Canadians?
What could be more radical than to want to join a foreign army that has one of the worst human rights records of any modern state and daily commits terrorism against a virtually defenseless, captive population? What could be more extreme than wanting to travel half-way across the world to spray bullets at civilians in Gaza and drop bombs on hospitals, schools, apartment blocks, etc.?
In a recent article entitled “Supporting ‘terror tourism’ to Israel gets Canadian tax credits,” writer Yves Engler explains how hundreds of Canadian Jews fight in the Israeli military. Engler documents how Canadian charities established by Zionists are freely allowed to financially sponsor young Canadian Jews who wish to join the IDF and fight in Israel’s bloody conquests.
“The double standard is extreme. It is illegal for Somali Canadians to fight in that country but it is okay for Canadian Jews to kill Palestinians in Gaza. And the government will give you a charitable tax credit if you give them money to support it,” says Engler.
What could explain such lavish privilege afforded to Canadian Jews who commit terrorism abroad and then return to Canada to enrich our society with their self-righteous zealotry and demented hubris?
Has Canada become nothing more than a de facto slave colony of the Jewish State?
Written by Brandon Martinez
Sept. 3, 2014
CBC News has reported that the RCMP, Canada’s equivalent of the FBI, has in the works a new program designed “to stop Canadians from becoming radicalized by violent ideologies.”
“As of early 2014, about 130 people with Canadian connections were believed to be in countries such as Syria, Somalia and Afghanistan participating in terrorism-related activities,” reports CBC.
The RCMP is allegedly establishing a Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) program “to stop Canadians at risk of being radicalized.”
The CBC report further noted that “[an anti-terrorism] law passed in 2013 […] made it illegal to leave or attempt to leave the country to commit certain terrorism-related offences.”
Well then, will those Canadians who espouse the ideology of Zionism — an incredibly violent, narcissistic and racist ideology that seeks the ethnic replacement of Palestinian Arabs with Jews — and who endeavour to join Israel’s military to participate in brutal war crimes, including the indiscriminate slaughter of small children as they play soccer on the beach, be considered as prime subjects for this new RCMP program to counter radicalism among Canadians?
What could be more radical than to want to join a foreign army that has one of the worst human rights records of any modern state and daily commits terrorism against a virtually defenseless, captive population? What could be more extreme than wanting to travel half-way across the world to spray bullets at civilians in Gaza and drop bombs on hospitals, schools, apartment blocks, etc.?
In a recent article entitled “Supporting ‘terror tourism’ to Israel gets Canadian tax credits,” writer Yves Engler explains how hundreds of Canadian Jews fight in the Israeli military. Engler documents how Canadian charities established by Zionists are freely allowed to financially sponsor young Canadian Jews who wish to join the IDF and fight in Israel’s bloody conquests.
“The double standard is extreme. It is illegal for Somali Canadians to fight in that country but it is okay for Canadian Jews to kill Palestinians in Gaza. And the government will give you a charitable tax credit if you give them money to support it,” says Engler.
What could explain such lavish privilege afforded to Canadian Jews who commit terrorism abroad and then return to Canada to enrich our society with their self-righteous zealotry and demented hubris?
Has Canada become nothing more than a de facto slave colony of the Jewish State?
Written by Brandon Martinez
Wednesday, June 13, 2018
Wednesday, June 6, 2018
The Connection Between Jews, Israel, Freemasonry, the Stasi and Organized Stalking
There are strong connections between Freemasonry and the state of Israel. Most people don't know there are strong connections between Jews, Israel, Freemasonry, Homeland Security, organized stalking, the Stasi and the Cheka. See here for more about this.
Jews played a leading role in the development of Bolshevism and the Cheka. The Stasi called themselves proud "Chekists," once again, emphasizing the connections to Bolshevism and the Cheka. (To learn more about the Jewish connections to this, see here, here, here, here, here, here and here.)
They have also played a major role in the development of the new Homeland Security laws. See here for a collection of links regarding Homeland Security.
See this post about classified technology that allows them to stalk, harass and torture you remotely, see here for the techniques they use when they find out where you are and who you are.
The reality is, this is a part of COINTELPRO from the FBI. Now, guess who was a Freemason? None other than J. Edgar Hoover. You don't think the same ideas aren't running the RCMP or the Police in England that have the Masonic checkerboard on their hats? As I said before, Israel is everything. It is the most important place on the map.
Don't let anyone fool you, this is what runs this world. Can you see the similarities of the Stasi flag, the Israeli flag, and the Freemasonry sign below?
Jews played a leading role in the development of Bolshevism and the Cheka. The Stasi called themselves proud "Chekists," once again, emphasizing the connections to Bolshevism and the Cheka. (To learn more about the Jewish connections to this, see here, here, here, here, here, here and here.)
They have also played a major role in the development of the new Homeland Security laws. See here for a collection of links regarding Homeland Security.
See this post about classified technology that allows them to stalk, harass and torture you remotely, see here for the techniques they use when they find out where you are and who you are.
The reality is, this is a part of COINTELPRO from the FBI. Now, guess who was a Freemason? None other than J. Edgar Hoover. You don't think the same ideas aren't running the RCMP or the Police in England that have the Masonic checkerboard on their hats? As I said before, Israel is everything. It is the most important place on the map.
Don't let anyone fool you, this is what runs this world. Can you see the similarities of the Stasi flag, the Israeli flag, and the Freemasonry sign below?
Wednesday, May 23, 2018
Lowlife Entitled Scum of the Earth --- Meet James Altucher- Intelligence Psychopath Who Poses As a "Self Help Author"
See Picture & Links Below!
Something to keep in mind, James Altucher is a computer scientist, he knows about this technology. So, why doesn't he enlighten the world by educating us all? He claims to be a "self-help" author, well wouldn't he be helping others by revealing this information? This proves I am telling the truth, do you honestly believe that he doesn't know about this sort of technology?
3. James Altucher and Recent Interview With Phony Jewish Human Rights Activist Garry Kasparov
4. See here for James Altucher- Entitled Psychopathic Lying Zionist Scum
5. Classified Technology: goo.gl/ZqTF28 Learn Intelligence Tactics: goo.gl/W5QrH9 Discredit Someone with Hi-Technology: goo.gl/WSxxjZ
6. See here for vigilante Zionist justice
7. Zionist Vigilantes With James Altucher and Curtis Sliwa
8. See here for connections between Zionism and Homeland Security
Wednesday, May 16, 2018
Exposing The Real Bullies
For more about this sort of behavior, see here. Also see "Is This Crazy Enough For You?" Part 1 and Part 2. One of the people that is featured in the top video is Miko Peled. It is very hard for Jews to call him "antisemitic," look at his background and who he is. Here is an excellent must watch video that I put up a few years ago, here is another video with him too. Both videos are must see.
Monday, May 14, 2018
Oh My God! The Jews Are Going To Be Pushed Into the Sea By Iran! Watch the Videos Below!
Once again, the lies that come out of the leadership of the United States government and the state of Israel are absolutely astonishing. Some of these nut-jobs want to attack Iran. Use a little critical thinking.... don't you think Iran would start with attacking the Jews in Iran first? Did you know that many Iranian Jews are happy in Iran and do not want to move to Israel?
Although it is not often highlighted, Iran has the largest and the only growing Jewish population in the Middle East – outside of Israel. Jews, as well as Christians, and other minority religious groups live peacefully in Iran, serving in the country's government and even voicing criticism of the Zionist Israeli state. Around 60 synagogues, including six in Tehran, serve as places of community and worship for the Iranian-Jewish community.
It is time that you stop listening to the trash people that are running Canada, the United States and Israel. They are psychopaths. All three of these countries have the least critics of Zionism and they all have the largest population of Jews in them. (Israel actually has more critics than Canada and the United States!) No this does not mean I side with Iran, this is not some stupid either/or false dichotomy between the corrupt leadership of governments, this is just about acknowledging the truth and realizing to change anything you need the truth.
This is also important when considering what you have heard about Iran and the supposed "Iran Deal" which under Obama was made at least reasonable. To put sanctions on the Iranian people is a crime against humanity because it is based on nothing but lies. Most people do not know anything about this at all. Did you know that Iran has always allowed the IAEA, (The International Atomic Energy Agency,) to inspect its nuclear facilities? This is before anything the Obama administration changed. Yet, the United States still put crippling sanctions on the Iranian people just like they did to the poor Iraqi people. At least Obama stopped these sanctions. But Trump is starting them again. It gets even worse. Israel has never once signed any nuclear agreement, (while Iran has,) nor ever publicly acknowledged that it has nuclear weapons! They have also NEVER allowed the IAEA to inspect their nuclear facilities! To learn more about Zionist lies, go here. To learn more about the so-called Jews, go here.
Although it is not often highlighted, Iran has the largest and the only growing Jewish population in the Middle East – outside of Israel. Jews, as well as Christians, and other minority religious groups live peacefully in Iran, serving in the country's government and even voicing criticism of the Zionist Israeli state. Around 60 synagogues, including six in Tehran, serve as places of community and worship for the Iranian-Jewish community.
It is time that you stop listening to the trash people that are running Canada, the United States and Israel. They are psychopaths. All three of these countries have the least critics of Zionism and they all have the largest population of Jews in them. (Israel actually has more critics than Canada and the United States!) No this does not mean I side with Iran, this is not some stupid either/or false dichotomy between the corrupt leadership of governments, this is just about acknowledging the truth and realizing to change anything you need the truth.
This is also important when considering what you have heard about Iran and the supposed "Iran Deal" which under Obama was made at least reasonable. To put sanctions on the Iranian people is a crime against humanity because it is based on nothing but lies. Most people do not know anything about this at all. Did you know that Iran has always allowed the IAEA, (The International Atomic Energy Agency,) to inspect its nuclear facilities? This is before anything the Obama administration changed. Yet, the United States still put crippling sanctions on the Iranian people just like they did to the poor Iraqi people. At least Obama stopped these sanctions. But Trump is starting them again. It gets even worse. Israel has never once signed any nuclear agreement, (while Iran has,) nor ever publicly acknowledged that it has nuclear weapons! They have also NEVER allowed the IAEA to inspect their nuclear facilities! To learn more about Zionist lies, go here. To learn more about the so-called Jews, go here.
Thursday, May 3, 2018
Activist Reveals Hidden Military Ties Between Canada and Israel-Weaponizing Nanotechnology! Originally Posted in 2015
Please see here, here, here, here, and here for articles on the close relationship between Israel and Canada. I have written previously about how there is an agenda in the United States and Canada to take away your rights and freedoms. This is a part of Homeland Security. See here, here, here, here, here, here and here for more information. The following article refers to the weaponization of Nanotechnology. This is one of the ways they are going about this.
Original Article By Jonathan Caragay-Cook — Published January 27, 2015
These are the words of Jeff Halper, one of 191 Nobel Peace Prize nominees in 2006. Not only a sentiment of solidarity, this statement reflects the effects of Israeli military research on civil liberties in Canada, according to the Israeli academic and peace activist. He led a discussion with students and professors at Concordia Monday afternoon.
“Where certain parts of universities are getting closed down, departments of universities that feed into military research have greater budgets,” Halper told The Link. “The closer [ties] to the military, the better funded you are.”
Universities like Concordia and McGill collaborate on projects like developing the weaponization of nanotechnology with Israeli schools such as Technion, the Israel Institution of Technology in Haifa, according to the Independent Jewish Voices of Canada. Halper claims Canada benefits when Israeli researchers use Palestinians as “guinea pigs” for its weapons and systems and their exportation.
“Israel is involved in your prison systems. It’s involved in training the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. It’s involved in your airport security,” Halper said of Canada’s use of Israeli security tactics.
As the director of the Israeli Committee Against House Demolition, he referred to how austerity measures in countries like Canada is leading to cuts everywhere except the military and police.
“It’s getting to a point where, if you don’t fall in line to the powers at be, you’re a terrorist,” he said about the West’s increased police militarization. “The whole world is being corrupted; it’s delegitimizing all resistance.”
Halper used the term “pacification” multiple times to describe the current political climate. Protests are becoming more controlled and nullified, according to the Israeli academic. When prompted by a Demilitarize McGill representative in the audience for advice about how to further their cause, Halper suggested asking professors involved in military research to cease operations, and, if they refuse, to publicly out them.
During the Concordia Student Union by-elections last semester, students passed a referendum allowing the CSU to support the global Boycott, Divest and Sanction movement against Israel. The exact terms of how Concordia will enact BDS is yet to be determined, but Halper’s suggestions may be useful.
Born in the U.S., Halper emigrated to Israel in 1973. As both countries pushed anti-Palestinian rhetoric, the activist credited his upbringing in the 1960s and non-belief in government propaganda for his critical thinking.
“From the very beginning, I linked up with the Israelis who themselves are critical of the occupation,” he said. “There are some connections also with Palestinians so that was the circle that I got into.”
While he made Israeli friends with similar opinions and co-founded ICAHD in Israel, Halper said that segregation from Palestinians means Israelis can live their lives in relative safety and a prosperous economy, without encountering a Palestinian or going to the West Bank.
“The occupation is becoming a non-issue,” he continued. “Less and less people are concerned about it.”
“We’re all Palestinians.”
These are the words of Jeff Halper, one of 191 Nobel Peace Prize nominees in 2006. Not only a sentiment of solidarity, this statement reflects the effects of Israeli military research on civil liberties in Canada, according to the Israeli academic and peace activist. He led a discussion with students and professors at Concordia Monday afternoon.
“Where certain parts of universities are getting closed down, departments of universities that feed into military research have greater budgets,” Halper told The Link. “The closer [ties] to the military, the better funded you are.”
Universities like Concordia and McGill collaborate on projects like developing the weaponization of nanotechnology with Israeli schools such as Technion, the Israel Institution of Technology in Haifa, according to the Independent Jewish Voices of Canada. Halper claims Canada benefits when Israeli researchers use Palestinians as “guinea pigs” for its weapons and systems and their exportation.
“Israel is involved in your prison systems. It’s involved in training the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. It’s involved in your airport security,” Halper said of Canada’s use of Israeli security tactics.
As the director of the Israeli Committee Against House Demolition, he referred to how austerity measures in countries like Canada is leading to cuts everywhere except the military and police.
“It’s getting to a point where, if you don’t fall in line to the powers at be, you’re a terrorist,” he said about the West’s increased police militarization. “The whole world is being corrupted; it’s delegitimizing all resistance.”
Halper used the term “pacification” multiple times to describe the current political climate. Protests are becoming more controlled and nullified, according to the Israeli academic. When prompted by a Demilitarize McGill representative in the audience for advice about how to further their cause, Halper suggested asking professors involved in military research to cease operations, and, if they refuse, to publicly out them.
During the Concordia Student Union by-elections last semester, students passed a referendum allowing the CSU to support the global Boycott, Divest and Sanction movement against Israel. The exact terms of how Concordia will enact BDS is yet to be determined, but Halper’s suggestions may be useful.
Born in the U.S., Halper emigrated to Israel in 1973. As both countries pushed anti-Palestinian rhetoric, the activist credited his upbringing in the 1960s and non-belief in government propaganda for his critical thinking.
“From the very beginning, I linked up with the Israelis who themselves are critical of the occupation,” he said. “There are some connections also with Palestinians so that was the circle that I got into.”
While he made Israeli friends with similar opinions and co-founded ICAHD in Israel, Halper said that segregation from Palestinians means Israelis can live their lives in relative safety and a prosperous economy, without encountering a Palestinian or going to the West Bank.
“The occupation is becoming a non-issue,” he continued. “Less and less people are concerned about it.”
Wednesday, May 2, 2018
Tuesday, May 1, 2018
Rapper Wiley remains defiantly "anti-Semitic" : Claims 'I'm right, Jews do run the earth'- Read Article Below!
By DONNA RACHEL EDMUNDS AUGUST 23, 2020 15:24
Wiley insisted that his bans from social media - far from chastising him - would only serve to further his message.
British rapper Wiley has doubled down on his recent antisemitic comments, insisting, "I'm right. I'm right. The Jewish community do [...] run the Earth."
Last month UK police launched an investigation into the rapper, whose real name is Richard Kylea Cowie Jr., after he took to Twitter to post: “If you work for a company owned by 2 Jewish men and you challenge the Jewish community in any way of course you will get fired.” In a follow-up Tweet, he added: “In fact there are 2 sets of people who nobody has really wanted to challenge #Jewish & #KKK but being in business for 20 years you start to understand [sic] why.”
Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and YouTube responded by removing his official accounts from their sites. But speaking to the 1 Po show on YouTube, Wiley again insisted that there is enmity between Jews and Black people, the latter being oppressed by the former.
"I’m right. I’m right. The Jewish community does own a lot of s*** on this planet, and they do, with other societies, run the Earth. They own everything," he said. "I’m not antisemitic if I say the Jewish community’s very powerful, they own this, they own that – I’m not wrong. I’m not wrong. If I say there's Sheikhs who own a lot of oil - am I wrong?
“A lot of what I’m going on about is institutional, deep-rooted, systemic, it’s in-place anyway… I’ve never had a problem with anyone in business other than with some of the Jewish community that I’ve worked with,” he added. “The Jewish community does stick together.”
In an attempt to bolster his viewpoint, he referenced a 2018 incident in which Israel's Sephardic Chief Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef likened Black people to monkeys and used the word 'kushi,' which is used in the Talmud but in modern Hebrew is a pejorative. Yosef was investigated by the Justice Ministry over whether the comments constituted a criminal incitement to racism, and the Anti-Defamation League, among others, sharply criticized the Rabbi, calling his comments "utterly unacceptable."
But Wiley argued that the rabbi had received preferential treatment by the social media platforms.
“People had a problem with what I said the other day," he said, "and I felt they’re going to shut down this and this and this, but before even that I was on the ‘net and I saw the chief rabbi compare black people to monkeys. They didn’t take down his Twitter, Instagram, Facebook and YouTube. When I saw that I learned something – you can’t make somebody care about your history more than they care about their own.”
During the course of the 34-minute interview, he insisted that the removal of his accounts was an act of racism against him as a Black person, perpetrated by Jews.
“Twitter, shut down – who owns Twitter, do you reckon? Instagram, shut down – who owns Instagram, do you reckon? Facebook – shut down – we all know who owns Facebook. YouTube, Google, who owns that do you reckon? That’s the first lot of people who have shown who they are."
However, he remained defiant, insisting that the bans - far from chastising him - would only serve to further his message.
“My thing was just to show my people, you know what, you know that unfair world? It really does exist. And once I say this, they’re going to try to shut me down, but in spirit, in life, ka-boom, I’m just going to get bigger. It’s been like that for time. It’s systemic. It needs to change. We all need to come together instead of throwing ourselves to them. They chew you up and spit you back out again.”
The video was published to YouTube channel FilthyFellas on Friday, who explained their rationale for hosting him in the video's description. "Wiley is an important person. He is the Godfather. He had a vision for music made by black people in Britain and he forged a path for so many people of all colours and backgrounds to create great art, make a living and really impact the world," they wrote.
"He is not without his faults and 1 PO SHOW and FilthyFellas will acknowledge them. In our opinion recent tirade was wrong and poorly considered and very dangerous. There is more to him than those Tweets though and we wanted to make sure we gave him the opportunity to clear-up as much of the mess has been left behind as possible."
They added: "We love Wiley. He means a lot to us. We do not condone prejudice in any form."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)