Saturday, April 8, 2017

Look What Donald Trump Had To Say About Senator John Glenn And Yet They Won't Talk About Classified Technology

See here and here for previous posts about John Glenn and electromagnetic weapons. He acknowledged that some of the technology that I'm talking about existed. (See here and here for more about classified technology. See here for more about microwave weapons.) Maybe Donald Trump and the pathetic Zionist influenced media should be more truthful with people.

Click On Screenshot Above To Enlarge

Friday, April 7, 2017

Must See Video With George Soros About World War II

Below is an extremely interesting interview video with George Soros who runs the Quantum Fund. Every Jew and Gentile should watch this. This is one of the reasons that I have been putting up information about the Holocaust, the Transfer Agreement, (see here and here) and World War II.

The reality is, we need to know the truth about World War I and World War II. There is a lot of information that is being hidden from people and historians themselves cannot even pry into this too deeply without being labeled "Holocaust Deniers." It has nothing to do with doubting a Holocaust, it is about finding out the truth. Just like every historical event, it should be open to investigation so we get the facts straight. The reality is, some of the workers in Auschwitz were working for I.G.Farben, which was a massive chemical company and a fundamental force for the Nazi war effort. Why was this happening? Why didn't the United States government do something about this? Read below to learn more about the Warburg's who were instrumental in setting up the Federal Reserve in the United States and I.G. Farben. The Warburg family is not as well known as the Rothschilds, but, they are almost as powerful. There are many of these Jewish banking dynasties that few people know about.

Felix and Paul Warburg emigrated to the United States. Felix Warburg married Frieda Schiff, daughter of Jacob H. Schiff, a banker who grew up in Frankfurt. Jacob Schiff was also a major financier of the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. Schiff financed parts of the American rail system through his investment bank Kuhn Loeb. Schiff's great great grandson Drew married Al Gore's daughter Karenna. Felix Warburg's house in New York City is now the Jewish Museum, and Kfar Warburg in Israel is named for him. His brother Paul Warburg married Nina Loeb, daughter, of Solomon Loeb; they met at the wedding of Paul's brother Felix to Nina's niece Frieda. Paul Warburg was a planner for the U.S. Federal Reserve System which is a collection of private banks, and attended as the American representative, at the Treaty of Versailles conference, where his brother Max was on the German side of the bargaining table.

Beginning in 1933, Max Warburg served on the board of the Nazi Reichsbank, reporting directly to Hjalmar Schacht, before emigrating in 1938.

Before World War II, Max Warburg served on the board of directors of Interessen Gemeinschaft Farben or I.G. Farben, the giant German chemical firm that produced Zyklon B gas used in Nazi internment camps. His brother Paul Warburg served on the board of directors of I.G. Farben's wholly owned American subsidiary, which was also associated with Standard Oil (however, Paul Warburg died in January 1932, before Hitler was elected Chancellor). I.G. Auschwitz, founded in Katowice (33 km northwest of Auschwitz town) had its own corporate slave camp called Buna/Monowitz, where prisoners from Auschwitz were put to work. The Kilgore Committee Report of 1942 claimed that all I.G. Farben board members had precise and prior knowledge that Zyklon B (an insecticide) was being used to murder civilians in concentration camps, with no attempt made to halt production of the insecticide after such murders were understood. I.G. Farben, financed through Wall Street, was instrumental in channeling funds for the rise to power of the Nazi Party (as was Prescott Bush.)

(On a side note; isn't it interesting that Prescott Bush's son George H. W. Bush became the head of the CIA and the Vice President and the President of the United States, and his grandson George W. Bush followed by also becoming the President of the United States? These people are extremely connected individuals, as I said before, intelligence agencies are connected to Wall Street and banking. It always has been.)

I. G. Farben also built up the industrial and war-making capabilities of Germany once the Nazis were in power while simultaneously attempting to restrict industrial production materials to countries marked for invasion by Nazi Germany, all of this to such a degree that all German board members other than Max Warburg were charged after World War II as war criminals. The I.G. Farben factories were carefully avoided by Allied bombers indicating they were protected, as was Max Warburg.

Another interesting bank to look at is UBS, which is a bank that at one time was associated with the Warburgs. It probably still is --- you can look into who the major shareholders of this bank are. See here and here for the controversies with money regarding the Holocaust and World War II.

Nothing New: More Jewish Hypocrisy

Look at these children, see what Israel did to them. For some previous videos see here and here. See here for how Israel is the only country in the world to automatically prosecute children in military courts that lack basic safeguards for a fair trial.


Thursday, April 6, 2017

More MUST SEE VIDEOS: Jewish Bullies In Israel Attacking Children, Women And Senior Citizens

For some previous videos see here. See here for how Israel is the only country in the World to automatically prosecute children in military courts that lack basic safeguards for a Fair Trial.














Bloodsucking Rabbi's Infect Babies At Circumcision

For more on the Talmud, see here. See here for a video from an honest Israeli who talks about the problems of Israel and Judaism.

Wednesday, April 5, 2017

Learn More About Jews & Slavery

Watch The Video Below!

See here and here for more about the Holocaust and Six Million.  Ask yourself why a liar like Elie Weisel was such a prominent figure with the Holocaust museum. See here for his importance in the establishment of the Holocaust museum. See here, here and here for more about the "most famous Holocaust survivor" named Elie Wiesel. Isn't that pathetic given his lack of credibility? 

But wait... is Hollywood any better? Is Marlon Brando right about what he says here? You can be the judge of that. But, one perfect example of this is Steven Spielberg. See here for more about Steven Spielberg trying to cover-up the Jewish role in slavery and here for more about his pathetic Holocaust documentary.

Do you know that Germany just finished paying off the reparations from World War 1 and the Treaty of Versaille? Do you know that Germany is still paying "Holocaust" reparations to the state of Israel? Can you believe this? 

Who do you think owns most of the companies that pull the resources out of the ground all over the world but especially in the African continent?   (Who do you really think is behind the mainstream and alternative media? The same people that are behind the banks, the intelligence agencies and the fraudulent human rights organizations. The financiers and the companies that sell the resources that are being pulled out of the ground.) This is why Africa is being held down. This is what AFRICOM is truly about. These people have access to technology that can find oil and mineral deposits underground with up to 99% accuracy. (See this ad from Shell as an example. Also, see here for an example of synthetic aperture radar satellites.) That includes diamonds! They can rape the planet and hoard all its resources. 

Look under the Jewish slavery category of this blog to learn more about the Jewish slave trade in blacks and whites. (Be sure to scroll down and go through all the articles there.) The video below is interesting and must be watched. See here for the little-known connections between the Talmud, Judaism, and racism against Blacks. Also, be sure to watch this short excellent video from an honest Israeli talking about Judaism and Israel.  

See here for Jews selling Blacks. The historical fact is less than 4% of non-Jewish whites in the South of the United States owned slaves. Less than 2% of the whites in all of pre-civil war America, while 40% of Jewish households owned slaves.  Notice how guilt is only ascribed to "white people" - while Jews were 2000% more likely to own slaves than Gentile whites. Why are black and white Americans not allowed to know who the primary slave traders were? 

It is also worth noting that Judaism has a history of slavery but also, usury--- which is essentially another way of enslaving people. Besides this, Transhumanism (see here and here,) which is arguably a covert form of slavery and certainly has connections with eugenics, is also heavily oriented with Jews, for more about the connections to Judaism, see here and here. See here also for the connections between Judaism and eugenics. (Make sure you click on all the links there.) 

See here for many more informative videos and articles. 

Four New Human Rights When Our Brains Are Hooked Up To Computers

See here for classified technology and here for more about Elon Musk. The reality is, this has been happening for years, see here for more MKULTRA articles, be sure to scroll down and go through them all. Also, see here for an old New York Times article referring to this topic.  In all actuality, we don't really need any new human rights. They only need to enforce the Bill of Rights in the United States and the Bill of Rights and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in Canada. What we need is for the public to be made aware of this technology and that is should be treated with the equivalence of a biowarfare outbreak or a pandemic. 
By Edd Gent
The human-machine mind meld is just around the corner if you believe the buzz coming out of Silicon Valley these days. But neuroethicists worry the technology poses a threat to the last bastion of privacy, our innermost thoughts, and have suggested tweaks to our fundamental human rights to protect that privacy.
Elon Musk made waves last month when it was revealed that he had launched a new company called Neuralink, aimed at building brain-computer interfaces (BCI) that would allow us to “telepathically” communicate with machines.
The tech billionaire has been talking about the need to avert the existential threat of artificial intelligence by merging with machines for some time, but he’s now put his money where his mouth is and set an ambitious target of having healthy people installing these devices as a consumer product within the decade.
Earlier this month, the head of Facebook’s Building 8 research group, Regina Dugan, said they are also working on this kind of neural technology, though they want to create a non-invasive headset rather than an implant. They envisage people being able to use their thoughts to control a cursor in augmented reality or type 100 words per minute.

“The technology is coming and is likely to have dramatic implications for privacy, consent and individual agency.”

The technology is coming and is likely to have dramatic implications for privacy, consent and individual agency. That’s why Marcello Ienca, a neuroethicist at the University of Basel, and Roberto Andorno, a human rights lawyer at the University of Zurich, have outlined four new human rights in the journal Life Sciences, Society and Policy designed to protect us from the potential pitfalls.
“While the body can easily be subject to domination and control by others, our mind, along with our thoughts, beliefs, and convictions, are to a large extent beyond external constraint,” they write. “Yet, with advances in neural engineering, brain imaging and pervasive neurotechnology, the mind might no longer be such an unassailable fortress.”

1. The Right to Cognitive Liberty

The first proposed new right is the right to “Cognitive Liberty,” which states that people have the right to use emerging neurotechnology to modify their mental activity. But it also protects the right to refuse to use it in situations such as an employer requiring workers to take advantage of devices that would improve their performance.

2. The Right to Mental Privacy

Second on the list is the right to “Mental Privacy,” which would protect people from third parties accessing data about their mental activity collected by a neurotechnology device without their consent.
The impulse for this protection is obvious; tech giants are already hoovering up huge amounts of our behavioral data in their efforts to divine our innermost desires and sell us stuff. Brain data could let them bypass this guesswork and precisely tailor our online experiences in pursuit of their goals.
The authors debate whether this right should be absolute or relative, though. In certain situations, allowing the state to access the thoughts of criminals and terrorists could have obvious benefits for society. But the researchers suggest this could erode the already well-established right not to incriminate oneself, which is widely recognized across the democratic world and enshrined in the Fifth Amendment.

3. The Right to Mental Integrity

The last two rights are intertwined and deal with the emerging ability to not just record mental activity, but directly influence it. The right to “Mental Integrity” effectively protects against people hacking brain implants to hijack or interfere with their mental processes or erase memories.

4. The Right to Psychological Continuity

The right to “Psychological Continuity” deals with the vaguer notion of attempts to alter someone’s personality or identity, either through similar brain hacking approaches or more subtle ones like neuromarketing, which can involve companies using insights from neuroscience to try and alter unconscious behavior and attitudes in consumers.
These proposals raise some important issues that will have to be tackled as neurotechnology becomes increasingly common. However, it remains debatable whether the invention of new human rights is the best way to tackle them.
The researchers themselves raise the problem of so-called “rights inflation,” where the push to label anything that is morally desirable as a fundamental right waters down the meaning of those already in place.
While they offer a defense, it is not entirely clear why existing rights to privacy and accompanying data protection laws would not be equally applicable to the personal and medical data collected by neurotechnology devices. Similarly, it could be argued that the final two rights overlap to the point where it may make more sense to combine them.
Either way, though, the paper cuts through the utopian futurism that has surrounded emerging neurotechnology in recent months by highlighting the potential dangers and opening up discussion on how best to tackle them.