Friday, March 24, 2017

History Channel - Reading Minds & Microwave Mind Control

For more information on this sort of technology, go here. It is very interesting that you cannot seem to find this documentary anywhere on the internet anymore. For a full transcript of the documentary, go here.

Military Secret Brain-Chipping Soldiers Program Exposed

See a previous post here about DARPA guinea pigs here and here. See a previous post about nanotechnology here

Deborah Dupre
Human Rights Examiner

The United States is secretly implanting mind control brain chips in soldiers under the guise of proactively helping to heal battlefield brain injuries, according to an NPR interview with the author of a new book, implicating the highly secret branch of the U.S. military, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, DARPA, in a human rights violation that has surpassed criteria of a crime against humanity.

“Of the 2.5 million Americans who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, 300,000 of them came home with traumatic brain injury,” journalist Annie Jacobsen told NPR. “DARPA initiated a series of programs to help cognitive functioning, to repair some of this damage. And those programs center around putting brain chips inside the tissue of the brain.

”While the public is being told that the U.S. military is trying to find some way through computer technology to help people with brain injury, the program is far less than benevolent, according to Jacobsen, other scientists and thousands of secretly implanted Targeted Individuals.

"But your concern is that whatever is being discovered through that process might be turned to other and more secret ends," NPR's Steve Inskeep told Jacobsen.
"And this is a concern that has been voiced to me by many knowledgeable scientists who have worked with DARPA over the years," Jacobsen replied.

Once again, a disturbing claim consistently reported by thousands of  innocent Targeted Individuals (TIs) has been validated, albeit only after years of suffering and reporting of physical and psychological injury. Their suffering continues unabated, dismissed as "paranoia" or other mental illness, disregarded as fringe accusations by nearly every legal and medical professional nationwide.




DARPA hires scientists and defense contractors to secretly develop new weapons and new technology. When DARPA launched its RAM (Restoring Active Memory) program in 2014, it projected approximately four years until researchers were implanting chips in humans. What the military tells the public will occur usually has already been a reality, sometimes for decades. Just ask Annie Jacobsen, author of the new book about the history of DARPA, "The Pentagon's Brain." According to Jacobsen, DARPA has been, in effect, mapping the human brain for behavior control.

"Brain mapping is a set of neuroscience techniques predicated on the mapping of (biological) quantities or properties onto spatial representations of the (human or non-human) brain resulting in maps. Brain mapping is further defined as the study of the anatomy and function of the brain and spinal cord through the use of imaging (including intra-operative, microscopic, endoscopic and multi-modality imaging), immunohistochemistry, molecular & optogenetics, stem cell and cellular biology, engineering (material, electrical and biomedical), neurophysiology and nanotechnology, according to the definition established in 2013 by Society for Brain Mapping and Therapeutics (SBMT).

After countless Targeted Individuals reported to this author their experiences and evidence of being implanted victims of a secret program implanting people without their knowledge or consent, I wrote an article revolving around the explosive court case of brain-implanted Mr. James Walbert.

The brain implantation procedure can and is being used as a form of mind control on "America's best" citizens, according to one of the nation's most prestigious private investigators formerly involved in U.S. intelligence, William Taylor. Equally concerning is dentists and other medical professionals easily and routinely implanting chips into patients, including children, with neither patient nor parent knowledge or consent. This is why NSA employees go to designated dentists and medical professionals.

Subsequent trauma that brain implanted victims allegedly experience meets criteria of torture. This technological "no-touch torture" can be applied in the home and community of anyone perceived a possible threat to the "Homeland." It also meets criteria of a crime against humanity.

In a historic 2014 Russia Today program, TI Magnus Olsson explained that today’s secretly forced human chips are as tiny as a few nanometers. He exposed many shocking details that made Edward Snowden’s human surveillance and control disclosures seem sophomoric.

Through brain implant technology, human rights - all the important ethical issues regarding the most special aspects of being a free human being living a full human life - are dismissed.

Secret Brain Implants: Explosive Court Case



Deborah Dupre
Human Rights Examiner

Among greatest human rights violations imaginable.

Increasing numbers of innocent citizens targeted for U.S. state-sponsored terror are being secretly brain implanted with U.S. RFID chips without their consent for no-touch torture and mind control plus experimentation. One man evidenced this in court; won his case; and now prepares for a continuation in federal court, due to be equally explosive.

RFID is an abbreviation for Radio-frequency Identification, a misnomer due to the device functions consisting of far more than ID. It is used for remote technological harassment, torture and even assassination. 

James Walbert, a resident of Wichita, Kansas, proved his experience as a Targeted Individual under surveillance includes implanted RFID chips, including in his brain, and subsequent remote electronic abuse. Walbert told Sedgwick County, Kansas court panel that Jeremiah Redford threatened him with “jolts of radiation.” (Note: In the following video, you will see examples of scanning for radio frequency emissions. People must understand that nanotechnology is so small that even if it is located with a radio frequency scanner that doesn't mean you will pick it up on an MRI or an X-Ray.  That is one problem, the other problem is that you would not pick up a radio frequency emission to begin with.)

On November 25, 2008, the court ordered the associated targeted stalking of Walbert to halt. Walbert then began suffering electric shock sensations and hearing electronically generated tones, including popping and ringing sounds.

On December 30th, Court decided in Walbert’s favor, issuing a first-of-its-kind order of protection, banning Redford from using “electronic means” to injure Walbert. That Order has been violated - including by police Walbert told the Examiner.

"Nothing to date has changed at all - not to say that they are not investigating. There just has been no change at all in this harassment despite this order of protection."

RFID implants

A common misconception is that RFID implants are solely to track individuals 24/7. This is not the case with advanced satellite surveillance and "harassment" technologies that covert government agencies and organized crime syndicates are using on innocent people to neutralize them, and suppress them through mental torment and physical injury. These technologies are effectively used against RFID implanted persons.

Most RFID devices contain at least two parts: 1) An integrated circuit for storing and processing information, modulating and demodulating a radio-frequency (RF) signal; and 2) An antenna for receiving and transmitting signals.

With the second RFID part, the antenna, implanted subject can receive sounds, even verbal orders, and thus be subjected to control against his or her best interest, a method of mind control. With the antenna, the subject can also receive electronic pain and injury meeting torture criterion. The antenna has the capacity to covertly assassinate the target by directing electric energy from hand-held devices or satellite to a vulnerable body or organ part. Thus, the cause of death is attributed to the subject's vulnerability as recorded in medical records and then viewed by most people as death by "natural cause." (For information on NSA neural remote monitoring, see NSA Signals Intelligence here, here, here and here. )

"Mankind has inalienable human rights that are absolute and can not be debased, nor perverted. Human life can not be degraded to a 16 digit RFID chip number embedded under your skin under any circumstance. By uniting on this common ground, we can send a strong message to the IBM-funded Verichip that We The People Will Not Be Chipped," is the mission statement of the group, We the People Will Not be Chipped."

But what happens when unwitting, innocent persons are covertly chipped? Not possible? This is being reported throughout communities in the U.S. and other nations - with growing hard evidence to prove it.

The largest deployment of active RFID is the U.S. Department of Defense. (Wikipedia)


Chipped for failure to comply with bullies

"In 2004, I became an inventor and was then threatened shortly afterwards by the party outlined in the protection order," explained Walbert. "He had stated that I would give him this invention or he would further discredit me and just take it from me."

Walbert says that's when it all started.

"The FBI believes it to be close friends of mine who are executing this crime," says Walbert. "Very soon after the threat for not giving away my invention, I started experiencing very odd things around me, mostly the way people were acting towards me.

Most Targeted Individuals report that friends and even family members begin treating the target differently, as though mentally ill or dangerous. Some of these family members have reported to the Examiner that they were secretly contacted by law enforcement, threatened to keep the contact secret, and told lies about their loved one. The average person perceives and treats the target with less respect or understanding of the state-sponsored crime against them - all due to "official" lies to discredit and isolate the target, making it easier to further persecute him or her since no support or protection exists.

This sworn secrecy part of the program has been reported so many times, it raises serious ethical questions such as: How many people in the fields of medicine and mental health including psychology are directly involved in this system of abuse and just following orders? 

After a consultation with Walbert, Clinical Psychologist Cathy Meadows, M.A. wrote:

"The techniques used against these targeted individuals are purposely designed to make the victim appear to have a mentally disorder in order to invalidate any claims of wrongdoing by the perpetrators. [The same tactic is presently being used in the Gulf Coast crime against humanity, with focus on mental injury, not physical injuries.] It is a highly organized and multi-faceted attack that is used by many political and religious extremists, by corporations and businesses, and even by organized crime."

Meadows concludes stating that Walbert's "reasons for the covert attack and details he gives about the attack are in sync with what we know about gang-stalking and technological harassment and for this reason I can't rule out his claims."

Walbert now calmly describes the terrifying experiences hundreds of innocent targeted individuals report, a violation of their bodies and minds, often in their homes:

"I then woke up to bloody ears and lots of ringing and nervous system stimulations. Very soon after that, I went to the doctor and they had found something in my ears."

Walbert had scars along with this foreign body in his ear according to doctor reports.

"The whole left side of me was damaged," 

"I had gone in for an MRI. They found something else in the trapezia area. I had it sent off to a few doctors that I know." 

Dr. John Hall identified the foreign body as a RFID chip, consistent with what investigator William J. Taylor had stated.

Wanting to test his blood for any residues from the implant, the following year, Walbert saw the famous Industrial Toxicologist and Doctor of Integrative Medicine, Dr. Hildegarde Staninger with Integrated Health Services out of Los Angeles. After sending Walbert for 30 blood tests in search of damages, Staninger further confirmed the existence of the foreign bodies.

"Well we found the damages - and other implants as well," said Walbert.

He then had further tests run by another investigator to back up findings and confirmations by investigators at William J. Taylor's Agencies. Again, the new investigations concurred with the old.

Walbert then turned to private detective Melinda Kidder who confirmed the findings, stating that what everyone involved in the investigation had all been saying to be truthful, factual and real.

"Very soon after this, I again turned to the State Rep Jim Guest."

In 2006, when the U.S. Department of Defense awarded $1.6 million to Clemson University to develop an implantable biochip, WeThePeopleWillNotBeChipped.com's Yelene Slattery stated, "Soldiers can't choose to not get certain things done because they become government property once they sign up. When does it end? When does it become an infringement on a person's privacy?"

Slattery expressed valid concerns that once the chip is in, soldiers can be put on surveillance, even when off-duty, according to CBS affiliate KUTV. (U.S. Military May Implant Chips In Troops' Brains, Salt Lake City, Utah; Online: http://www.kutv.com/local_story_215001119.html; or see www.wanttoknow.info/a-us-military-may-implant-chips-troops-brains)

By 2008, due to Rep. Guest's leadership in Missouri, it became illegal for businesses to require employees to be micro-chipped.

“When you’re forced to have a chip put in you as a condition of employment, that’s taking away your civil liberties and your freedom,” said Rep. Guest, a King City Republican who added the microchip language to a bill concerning overtime and disability benefits. At that time, Guest vowed to introduce a bill to prohibit all microchip implants in humans. 

Guest had supported Walbert's first case in which the first protection order of its kind was issued, a major win that offered a glimmer of hope to the hundreds if not thousands of targets having their lives ruined by a covert, sophisticated system of abuse operating at every level of society.

"This time around," Walbert said, "I had solid evidence to present to Representative Guest's offices. Once this issued to his offices, I then had him confirm this evidence as being truthful and accurate and asked for another letter of support per his offices. It was granted."

Guest proceeded to introduce U.S. House Bill 550 against illegal chip implants.

"Rep Guest had came through again for all the victims, as we all knew he would and continues to do," said Walbert.

Walbert finally then turned to the Medical Community. He, like other implanted survivors, wants the devices extracted - but that has not happened.

"I was and continue to be turned away out of fear. Several doctors stated that they see it on the MRI and agree with other doctors, but they are not going to help out fear that the government is involved and tear their offices apart for any records that are related to this extraction of this implanted device." (Emphasis added)

Harassment continues

Walbert explains, "In the Order, there's a request to the Courts to have the defendant withheld from the use of such devices, and that is what the order was issued under that request. That is why it was a hit in such a big way. It was and is still the only order of protection from this equipment and its effects that has ever been issued to date.

"I'm preparing to fight the local police. The Federal courts are the only courts I can fight them in considering this is a federal crime."

The courts have waived the filing fee for Walbert and are serving the police via Federal Marshall office. They will deliver the suit to the police.

"That's kinda cool to see happening to them," said Walbert. "I have political support, investigatory support, medical support, psychological support as well for this case. If there are statement's that have been made against my mental health then we will just add the defamation into the suit as well. I am trying to get local media involved with this case. Just to expose our police department into a negligent state."

To date, Walbert's first case rests on over 557,000 websites, was featured in a Wired Magazine article plus appeared in numerous mainstream media outlets.

Walbert's next court case is due to be just as explosive as the first. This case impacts not only impacts the innocent citizens who silently suffer persecution, denied by those who could help. This goes further.

Paul Baird of www.surveillanceissues.com told the Examiner that the system of which Walbert reports and fights also has to do with "exclusion of those with character/integrity from public life; a selection process now perfected with the use of surveillance technology to ensure that no opposition exists."

Baird stated:

"The Big Brother system of control that we now know about is both the essence of the problem and the reason that approaches to public figures fail to get the necessary result. You can find good and bad in most quarters but not in the mainstream media, politics etc. The good - and I've found quite a few - are on the outer; systematically excluded."

To non-believers, including family, friends, and professionals who choose to forsake loved ones or clients due to this seemingly unbelievable hidden system of persecution, including by media, medical and mental health professionals, Walbert says:

"Anyone who wants more evidence, I have over 800 documents of solid irrefutable evidence to share."

Thursday, March 23, 2017

Psychiatry: The Marketing of Madness: Are We All Insane?

See a previous video on this topic here. For more articles on the topic of mental health, look under the psychiatry category here. (Be sure to scroll down and see all the articles.) Below is another interesting video about psychiatry. While they say much of psychiatry is ridiculous, not all of it is. There are some cases when drugs can help people. Generally speaking, true schizophrenics are a good example of this. A true schizophrenic always has symptoms of schizophrenia at a very young age... it is not something that is developed later in life.

This is why psychologists are generally more useful than psychiatrists. (Though there are some psychologists that are hacks because it requires a lower educational entry level.) Most people don't even know the difference between the two. Psychologists can't prescribe drugs. A good psychologist will teach you quality mental coping skills that are beneficial for your life. Also, it is unfortunate that much of recent empirical experimentation and studies dealing with psychology are being used for the control and manipulation of citizens. This works perfectly with the surveillance state that has been kicked into high-gear since September 11, 2001.

Paranoid Schizophrenia, Tool of the Red Terror, Makes a Comeback in Authoritarian USA & Other Western “Democracies"

See here for a previous article that touches on the topic of abusing political dissidents by throwing them into mental health facilities. Watch the documentary below. Areas of psychiatry are being increasingly debunked as valid science and seen to be what they were historically set up for ---- a strategy initiated by 19th and 20th century old-world, eugenicists, racists, and control freaks to prop-up a fraudulent State-supported methodology of social control with the help of pharmaceutical companies.

This isn't to say that there are no good people that are psychologists or decent psychiatrists working in the industry --- it's just that the very beginnings of psychiatry are suspect and the DSM Manual was massively connected to the CIA right from the beginning. (See here and here for more about this.)

But, most importantly, it’s useful to remember that throughout the last two centuries it has been used as a tool by totalitarian governments and authoritarian groups ---- the East German Stasi, the KGB of the Soviet Union, the US secret agencies among them --- to crush dissent, destroy truth, and silence credible witnesses.

See previous posts on this topic below the video.


Political Abuse of Psychiatry in the Soviet Union - Now Happening in Canada and the United States

MKULTRA Scientists and Electromagnetic Weaponry

CIA Mind Control Techniques MKULTRA Program Brainwashing

Dr. Donald Ewen Cameron: The Psychopathic Canadian Psychiatrist Behind "Psychic Driving"

Canada Psychiatrist Concerned About Remote Influencing Weaponry Affecting Mental And Physical Health

Just Remember the Ad Hominem Video... Don't Let Them Destroy the Message by Trying to Destroy the Messenger

Zersetzung - The Origins of Modern Day Homeland Security and the Police State Part 2

Is This Still Happening In Canada? Dr. Ewen Cameron Lives On --- the Nazis Didn't Lose the War, They Just Had to Move...

Transhumanism and its Connections to Eugenics and Political Control

Cold War Nonconsensual Experiments: The Threat of Neuroweapons and the Danger it will happen again

The “Deep State” Hides in Plain Sight: Organized Covert Harassment Points to Overreach and Abuse of Powers by Out-of-Control Intel Agencies

For complimentary information to the article below, see here for the Stasi techniques they use against political dissidents. Make sure you look under the links labeled 'Zersetzung'. See here to learn more about the classified technology they use. You can also look under the classified and hi-technology heading on my blog. 

To learn more about Counter Intelligence, see herehereherehere and here.  Also, see this video of Noam Chomsky talking about this problem.
========================================================================

We are living in a time of unprecedented surveillance and social control in the US and Canada, and also, many countries worldwide.

Very plainly, factions from Homeland Security and the US Military, in collusion with Intel agencies such as the NSA, DIA, CIA, FBI, and in a massive cover-up operation involving the collusion of neighborhoods, communities, and private businesses, has been and is covertly and clandestinely torturing American and Canadian citizens, (particularly outspoken activists, writers, and community members, in essentially a blatant “neutralizing of dissent”) 24/7 with deadly radio-frequency radiating neuroweaponry, euphemistically termed non-lethal weapons, and Remote Neural Monitoring technologies, both of which permit operators to remotely irradiate and manipulate human beings, in officially-sanctioned and clandestinely-run Non-Lethal Weapons testing and nonconsensual University-run science/sociology research programs on the civilian American population. The Patriot Act, the NDAA, and Executive Orders and Pentagon Directives are being used to cover up this crime of mammoth proportions.

Secrecy in law has brought us to a point where people either live in fear of the surveillance state and are afraid to speak their minds, or are naively co-opted into actively harassing activists/whistleblowers/writers in their midst, by Intel agencies working locally through Fusion Centers (via narratives of fabricated “investigations” of these civically-engaged citizens falsely termed “security risks” now needing to be “monitored electronically” 24/7 by the oh-so-concerned State and enrolled covertly in “neuroscience/behavior modification programs” which warrant friendly but un-turn-downable “official” requests for community co-operation).

Businesses and communities are openly repressed by Intel agencies using the overreaching powers of state secrecy laws–like Section 215 of the Patriot Act, and the whole Patriot Act, and the facile issue of National Security Letters via secret machinations of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, and secret sharing of private information, all tools to oppress civilians and groups, and to force a community’s silence through gag orders and threats of incarceration and fines.

Secrecy, Silencing, Surveillance, Censorship: are we Secure yet? Has American society always been secretly run by Intel groups?

According to Mike Lofgren (former GOP congressional staff member with Senate and House Budget Committees) in this Bill Moyers episode, the “Deep State” has been hiding in plain sight for years and includes Intel agencies, Wall Street, and Silicon Valley: he collects his thoughts also here in this essay, Anatomy of the Deep State.

Do Spy Agencies have any right whatsoever to covertly harass citizens–and to co-opt others through lies and deceit into also persecuting these citizens?

Or do these actions indicate a tremendous overreach and abuse of their powers?

Harassment today is malicious in the extreme, and involves the covert use of deadly directed-energy neuroweapons,  “electronic monitoring” or “electronic surveillance,” which community members consent to engage in, themselves (because they all have cell phones?! see here and here,) is nothing less than the GPS tracking, targeting, and discharge of deadly directed-energy neuroweapons on citizens. (See Classified Weapons, see microwaves here.)

The nature of spying in itself is a deterrent to democracy; to understand why. watch the documentary Counter-Intelligence posted online in five parts. See this Popular Resistance interview with filmmaker Scott Noble: Counter-Intelligence: Spying Deters Democracy.  Excerpt: “In making the film I set out to explore how these agencies function in the real world. How do they keep secrets? What are some common m.o.’s? What is their ultimate purpose? In a broader sense I wanted to ask whether democracy is even possible when organizations like the CIA exist. We are currently living under a hybrid of plutocracy (from plouto, “wealth”) and cryptocracy (from krypton, “hidden”) that benefits about 1 percent of the human population. It’s no secret we’re ruled by the rich, but there is a relative lack of understanding about just how much information is kept hidden from the public. A 2004 study by Peter Galison at Harvard concluded that “the classified universe is certainly not smaller, and very probably much larger than this unclassified one.””

What was COINTELPRO all about? Who did it target, and doesn’t it seem like it’s quite aggressively active today?

This brief video which excerpts part of the Church Committee findings, shows Walter Mondale and other Senators discussing the unprecedented nature of Covert Harassment they were uncovering: Covert Actions Against Citizens Living in America.

Who does the public listen to today? Are communities and citizens all too easily swayed by the voice of “Authority”?

How easily can your average person be persuaded to act against a fellow citizen, merely by the flashing of a badge? Is this how Intel agencies are running entire communities now, and ensuring their “community involvement/participation” in the harassment of activists/whistleblowers/writers–their own neighbors? 




Dealing With Zionist Lunatics

Note: See here for an excellent short video of an honest Israeli talking about the problems with the Talmud, Judaism, and Israel. See here for a collection of posts about the problems with Judaism and Israel. Through the new Homeland Security and Bill C-51 laws, these psychos are at war with the population, here are the methods they use and here is the technology. 
===========================================================================


By Karin Friedemann

Gideon Levy a Ha'aretz newspaper reporter recently asked: "If Israelis were so sure of the rightness of their cause, why the violent intolerance they display toward everyone who tries to make a different case?"

In "Survival Instinct or Jewish Paranoia?" my favorite shrink, ex-Israeli Avigail Barbanel writes that, "The implications of seeing the conflict from within the lens of Jewish trauma are very serious. Can we really negotiate with this? Can we explain to Israelis that their perspective on life and on the conflict is seriously flawed? If we tried will they listen, and do the Palestinians have time to wait until they do?"

It seems that Americans are kind of in an abusive marriage situation with Israel, where because love and friendship are assumed to be there, the abused partner keeps feeling guilty and acting hyper-responsible, and tries even harder to please the abuser. Many Americans maintain friendships with pro-Israel Jews and simply decide not to discuss politics; however there is an emotional blackmail going on because if you did mention Israel or Jewish-American genocidalism, the relationship would be over.

I was just thinking today about the aspect of emotional violence within Israel advocacy techniques that are used to shut down discussion about Jewish destructive behavior patterns or the State of Israel. This method is used against Gentiles primarily. Sometimes there is even a good cop-bad cop routine, with groups ganging up on someone to try and make the person feel ashamed for their alleged anti-semitism.

A Gentile in America, even a child, is raised to accept a very heavy sense of personal responsibility that far exceeds anyone else's normal sense of personal responsibility. It creates a neurotic personality who is always feeling guilty and thus is too weak to stand up to Zionist criminal behavior and the comical, obviously non-factual Zionist ideology.

Jews in America are socially empowered to go way beyond the learned trauma of the Jewish experience that results in typical reactionary behavior. They actually participate in group behavior that is deliberately manipulative and abusive - aimed at punishing activists who stand up for human equality and justice. Over the years, US Jews have become increasingly nutty not only due to current events but due to the internet "alerts" coming to them from Jewish lobbyists, who solidify their brains in this self-righteous fantasy world where Hamas is a terrorist organization, where Israel has some kind of right to kill and rob non-Jews.

So we are dealing with not only dangerous reactions based on past trauma - actually learned trauma based on a glorified and fictionalized past - but American Jews are actually being trained since childhood to interact with non-Jews in a deceitful and arrogant manner, in coordination with each other, to emotionally destroy Gentiles and Israel critics, in addition to wrecking their careers and interfering with their social relationships. This is actually deliberate, wicked, planned behavior motivated by a narcissistic self-righteous fury.

I think it's impossible to help heal Jews from Zionism without first somehow snapping off that connection with the Lobbyists. Mainstream gullible Jews and their dishrag friends tend to naively believe anything racist against Muslims ­ even from someone as disloyal to the United States Constitution like Charles Jacobs of CAMERA or the psychotic racist freaks at HonestReporting - who send them some unsubstantiated talking points memo - and people never even do any fact-checking.

American Jews tend to enforce blind conformity, bullying and shaming people into agreeing with a bogus sham written by a Polish immigrant funded indirectly by US taxpayers whose money was illegally laundered through the JCRC. Whatever happened to "Question Authority"?

So many Gentiles fall into this trap and start doing the work of the Zionists, attacking people if they deviate from political correctness. If we could focus on the emotional violence of Israel advocacy techniques we might be able to empower Gentiles to stand up to the psycho Zionists without enduring quite as much emotional pain.

The problem is that Gentiles are taught through emotional pressure and violence via the media and the school system to be very sensitive to Jewish suffering so when a Zionist becomes outraged at them for challenging their world view, the Gentile really has to fight against his own inner self in a huge battle against his "inner Jew" making him feel inadequate and intimidated. But the Jew doesn't care how much he or she hurts others. Jews only care about what's good for the Jews.

The world needs to intervene to save Jews from their murderous selves, and to save the Palestinians. However, sending in the UN as an occupation force would be an insult to the Palestinians especially given the UN's past record of backing up Israel and neocon wars in general and the previous example of Bosnia. Instead of helping Bosnians, the UN dismantled their country and now uses it as a CIA base for kidnapping white prostitutes to sell to Israel.

Intervention involves convincing world leaders to do the right thing, which seldom happens and does not empower us to action other than begging them.

What is possible and in fact quite easy is to find a way to deal with Zionist Jews in our local area, especially those who are involved in the organizational structures of Zionist organized racism.

Obviously, prosecuting Zionist organizations also requires convincing the establishment to define Zionism as a criminal ideology, like we do Nazism, and going after the leadership.

However, meanwhile, there should be a way for ordinary people to wear down ordinary Jews and their leadership by engaging them in arguments, and so on. The nicey nice "interfaith dialogue" routine is not working to help the situation as it just teaches Gentiles to be friends with Jews by never mentioning Israel's crimes against humanity.

One occasionally effective path for helping Jewish friends snap out of their ideological programming is to simply state the facts over and over again.

Obviously, coming up against a Jewish narcissist is always a painful experience and yet - as with a child molester - you have to intervene. If a person is walking around believing lies that enable violent crime, you would be a BAD person not to mention it to them.

If the Zionists on the local level could be made to feel a bit less comfortable with their ideology, and they were robbed of the freedom that comes with privacy and non-discussion, things could change very fast.

Most people in Israel who want peace say it's the American Jews and other Diaspora lobbies raising the money for the hate propaganda and the campaigns to elect war criminals in Israel and so on. Getting rid of Israel would not solve the problem of this Jewish international crime network. If they lost Israel they would just find something else to mess up. The American Jews are arming the rebels in Darfur now.

Something has to be done to break the spell of hypnosis that these Israel advocacy organizations have put on the local Jews and their intellectually deficient so-called friends. Discrediting the people who are spreading Israeli propaganda to the American public is absolutely paramount.

Part 2

I can't express how much more at peace I feel since I decided not to engage Zionists as friends anymore, but to treat them like people treat any other member of a racist criminal organization like the KKK. I consider a Zionist anyone who believes that Israel must exist as a Jewish State, especially if they are emotional about the issue, because that means they believe Jews have a right to steal from non-Jews, and they believe Jews have more rights than others, which is an indefensible position to maintain.

In the past it was always the other way around. I mention Palestinians, and they would act like I did something bad and not talk to me for some months or years. I used to feel very hurt because I was not trying to offend them. I had actually spoken politely to them. From now on I'm just ignoring them.

Many people deal with Zionists by making light talk and never discuss politics, but I think we should stop doing that since it normalizes their support for racist genocide.

Many Zionists don't call themselves Zionists but to me, a Zionist is someone who would deny Palestinians equal rights in order for the Jews to keep what they stole and call it Israel. They are very brainwashed so it's usually not useful arguing with them. Jewish organizations and synagogues teach classes in linguistic martial arts tactics (how to confuse your opponent etc.) to deflect blame from Jews and Israel. It's extremely dishonest and manipulative. According to the David Project, an organization which teaches these Israel Advocacy techniques and also disseminates Islamophobic misinformation to the public, states that their goal is to diminish the impact of Israel's detractors.

Obviously, those Zionists who are simply ignorant, if they are willing to hear my point of view and to ask questions in a polite way, that's different. But normally they act manipulative and do everything to prevent a normal discussion on Jews/Israel. I once reduced a 50 year old man to hysterical sobbing tears because I told him gently and lovingly that Jews were not that unique. I just told him the Jews, like everyone else, have had good times and bad times. Times when they were slaughtered and other times when they slaughtered others. Just like everyone else. Guess what he did next. He emotionally abused me in an insulting way and then cut off all further communication. Jewish behavior is so predictable that it's truly scary.

Most of the Zionists claim to want a Palestinian State side by side an Israeli state, but as Israel Shamir points out in his book, Flowers of Galilee, it's a political maneuver: a bluff. They are simply taking advantage of your good faith to keep you engaged, to give Israel more time to steal more land. What I tell them is, even if the Jews just stole half of Palestine instead of the whole thing, it's still stealing and they need to give it back and let the refugees come home, according to legal and ethical norms. The UN definition of "genocide" says destroying a people "in whole or in part" so even if they just took part of the land, it's still considered genocide.

The two-state Zionists show their true colors when the issue is cutting off US funding to Israel. They are very attached to the idea of a racist apartheid state for Jews paid for by non-Jews. If you mention cutting off the money or if you mention the possible compromise of living with Palestinians as equals in one state they become very angry and start using bullying tactics, unless they have some reason to fear you, in which case they shun you and complain about you to the authorities, try to get you arrested or try and destroy your career or social status through character assassination.

Rabbi Michael Lerner is a good example of this type of racist. He believes that Jews need to take care of the Palestinians and teach them how to become civilized. He considers stealing Palestinian land as "affirmative action for Jews."

Zionists all believe in the myth of "1000 years of Jewish suffering" and feel that the world owes them compensation for their ancestors' "unique" suffering. It's a criminally insane viewpoint. They cope with the contradictions between their belief that they are the good guys and what Jews are actually doing to their neighbors, both in the Middle East and in the US, by developing mental health issues. Most Zionists are functional schizophrenics.

A few Zionists are not schizophrenic. If you say, "You stole their country," they just say, "Yeah, so? And what are you going to do about it?" I'm actually more willing to deal with those kind of Zionists because at least they are honest, and this does leave some room for discussion. But why. Just as Americans are not required to support Israel, we are not obliged to interact with racists.

Monday, March 20, 2017

Doing What Some Jews Do Best- Terrorizing People and Ganging Up on Them Part 2 (This Time With Children)

Wait for the video to load below! The most immoral cowards in the world. The IOF 'arresting' a 5 yr old Palestinian boy in Occupied Hebron. ARE THESE NOT MONSTERSThere is also a picture below the video, check it out. This is all real. See here for my last post on this topic, see here for a post about these bloodthirsty sick people. See here for how Israel is the only country in the world to automatically prosecute children in military courts that lack basic safeguards for a fair trial. Watch this video about how some of these psychos act over in Israel. Believe me, some of the Zionists are just as crazy in Canada and the United States. They just do it in a different way, their method of attack in North America is a part of Homeland Security and they use Stasi techniques and classified technology.

The most Immoral Co wards in the world. The IOF.. 'arresting' a 5 yr old Palestinian boy in Occupied Hebron. #Monsters pic.twitter.com/rhxlATUvVj

Sunday, March 19, 2017

Doing What Some Jews Do Best- Terrorizing People and Ganging Up on Them

“Israeli Soldiers Detain! Mock ! And Humiliate!
A Young Palestinian With DOWN SYNDROME

Look at the video below. Just like what they did to Stephen Hawking after he decided to boycott Israel. This is what some Jews love to do. 

Sending a lamb or a goat into the wilderness. This is actually in the Old Testament, but NOT WITH HUMAN BEINGS. Unlike the Jews --- who with their Talmudic laws, consider all Gentiles animals. This is their interpretation of the Old Testament.  Especially those they deem as AmalekThis is why Jesus was a sacrificial lamb.

As I said before, not all Jews are like this... but, the ones who aren't, it is not because of Judaism---it is because they have adopted values from outside of their tribal insanity. Unfortunately, there are still many Jews who hide their identity, (you have to ask why they even do this...) and act like they are "liberals" and "tolerant" --- and yet, they still participate in anti-social behavior of this sort. They gang up on people and slander them. (See here and here.) Many are spies who work for the state of Israel or for their host countries. Others are just volunteers --- these people are called Sayanim.

This is the honest to God truth. Besides usury, this is exactly what has traditionally got Jews booted out of nations. They are a banking class that is connected to usury. As evidence to this, think about what the state of Israel actually is. The state was literally created by bankers, who--- if you can actually believe their level of nerve and gall, got England to give a piece of land to the Jews in the Middle East! See these videos here with Lord Rothschild.

This is exactly what the Balfour Declaration was. See here, here and here.

Think about that for a second.... imagine if a group of bankers from the United States said to Canada that the Jews should have a homeland in Vancouver?

"Hey Canada, we are going to come into your country and take Vancouver over and give it to the Jews." 

Now, imagine after this they started to clear out those who are not Jewish. Literally take over their homes and land and give them to Jewish people.

The state of Israel was literally commissioned by one of the most wealthy people (if not, the most wealthy,) on the face of the earth. An insatiable usurious moneylender. This is what they defend. They defend their tribe which is connected to this ---- it is Talmudic, they are a group connected to usury. As I said before, this is why they have historically had problems with their host populations.


The Famous Roman Lawyer and Politician Cicero and the Jews

See the Wikipedia write-up of Cicero here. See previous posts about the Jews from other famous individuals here, here and here. See the problems of Judaism here. Learn more about the Talmud hereSee here for an excellent short video of an honest Israeli talking about the problems with the Talmud, Judaism, and Israel.

Cicero on the Jews


Marcus Tullius Cicero is one of the best known and most admired of all figures in Roman history and long has been the idol of major intellectual figures in world history such as John Calvin. (1) He also has the honour to have written one of the most quoted paragraphs in the history of anti-Judaism and anti-Semitism, which appears in his defence speech of the former governor of Asia; Lucius Valerius Flaccus, who stood accused of corruption charges and one of the specific charges was that Flaccus had prevented the jews of his province sending the tribute due to the temple of Jerusalem and diverted that money instead into his own treasury.

The intellectual tendency in dealing with this charge has historically been to claim that Cicero was merely using invective and rhetoric to get his client cleared off the charges. This is; of course, possible and indeed we can see the idea that Cicero's use of rhetorical and oratorical gesture; as pointed out by Marshall, (2) supports this to an extent. However, to make such an argument is to assume that the use of rhetorical and oratorical gesture as well as the art of rhetoric itself makes a charge false, incorrect or exaggerated.

This is obviously problematic as it assumes that the art of rhetoric and gesture is the art of lying, which is not so but rather it is simply the art of best representing your case to your audience. As such then Cicero is merely guilty of doing his best for his client and that we cannot blithely assume that he is making up the charges he levels at the jews.

What has not been generally remarked on; outside of academic treatises on the relations between jews and Romans, is that Cicero did not mention jews only once: he also mentions them in a speech he made to the trial of a noted friend of the jews; Aulus Gabinus, who had profited greatly from an arrangement with the newly conquered jews of Judea during his term in office. (3)

Cicero calls the jews a 'nation born to slavery' and states that Gabinus' actions; usurping the established process of giving the job of taxing the provinces to up and coming Roman politicians and military men [as governance experience] and instead awarding it to the jews, were tantamount to treason to the Roman state.

To quote Cicero:

'And as for the miserable tax collectors, (miserable man that I also am, when I see the miseries and suffering of those men who have deserved so well at my hands), he [Gabinus] handed them over as slaves to the Jews and Syrian nations: themselves born for slavery. He laid down as a rule from the very beginning, and he persevered in it, never to decide an action in favour a tax collector. He rescinded contracts that been made justly and he took away all the garrisons established for the their protection. He released many people required to pay tributes and taxes from such payments at whatever town he was living in or whatever town he arrived at and he forbade any tax collectors or they representatives to remain. Why need I enlarge on this? He would be considered a cruel man if he had shown such a disposition to our enemies, as he has shown towards Roman citizens. Especially towards those of the class which has hitherto always been maintained by its own dignity and the goodwill of the magistrates.' (4)

We can thus see from the above that Cicero is showing a not inconsiderable hostility to the jews; as a people, in passing and we may point out that by extension that Cicero's claims that Gabinus was a 'glutton and robber' (5) is based on the idea; later enunciated in his 'Pro Flacco', that the jews corrupt Roman officials with their gold. (6) In 'Pro Flacco' Cicero even refers back to his charges against Gabinus when he states that because the jews (i.e. Gabinus and his jewish supporters) had been defeated the gods had been pleased as well as placated and that the tax collectors were once again allowed to go about their unpopular but necessary work.

Cicero's reference in 'Pro Flacco' to the happiness of the gods at the defeat of the jews is reinforced by his point that his friend; Pompey the Great, had not touched the jewish temple or been infected by the ideas of Judaism as they were at odds with everything that the Roman Empire stood for and believed in. As Goodman observes this was quite correct: (7) as Judaism was the most extreme of all current barbarous faiths to the Romans with the only historical comparison being the vicious religion of Carthage. So dangerous were jews and Judaism considered that they were outlawed from becoming citizens during Cicero's time and for a while afterwards: (8) a view that Tacitus suggests was due to their wholly alien nature and religious intransigence. (9)

In essence Cicero was saying; in relation to Pompey, that any possible positive association with the jews was a significantly negative thing as the jews were classed as the lowest of the low by the Romans (ergo his comment about the jews being a 'nation of slaves').

This is both due to the fact that large numbers of jews had recently been sold in Rome as slaves and also because it was Cicero's own view. We know this because Cicero refers to the jews as active agents attacking senatorial and republican interests in Rome rather than just pawns of larger and more powerful interests. This is interestingly supported by Suetonius' assertion that the jews were very supportive of Julius Caesar (10) who Cicero was ideologically opposed to and regarded as a tyrant.

That Cicero saw the jews as a powerful interest group is suggested in 'Pro Flacco' when he asserts that the area chosen for the trial of Flaccus by the prosecution was chosen specifically so as to allow large demonstration by mobs of jews. (11) The problem with suggesting that this is a rhetorical trick is that in order for Cicero to have made the assertion: it had to be credible as otherwise its use was pointless. If the assertion was credible then there would have to be significant numbers of jews in Rome who were able (i.e. not slaves) to actively oppose a trial of this kind.

Further to this Cicero makes clear that he is making two points not one here: in so far as he states that the jews export gold out of Italy (and other provinces) to Jerusalem every year to pay their tithe to the temple in Jerusalem (i.e. enriching themselves at the cost of Rome). In doing so Cicero is telling us that jews had enough money to be able to do this (i.e. they were not slaves or among the poor) and there was a community of jews who were free and active proponents of their religion.

This is confirmed by a comment that Plutarch states Cicero made during his prosecution of Varres (lit. 'boar' or 'pig'); the former Roman governor of Sicily, who was defended by a Roman aristocratic god-fearer; i.e. a gentile who had sworn allegiance to the jews in all things and abandoned the gods of his ancestors, named Cecilius. Plutarch tells us that Cicero opened his argument by making fun of his opponent by stating: 'What has a Jew to do with a pig?' (12)

Cicero is here showing that he is aware that of the phenomenon of the god-fearers in Rome; as well as that they had some notable neophytes from among the highest echelons of Roman society, (13) as he calls Cecilius what he in effect is: a jew. If we understand that to Cicero: god-fearers were also to be counted jews then we can read Cicero's assertion of the 'mobs of jews' slightly differently. In that while large numbers of jews could possibly have been in Rome at the time; which this is traditionally used as evidence of, it is more likely that the jews Cicero is referring to is far less to do with actual jews and more to do with the numerous god-fearers. (14)

If we make the reasonable assumption that Cicero's assertion about the location of Flaccus' trial in relation to mobs of jews has some basis in fact; as otherwise why assert it in the first place, then we can suggest that nearby there would have been a significant amount of god-fearers and in all probability a smaller amount of jews. This means in effect that what Cicero was talking about was the local jews whipping up their sworn followers into mobs and going; as many would have likely been Roman citizens, to the locale of trial to influence the verdict against Flaccus.

This then makes sense of Cicero's assertion (as it tells us why he mentioned it and also why it was plausible to the listeners) as well as his known strongly pejorative comments against the jews in so far as Cicero even went as far in 'Pro Flacco' as to call the jews:'our enemies'. Or put more simply: the eternal enemies of the Roman people.

We may further note that Cicero's teacher was the anti-jewish Greek thinker Apollonius Molon: who wrote a whole treatise; which has sadly been lost, attacking the jews and had had a lot of experience with them on his home island of Rhodes. If we understand that Molon almost certainly taught the young Cicero about the jews and then Cicero; in the course of his public life and pro-republican advocacy, came into contact with jews doing precisely the same things his old teacher had described then his reaction would have been both as strong and as brutal as it seems to have been.

In essence Cicero took no prisoners when it came to jews and took every reasonable opportunity to attack the jews when chance presented itself and his anti-jewish comments in 'Pro Flacco' should not read as a purely rhetorical exercise, but rather as an expression of fundamental beliefs that Cicero held about jews.

Or put simply: Cicero didn't like the jews or Judaism one bit.

References

(1) Bruce Gordon, 2009, 'Calvin', 1st Edition, Yale University Press: New Haven, pp. 25-26
(2) Anthony Marshall, 1975, 'Flaccus and the Jews of Asia', Phoenix, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 139-142
(3) Martin Goodman, 2008, 'Rome and Jerusalem: The Clash of Ancient Civilizations', 1st Edition, Penguin: New York, p. 389
(4) Cic. Prov. 5:10
(5) Ibid. 5:11
(6) Cic. Flac. 63
(7) Goodman, Op. Cit., p. 390
(8) Martin Goodman, Jane Sherwood, 2003, 'The Roman World 44 BC – 180 AD', 2nd Edition, Routledge: New York, pp. 103; 120
(9) Tac. Hist. 5:5
(10) Suet. Aug. 84
(11) Marshall, Op. Cit., p. 139
(12) Plut. Cic. 7
(13) Harry Leon, 1961, 'The Jews of Ancient Rome', 1st Edition, Jewish Publication Society of America: Philadelphia, p. 17
(14) Ibid, p. 1
5

Wednesday, March 15, 2017

Transhumanism Discussion Admits Changing Brain Structure- This is Going on With Human Experimentation

As you can see from the discussion below, if you go 6 minutes and 30 seconds into the video, you will see Max More admit they have the technology to alter the brain structure of individuals. This is what I was talking about herehere and here.

For more information about classified and hi-technology, see here. For more information about Transhumanism, see here. For some excellent documentaries on the subject, go here. You can also watch the bottom video here that features the lady in the discussion below. Her name is Francesca Ferrando. In it she talks about humans being infected with viruses.

See Walter Block - "Anarcho-Capitalist" Libertarian Defend the "Undefendable" or Intelligence Agency Stasi Techniques

As you can see from the screenshot below, the video here, and Walter Block's book here, he is essentially defending the exact same techniques the intelligence agencies are engaging in. Including blackmail, slander and libel. (CLICK ON THE SCREENSHOT BELOW TO MAKE IT BIGGER.) 

Apparently, in his mind... these are "Libertarian" principles.  One might begin to wonder why none of these supposed Libertarians ever seem to mention the insane level of surveillance the population is under by intelligence agencies. This extremely intrusive level of surveillance includes having access to the brains of political dissidents (some who are Libertarians themselves,) and shooting them with microwaves and electromagnetic weapons. Isn't this kind of relevant to the case for freedom? Isn't it contradictory to their professed principles? Why are none of the people or the websites that Walter is associated with, (the Mises Institute or Lew Rockwell.com to name two,) talking about this?

I know why...it's because these websites are associated with the CIA. These websites are all a part of the modern day counter-intelligence program that never ended called COINTELPRO. (See here also.)

I think it is important to ask ---- is keeping quiet about this classified technology and these Stasi stalking techniques compatible with the Libertarian principles of "non-aggression" that Walter holds? My personal opinion is it is more compatible with East Germany than Libertarianism.

Just for the record, Walter knows what these people are doing with electromagnetic weapons. Just like many of the other pseudo-Libertarians listed here, here and here. Many of these supposed "Libertarians" are Zionists and they are strong supporters of Israel. When it comes to compromising their principles, they are exactly like the Pharisees who Jesus charged with being hypocrites. In others words, they say one thing and do the exact opposite. When it comes to Israel and Judaism, they are willing to completely ignore their principles. What they really believe in is enforcing Jewish rule over Gentiles.

Here is a good way to separate the wheat from the chaff ---- if they are not talking about organized Stasi-like stalking techniques or classified technology and electromagnetic weapons, there is a good chance they might be a Judas goat. For more information about counter-intelligence, otherwise known as COINTELPRO, see hereherehereherehereherehere and here. For a more extensive amount of articles about classified technology, see under the Classified and Hi-Technology category on my blog.

Click on the Image Above to Make it Larger