Tuesday, July 17, 2018

United States Sends State of Israel $7000 a Minute

Saturday, July 14, 2018

Is Zionism / Jewish Nationalism a Political Cult?

Also see here for more about the "so-called" Jews.

By Juan Cole

Liberal politics in the broad sense, in the tradition of Locke, Voltaire, Madison, Jefferson and John Stuart Mill, is rooted in a conviction that vigorous debate clarifies issues and makes for better public policy over time. This principle is often misunderstood by political partisans, who confuse analytical disagreement with simply being contrarian and hurling insults.

The opposite of liberal debate and analytical argument is the cult. Sociologists of religion sometimes shy away from that word nowadays, feeling that it has been appropriated by the tabloids and become pejorative. But it has an important place in the history of the modern sociology of religion and I think it should be used, but defined carefully.

I define a cult as an organization characterized by very high demands for obedience by the leaders, complete intolerance of dissent, secretive whisper campaigns against dissidents, dishonest destruction of reputations, and shunning and excommunication as social control mechanisms. It will be objected that all churches have some of these characteristics. But cultness is on a spectrum. Some organizations are high on a cult scale, some are much lower.

There are also political cults. Stalinism and Baathism are both political cults in this sense.

And, it is clear to me that some devotees of Jewish nationalism or Zionism practice their politics in a cult-like manner. I am not a fan of nationalism. I think most of its premises are frankly stupid. There are no “peoples” in the sense that romantic nationalists used the term. No “peoples” are tied to a land or territory. There is no such thing as a national character. People switch out their languages (the ancestors of most Americans did not speak English; the Mongolians of central Afghanistan, the Hazaras, are now Persian-speaking Shiites). I don’t think making Judaism the basis for nationalist zealotry is a good idea, and most American Jews were appalled by the idea for most of the first half of the twentieth century. It isn’t worse than other nationalisms. It mostly isn’t much better. But when it is practiced as a political cult it is truly objectionable.

In Liberal politics (which includes modern conservatism of the William Buckley sort), if you make an argument, you can expect a counter-argument and a debate. In a political cult, if you make an argument you can expect to be smeared, undermined, and if possible destroyed professionally. Cults are extremely destructive, whether religious or political. They insist that the leader and the organization be exempt from criticism.

That so many Jewish nationalists insist that it is not legitimate ever to criticize anything Israel does is a clear sign of political cultism. It is the same mindset that American Communists had in the 1930s about Josef Stalin and the Soviet Union.

So a considered examination of the Israeli government’s Gaza War might conclude that disproportionate force was deployed, and that the army showed reckless disregard for civilian life.

By no means, all Jewish nationalists would be unwilling to debate these points rationally. But very large numbers are not willing, and they respond to this perfectly legitimate argument with abuse. The author of the argument is, they allege, a racialist bigot. He or she is purveying a Protocols of the Elders of Zion conspiracy theory. Others contradict without arguing. Or he or she is questioning the right of Israel to exist (they don’t specify the national borders). They mouth slogans such as that the Israeli army is the most humane in the world, or that Hamas is to blame for civilian deaths even when Israeli bombs do the killing. Some even hint at violence (a Jewish dissident wrote me recently, fearful of thuggish tactics of the Jewish Defense League– an organization classed by the FBI as having been the major source of domestic terrorism in the US 1965-1980). And perhaps worst of all, they secretly compile and send around a dossier to the employer of the author of the argument, seeking to have the person fired.

Of course, all nationalism is somewhat intolerant. The Dixie Chicks got into trouble for disavowing the Bush administration and its war of aggression in Iraq. But in a Liberal society, nationalism’s worst excesses are curbed by a rule of law. People are not punished for making arguments in public in a free society, assuming they are not libelous (and a truly free society needs to avoid having political libel on the books).

All this is prelude to my condemnation of of the University of Illinois for firing Steven Salaita, apparently for his Twitter feed! Professor Salaita said some provocative things during the war, but none of them are indefensible in rational debate. When asked about organized religion, Voltaire said “Crush the infamous thing!” Jefferson advocated an American revolution every 25 years, which would have gotten him in trouble with today’s FBI. Etc. Are there lines that shouldn’t be crossed? Sure, but they should bad arguments based on shoddy research that people in the field have a consensus as being bad.

Vijay Prashad, now at the American University of Beirut but previously at Trinity, wrote on Facebook:

“But I do know that twice, the Anti-Defamation League and the Jewish Community Relations Council of the Jewish Federation came to see my college president to have me removed from some administrative positions I held because they argued that I was an anti-Semite based on my role in the BDS movement (I am fortunate that the outgoing president at Trinity sent me all the emails before he left). I’ve been slowing reading through them — it is astounding how these organizations held private meetings with the president about my role on campus, and the administration at no point asked me to meet with them, or at no point did they wish to meet with me. It was an attempt to get me out behind closed doors.”

He later saw emails detailing the skullduggery.

I strongly suspect that Zionist organizations pressured the university to fire Professor Salaita. But note that they did not engage him in a public debate. They went into the halls of power behind the scenes. We saw this a few years ago with Norman Finkelstein. This behavior is undemocratic and cult-like, and it is unacceptable in a Liberal society. We also see Jewish nationalists on the bench, in public office, and in high administrative positions who misuse their public position to engage in a sectarian vendetta so as to protect Israel from criticism or to punish its critics. That behavior is unethical. US law and the US constitution should guide the decision-making of public servants, not narrow and idiosyncratic commitments. Would it be all right for a judge of Serbian ancestry to throw the book at a Croatian-American defendant?

Universities are places for argument and debate. If Salaita says challenging things, he should be debated on them. He has been saying such things for a long time, so they should have been known when he was hired. But academic hiring and firing in any case should be based on academic writing, not on Twitter! Will we next be promoting people to academic positions because they sent out flattering tweets about their president or dean?

Issues in decorum are legitimately taken account of in decisions about whether to promote someone to an administrative post at a university. But professors should argue, and sometimes they may argue provocatively, deploying rhetorical devices like hyperbole. We have a tenure system to make sure that academic debate is not punished, and I believe that it is important to the republic and its democratic values that this be so. Our journalists are often muzzled by the corporations for which they work. Likewise, businesses often maintain that they can fire employees for taking political stances that embarrass the business. Much of America cannot in fact exercise free speech, for fear of economic reprisals, despite constitutional guarantees. That is not right, but at least in academia it is difficult to just fire someone for making a public argument. But sometimes the dirty deed can be done, with regard to the untenured or to those with an outside offer who are moving between tenured positions. It is a shameful business.



Tuesday, July 10, 2018

Something Very Few People Know About- The Attack on the USS Liberty By Israel That Was Covered Up

For a previous post on this topic, see here.  For more about Zionist terrorism see here
See here for Zionist terrorists who need to be dealt with. See here for how the RCMP targets Muslim extremists, but gives Zionist terrorists free pass. See here for how the Canadian government is killing freedom of speech on Israel and Zionism. See here and here for Zionism against the United Nations. 

Sunday, July 1, 2018

Canadian Police State - Fusion Centers - Data Mining - Loss of Sovereignty


Beyond looking for keywords set off in sent emails or words used in conversations on phone calls, CSIS and CSE have access to technology very similar to the CIA and the NSA. The NSA and the CIA use extremely sophisticated software like this: https://www.recordedfuture.com/, https://www.palantir.com/, and  http://bericotechnologies.com/ to comb through mounds of data to find statistically significant patterns from all of the data they get from all over the internet. Some of the major contributors of data and information are companies like Facebook, Twitter, Google, MicrosoftYahooLinkedIn and Apple.  They also have access to the databases of the U.S. government's files. The CIA and the NSA can also access every Canadian citizen's data. See more about PROMIS software hereherehere and here how this was possible a long time ago. There was problems with the United States and Israel at that time. Nothing has changed.

Essentially PROMIS was a precursor to the three software companies I list above and is the brainchild of the PRISM surveillance program.

To learn more about big data go here. Once a target has been recognized, the information is passed along to what is known as a fusion center. (See here for how the United States and Canada are working together in their fusion centers, intelligence agencies, and national police forces.)

This is where the informant society and organized stalking comes into play. This model is based highly on the East German Stasi government.

All of this spying is has reached a pinnacle with political eugenics and Transhumanism. You have to realize that the United States government's intelligence community, DARPA, and Raytheon BBN Technologies were involved in the creation of the internet. This means the internet was set up for spying, intelligence, and data gathering right from the beginning. They have the potential to gather data from numerous sources on the internet, especially counter intelligence websites like the ones shown herehere and here. Also, see here for more about Judas goats and political dissidents. It is important to remember, that the main targets of the East German STASI were those that they deemed to be political dissidents.

Except it is much, much worse...


In May 25, 2007, the U.S. Director of National Intelligence Michael McConnell authorized the National Applications Office (NAO) of the Department of Homeland Security to allow local, state, and domestic Federal agencies to access imagery from military intelligence Reconnaissance satellites and Reconnaissance aircraft sensors which can now be used to observe the activities of U.S. citizens. (This is in the United States, but, all of the links below will show you how close the relationship is between Canada and the USA.) The satellites and aircraft sensors will be able to detect chemical traces, and identify objects in buildings and "underground bunkers", and will provide real-time video at much higher resolutions than the still images produced by programs such as Google Earth. See here and here for more.

In other words, these people have access to technology that can find oil and mineral deposits underground with up to 99% accuracy, (this is called earth-penetrating tomography, Interferometry, see also Earth's Field NMR, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, and Electron Paramagnetic Resonance.) See here for an example using space-based radar, see here and here for more about satellite terrorism. 

Along with satellites and radar, the process of weaponizing nanotechnology and brain-computer interface technology has begun, just as this political activist says here. These technologies allow them to read your mind and thoughts, influence your behavior and track you around the globe. See here and here for more about this.

They have access to the EEG readouts of your brainwaves and brain states to know what you are thinking, and the ability to see out of your eyes and hear out your ears. This is called Total Information Awareness, meaning the goal is to have access to every piece of information on this planet. (See here for more about being hooked up to a supercomputer with artificial intelligence at the NSA and the CIA, and here for why Edward Snowden is a fake.) 

Like I said, they can also influence your behavior. They can put thoughts in your head and hook you up to another individual's brain. When engaging in the latter, if an individual changes the EEG of his or her brain,  that individual can change the EEG of another brain that they are hooked up to. Or in other words, two brains can effectively become one.

BUT IT GETS EVEN WORSE! They can also shoot you with space-based weapons. (See herehere and here for more.)

See Below for More About the Loss of Canada's Sovereignty to the
 
Ideology of Zionism, the State of Israel and the United States: 

























RCMP Targets Muslim Extremists, But Gives Zionist Terrorists Free Pass

Introductory Note: I did not write the article below, all I want to say beforehand is how bad Canada really is when it comes to this topic.  It is worse than what this article is saying! I personally believe that extremist Zionist Jews and Zionist Christians are the driving force behind taking our rights away in Canada and the United States. They are the driving force behind  Bill C-51, the Patriot Act, the NDAA and Homeland Security.  You can see for yourself that the JDL is listed as a terrorist organization. See also hereBUT NOT IN CANADA. In fact, they were asked to be a part of Stephen Harper's entourage.

This is nothing new. just look at the Ernst Zundel trial. Now, remember, it doesn't matter if Ernst Zundel was right or not, what matters is; 1.) That such a thing even had to go to trial to begin with 2.) How he was treated when going up to the court house. I have never seen any criminal in Canada get attacked like him while going into court. Think about that... with all the heinous crimes and criminals we have had in this country. NEVER! In fact, I have never seen anything like that in any country. It just goes to show you how powerful these people are and how controversial this topic is. It was like the Manson trial of Canada.

===========================================================================

Non-Aligned Media
Sept. 3, 2014

CBC News has reported that the RCMP, Canada’s equivalent of the FBI, has in the works a new program designed “to stop Canadians from becoming radicalized by violent ideologies.”

“As of early 2014, about 130 people with Canadian connections were believed to be in countries such as Syria, Somalia and Afghanistan participating in terrorism-related activities,” reports CBC.


The RCMP is allegedly establishing a Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) program “to stop Canadians at risk of being radicalized.”

The CBC report further noted that “[an anti-terrorism] law passed in 2013 […] made it illegal to leave or attempt to leave the country to commit certain terrorism-related offences.”

Well then, will those Canadians who espouse the ideology of Zionism — an incredibly violent, narcissistic and racist ideology that seeks the ethnic replacement of Palestinian Arabs with Jews — and who endeavour to join Israel’s military to participate in brutal war crimes, including the indiscriminate slaughter of small children as they play soccer on the beach, be considered as prime subjects for this new RCMP program to counter radicalism among Canadians?

What could be more radical than to want to join a foreign army that has one of the worst human rights records of any modern state and daily commits terrorism against a virtually defenseless, captive population? What could be more extreme than wanting to travel half-way across the world to spray bullets at civilians in Gaza and drop bombs on hospitals, schools, apartment blocks, etc.?

In a recent article entitled “Supporting ‘terror tourism’ to Israel gets Canadian tax credits,” writer Yves Engler explains how hundreds of Canadian Jews fight in the Israeli military. Engler documents how Canadian charities established by Zionists are freely allowed to financially sponsor young Canadian Jews who wish to join the IDF and fight in Israel’s bloody conquests.

“The double standard is extreme. It is illegal for Somali Canadians to fight in that country but it is okay for Canadian Jews to kill Palestinians in Gaza. And the government will give you a charitable tax credit if you give them money to support it,” says Engler.

What could explain such lavish privilege afforded to Canadian Jews who commit terrorism abroad and then return to Canada to enrich our society with their self-righteous zealotry and demented hubris?

Has Canada become nothing more than a de facto slave colony of the Jewish State?

Written by 

Wednesday, June 13, 2018

Watch Two Important Videos: Trump Drain The Swamp? Laughable, He Is Surrounded By Lying Zionists - They Are the Swamp...

Watch both videos below. See here for previous posts on Trump, see here for previous posts on Jewish terrorism. See here for previous posts on the terrorist attack that happened on September 11, 2001, and its relation to Israel and Zionism. 

Wednesday, June 6, 2018

The Connection Between Jews, Israel, Freemasonry, the Stasi and Organized Stalking

There are strong connections between Freemasonry and the state of Israel. Most people don't know there are strong connections between Jews, Israel, Freemasonry, Homeland Security, organized stalking, the Stasi and the Cheka. See here for more about this. 

Jews played a leading role in the development of Bolshevism and the Cheka.  The Stasi called themselves proud "Chekists," once again, emphasizing the connections to Bolshevism and the Cheka. (To learn more about the Jewish connections to this, see hereherehere, hereherehere and here.) 

They have also played a major role in the development of the new Homeland Security laws. See here for a collection of links regarding Homeland Security. 

See this post about classified technology that allows them to stalk, harass and torture you remotely, see here for the techniques they use when they find out where you are and who you are. 

The reality is, this is a part of COINTELPRO from the FBI. Now, guess who was a Freemason? None other than J. Edgar Hoover. You don't think the same ideas aren't running the RCMP or the Police in England that have the Masonic checkerboard on their hats? As I said before, Israel is everything. It is the most important place on the map. 

Don't let anyone fool you, this is what runs this world. Can you see the similarities of the Stasi flag, the Israeli flag, and the Freemasonry sign below? 



Image result for flag of israel