Racism & Insanity In Israel

Boycott Israel? No US State Jobs Or Aid For You

Once again, a perfect example of absolute arrogance and entitlement. This mentality comes right from the Jewish Talmud. (Be sure to scroll down and go through all the articles here.) See here for more about the connections between Homeland Security and Zionism. This is so important to point out because what you see in the video below is 'PROOF' of the connections between Zionism and Homeland Security. This is another part of what Homeland Security does, they are involved in "protecting the Homeland." One wonders what "Homeland" they are actually involved in protecting. To learn more about the state of Israel, see here and here.

Something to Think About With Transhumanism - A Critique of Utopianism From Marx and Hayek

The following excerpt was taken from the book Hayek, Marx, and Utopia the question is... does this form of utopian thinking also apply to Transhumanism? After all... the idea behind Trans-humanism is to go "beyond" being a mere human. This is very vague and open-ended. In this sense, one could say it could also be a nice trap to sell people to embrace an anti-humanist stance with fancy terminology. If you watch this video here of Max More, he actually does kind of say that Transhumanism is against the ideology of humanism which has been progressing since the Renaissance. See here for the connection between Judaism and Transhumanism, see here for the Jewish utopia. Can people not see a connection between Transhumanism, slavery, usury and Judaism? See here for the history of Jewish slavery and here for more about banking, especially this post.
========================================================================

Both Marx and Hayek indict utopianism for its fundamentally nonradical method of theorizing. For both thinkers, the radical is that which seeks to get to the root of social problems, building the realm of the possible out of the conditions that exist.

By contrast, the utopian is, by definition, the impossible (the word, strictly translated, means ''no-place"). For both Marx and Hayek, utopians internalize an abstract, exaggerated sense of human possibility, aiming to create new social formations based upon a pretense of knowledge.

In their blueprints for the ideal society, utopians presuppose that people can master all the sophisticated complexities of social life. Even when their social and ethical ends are decidedly progressive, utopians often rely on reactionary means. They manifest an inherent bias toward the statist construction of alternative institutions in their attempts to practically implement their rationalist abstractions. Both the Marxian and Hayekian perspectives agree that utopianism:

1. fails to take into account the social and historical context of the society that exists;

2. fails to recognize the internal relationship between the theorist and his or her sociohistorical setting;

3. reifies human rationality as a capacity abstracted from social and historical specificity;

4. depends on constructivist rationalism to bridge the gap between conscious human purposes and unintended social consequences; and

5. fails to appreciate the complexity of social action that is constituted by both articulated and tacit elements.

And yet, despite their common anti-utopianism, Marx and Hayek differ with regard to some crucially important epistemic premises. For Hayek, Marx's vision of the ideal communist society rests on the mistaken assumption that in the future, people will be capable of mastering their own destiny. In Hayek's view, this grandiose Marxist illusion served as an ideological legitimation for modern attempts to achieve the millennium through the coercive power of the state.

Hayek explains that for important ontological and epistemological reasons, such a utopian goal must engender dystopian consequences. For Marxists, however, any such epistemic constraints are historically specific to capitalism. Such critics as Hilary Wainwright contend that Hayek embraces a "dogmatically individualist" view of knowledge that does not recognize the potential for efficacious collective action.

Despite their differences, both Marx and Hayek embrace a profoundly anti-utopian mode of inquiry. Marx identified this method as dialectics. His own use of dialectical conceptual tools represented the apotheosis of genuinely radical social theorizing. Indeed, Marx's insightful critique of his utopian contemporaries was a reflection of this dialectical approach.

Absolute Must Watch Video For Canadians and Americans

The video below is an absolute MUST WATCH for people who live in Canada and the United States. What you will see in the video is the exact same mentality that I have seen from some Zionists in Canada and the United States. They have no regard for the lives of those who oppose their lies and dictatorial rule. Let me make this clear --- this is not about "coexistence" and abiding by the golden rule. This is what most normal people want ---but not some of these psychopathic Zionist dirtballs.

This is about resisting their rule over you. See here for more about Amalek. Judaism has always been connected to slavery and usury. This is also why they are the major ones behind Transhumanism, (see here and here,) some of these people want slaves. They just can't do it in the way they used to. They have to be much more sneaky because they know that you would revolt against them. Some of these people are liars beyond anything that most people have ever experienced. Don't you see how all of this is connected?

The system has been set up to find those who are politically knowledgeable and awake to their lies. They have set up tons of websites that are fronts. Once they find you, they get nanotechnology inside you, then they contact people around you and begin to stalk, harass and slander you all while shooting you with electromagnetic weapons. The internet is a part of this program. The internet is being used like Mao's Hundred Flowers Campaign. It is very important that you learn about this.

Essentially, it is a strategy of allowing a stage of liberalization and relative amounts of free expression in order to locate where their political opponents are. They are beginning to clamp down now. This is a Communist strategy and many of the techniques they are using come right out of East Germany. See here, here, here and here for the connections between Jews, Bolsheviks, the Cheka and the Stasi. The modern day Homeland Security is an extension of this.

 'The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.' ---- Vladimir Lenin

Here is the technology they use and here are the Stasi techniques they use when they find you.

Many of these Zionists are liars and they know this. Amazingly, this is exactly what they are defending. Their right to keep you ignorant and as their slave while they lie to your face. They don't care about the truth. They think they can do whatever they want and that YOU, their good little obedient slave ---- will never do a damn thing about it. They are complete psychopaths.

They will kill your dog and go after your family and make jokes about it. Remember, they are terrorists. Modern terrorism was invented by Jews and the state of Israel was born in blood. (See here, here, here and here.)

Once again, I am not saying all Jews are doing this, or that they are all participating.  

What I am saying is that Jews and Judaism have a history of terrorist acts that exceed Islam.(See here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here for more about this.) Zionist terrorists are being given a blank check in North America. These extremists are allowed to persecute people in the United States and Canada and no one will say anything about it.  It just shows you the level of power they have in North America.

Some of these people are literally at war with the population of Canada and the United States. This is why the FBI is saying this and this and why the Anti-Defamation League is so concerned about potential "anti-government sentiments." This is what Homeland Security is about. (Also see here.) Listen to this interview to learn more about this. Anyone who is politically aware knows this is the truth. This is happening right now! 

For more videos like the one below please go here.

Need to Get Rid of Amalek - In Other Words, Gentiles (Non Jews,) That Get in The Way

Israeli Terror 9/11: Classified

 See the September 11th, 2001 section of the blog located here for more articles about the terror attacks. (Be sure to scroll down and go through them all.) 

'Smart Dust' Aims To Monitor Everything

Click here for another article about smart dust.  

By John D. Sutter, CNN (2010)

Palo Alto, California (CNN) -- In the 1990s, a researcher named Kris Pister dreamed up a wild future in which people would sprinkle the Earth with countless tiny sensors, no larger than grains of rice.
These "smart dust" particles, as he called them, would monitor everything, acting like electronic nerve endings for the planet. Fitted with computing power, sensing equipment, wireless radios and long battery life, the smart dust would make observations and relay mountains of real-time data about people, cities and the natural environment.

Now, a version of Pister's smart dust fantasy is starting to become reality. "It's exciting. It's been a long time coming," said Pister, a computing professor at the University of California, Berkeley.

"I coined the phrase 14 years ago. So smart dust has taken a while, but it's finally here."
Maybe not exactly how he envisioned it. But there has been progress.

The latest news comes from the computer and printing company Hewlett-Packard, which recently announced it's working on a project it calls the "Central Nervous System for the Earth." In coming years, the company plans to deploy a trillion sensors all over the planet.

The wireless devices would check to see if ecosystems are healthy, detect earthquakes more rapidly, predict traffic patterns and monitor energy use. The idea is that accidents could be prevented and energy could be saved if people knew more about the world in real time, instead of when workers check on these issues only occasionally.

HP will take its first step toward this goal in about two years, said Pete Hartwell, a senior researcher at HP Labs in Palo Alto. The company has made plans with Royal Dutch Shell to install 1 million matchbook-size monitors to aid in oil exploration by measuring rock vibrations and movement, he said. Those sensors, which already have been developed, will cover a 6-square-mile area.
That will be the largest smart dust deployment to date, he said.

"We just think now, the technology has reached a point where it makes basic sense for us ... to get this out of the lab and into reality," Hartwell said.

Smart dust (minus the 'dust')

Despite the recent excitement, there's still much confusion in the computing industry about what exactly smart dust is.

For starters, the sensors being deployed and developed today are much larger and clunkier than flecks of dust. HP's sensors -- accelerometers like those in the iPhone and Droid phone, but about 1,000 times more powerful -- are about the size of matchbooks. When they're enclosed in a metal box for protection, they're about the size of a VHS tape.

So what makes a smart dust sensor different from a weather station or a traffic monitor?
Size is one factor. Smart dust sensors must be relatively small and portable. But technology hasn't advanced far enough to manufacture the sensors on the scale of millimeters for commercial use (although Berkeley researchers are trying to make one that's a cubic millimeter).

Wireless connections are a big distinguisher, too. A building's thermostat is most likely hard-wired. A smart dust sensor might gauge temperature, but it would be battery-powered and would communicate wirelessly with the internet and with other sensors.

The sheer number of sensors in the network is what truly makes a smart dust project different from other efforts to record data about the world, said Deborah Estrin, a professor of computer science at the University of California, Los Angeles, who works in the field. Smart dust researchers tend to talk in the millions, billions and trillions.

Some say reality has diverged so far from the smart dust concept that it's time to dump that term in favor or something less sexy. "Wireless sensor networks" or "meshes" are terms finding greater acceptance with some researchers.

Estrin said it's important to ditch the idea that smart dust sensors would be disposable.
Sensors have to be designed for specific purposes and spread out on the land intentionally -- not scattered in the wind, as smart dust was initially pitched, she said.

'Real-world web'

Despite these differences, researchers say the smart-dust theory that monitoring everything will benefit humanity remains essentially unchanged.

And there are a number of real-world projects that, in one way or another, seek to use wireless sensors to take the Earth's vital signs.

Wireless sensors currently monitor farms, factories, data centers and bridges to promote efficiency and understanding of how these systems work, researchers said in interviews. In all of these cases, the sensor networks are deployed for a specific purpose.

For example, a company called Streetline has installed 12,000 sensors on parking spots and highways in San Francisco. The sensors don't know everything that's going on at those parking spots. They are equipped with magnetometers to sense whether or not a huge metal object -- hopefully a car -- is sitting on the spot. That data will soon be available to people who can use it to figure out where to park, said Tod Dykstra, Streetline's CEO. It also tells the cities if the meters have expired.

Other sensors are equipped to measure vibration in factories and oil refineries to spot machine problems and inefficiencies before they cause trouble. Still others might pick up data about temperature, chemistry or sound. Tiny cameras or radars also can be tacked onto the data-collecting network to detect the presence of people or vehicles. The power of these networks is that they eventually can be connected, said David Culler, a computer science professor at UC Berkeley.

Culler says the development of these wireless sensor networks is analogous to the creation of the World Wide Web. What's being created with the smart dust idea is a "Real World Web," he said.
But he said we're still early on in that progression. "Netscape [for the wireless sensor network] hasn't quite happened," he said.

Big Brother effect

Even when deployed for science or the public, some people still get a Big Brother feeling -- the uncomfortable sense of being under constant, secret surveillance -- from the idea of putting trillions of monitors all over the world.

"It's a very, very, very huge potential privacy invasion because we're talking about very, very small sensors that can be undetectable, effectively," said Lee Tien, an attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a privacy advocate. "They are there in such numbers that you really can't do anything about them in terms of easy countermeasures."

That doesn't mean that researchers should stop working on smart dust. But they should be mindful of privacy as the work progresses, he said. Pister said the wireless frequencies that smart dust sensors use to communicate -- which work kind of like Wi-Fi -- have security built into them. So the data is public only if the person or company that installed the sensor wants it to be, he said.

"Clearly, there are security concerns and privacy concerns," he said, "and the good news is that when the radio technology was being developed for this stuff, it was shortly after all of the big concerns about Wi-Fi security. ... We've got all the security tools we need underneath to make this information private."

Further privacy concerns may arise if another vision for smart dust comes true. Some researchers are looking into making mobile phones into sensors. In this scenario, the billions of people roaming the Earth with cell phones become the "smart dust."

Bright future

Smart dust researchers say their theory of monitoring the world -- however it's realized -- will benefit people and the environment. More information is better information, Pister said. "Having more sensors improves the efficiency of a system and reduces the demand and reduces waste," he said. "So all of that is just straight goodness."

Hartwell, the HP researcher, says the only way people can combat huge problems like climate change and biodiversity loss is to have more information about what's going on. "Frankly, I think we have to do it, from a sustainability and environmental standpoint," he said. Even though the first application of HP's "Central Nervous System for the Earth" project will be commercial, Hartwell says the motives behind smart dust are altruistic.


"People ask me what my job is, and I say, well, I'm going to save the world," he said.