Exposing Intelligence Agency Human Rights Abuses

Friday, July 10, 2015

The Inevitable Problems of Technology: World Surveillance and the Totalitarian Technocracy

Example of Synthetic Telepathy

In the following video that is located below, Michael Persinger demonstrates for the whole world to see what is known as synthetic telepathy. This is now completely proven. By the way, it is worth mentioning that Michael Persinger has worked with the CIA. Controlling the human mind has always been the goal of those who seek to influence others.

What this demonstrates is how one brain can influence another at a distance. Or, how you could influence the EEG of another person's brain. What can you do when you change the EEG of another person? You can change who that person is. Effectively, two brains become one. There have been scientific studies conducted that show how a BCI (Brain-Computer Interface,) can change the neuroplasticity of a human brain. This is one of the reasons why ethical considerations plague anything that alters the human mind. Especially when it is done without a person's knowledge or consent!

Relevant links for more information:

1. http://exposeintelligence.blogspot.ca/2015/07/domestic-terrorism-silent-rape-and.html
2. http://exposeintelligence.blogspot.ca/2015/07/the-inevitable-problems-of-technology.html

Thursday, July 9, 2015

19/5/15 Richmond Counsel Meeting Resolution of Space Preservation Act of Space

Domestic Terrorism Silent Rape And Murder - Brain Chips, Nanotechnology, Resonance Based Weaponry, Direct Energy Weapons and Electronic Warfare

In the following video, you will see examples of scanning for radio frequency emissions. People must understand that nanotechnology is so small that even if it is located with a radio frequency scanner that doesn't mean you will pick it up on an MRI or an X-Ray. That is one problem, the other problem is that you would not pick up a radio frequency emission to begin with.

It wouldn't be so bad if they just had a tracker on your car, your clothes, or even in your arm. But no, these people are so insanely terrible. They have them in your brain and throughout your body. Once it is in you, it replicates and they can hack into you just like a pacemaker. They hook you up to artificial intelligence and supercomputers. They can also push thoughts into your brain using synthetic telepathy and CONTROL YOUR MIND. (See under ethical considerations.) Especially when you don't know that it is inside of you, you cannot tell the difference between the synthetic thoughts and your own. They can read your mind, look out of your eyes and hear out of your ears, send messages to you using synthetic telepathy that can affect your judgment. Light can be measured, (photons,) minds can be read, thoughts can be sent. If you can think a thought, you can send it. Just like writing an email with your mind. Zuckerberg is saying it here, he's just not telling you the whole story. Also see here for another article with Mark Zuckerberg referring to synthetic telepathy. See here for a Cisco ad that talks about this technology. See this old clip of a scientist looking out of a cat's eyes.

1.) Nanotechnology- can be introduced into the body with an airborne virus or a bacteria (a cold or flu for instance,) or it could be done by a simple injection. (Also see here.) Once the nanotechnology is inside you, the miniature nanorobots or nanowires replicate and go up into your brain and throughout your body. Imagine your brain being hooked up to a supercomputer and your life being broadcast to a bunch of psychopathic intelligence spies. Imagine if they could read your mind, look through your eyes and hear through your ears. Imagine being "hooked up" to another brain. Imagine your life being broadcasted "live" and recorded like a movie. Imagine them doing this just for entertainment. You're a girl on Facebook that they like and want to "get to know" on an intimate level? You're a political dissident with political views the "powers that be" don't like? Watch out. The people in power are absolutely terrible and they do this. THEY CAN DO ALL OF THIS NOW!

2.) Resonance Based Weaponry, Direct Energy Weapons, and Electronic Warfare - Some of the other information that I have put up is about electromagnetic weapons. It also goes by the name of resonance based weaponry. To use this against you, they do not need anything in your body. You are an antenna. You are a resonance being. In this case, people may not emit any radio frequencies from implants or nanotechnology but they could still be influenced, manipulated, injured. maimed or killed. (See old CNN footage from the 80's.)

These weapons are made to covertly harass and torture any human they want. They are integrated into the United States distributed satellites and military radar systems (the radars are distributed receiving and transmitting array's placed in space, on land, and sea surrounding the world.) Some of them use the sky as a reflective surface to access over horizons, mountains, and long distances bouncing signals up into the ionosphere and then down into their targets. As these remote radar sensors and transmitters are aimed at living creatures, electronics, and homes, we can be invaded on a multitude of ways, with the transmitters and satellites locking onto people with the purpose to harass, harm and torture by directing 'radio frequencies,' energies. (Resonance frequencies of the body.)

With all these inventions, targeted individuals are focused at with directed energy frequencies which broadcast from military radar or satellites far from the person and sometimes even far from the person's present city. See here and here for more. See here for evidence of past use of this technology in the 70's.

Evidence exists that the United States military knew of harmful world scale effects of radar very early on, that radar could be used as a weapon against humans. Hints of this include the story of how the original microwave oven was invented based on military radar technology, as a man named Percy Spencer identified in the 1940s that radar would warm soldier's bodies and melt candy bars in their pockets (proof of world scale effects identified early on). While he was not the first to notice it, this inspired him to investigate further ultimately creating the first microwave oven for the purpose of food heating by attaching a high-density electromagnetic field generator to an enclosed metal box (basically radar parts).

Tuesday, June 30, 2015

There Is No Canada - CSIS

The following article is from Dr. Denis G. Rancourt, who is a former tenured and Full Professor of Physics at the University of Ottawa, Canada.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It could not be more clear. CSIS, the Canadian corporate media, and Canadian parliamentarians could not have made it more clear. There is no Canada. Here is Canada's spy chief, Richard Fadden, publicly making the "bold" assertion that "a number of Canadian politicians are being influenced by foreign states". The responses are swift and vehement. Parliamentarians want to get to the bottom of this inexplicable "intel"...? And Canada's corporate media are hot on the trail of this confounding revelation!

What is revealed by these dedicated truth seekers is that the elephant in the room is as large as the G20-Toronto police state mass aggression budget was gargantuan: It turns out that CSIS and none of the media and none of the parliamentarians are talking about the US or Israel as the influence on Canadian politicians.

Hello...? Is someone going to say something? The US and Israel are not foreign states? This comes just days after Canada-born Zionist leaders Stephen Harper (Prime Minister) and Bob Rae (Liberal MP) accused Libby Davies (MP, NDP Deputy Leader) of saying "some hateful things about Israel" and "'extremist' comments and 'a fundamental denial of Israel's right to exist," and demanded that she be fired as NDP Deputy Leader in the House of Commons, ALL BASED ON THE VIDEO EMBEDDED BELOW. Houaaa...

For the elephant in the room to be this large we must conclude that there is no Canada. Simple as that. When a reasoned questioning of national sovereignty is this taboo and the perceived reprisals to MPs this significant, it has to mean that it's over and that the question will never come up again. English Canada is dead. The US-globalists and geostrategists ran the attack against democracy at G20 in Toronto and run the show in Canada's foreign policy.

Why is Canada in Afghanistan again? And why does Canada's security depend on supporting Israeli war crimes, to the dismay of the rest of the world? How does that work exactly? Is there a parliamentary committee looking into these questions? Is there a single MP or Senator speaking out?

Friday, June 19, 2015

The Secret For Gaining Admission To The Ivy League

Posted by Alcibiades Bilzerian

Contrary to popular opinion, the most important criteria for admission to the Ivy League is not grades, nor SAT scores, nor recommendations, or even essays. The most important criteria is actually race/religion. By claiming to be Jewish, an applicant can increase his chances of admission by up to 15 fold.

While Jewish students comprise only 2% of the American population, they account for 12-15% of the student bodies at Dartmouth, Princeton, and Cornell. And more than 25% of the student bodies of Brown, Columbia and Yale; shockingly, more than 30% of the students at the University of Pennsylvania and Harvard, are Jewish. The Ivy League, the breeding ground of future leaders, has between 6-15 times Jewish overrepresentation. Most other top American schools have similar Jewish overrepresentation as well.

Theoretically, these lopsided admissions statistics could be explained by a number of factors other than racial/religious discrimination in admissions, such as: A higher value for education among Jewish families, or even superior intellect and abilities. Setting aside the fact that these same elite universities claim that there are no differences in racial intelligence, if one were to accept the research of racial intelligence academics such as Richard Lynn and account for supposed differences in racial intelligence, the ratio of non-Jewish whites to Jews is still astronomically lower than it should be. Accounting for the supposed superior Jewish intelligence, non-Jewish white students should have representation of around 7 to 1 to Jewish students, rather than the current ratio of 2:1 and in some cases 1:1. When sheer ability and qualifications are factored in, Jews are still 1,000% overrepresented. In fact, when it was discovered that Princeton was not favoring Jews in admissions to the extreme that other Ivy League universities were, four front page articles were written in the Daily Princetonian as well as a New York times article to address the “problem”. In one article, a rabbi leading the campaign to ensure maximum Jewish overrepresentation was quoted as saying she, “would love to see 20%” Jewish students, which would be a ten times overrepresentation to their percentage of the population.

If the overrepresentation of Jewish students in the Ivy League has little to do with credentials or intelligence, how can we explain the racial disparity? It just so happens that most of the top administrators in the Ivy League are Jewish, and this is likely impacting the admissions process. The following list of names was constructed about two years ago, so some of the administrators may have retired or moved to other roles, but it is unlikely that the overall statistics have changed much. On a side note, these statistics are similar at most top schools in America.

Brown’s Chancelor, Thomas Tisch and Provost, David Kertzer are Jewish.
Lee Bollinger, President of Columbia, is Jewish.
The President of Cornell, David Skorton and the Provost Kent Fuchs are Jewish.
Chairmen of the Board of Trustees of Dartmouth, Stephen Madel Jr. is Jewish. And so is the Provost, Carol Folt.
The President of Harvard: Drew Faust is married to a Jew: Charles Rosenberg.
The provost of Harvard, Steven Hymen, is Jewish.
The President of Princeton Shirley Tilghman is married to a Jew named Jospeh Tilghman.
Chairmen of the Board of Princeton Stephen Oxman is Jewish and so is the Provost Christopher Eisgruber.
The President of UPenn, Amy Gutmann, is Jewish and Vincent Price, the provost, is also Jewish.
The Chairmen of the Board of UPenn David Cohen is Jewish.
Yale President Richard Levin is Jewish and so is the Provost Peter Salovey.

About 80% of the senior officials in the Ivy League are Jewish or married to Jews; And these Jewish administrators are accepting Jewish students at a ridiculously overrepresented rate, while simultaneously claiming to push diversity on campus. How can there be diversity when a minority group that represents 2% of the population is taking between 12-35% of the places?

Conclusion

When applying to the Ivy League, either claim to be Jewish or married to a Jewish person, or strongly infer that you are Jewish or contemplating converting to Judaism.

Canada Psychiatrist Concerned About Remote Influencing Weaponry Affecting Mental And Physical Health

Amin Muhammad Gadit is a Clinical Professor of Psychiatry at Memorial University of Newfoundland, Faculty of Medicine. October 2009, he writes a paper with the title “Terrorism and Mental Health: The issue of Psychological Fragility” published in Journal of Pakistan Medical Association. In the paper he talks about psychological long term effects that result from terrorist activities on civilians, including behavioral problems and post-traumatic stress.

He also notes that with the introduction of remote influencing technology, and the new weapon systems, it might be challenging for a psychiatrist to tell the difference between real mental and physical problems and induced ones, asking one crucial question: Are we prepared for this challenge?

Terrorism and Mental Health: The issue of psychological fragility

Amin A. Muhammad Gadit ( Discipline of Psychiatry, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL A1B 3V6 Canada. )

Read PDF

It is rightly said that the world is no longer a safe place to live due to the growing terrorism. According to the U.S. Department of State report, 'Terrorism is premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience.1 A universal medical and public health definition was proposed which is: "The intentional use of violence, real or threatened, against one or more non-combatants and/or those services essential for or protective of their health, resulting in adverse health effects in those immediately affected and their community, ranging from a loss of well-being or security to injury, illness or death.2

The terrorist incidents of Pan Am Flight 103, Oklahoma City bombing and attack on World Trade Centre has shaken the mental health of children and adults in United States. The incidence of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) has been recorded to be quite high among adults while children exhibited depressive disorder, separation anxiety disorders, grief reactions as well as PTSD. A survey conducted on 512 participants out of whom 84 had been directly exposed to a terrorist attack and 191 had a family member or friend exposed to such an attack revealed PTSD among 48 participants, acute stress disorder by one participant and 299 reported depression.3

In a study4 among Vietnamese refugees, people who were exposed to more than three trauma events had heightened risk of mental illness after 10 years compared to people with no trauma exposure. Results5 from a meta-analysis indicates that in a year following terrorist incidents, the prevalence of PTSD in directly affected populations varies between 12% and 16%. A national household survey6 on 4,023 people revealed six-months PTSD prevalence to be 3.7% for boys and 6.3% for girls, Major Depressive Episode among boys was 7.4% and 13.9% in girls, Substance Abuse Disorder had a six-month prevalence of 8.2% among boys and 6.2% for girls. In a study by Wanda,7 children's responses to terrorism include acute stress disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety, depression, regressive behaviours, separation problems and sleep difficulties.

Adults, adolescents and children do get the effects from violence and terrorism depending upon the type of event and psychological endurance. However, it is important to note the fact that the experience of violence does not necessarily lead to psychiatric morbidity.8 W.H.O. estimated that, in the situation of armed conflicts throughout the world "10% of the people who experience traumatic events will have serious mental health problems and another 10% will develop behaviour that will hinder their ability to function effectively. The most common conditions are depression, anxiety and psychosomatic problems such as insomnia, or back and stomach aches."9 The matters in terms of violence are advancing with the passage of time that may possibly bring in more serious issues related to both physical as well as mental health.

Of late, there are reports of a new and dreadful invention of weapons of violence that are called Bio-electromagnetic Weapons. According to the description by an Institute of Science in Society, these weapons operate at the speed of light, can kill, torture and enslave without making physical appearance. It further adds that voices and visions, daydreams and nightmares are the most astonishing manifestations of this weapon system, it is also capable of crippling the human subject by limiting his/her normal range of movement, causing acute pain the equivalent of major organ failure or even death and interferes with normal functions of human senses. It can cause difficulty with breathing and induce seizures besides damage to the tissues and organs.
Through this form of terrorism, it is possible to persuade subjects that their mind is being read; their intellectual property is being plundered and can even motivate suicide or murder. Pulsed Energy Projectiles (PEPs) are another form of weaponry that is used to paralyze a victim with pain.

According to Peter Philips, a scientist from

USA

, circumstances may soon arrive in which anti-war or human right protestors suddenly feel a burning sensation akin to touching a hot skillet over their entire body. Simultaneously they may hear terrifying nauseating screaming, which while not produced externally, fills their brains with overwhelming disruption. This new invention is dreadful addition to the armamentarium of weapons of abuse and torture. Manifestations of the effects of these occult weapons can mimic mental ill health and add further to the misery of the victims.

The potential threat from use of biological warfare agents is more devastating as they are not detectable before the attack and can lead the possible victims to a state of constant vigilance and anxiety.

Pakistan

has witnessed numerous episodes of terrorism and the common people are unable to see light at the end of the tunnel in terms of a termination point. This includes suicide bombing, killings, threats and violent intimidations. Horrendous acts of terrorism were video recorded and released on internet sites.

We have yet to see the psychological morbidity among the surviving victims and witnesses of Islamabad Marriot Attack and similar multiple attacks in numerous cities of

Pakistan

There are a number of questions that would arise: Do we have national figures on mental health morbidity leaving aside few publications and recorded personal observations? Are there any national empirical studies being conducted onterror related mental health morbidity? Do we have enough capability to address the psychological disaster resulting from this state of affairs? Are the mental health professionals adequately trained in terms of 'disaster Psychiatry'? What is the magnitude of the problem among those who do not report the mental ill-health symptoms? Is there a need to equip the health system with the means and strategies to help the sufferers of terrorism? What can be done at the Family Practice level to begin with? Living in the midst of violence, should we not find effective ways to address the mental health morbidity before it is too late?

References

1.Ruby CL. The Definition of Terrorism, Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 2002; p 9-14.
2.Arnold JL, Ortenwall P, Birnbaum ML, Sundnes KO, Aggrawal A, Anantharaman V, et al. A proposed universal medical and public health definition of terrorism. Prehosp Disaster Med 2003; 18: 47-52.
3.Bleich A, Gelkopf M, Solomon Z. Exposure to terrorism, stress-related mental health symptoms and coping behaviours among a nationally representative sample in Israel JAMA; 2003; 290. 612-20.
4.Steel Z, Silove D, Phan T, Bauman A. Long term effect of psychological trauma on the mental health of Vietnamese refugees resettled in Australia: a population-based study. Lancet 2009; 360: 1056-62.
5.DiMaggio C, Galea S. The behavioural consequences of terrorism: A meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med 2008; 13: 559-66.
6.Kilpatrick DG, Ruggiero KJ, Acierno R, Saunders BE, Resnick HS, Best CL. Violence and risk of PTSD, Major Depression, Substance Abuse/Dependence, and Comorbidity: Results from the National Survey of Adolescents. J Counsult Clin Psychol 2003; 71: 692-700.
7.Wanda F. Childhood reactions to terrorism-induced trauma: A review of the past 10 years. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2004; 43: 381-92.
8.Curran PS, Miller PW. Psychiatric implications of chronic civilian strife or war; Northern Ireland. Adv Psychiatr Treatment 2001; 7: 73-80.
9.World Health Organization. World health report 2001-Mental health: new understanding, new hope. Geneva: Switzerland 2001; p 1-16.